0:00
Hey, guess what?
0:01
Adam curry Jhansi Devora.
0:03
Sunday January 15 2023. This is
your award winning combination
0:07
media assassination episode
1521.
0:10
This is no agenda.
0:13
We are classified and
broadcasting live from the heart
0:16
of the Texas hill country here
in FEMA Region number six in the
0:19
morning, everybody. I'm Adam
curry
0:21
and from Northern Silicon
Valley, we're all asking the
0:24
question, how do you blow a 27
point lead? I'm John C. Dvorak.
0:30
Buzzkill. Here I was thinking
that you'd have a Miss Universe
0:37
opening but no, it's sports.
0:42
Yeah, I was in the Miss Universe
things.
0:45
This is your beat. Oh, it
0:47
was never because it was my beat
five years ago, and we made a
0:50
decision that we were going to
stop it. You that You got sick
0:55
of it?
0:57
Did I really get sick of it? No,
I don't think
1:00
so. I don't know. I don't think
we've jointly got sick of it.
1:03
But we were sick of it. Family
Miss America one. It was the
1:06
same. Of course it was in New
Orleans. They always do. That's
1:09
a scam. Where did miss Ukraine
come in?
1:14
Not even in the top 20 As far as
I know. Well, you don't know
1:17
though. No, I looked at the top
five and looked at the top 20
1:20
She wasn't in there. So I don't
know what happened.
1:23
She didn't you know, and I know
what didn't happen. What didn't
1:27
happen. She didn't do her job.
1:32
there what do we need? I gotta
play one on clip for you. This
1:36
just came I didn't see it.
Obviously. You know me. I didn't
1:39
see it. This is the owner of the
of the pageant. Yeah, well used
1:45
to be Donald Trump. Yes. Now
it's an jakirah Juta tip.
1:52
For you to say listen to this
1:54
Miss Universe Organization. From
now on is going to be ran by
2:00
women. Owned by a sponsor a
woman owned by a trans woman.
2:08
Oh, that's great.
2:11
And everyone goes crazy
2:20
the world has officially gone
crazy.
2:23
Is kind of nutty. So, so the
freeway is backed up completely.
2:28
It's like, majorly backed
2:30
back to important news. Yes.
Okay. The freeway.
2:33
I've never seen this ever. So
it's backed up into the fire
2:37
truck. There's a fire truck they
had trying to get their unit
2:39
trained going on the soft
shoulder to get there. But it
2:42
wasn't a regular fire truck. And
I can't imagine what's going on
2:46
at the end of this wreck.
Whatever it is. Oh, it was a
2:48
hook and ladder. Yeah. What do
you need a hook and ladder? For
2:55
at a traffic wreck? Unless the
cars are piled high?
2:59
Maybe it's all they had left?
Maybe everything else was on on
3:03
duty?
3:04
I don't think so. This is you
know what you need to know what
3:07
you need. I'm going to Okay,
when is your birthday? Everybody
3:12
remind me remind me everybody
when it's your birthday, I am
3:15
giving you a Bearcat scanner.
You might get us America you
3:20
need to sit there by your window
and go hey
3:25
you know they actually have a
good CHP cited me meal list.
3:30
That's not the point they posted
don't No no. You
3:33
want the old school with the
lights going? With you put
3:38
crystals in Yes.
3:39
What i Hey, guess what? There is
a wreck. There's a wreck there
3:44
on the ad.
3:45
Do you remember the bear county
have you had to buy crystals of
3:48
the right frequency and stick
them in there? So the frequency?
3:51
Oh, it's the best part is these
days. They're all they're all
3:55
encrypted. That's why everyone's
going to encryption. And it's
3:58
people are kind of worried about
that because now you can't
4:01
listen to what the cops or the
or your services are doing. You
4:05
used to be able to just listen.
4:07
Yeah, well you still get it
right here on crow they
4:10
encrypting
4:11
everywhere. They are encrypting,
it's all digital. I do have some
4:16
important news that I would like
to share from boots on the
4:19
ground. And I'm gonna set it up
with this short clip
4:22
operations at the FAA and major
airlines have returned to
4:25
normal. But the lingering
effects of yesterday's outage
4:27
the grounded flights that may
take days to recover from more
4:31
than 4500 flights were disrupted
today, mostly because of the bad
4:34
weather. More than 12,000 were
delayed or canceled on
4:37
Wednesday. The FAA is blaming a
damaged database file in a
4:41
system that is nearly 30 years
old.
4:43
And of course this resulted in
in calls for upgrading the
4:48
system and money for the for the
Department of Transportation run
4:51
by Mayor Pete But for 15 years
we've been doing this show we
4:56
have held one group of people in
very high regard That being sis
5:01
admins, IT administrators, dudes
named Ben dudettes named
5:06
Bernadette. And the reason why
we've always done that is
5:09
because a they're shit on and
every single corporation did it
5:13
no gig. And we know that they
truly hold the keys to that. And
5:20
I think maybe for that whole
time, we've always said when it
5:23
really comes down to it, it's
not going to be the ham radio
5:25
operators, it's going to be the
SIS admins who are going to save
5:28
the world or at least save those
who who are nice to them. So I
5:34
have confirmed from two sis
admins sources known to me and
5:40
no and confirm that they are in
the right areas. That the no
5:44
time ground stop was, in fact, a
cyber intrusion. The law in the
5:49
US and in Canada,
5:51
I'm glad somebody finally came
up with some information. But
5:55
here's what's because it never
made the fat finger thing known
5:59
is always suspicious.
6:02
And didn't they immediately come
out and say not a cyber
6:04
intrusion?
6:06
That's always suspicious for
doing any investigation, come
6:11
out with some statement like
that.
6:13
What's What what happened was
someone else as a pop the
6:17
system, they were in and they
were changing things, but weird
6:21
things like instead of three
lights are out one lights out,
6:24
not really big things. And it's
confirmed by another source who
6:28
works on infrastructure, no tam
input that you know, things were
6:32
quote unquote wonky, like things
wouldn't stick or maybe things
6:36
went in wrong. We just
inconsistent. So the question
6:40
is, was this someone mucking
around just to create some
6:46
confusion and get the desired
result of more money and etc?
6:53
Was it someone looking to enter
other systems? And no one has an
6:59
explanation as to why all all
the Jets were scrambled right
7:03
after that happened and the air
borne tankers that there's no
7:07
explanation for that from anyone
but everyone, everyone knows
7:10
there's more than just those two
possibilities. There's the
7:13
possibility of a goofball.
7:16
Yeah, oh, totally, totally,
totally goofball,
7:19
there is a possibility of a bad
actor who was just testing the
7:22
system to see how far he could
get before it's someone noticed.
7:25
There's, yeah, there's a lot of
possibilities. But the one
7:30
possibility obvious was the bad
actor that had that required the
7:34
scrambling of jets, but the fact
that the media now we we just
7:39
this is just secondhand
information for us, but it makes
7:42
more sense than the stories
we've been given. Absolute,
7:46
especially with the jets flying
around. Yeah,
7:48
that's that's the part that's
very odd. And, you know, as if
7:54
they were, I think the quote is,
they probably had eyes on
7:58
someone, I don't know what that
means. Don't know what that
8:02
means. So that's it. Your your
government lies to you once
8:08
again. Of course,
8:09
it's kind of pathetic how much
they do that.
8:13
It really is.
8:15
So I have talking about lying. I
have a welcome to the show. I
8:20
have about, I have a lot of
clips on this Biden thing with
8:24
these different these different
perspectives on on what's really
8:28
going on, and I have two or
three different perspectives
8:31
than the one we came up with.
And I'd like to if you want to
8:34
discuss it now.
8:36
Let's go for it. I mean, we've
had the real news, which was
8:39
cyber intrusion in our federal
aviation airspace systems. Don't
8:44
No, no. News Media concentrate
on this. It's the prep time take
8:49
down with the President.
8:50
It or it's not. I've heard I've
heard. The other thing is we
8:56
could talk more about the other
if you want it, you but we don't
8:58
have any information. Oh, no,
no,
8:59
no, no, I meant the mainstream
media is all over this.
9:03
Oh, no, they won't touch the
other thing, because it might,
9:06
it might. I don't know
9:09
that someone might find out what
the truth is,
9:11
they might find out what's going
on and have a can of that. So we
9:15
can only deconstruct what we
have in front of us. So let's
9:17
start with the thesis that you
brought forth, which is that the
9:21
thing was an OP that started
with Trump. They find his docs
9:26
and then it was just trying to
get rid of Joe. And then I don't
9:30
have any clips from this. But I
mentioned Tucker Carlson's
9:33
thesis, which is this very
similar to yours, except it
9:36
began with he doesn't have the
elaboration where Trump's
9:41
discovery has anything to do
with it. Right. But he felt that
9:45
today that Biden said, I'm going
to run for reelection. They went
9:52
after him for that. This is what
I've heard as well. Okay, well,
9:56
that's that Tucker's The one is
promoting that the most, but
9:59
let's go to Italy. II Smith and
Lee Smith. We had Lee Smith
10:06
clips on before least miss the
guy who wrote the book The plot
10:10
against Trump. He's right,
right, right. And he does a
10:14
bunch of he's, he's really good
at his analysis, and he comes up
10:17
with something that is
different. And then I have
10:21
another one that's different
than that. But let's start with
10:24
Lee. And if Scott unfortunately
spelled it smoth,
10:28
it happens to the best of us.
Distracted by the scanner,
10:33
and then every one of them is of
course, they just copy the other
10:36
one, I found him. So let's go at
least Smith on Biden Doc's one.
10:40
And earlier
10:40
today, I spoke with Lee Smith
for his analysis, Smith wrote
10:44
the book, the plot against the
president, and as host of the
10:47
show over the target on Epic TV,
we start with recent allegations
10:52
that these documents could have
been planted as a way to
10:55
undermine Biden, Lee Smith,
welcome to our show. Thanks so
10:58
much for joining us. Now, some
say the revelation of classified
11:01
documents in Biden's personal
possession may be a way to
11:04
thwart any chances of the
president running again. How do
11:08
you see it?
11:08
Yeah, I don't think so. The way
that I don't think it's an
11:13
internal Democratic National
Committee coup, I think rather
11:17
it's a cover up. I mean, first
of all the the media aligned
11:21
with the party. If you watch
MSNBC, CNN, you see that
11:26
everyone on there is very
supportive of Biden. They're all
11:29
comparing it to how bad Trump
is. So there's no one who's
11:33
coming out for there's no one
who's coming out against Biden.
11:37
And this is not the way that
Democrats would it's not an
11:40
issue that Democrats would use,
right? Classified information
11:43
doesn't matter to them. And
that's why, you know, that's why
11:45
there was no problem with
Hillary Clinton's candidacy in
11:48
2016. They would use another
instrument to bring down Joe
11:52
Biden if they were trying to
bring down Joe Biden, and I
11:55
don't believe they are.
11:56
Okay. Is this empty? He, by the
way, I'm just curious. Yeah.
12:01
Because someone's visit.
12:02
Oh, they only bring him on NTD.
I don't know why no one else had
12:06
ever talk to the guy
12:07
because we have something good
here.
12:11
And TD, just
12:13
mixing it up a bit for you.
12:16
Let's go to
12:17
the DOJ is investigating Trump
for something that Biden may
12:20
also have done. So what do you
think the way the department is
12:23
handling Biden's case?
12:25
i The special counsel who was
appointed Robert her. I mean,
12:30
this is this is an aspect of the
cover up. I mean, the man is
12:34
presumably identifies as a
Republican, but he's an anti
12:38
Trump Republican. Right. He was
a protege of rod Rosenstein rod
12:42
Rosenstein was the Deputy
Attorney General who said he was
12:46
going to who said he was willing
to wear a wire to spy on Trump.
12:51
That's what an internal coup
looks like. When the Deputy
12:54
Attorney General says I'm going
I'll wear a wire to spy on the
12:58
President of the United States.
What's happening with Biden does
13:01
not look like an internal coup.
When they appointed guy who is a
13:05
who is against Trump, and sides
with the establishment Deep
13:11
State however we want to put it
that's moving toward a cover up.
13:15
And this is what this is what my
sources on Capitol Hill had been
13:20
telling me. And I think they're
100%. Correct.
13:24
What a cover up.
13:27
Yeah, this is the problem I have
with this because he never, no,
13:31
another guy comes on a different
show. And I think that cover up.
13:35
When you hear the clip that's
going to finalize these clips
13:39
you're going to take well, maybe
because the possibility existed
13:44
this whole thing is you use the
term a few times on the show,
13:47
but we've never really explained
limited
13:49
hands. Oh, goodness, I hate that
term. Yeah, because it's a made
13:55
up term.
13:56
I don't like it either. But I
there was a guy that said some
13:59
one of these guys out there
talking about vaccines. And he
14:04
he described limited hangout. Do
you want it? Do you not have a
14:08
good definition for it that you
can tell the people? Well,
14:10
from what I understand it was
during the Nixon era, and they
14:14
were talking about letting some
guy leak out a little bit of
14:17
information in regard to
Watergate. And Nixon apparently
14:21
said, so it's like, limited.
He's hanging out in a limited
14:24
way. And no one ever said in
that conversation, as far as
14:27
I've seen transcripts. Oh, it's
a limited hangout. But no one
14:32
I've ever encountered an
intelligence has ever used that.
14:36
It's Whitney Webb. She's the one
who keeps you know, keeps using
14:41
that term.
14:42
Well, you just said that no one
intelligence ever used it. And
14:45
then you said Whitney Webb, what
are you talking about? Oh,
14:47
nice one. Good one. You're so
slick. You're so sweet. Love it.
14:54
So a limited hangout is the idea
that you can solve. I think it's
14:58
just a version of false flag.
but not a false flag and in it
15:03
false flag in a public relations
way. In other words, you put
15:06
something out there and you make
it look great, what this what is
15:08
good. And the limited hangout is
being used in terms of the by
15:13
Vaillant vaccine causing
strokes. The idea is that it's
15:17
going to be a limited, you're
gonna push this little narrative
15:20
out there about the strokes and
this and they're gonna say, oh,
15:23
okay, well, we're gonna just
take this by valen off the
15:25
market, you leave all the other
vaccines out there, and you
15:27
don't look into anything else.
15:29
I call that a strategy in
crisis. I don't think it's a
15:33
limited hangout.
15:34
I know, I would call it anything
else. But I'm just saying it's
15:37
gonna it's gonna start showing
up because it's, I don't like
15:40
it. I don't like it. I don't
like it either. I didn't like it
15:43
the first time I heard it. But
I'm just saying it's possible
15:46
that this, that this is what
this is going on here. Which is
15:49
a phony baloney deal. But let's
go to step three.
15:53
And the Justice Department found
out about these documents about
15:56
a week before the midterms, but
we're only just learning about
15:58
it. Now. Why do you think that
is?
16:01
I think it's not just about the
elections. I think it's I assume
16:05
it's something much more
serious. Because, you know,
16:08
they've been they've been
holding on to this. That's not
16:14
like it just came out after the
election. Right. They said they
16:17
found the documents November 2.
And look, that story is in
16:22
itself improbable. Right?
Because look at what you have to
16:25
believe about the story, you
have to believe about the story
16:27
either, every other time that
Joe Biden's belongings moved.
16:33
Right, the lawyers missed it? Or
do you have to believe that this
16:36
time is the time that lawyers
went through his belongings? And
16:39
normally, it was staffers who
didn't know what classified
16:41
would classifications on
documents look like. So the
16:45
story is highly improbable. And
remember, these documents have
16:48
been moved at least twice, once
out of the White House and to an
16:51
interim space, and then a second
time to the Penn Biden center.
16:55
Because remember, Penn Biden
Center did not open up till
16:58
2018. So between January 2017,
and 2018, these documents were
17:04
somewhere else, we have no
insight yet as to where they
17:06
are. So but they'd been moved
twice. And it appears this was
17:11
in preparation to move them a
third time. So again, the idea
17:14
that the lawyers that Biden's
lawyer somehow just noticed
17:17
this, that doesn't make sense.
17:24
Okay, so that was interesting.
And so it really brings a lot of
17:27
doubts for let's go with the
last of these clips.
17:31
There's a CNN piece today
saying, talking about again,
17:35
it's more of the press cover up,
the CNN piece is going on about
17:38
oh, it was very chaotic. And as
Joe Biden was leaving the White
17:41
House in January 2017, they
never knew who is what was going
17:45
into the boxes and the
belongings. It was just chaotic.
17:48
And so it's just meant to cover
up for what's going on with Joe
17:50
Biden. So you're telling me that
the aids the aids at that time
17:55
packed it up, but now they've
got the professionals in there.
17:58
And since when the lawyers go
through belongings, the story
18:03
doesn't make sense, right?
People are right. The people who
18:07
are saying they wonder if it's a
coup or they're not right that
18:10
it's a coup, but they are right
to say that the story does not
18:14
make sense the way it's being
told and that's why I believe
18:17
there is something there there
whatever is in these documents
18:23
or whatever the backstory behind
it is likely to be extremely
18:26
damaging and that's why it's a
cover up not a coup
18:31
ha So covering every cover up
for what
18:35
for for Ukraine is the only
thing that can come to mind has
18:38
to be a cover on crane
18:40
Yeah, well there's a cover up
that comes up which is the way
18:43
it would be a good because they
keep if you notice that was used
18:46
Ukraine Ukraine Ukraine even
Tucker does that as though this
18:49
is some of Ukraine things got
something to do with the kid who
18:52
knows what it could be a cover
up for something even more
18:55
sinister. At least that's the
theory bitch by this guy. This
19:01
guy's Phil Philip Klein, you
used to be a Kansas Attorney
19:04
General and he was on one of
these shows he was on bond. Gino
19:07
show. Yeah, but I kept by Gino
out of this. Just have field
19:14
going on about this. Listen to
this.
19:18
And when you look at the special
counsel as it relates to
19:21
President Biden, they have a
very narrow authority according
19:24
to the appointment letter, only
to look at the documents. Now
19:28
let's take a look at it for a
second Dan. What Attorney
19:31
General garland knew when he
made this decision. He knew that
19:35
the documents were found at the
Penn Biden Center. He knew that
19:38
the pin Biden center when they
located at the University of
19:41
Pennsylvania that the University
of Pennsylvania received $47
19:45
million. While that center was
there, that the University of
19:49
Pennsylvania push that money to
Biden and 10 of his Cabinet
19:53
members receive salary up to 10
at the Penn Biden center,
19:57
including Mr. Biden a
additionally, at the same time
20:01
Hunter is on the Burisma. Board,
the documents pertain to
20:04
Ukraine. And that would be of
interest to those who are
20:08
concerned about Hunter Biden and
who he's dealing with, and those
20:13
who are paying his salary. So
you have some evidence of intent
20:18
as to why the documents should
be there. And that evidence of
20:22
intent relates to the flow of
money. There's something else
20:26
that Attorney General garland
knew, he knew that he had
20:29
received a letter from the
University of Pennsylvania,
20:32
asking that he end the China
initiative of the Department of
20:36
Justice, which is looking at
economic espionage by China.
20:40
Now, you have to understand that
50% of the most wanted list on
20:46
the FBI fugitive list relate to
espionage by China, he ended it
20:52
at the request of the University
of Pennsylvania, that is a
20:55
conflict of interest, yet he
only gave the special prosecutor
21:00
a very narrow focus, while
President Trump's special
21:03
prosecutor can look at
everything.
21:07
I have some new thinking on
this. I'm all ears. How about
21:12
simpler, simpler? Everything is
is about the power and politics
21:20
it was I'm just gonna, it's hard
because I love the cover up. I
21:24
love the China. I love the I
love. I want it to be that when
21:29
we see the documents, but what
if the Democrat Party can't
21:36
convince Michelle Obama to run
they know that they have Newsom
21:39
on deck? They know they can't be
Kamala Harris. They're very
21:44
worried about DeSantis, who now
has big money billionaires
21:50
behind him Wall Street basically
positioning themselves behind
21:54
DeSantis. They actually can't
indict Trump, because they need
22:00
him to run they need him to run.
He can't be taken off the
22:04
playing field because they feel
that DeSantis will be stronger.
22:08
And and what will this this will
come down to a sputtering of
22:14
well, you know what? We have to
keep justice equal on both
22:17
sides. No one gets prosecuted,
but let's not do that again.
22:24
Let's not do what again,
22:26
let's not, you know, you, let's
be clear about classified
22:30
documents, you can't take them
home, etc. Just we can't if
22:33
we're not going to prosecute
Biden, we can't prosecute Trump,
22:36
and we won't want to prosecute
Trump because key has to run.
22:44
Well, I don't like it. From the
basis of the fact that you used
22:49
to always thought that Michelle
Obama was Obama was in play.
22:53
I've never believed that. I
22:54
still think she's in play. I'm
just giving you a scenario. I'm
22:56
not saying that. Yeah, I
22:58
like the Chinese scenario the
best because this is the best
23:01
way to cover it anything going
on this suspicious? I didn't
23:04
know that they garlin has pulled
the plug on going after the
23:08
Chinese espionage, which was a
big deal. When you had Pompeo
23:13
and people like that floating
around. I'm just very suspicious
23:16
of this university of Penn Biden
Center. This is getting tased
23:20
Pennsylvania
23:21
Hello, guys in New Jersey. New
Jersey people know it's no good
23:27
but
23:27
this brought me to a series of
super cuts which I think are
23:31
worth playing even though it's
anti climactic in some way been
23:36
Gino had a super cut of the of
the not a super cut, but I'd
23:41
call it mini cut of when Trump
was first discovered with the
23:46
with the documents. And I just
got a kick out of it. This is
23:49
the short super cut over Trump
classified documents clip, this
23:54
classic picture of
23:55
the walls closing in
23:57
why in the world? Would he need
to have these kinds of sensitive
24:00
documents in Florida or really
anywhere?
24:02
So you're not above the law,
you're not in the lead? You're
24:05
not untouchable? And so it's
nice to see that the
24:07
rule of law has returned. My top
level expert legal analysis of
24:13
the affidavit is why this dude
in jail
24:17
in many ways, it feels like the
walls are closing in on Donald
24:20
Trump.
24:21
Right? No, that's immediate for
you. So so that brought me to I
24:26
have no hate to go into
classics. But I have to that I
24:31
just have to fake as there's
something about his walls
24:34
closing in. It began right after
he got elected in 2017.
24:40
recollected this super cut in
2017. Mind you of the walls
24:46
closing and I want to play this
the 2017 bombshell walls medley
24:50
BREAKING NEWS
24:51
A bombshell today is a turning
point today was historically bad
24:55
for President Trump today was a
turning point a turning point
24:59
we're at a turning point here At
the beginning of the end for the
25:02
Trump presidency,
25:03
we have another bombshell Mike
25:04
Pence might have to assume the
office of the presidency
25:07
rumblings
25:08
of the word impeachment breaking
news of the bombshell out of the
25:11
White House.
25:11
I believe this is the beginning
of the end. I did say
25:14
that it's really the beginning
of the end he may be feeling the
25:16
walls closing in on him all the
walls closing in on him and
25:19
walls closing in on him.
Breaking news a new bombshell
25:22
one astrologer
25:23
says this means the beginning of
the end for President Donald
25:26
Trump, Trump will resign Trump
is going to resign. Is this
25:29
the tipping point? I know we've
said it over and over. You think
25:32
this is a tipping point and over
and over this tipping point and
25:36
over and over breaking news
President
25:38
Trump off the rails. It was the
beginning of the end today is
25:40
the beginning
25:41
of the end. Breaking news
tonight. New
25:43
bombshells is the beginning, not
the end,
25:45
the beginning of the end of
walls are closing in the walls
25:48
closing and closing it breaking
overnight. bombshells is
25:52
a very dramatic day and I think
it might be near a tipping point
25:54
of using this as a tipping
point.
25:56
December 1 2017. You
25:58
can mark it down. This is the
day that everything changed the
26:01
beginning
26:01
of the end, beginning of the
26:03
end, the beginning of the end of
the beginning of
26:05
the end of the beginning of the
year. We begin tonight with a
26:07
bombshell Donald Trump has a lot
of trouble.
26:09
Trump is in trouble. The
President will resign another
26:11
hour and this is a tipping point
Trump's going down this
26:15
president could be impeached
26:17
resignation resignation.
26:18
I don't think this President is
going to serve out his term. Mr.
26:21
Trump will not serve out his
term. He will not serve out his
26:24
term. No way. No How breaking
26:26
news and absolute bombs Donald
Trump is not he's done. And it's
26:30
over. It's over
26:31
walls closing in walls closing
26:33
in this is going to be the
Achilles heel breaking news
26:36
tonight. I expect Trump to
depart
26:38
this week will be the watershed
week Trump is in big trouble.
26:41
Trouble. It's a sign of a
terrified old man who feels the
26:44
walls close again. The walls are
increasingly closing in on him
26:48
tonight the walls are closing in
a day changed everything. This
26:51
is the beginning of the end day
the biggest tipping point for
26:54
the Trump administration. What
26:55
a historic day, the bombshells
he's
26:57
underwater. He feels
26:58
the walls closing in earning
fight. We may be at a tipping
27:01
point. It's
27:02
the beginning of the end. It's
the beginning of the end.
27:04
Another bombshell bombshell
27:05
bombshell bombshell bombshell,
bombshell bombshell,
27:08
this is a bombshell.
27:10
Oh man that gives me flashbacks.
How was so annoying that period
27:15
and way go to I got one more
bombs. How do we go from 2017 to
27:23
2018? And here's another super
clip these are the same
27:27
boneheads that they're feeding
the public this crap no wonder
27:31
this guy. I mean, years and
years of this but this is just
27:35
too early in his in his before
2020 is 2018 play these.
27:39
Why do you think these attacks
are becoming so much more
27:42
frequent now?
27:44
It's not surprising that Donald
Trump is increasing his attacks.
27:47
The walls are closing in on him
feels like
27:50
the walls are closing in on the
White House. It feels as if the
27:54
walls are closing in here that
27:56
I think the walls of Justice are
closing in on President Trump
28:00
increasingly desperate feeling
like the walls are closing in
28:03
the president. Clearly feel all
the walls closing in on him in
28:08
terms of the Russia
investigation. The walls are
28:09
closing. I think at this point
the walls
28:12
are spinning. It does feel like
the walls are closing in but
28:14
seeing that the administration
at this point can start to see
28:17
the walls closing in the fields
28:19
the walls closing in on him
everybody he talks to says the
28:22
walls are closing in
28:24
this is another potential wall
closing
28:26
it
28:26
this President is feeling the
walls are closing in
28:29
walls meanwhile are closing in
on the President of the United
28:32
States.
28:32
I think he's feeling the Russia
investigation. I
28:34
think he's filling the wheels.
The walls closing in on him.
28:37
Vicki knows
28:38
that the walls are closing in
the walls
28:40
may be closing in higher up at
the White House President
28:43
apparently believes that the
walls are closing in on him
28:45
these walls are closing in on
the President right now to
28:48
Donald Trump feels the walls
closing in that feeling like
28:50
the walls are closing in around?
Yes, it
28:52
doesn't seem like the walls
could be closing in on this
28:56
president
28:56
feels like we are finally at a
tipping
28:58
point the walls are closing in
on President Trump feels
29:01
like the presidency in the White
House of the walls are closing
29:04
in around him and that's
29:05
why there's this sense of the
walls closing and as it appears
29:08
the walls are closing in. In
terms of the Muller
29:12
investigation. The walls are
closing in. The walls are
29:15
closing and I do feel that he
feels the walls closing in on
29:19
him legal walls are closing in
on Donald Trump tonight. From a
29:22
democratic perspective. This is
the President feels like the
29:24
walls are closing and it feels
the walls are closing in any
29:27
indication
29:28
that legally speaking, the rise
of closing in
29:30
on the President feel some of
the walls closing in on him he
29:33
actually closed on President
Trump and the walls are closing
29:37
in in the present. Okay, so what
what this really proves in this
29:41
context is that the mainstream
media had very clear talking
29:45
points in these years. But they
don't seem to have any real a
29:50
coherent talking points right
now. Let me just play something
29:54
this is casey RW, leftist media
up in your neck of the woods
30:00
There are differences between
what we know about Donald
30:04
Trump's mishandling of
classified information and what
30:06
we know about Joe Biden's
mishandling of classified
30:08
information. But there's also a
whole lot we don't know about
30:11
the Joe Biden side. So I want to
come back to that. But first,
30:16
legally speaking, done. Donald
Trump is in jeopardy under two
30:21
issues, the mishandling part and
the obstruction part. We don't
30:25
have any evidence right now of
sort of that obstruction side
30:29
for Joe Biden. So in that sense,
that's one difference. But on
30:33
the mishandling of classified
information, actually, the two
30:37
are looking more and more
similar, frankly. And I have to
30:42
say, you know, I don't think the
White House has handled this.
30:44
Well, I don't think they've been
forthcoming. The fact that they
30:48
found these documents, and
rather turn them over to the
30:53
National Archives at least six
days before the midterm
30:56
elections when they were
hammering Donald Trump over the
30:59
mishandling of documents, and
didn't want to mention that to
31:02
the American people, I think
politically, not legally, is
31:06
telling. And the fact that then
two months later, they're
31:10
finding more documents in the
garage of his house. Not great
31:14
Bob. And I just, they've lost a
lot of credibility here. But
31:19
I'll tell you about the best
week in Washington, Merrick
31:22
Garland. Congratulations, Mr.
Attorney General, you had a
31:25
really hard decision on your
plate. And it just got a lot
31:28
easier because I don't see a
world in which these
31:31
distinctions will have a big
enough legal difference, where
31:36
he'll really at this point move
forward with one versus the
31:40
other. And frankly, he's not
going to move forward with
31:42
either
31:44
kind of kind of sets up the
theory I spoke about, I know you
31:47
don't like that could be a
talking point. It sounds like
31:52
Kareem Abdul Jabbar, John Pierre
Van Damme. Here's a mini cut.
31:57
He said he takes classified
documents and information
32:00
seriously, he takes classified
documents very seriously. He
32:03
takes classified information and
materials seriously. He takes
32:07
classified documents and
information very seriously. He
32:11
takes this very seriously. He
takes this very seriously. The
32:14
president takes this very
seriously. The president takes
32:16
this very seriously. The
President takes very seriously
32:19
very seriously, very seriously
very, very seriously.
32:23
So I think they're trying to say
that's the difference. Now,
32:26
Trump's a baboon doesn't take it
seriously. And this President
32:30
takes it seriously.
32:35
Yeah. Well, they're definitely
saying he's takes it seriously.
32:42
I thought it was fun to hear the
32:44
good supercut by the way,
32:46
so many cut. This is Hakeem
Jeffries, who at one point was
32:53
almost neck and neck with Kevin
McCarthy to be the speaker of
32:57
the house. So he's the minority
leader for the Democrats in the
33:00
House of Representatives. This
is this guy may be dumb. I'm not
33:05
sure. But I think
33:06
he you know, that's funny. You
mentioned it, because he's not
33:09
Nancy Pelosi is conniving. And
he is. I think he might be dumb.
33:16
On declassified documents, we've
learned the President was
33:19
informed of the initial
classified documents on the same
33:21
day they were found more than
two months ago. Are you
33:24
concerned the White House didn't
disclose this sooner?
33:26
I have full faith and credit in
President Biden believe that
33:31
doing everything Yeah. To take
the
33:35
steps. Don't you have full faith
and credit like a bank or
33:38
something? The full
33:39
faith and credit of which we I'm
sure we'll be talking about
33:42
today is typically regarding the
that we pay our bills, and that
33:47
the dollar is solid and stable?
Yeah,
33:50
what's it got to do with a
person? Hey,
33:53
man, the guy's dumb
33:54
President Biden, believe that
he's doing everything to take
34:00
the appropriate steps to
determine what happened, and how
34:04
to move forward in a responsible
fashion take seriously. And I'm
34:08
confident that he will continue
to do so what does
34:10
it say to you that documents
have been found at another
34:12
patient?
34:14
Again, I haven't been briefed on
the full set of facts in this
34:17
regard. But I have full faith in
President Joe Biden.
34:22
Isn't that interesting? Full
Faith is the kind of the full
34:25
faith for faith and credit. I
mean, what did what is going on
34:28
with this guy? I don't. He's not
read in whatever's going on. He
34:33
doesn't know. Oh, that's
34:35
a good point. Yes. Obvious. He's
not read in the somebody. They
34:40
don't trust him.
34:41
I have a CBS report about the
special counsel and see if it's
34:47
if it's any good
34:47
today, Attorney General Merrick
Garland tapped Robert her a
34:51
veteran prosecutor who served
under former President Trump to
34:54
investigate the possible
unauthorized removal and
34:57
retention of classified
documents.
34:59
So you say he's an anti Trumper
35:02
I never said it was an anti
Trump er it was said by the by
35:06
both the lease myth and the and
the Ag from the Kansas they both
35:11
say he's anti Trump. Okay. The
President's
35:13
stunning announcement came just
hours after the White House
35:16
admitted that a small number of
classified documents had been
35:18
found in the garage small
number, Biden's Wilmington
35:22
residents and in a room next
door.
35:25
Mind you, this is CBS and these
are these are the ones that
35:27
discovered all of these troves
Biden material. Next year,
35:31
Corvette,
35:32
President Biden was asked about
it this morning.
35:35
So the material was in a locked
garage. Yes, as well as my
35:38
Corvette.
35:41
This is I'm gonna go back to
elder abuse now, because they're
35:45
letting this poor guy hang out
in the wind so much now it's
35:49
it's pathetic, of what you can
go to any crisis management
35:55
firm. The last thing they will
say is, hey, it was safe man
35:57
because it was next my Corvette,
by the way, a gasoline burning
36:02
earth shattering Corvette.
36:05
Yeah, that thing probably that
bet he has probably gets about
36:08
14 miles to the gallon at the
best
36:10
Yes, as well as my Corvette. But
as I said earlier this week,
36:15
people know I take classified
documents of classified material
36:19
serious
36:19
serious. The latest revelation
follows Monday's admission by
36:22
the White House after
questioning by CBS News that Mr.
36:25
Biden's lawyers had found 10
classified documents in this
36:29
building roughly a mile from the
White House, where Biden once
36:32
had an office.
36:33
That office was not authorized
for storage of classified
36:36
documents.
36:37
Less than two weeks later on
November 14, the Justice
36:40
Department started its
preliminary review on December
36:43
20. President Biden's lawyers
found the additional classified
36:46
materials at his Wilmington
home. His lawyers also searched
36:50
his Delaware vacation house.
They said no classified records
36:54
were found there. I find
36:55
it odd that the lawyers are
searching his house. I've had
37:00
lawyers, no lawyer is going to
come to my house. I just
37:02
searched around for anything.
That's
37:05
former National Security
Official Javed Ali says the
37:08
matter brings up serious
questions about how Mr. Biden
37:11
and his team handled classified
material.
37:14
But as a former intelligence
professional, you're we were all
37:17
indoctrinated to never leave our
offices with any classified
37:21
material whatsoever. And that's
the whole point of the worst.
37:24
Garland has now appointed to
special counsels in two months
37:28
to investigate the handling of
sensitive materials by the
37:31
sitting president and former
President Trump who had over 300
37:35
classified documents at his Mar
a Lago with state. Today House
37:38
Speaker Kevin McCarthy
questioned Biden's transparency.
37:42
They knew this has happened to
President Biden before the
37:45
election, but they kept it a
secret from the American public.
37:48
Now we find another location
that it's at.
37:51
Yeah, that that obviously is
kind of lame that they knew
37:55
about this, just before the
midterm election, and they
37:58
clearly covered that up. Here's
a here's a question that Tina
38:03
asked me this night. I didn't
have an answer. She said, Where
38:07
are classified documents stored?
Are they not stored digitally?
38:10
Are these just things that are
done on a typewriter with carbon
38:14
carbon paper? I mean, who where
are these things stored?
38:19
Well, they're supposed to be
stored in a skiff.
38:23
Now that's where you can view
them. You can view them in the
38:26
skiff. Okay. What? River? What
server? Are they on? Where the
38:29
who's in charge of that? I mean,
are they in?
38:33
Need, we have dude's name
38:35
keys in order to open up the
classified documents. You know,
38:41
this whole thing could be one
big joke. Classified. They're
38:47
stored somewhere. They're
printed out. He prints them out,
38:52
takes them home. Can anyone
print them out? Can you only
38:54
print them out in the skiff? So
then he would have done that in
38:57
the school. I mean, these are
all questions that will never be
39:00
answered.
39:01
No, because nobody's gonna look
into that there's something else
39:04
going on. Yeah, that's why I'm
kind of in with Lee Smith is
39:07
something there's something
wrong with the entire narrative.
39:11
And there's something that we're
not we're not finding out and no
39:13
one seems to be interested in
finding it out to just say
39:16
whatever. Whatever. John Pierre
Claude down, tells him to play
39:20
including including the sea
faces seriously, man.
39:23
I mean, really, all everyone is
doing is just the outrage. No
39:27
one's actually doing any
investigative reporting. You
39:30
know, these guys had an opinion.
I like that had a different
39:34
opinion. The guys you played but
no one seems to be taking him
39:39
seriously at all.
39:45
I'm just baffled as
39:46
you are. I see you have a clip.
And it's an ask Adam. I'd like
39:50
to handle this right now because
it's it's relevant to the full
39:54
faith and credit of the United
States of America. And this is
39:57
the the debt limit. with Janet
Yellen came out and said, Boy,
40:03
oh, boy, boy, we got to raise
the debt limit because we're
40:07
going to reach it by Thursday.
And if we don't reach, if we
40:10
don't raise the debt limit by
Thursday, then we're gonna have
40:13
to start cutting things left and
right. So the full faith and
40:17
credit of the United States will
still be good. So we can play,
40:20
pay our debts. And it never
ceases to amaze me how clueless
40:25
people are in the United States
about this. They say, it's
40:29
unAmerican not to raise the debt
limit. I mean, it's, it's what
40:34
we do, and now stands at, I
think, $31.6 trillion.
40:41
And it's just ridiculous. And,
40:45
you know, they would have to
raise and see if I explained
40:48
this correctly. So the shortfall
that we have from our tax
40:53
revenue, which I think the tax
revenue that comes in is
40:57
probably just paying off the
interest at this point. So we
41:00
have to create more money. And
the way we do that is the
41:03
Federal Reserve gets to go
ahead, hey, we want to borrow
41:06
some more money. And then they
create it. And we have to pay
41:09
that back. So it gets added to
the to the to the the debt
41:14
limit. And of course, with the
higher interest rates, it's all
41:18
going to it could potentially
spiral out of control. Maybe
41:23
it's already spiraling out of
control. So you haven't asked
41:28
Adam about this?
41:29
Yeah. As as as going to ask you
what do you think the current
41:32
debt limit they want what they
want to set the new debt limit
41:35
at?
41:37
Play the jingle? Sorry? You've
confused? I don't even know what
41:43
my ask Adam is anymore. All
right. I do not know the answer
41:49
to this. But the last time they
raise it, I think two or $3
41:53
trillion. I'm just going to
guess seeing as inflation is
41:58
probably probably really a 10%
average, that they would have to
42:04
raise it by $3 trillion. I don't
know why I'm coming up with that
42:08
number just feels right.
42:10
Well, here's the here's the
answer.
42:12
Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen
warned Congress that the federal
42:15
government will hit its debt
limit next Thursday. After that
42:19
date, Yellen said the Treasury
will take what she called
42:22
extraordinary measures to shift
funds around and prevent a
42:25
national default. In turn, the
White House urged Congress to
42:28
quickly raise the limit. Now set
it $31.4 trillion.
42:35
So what are they raising it to?
42:37
They never said
42:39
this is this is a bogus Adam.
I'm glad I didn't find the
42:43
jingles. It's okay. I'm going to
give you the answer. That how we
42:48
solve this this is this is the
same every single since we're
42:51
doing the show. How many times
have we heard time to raise the
42:54
debt limit? How many?
42:56
More than once a year? Hmm, no,
no, no. Yes. No. More than one?
43:02
Yes, yes. But when?
43:03
Okay. I'm sorry, how many times
we heard there was a crisis, a
43:06
political crisis? And one party
said, No, we don't want to raise
43:11
it
43:12
more than once a year. I this is
not a one time deal. No, I just
43:18
happened.
43:18
The political crisis. When it
really comes down. It's always
43:22
when Republicans are running the
show. That's when the media goes
43:26
and makes a big deal about it.
That's we've never we only
43:29
handle one
43:30
idea. That's a good point. So in
the Democrats running things,
43:33
yeah. Because there's taking a
point now, right, because the
43:36
Republicans just took over. We
didn't hear this last year.
43:39
No. And the answer is always the
same. And I have it here. In
43:46
this case, it's from let me see,
it's from Forbes and I'm not
43:54
going to tell you what Forbes
said. But they gave the same
43:58
solution they give every single
time the Republicans are at bat
44:02
and can stop the raising of the
debt limit. And we play the same
44:07
clip every single time it
happens from The Simpsons, and
44:10
1945. The people of Europe have
struggled to rebuild following
44:14
the war. Saddam Simpson
44:18
believes this crisis President
Truman promised really, American
44:22
tax dollars
44:23
will help our allies who fought
so poorly and surrendered so
44:27
readily.
44:30
make good on this drunken post
drum unauthorized the one time
44:34
printing of the largest
denomination currency ever a
44:37
trillion dollar bill. trillion
dollar bill spicy meatball
44:48
and here it is forms the
trillion dollar coin and other
44:51
long shot debt crisis solutions.
Richard McGehee who wrote this
44:56
shame on you douchebag I can't
believe If they do this every
45:01
single time, the President could
fix it by minting a trillion
45:04
dollar platinum coin and deposit
that with the Federal Reserve.
45:10
You're right. We have this has
cropped up at least five times
45:14
and 50. We even named
45:16
the show the trillion dollar
bill show or coin we've coin
45:21
coin here. 2013 2013. Now that
was the oh, let me see if we
45:26
have truly here ABC one, two
years this from this is
45:33
Have you heard of the ABC act?
No.
45:38
This is a proposal. ABC stands
for automatic boost to
45:42
communities. It would provide a
boost debit card, we would all
45:46
get this. By the way all of us,
taxpayers dependents, non
45:51
citizens, even if you don't have
a bank account or social
45:54
security number, even if you
don't have an address, everybody
45:58
gets $2,000 and then your card
would be reloaded with $1,000
46:04
Every month until one year after
the end of the virus crisis.
46:09
This is stupid. This is from
2020 So you're not wrong that it
46:14
was pretty frequent. This is
Pelosi on Tapper
46:17
and the fact is that an all for
the bills that have passed
46:20
before they've all been
bipartisan, and we've all in our
46:24
caucus have agreed that
everything is Coronavirus,
46:27
centric and also in a timely way
that relates to the virus. It's
46:32
too deadly to our lives to our
livelihood, to our democracy for
46:36
us to use it for any other
purpose. So when the money for
46:39
state and local is to allay the
cost of the defray the cost of
46:45
the outlays they've made for
Coronavirus, and the revenue
46:49
loss because of the Coronavirus
Testing, testing the three
46:52
pillars, honor our heroes by
supporting our state so that
46:57
they don't lose their jobs,
these heroes don't lose their
47:00
jobs, open up government by
testing, tracing, treatment,
47:05
etc. And the third is putting
money in the pockets of American
47:09
people. All of it timed and
centric to the Coronavirus. We
47:15
would be an endless amount of
money if we put our wish list
47:18
for the future in there. But
that is not what the case is.
47:21
And sometimes I get a little
heat from my own folks who say
47:25
why can we do this in this bill
and that in the budget, because
47:27
that's not what the bill is
about. This bill is for this
47:30
purpose. And it's a big price.
But it's a big problem. And as
47:35
chairman of the Fed said think
big because the interest rates
47:37
will never be lower. And so we
are they've used the interest
47:41
rates to give confidence that
credit will be available because
47:45
the interest rates are low. We
want those same interest rates
47:49
and they use it to bolster the
stock market. We want to use it
47:52
to bolster
47:53
the other people what the heck,
I'm sorry, I would cut that out
47:56
of the show. It said trillion
dollar coin right there on the
47:59
title. So I'm so wow, you were
just you biggest dud ever. I
48:04
really apologize must have been
some series that we were doing
48:07
there is we did I definitely
recall at least twice before,
48:13
like in 20. I don't know if 13.
At least there was a trillion
48:23
dollar coin segment on our show
now to 23 least twice. Yeah.
48:28
2013
48:29
is when I had the that's where I
had that or the original
48:33
Simpsons clip from. I guess it
did come back. 2020 21 it was
48:40
I'm just looking at some
searches anyway. It's dumb. It
48:43
never happens. Shame on you,
Forbes. What are you thinking?
48:46
Stupid?
48:48
Well, it was this idiotic voice.
48:51
Alright, let's go to the other
big story, which is going to be
48:55
a very interesting media war.
This is the report that came
49:00
out. I think it came out during
our show even Thursday that
49:05
there's some up some up with the
bio valium with the bio vandal
49:09
shot. It could be giving people
strokes, and right away on
49:15
Friday, right away. I have all
these great, great little
49:22
articles New York Times the CDC.
But before we do that, let's
49:26
listen to Good Morning America.
The
49:28
FDA and CDC are standing by the
safety of Pfizer's updated
49:32
booster after concerns about a
possible safety risk. The agency
49:36
launching an investigation after
data from the vaccine monitoring
49:39
system suggested a link between
the booster and an increased
49:43
risk of stroke and people over
65. The CDC says they acted
49:47
quickly in assessing the concern
which was detected in late
49:50
November and after a review of
safety databases. Databases the
49:55
CDC found no other safety system
have shown a similar signal they
49:59
also said Multiple subsequent
analysis have not validated this
50:03
sign concluding that it is very
unlikely that the vaccine poses
50:07
a true risk the FDA and CDC will
continue to analyze data from
50:11
those safety systems. But you
guys, no changes have been made
50:14
to the COVID-19 guidance. Well,
don't do
50:17
ma'am. Now. Now this
50:18
is important. So well, like
crap. You know, this reminds me
50:22
of that of the meme that I put
in the newsletter, where they're
50:25
sitting there, you know, the
panel on CNN, and we're just
50:27
getting this and Dana Bash is
listening to it. Oh, and from
50:31
our sources at Pfizer, they say
is not the vaccine.
50:35
What she said though, was
exactly the answer that CDC has
50:39
given. So the New York Times is
where I first started this
50:42
trail. I'm just going to read
you a little pieces from this
50:44
article. No increased stroke
risks linked to Pfizer's COVID,
50:48
boosters federal officials say.
And here's here's in this
50:51
article, among about 550,000
people aged 65 and older, so
50:57
we're only talking about 65 and
older who had received the
51:00
Pfizer bio and tech by Valen.
Booster 130 had ischemic
51:05
strokes. And they use that term,
specifically. So I'm sure that's
51:09
a very specific type of stroke,
which I think is blood clot
51:12
related in the 21st days after
receiving the shots. So they've
51:16
already narrowed it down to 21
days after receiving the shot,
51:20
raising fears that the two
events were related, but
51:23
analysis, listen, but analysis
of the data using a different
51:28
method did not reveal an
increased risk of ischemic
51:32
stroke. Are you kidding me? They
didn't explain what the analysis
51:40
using a different method. But
you would you do count with
51:43
Common Core if something is I
mean, so I go to look at the
51:48
CDC. CDC and FDA identify
preliminary COVID 19 vaccine
51:55
safety signal for persons aged
65 years and older, the CDC
51:59
themselves. This preliminary
signal has not been identified
52:03
with the moderna COVID-19
vaccine by Vaillant. There also
52:07
may be other confounding factors
contributing to the signal
52:12
identified in the VSD that merit
further investigation.
52:17
Furthermore, it is important to
note that To date, no other
52:21
safety systems have shown a
similar signal. And multiple
52:26
subsequent analyses have not
validated this signal
52:29
gobbledygook. What are their
signals, they say very clearly,
52:33
the various database all of a
sudden, they using the various
52:36
database. And the V safe. V safe
is the app you're you can
52:44
download after you've received
your vaccination, and then you
52:47
can report if you're dead. So
the V safe didn't did not, you
52:52
know, if you got a stroke, then
you're not going to report it to
52:54
V safe. And the vaccine safety
DataLink VSD, which I had not
53:00
heard of before. These are 13
sites that provide clinical,
53:09
methodological and data
expertise. Only 11 of them
53:14
provide data and all of them are
Kaiser Permanente outfits. So
53:22
they get data from Kaiser
Permanente in California, New
53:25
York, New Hampshire, nothing in
the middle, except I think,
53:29
maybe Montana and they may not
even be reporting and that is
53:34
where they get signals from. So
they see someone Oh, yeah, you
53:38
know, we heard someone Someone
killed over a stroke and we're
53:41
reporting it. This is they did
no test. They did no actual
53:45
clinical test. They just said
got any signals got no signal,
53:49
you got a signal we got no
signal. And that all of a sudden
53:53
is is how the refuting this.
This is adverse events report
53:59
after by valen booster dose
appear appear. You love these
54:03
words, John, consistent with
those reported after a mono
54:06
valen booster, and are less
common and less serious than
54:10
health impacts associated with
COVID 19 illness so there was
54:14
something going on. But COVID is
worse, again, did just that.
54:20
They're just they're just giving
you lip lip service. Let's go
54:24
back to ABC more on it. Let's
54:25
bring in ABC medical contributor
Dr. I love Patel joining us from
54:28
San Francisco this morning. We
just heard Mona say the CDC is
54:32
not changing any recommendation
saying it's very unlikely that
54:36
the vaccine poses a true risk.
How have they come to that
54:39
conclusion?
54:40
And what does this mean going
forward? Well, you simply put
54:44
the CDC did see this early
signal for something called the
54:47
vaccine safety DataLink which is
designed to try to detect these
54:51
early signals, which could be
rare side effects.
54:53
It's not designed. They make it
sound like we have everybody
54:57
wired up will know immediately
when something happened side
54:59
effects happened we're on the
we're on the case. No, you
55:01
don't. It just didn't. They're
waiting for some hospital to
55:05
tell you that something's wrong.
Well, that's not going to
55:07
happen.
55:08
But as we just heard, that was
one signal from vaccine safety
55:11
DataLink, which has been around
for almost 30 years. From other
55:14
studies, including data from
other countries, there was no
55:17
link found.
55:18
Other countries. This is this is
your circular recording and
55:21
reporting according to the
Uganda times we can report here
55:25
in the New York Times is
everything is okay. So we got
55:29
data from other countries and
they said fine,
55:31
30 years, but from other
studies, including data from
55:34
other countries, there was no
link found. So this is is
55:37
reassuring and should actually
give the public trust and more
55:40
faith in the FDA and the CDC to
look for any potential side
55:43
effects not only now but moving
forward.
55:45
Now, of course, the big problem
is we have all of these skeptics
55:48
out there people who are clearly
Kuna
55:52
vaccine skepticism out there. So
I have to ask you the question,
55:55
should people still get a
booster right now?
55:59
Yes, should especially people
who are high risk such as the
56:02
elderly or anyone who is
immunocompromised, and either we
56:05
need to be honest here and say
that the power of vaccines and
56:08
boosters is to prevent severe
illness and hospitalizations.
56:13
approvable provable power, it's
56:14
the power of a baby and not
56:16
just out there to prevent every
single positive test or mild
56:19
infection. It's also important
to remind people that these
56:21
Bible and vaccine are still
protective against SB 1.5, which
56:25
comes from the Omicron family
and people have any questions to
56:28
chat with their doctors and make
sure they're getting good,
56:31
trusted information?
56:33
What happened to talk to your,
your medical professional chat
56:36
with your doctor? Have a chat?
Hey, Doc, I wanna have a chat.
56:40
Who is this guy? He's really a
stooge.
56:42
That's a doctor. I love Patel.
We've we've we've excoriated him
56:47
before, but our favorite is Dr.
Jenn Ashton from ABC, ABC must
56:51
be making bank off of Pfizer, in
this case now with
56:54
Dr. Kenan, we're talking about
long COVID The long
56:57
term effects
56:58
so we've heard many, many times
since the pandemic and how many
57:02
people confirmed in this country
have had COVID 19 infection
57:06
again, estimates are that it
could be 10 times that high, who
57:09
had it never was tested never
was confirmed, long COVID as
57:14
much of an issue as those acute
infections. And now a recent
57:18
study published in the British
Medical Journal, looked at about
57:21
300,000 people in Israel
vaccinated versus unvaccinated
57:26
COVID versus
57:28
there's no unvaccinated people
in Israel. This is but on its
57:32
face is ridiculous. You could
not breathe in Israel without
57:36
having a vaccination. This is
total total crap. But you see
57:43
what's happening. But the reason
you're dying. And getting
57:47
strokes is long COVID
57:49
people who didn't have COVID and
found the incidence of long
57:52
COVID, much higher than we
thought. And this is by
57:56
definition symptoms that can
persist for weeks or more after
58:00
the initial infection,
regardless of how severe that
58:03
infection is. Very, very high
respiratory problems, brain fog,
58:08
mood disorders, difficult
musculoskeletal pain, fatigue,
58:12
it runs the gamut. And so I
think this bears repeating,
58:16
there is some evidence that
suggests that people who have
58:18
been vaccinated are at lower
risk of developing long COVID
58:23
Which of course is just one more
reason to get vaccinated cars.
58:26
But it's not just about that
acute infection, you've not
58:29
listened to her own personal
story, guys. It's something that
58:31
10s of millions of people may be
dealing with for months or even
58:35
a year or more afterwards. And
58:37
I saw the average age of this
study was 25 years old. Were
58:40
kids
58:41
included in this is that also
the case with not as much we
58:43
don't know, in the pediatric
population as well. We don't
58:46
have that same kind of data. But
you guys I was asking you in the
58:49
break if you've had COVID I've
had COVID twice the first time I
58:52
actually did have some benign a
arrhythmia that lasted for a
58:56
couple of months irregular
heartbeat after my infection. So
59:00
this is something we all need to
be on the lookout for
59:02
long COVID gives you arrhythmia.
Okay, all right. Dr. Jim,
59:06
wait, she had COVID Twice.
59:09
Yeah.
59:10
Did she ever get she was she
should have gotten vaccinated?
59:13
She did
59:13
she? Yes. This is what happens.
It's long. COVID You can't
59:17
fight? Look, she's not dead.
She's not you know what the next
59:21
next stage is? That Okay, well,
it doesn't actually prevent you
59:27
from getting sick and dying, but
you'll go to heaven. That would
59:30
be the be the obvious next
benefit of getting getting your
59:34
booster back to ABC again
59:37
to COVID. Tonight and after a
lengthy investigation. Some
59:40
reassuring news to share with
you the FDA and CDC tonight are
59:43
now revealing the results of an
investigation into the safety of
59:46
the Pfizer booster shot and any
potential stroke risk. Health
59:49
officials finding that the
updated booster does not
59:52
increase the risk of stroke and
people 65 and older. The
59:55
investigation began after data
raised concerns about a possible
59:58
risk. They remain convinced
Pfizer booster is safe and
1:00:01
effective. They say no change to
current recommendations.
1:00:04
Now I am willing to accept that.
That the by valen booster does
1:00:09
not kill people or give them
strokes over 65. The people
1:00:13
we're seeing are under 30. This
is not discussed anywhere. Oh 65
1:00:19
Nothing wrong here. No signals.
We're seeing young people we're
1:00:23
seeing Yeah.
1:00:26
For the concerned man, men
1:00:27
men, let's go to some breaking
news, Fox News alert at the CDC
1:00:31
investigates
1:00:32
a possible link between Pfizer's
COVID 19 vaccine and an
1:00:35
increased risk of strokes. The
agency says the safety concern
1:00:39
is limited to people 65 and
older. Here to explain Fox News
1:00:43
Medical contributor Dr. Jeanette
national, well,
1:00:45
they actually positioned it that
way. Strokes people stroking out
1:00:49
65 Not a problem,
1:00:51
Doc, you know, this kind of
scares me. Can you put it into
1:00:56
detail? You know, I know. They
said it's only 65 and above but
1:01:00
all of us that took the vaccine
that were supportive of the
1:01:02
vaccine, should we be concerned?
1:01:06
No, I don't think you should be
concerned. I think we should all
1:01:09
just This is Fox. I love it.
1:01:10
Be aware know your risk.
1:01:12
This is just a safety sneak
signal. What does that mean? The
1:01:15
CDC has programs in place to
track and to figure out, Okay,
1:01:20
how many people are suffering
from a certain condition after
1:01:23
they receive the vaccine,
1:01:24
the certain condition is a
stroke. They're not reporting
1:01:26
that and what they
1:01:27
found here was at a 550,000
Seniors those 65 and older
1:01:33
within 21 days of receiving a
booster Pfizer vaccine, not
1:01:38
Maderna. But the Pfizer booster
the new one.
1:01:40
This is what's interesting that
they're really starting to
1:01:43
hammer that this is this is
Pfizer, not Maderna,
1:01:49
which makes it sound like a
promotion.
1:01:51
Well, interesting. You say that?
Because something very
1:01:56
interesting is happening at this
very moment we go to
1:02:00
P b s cancer deaths in the
United States have dropped.
1:02:04
This is the wrong one. Yeah,
this is the one I meant. Here we
1:02:07
go. PBS
1:02:08
ever since COVID. Vaccines first
became available in the United
1:02:11
States, the Federal Government
has been buying them from
1:02:14
manufacturers and distributing
them from free. But that was
1:02:17
never intended to be permanent.
And soon they'll be distributed
1:02:20
by the manufacturers at prices
they set. The government was
1:02:25
paying $26 a dose for modern has
updated boosters. But Maderna
1:02:30
and Pfizer have both said
they're considering a range of
1:02:33
$110 to $130 a dose on the open
market. Why the jump? And what
1:02:39
does this mean for the future of
vaccine cost as new variants
1:02:43
emerge, especially for those
without insurance? Jennifer
1:02:47
Cates is Senior Vice President
and Director of Global Health at
1:02:51
K FF, the Kaiser Family
Foundation. Jennifer first let's
1:02:55
be clear
1:02:55
that the Kaiser Family
Foundation, the very people who
1:02:58
said don't worry about it VSD
the one thing we maintained all
1:03:01
say Family Foundation Oh signal
Jennifer, first, let's
1:03:04
be clear that $110 to $130
range. What do those numbers
1:03:10
represent? A rip off
1:03:12
what we think they represent
what the manufacturers have said
1:03:15
they might charge when the
vaccines are in the commercial
1:03:18
market, they could end up
charging more. But this is
1:03:21
before Jack. And essentially
that would be the price per dose
1:03:24
about four or close to five
times what the federal
1:03:27
government paid even at the high
end. Who would they be charging
1:03:30
that too? Right. So good.
There's good news and bad news
1:03:33
here. The good news is that for
most people with public or
1:03:36
private insurance, we will not
be paying for those vaccines, we
1:03:39
are protected against costs.
It's the buyers, the insurers
1:03:43
who are the purchasers who are
going to be paying that and it
1:03:47
is possible that will have a
trickle down effect on premiums,
1:03:50
and certainly will increase
costs for this healthcare system
1:03:53
for individuals who
1:03:54
say healthcare system
1:03:58
that will have a trickle down
effect on premiums, and
1:04:01
certainly will increase costs
for this healthcare system. For
1:04:04
individuals, mostly most
individuals with insurance will
1:04:07
be okay.
1:04:07
Yeah, no, you're not going to be
okay. It's gonna raise
1:04:10
everybody's rates. This this
might be related. This is a
1:04:14
little more backstory to it.
1:04:16
So why this increase? Why go
from charging the government $26
1:04:21
to this big increase?
1:04:22
So if we think back to 2020,
when COVID first was emerging
1:04:28
and becoming a huge emergency,
there were no vaccines. And the
1:04:31
government made a bet that if it
purchased vaccines and advanced
1:04:35
candidates that weren't even
authorized yet, and helped fund
1:04:38
the research that one of those
candidates would be good enough.
1:04:41
And in fact, we had more than
one, and the government
1:04:44
continued to buy in bulk. And by
doing so the federal government
1:04:48
basically was saying to the
manufacturers, we're taking care
1:04:51
of your risk here. We're buying
these from you to distribute so
1:04:54
you don't have that risk of
losing money in the marketplace.
1:04:58
Now that we're going into a
commercialized environment, it's
1:05:02
the market. And these
manufacturers are trying to
1:05:04
assess who's going to want my
vaccine. What are they? What's
1:05:07
it going to be worth to them? Is
there going to be demand? And
1:05:10
they're just they're going to
try to make some profit. That's
1:05:12
not how it worked before.
1:05:13
So could it be possible that we
have a two warring factions
1:05:18
fizer versus Maderna. And
Maderna saying, Hey, man, their
1:05:23
stuff sucks, man, just gonna
kill you, bro. And this is
1:05:27
coming right around the time
when advertising will be cranked
1:05:30
up massively
1:05:32
reminding me of the Boeing
Airbus wars from some years back
1:05:37
in the early part of the show.
Yeah, there's a couple of things
1:05:40
at play here. It looks like
1:05:41
two more clips if you after you
say whatever you got to
1:05:44
well, that I think there's an
element there. But there's also
1:05:46
kind of a sub sub text messaging
going on about about the value
1:05:53
of an NH s or the French
healthcare says something is,
1:05:58
the government gets a better
deal, you know, because they put
1:06:02
us off it was we had government
if we had true health care,
1:06:06
government sponsored one pay
single payer health care, we
1:06:10
wouldn't have these profit
tears, because everybody in the
1:06:13
back of their minds knows that
both Pfizer and Maderna had a
1:06:17
huge profits from the 10 and $20
shots that they were selling to
1:06:21
the government, huge eight, I
think one of them 18 billion
1:06:25
other ones and 30 or something
like that huge profit. So so the
1:06:29
idea that they need to do this
to make a profit is bullcrap.
1:06:33
But just continue, is there
1:06:34
any way the government can
create a safety net here?
1:06:37
So it's interesting, the Biden
administration did come out with
1:06:40
a proposal to do that, in their
budget request, they basically
1:06:43
said, look, there's a problem.
The uninsured in the United
1:06:46
States, adults don't get
guaranteed access to any vaccine
1:06:50
that's recommended, whether it's
flu or COVID. And we want to
1:06:53
change that let's create a
program called a vaccines for
1:06:56
adults program modeled after a
really successful one that's for
1:06:59
kids. Well, Congress didn't bite
on that. And so there is no
1:07:03
program. I think the question
is, Will Congress at some point
1:07:07
appropriate additional funds, so
that that could that could
1:07:10
happen, at least for COVID? That
hasn't happened yet.
1:07:15
Just harkening back to the
raising of the debt limit. If
1:07:18
you raise the debt limit by $3
trillion, isn't that by
1:07:21
definition, once again,
inflationary? We're only when we
1:07:25
use it. I don't know. Okay,
final one from this. This PBS
1:07:31
Weekend Report.
1:07:32
Are there potential public
health implications from this?
1:07:36
There certainly are. I mean, for
all of the noise around the
1:07:39
vaccines, what we know about
these vaccines is
1:07:41
noise, noise, noise, concern
noise, it's noise, people just
1:07:47
noise they work
1:07:48
really well to prevent people
from getting sick, and hospital.
1:07:52
How well, really well really
1:07:55
well about these vaccines is a
they work really well to prevent
1:07:59
getting sick, and hospitalized
and even dying. If they get
1:08:03
COVID. You certainly don't want
people who are uninsured
1:08:05
or even dying. If they get COPD,
wait a minute, to get
1:08:09
sicker just because they can't
afford this. B even though the
1:08:12
vaccines do not 100% prevent
transmission. They don't
1:08:15
like 0% to reduce. They reduce
it, I'm sorry, they do reduce it
1:08:21
100% prevent transmission, they
do reduce it. And we know that
1:08:25
if you give people a vaccine,
they're going to be less likely
1:08:28
to be infectious, they're going
to be less likely to transmit to
1:08:30
everyone's you this
1:08:33
Jennifer Cates of KF F to Kaiser
Family Foundation. Thank you
1:08:36
very much.
1:08:38
Hello, Kaiser Family Kaiser
family right there to give you
1:08:41
the signal or no signal. Now we
have to wrap this up with with
1:08:46
our boy Osterholm. Who's doing
podcasts
1:08:50
I'd also like to ask you about
the conspiracy theory that has
1:08:53
been floating around on social
media following the incident
1:08:56
involving Demar. Hamlin, the
buffalo basketball player who
1:08:59
went into cardiac arrest during
a game against the Cincinnati
1:09:02
Bengals. This theory suggests
that the COVID-19 vaccines
1:09:05
played a role. There's been
similar speculation about the
1:09:08
death of soccer journalist grant
wall. Now, we don't want to give
1:09:12
this theory more oxygen than we
need to. But the reality is,
1:09:16
it's out there. And it's part of
a familiar pattern we've been
1:09:19
seeing since vaccines became
available. What's your response?
1:09:23
What say you?
1:09:24
Let me be really clear, there
are a number of people who have
1:09:26
alleged that grant actually died
from COVID or something to do
1:09:29
with COVID vaccination and that
in a sense, implying that Selene
1:09:34
must have something to do with
this all because she's such a
1:09:37
pro COVID vaccine scientist is
absolutely not true. The rumors,
1:09:43
disinformation and almost
terroristic comments have no
1:09:46
validity whatsoever in this
tragedy. Grant died from aortic
1:09:50
aneurysm confirmed by autopsy
here in the United States in an
1:09:54
unembodied body meaning that
they made every effort to get
1:09:57
every piece of information they
could so this one I'm put to
1:10:00
rest has nothing to do with
COVID.
1:10:03
Is this published it? Did this
family put out the autopsy
1:10:08
cremation No. Well, let's talk
about Hamlet. But let me I'm
1:10:12
sorry.
1:10:13
Wait, assume they did.
1:10:16
So let me move now to Mr.
Hamlin. Now he suffered a blow
1:10:20
to his chest, which has been
known in other activities to
1:10:23
actually cause the kind of
cardiac corrosivity experience.
1:10:26
Yeah, right
1:10:27
away.
1:10:28
There were those disinformation,
almost evil people out there.
1:10:32
That would be Austrian
disinformation, almost, we're
1:10:35
not quite
1:10:36
all we do is just play these
clips where we get Wow, we
1:10:39
evil because we're
disinformation is
1:10:41
those different for me in that
clip nation, almost evil people
1:10:46
out there that aha, this had to
be COVID related myocarditis
1:10:50
associated with a vaccine
myocarditis being an
1:10:53
inflammation of the heart
muscle. All I can tell you at
1:10:56
this point, there are no data,
none nothing that would support
1:11:00
that COVID vaccination or COVID
infection even had anything to
1:11:04
do with this particular event.
1:11:07
Even COVID infection could have
nothing to do with this event.
1:11:10
This is great.
1:11:11
And
1:11:12
I found that to be a botch.
1:11:14
I think it's a botch to do even
though the no disinformation is
1:11:18
almost evil people said, Hey,
man, maybe it's because of COVID
1:11:22
piece, just throwing that out.
And that's a mistake, because he
1:11:25
has to make sure that long COVID
Long COVID is on deck for the
1:11:29
blame. And long COVID is
probably because you waited too
1:11:33
long to get your booster COVID
vaccination
1:11:35
or COVID infection even had
anything to do with this
1:11:38
particular event. And it does
nothing to promote anything
1:11:44
about the truth just to continue
to say that and to cause this
1:11:47
kind of fear and panic about the
vaccine. So I hope no one no one
1:11:53
will avert getting the vaccine,
who should, as we've talked so
1:11:56
many times before about who
those people are based on this
1:11:59
case alone. And while I don't
believe whether it be grants
1:12:03
case, or whether it be you know,
Mr. Hammonds case, we're going
1:12:08
to see those people change what
their messaging is, but we in
1:12:13
the public should not stand for
that. We can't stand for that.
1:12:16
Put it down every time you see
it. Don't be afraid to put it
1:12:19
down. It's what we should do.
And and as part of this podcast
1:12:24
family, this is how we take care
of each other. Put that
1:12:27
information down. I don't know.
But
1:12:29
I want to be a podcast family
too.
1:12:31
I don't want to podcast family
so I can just kind of Puck, I
1:12:34
don't know, if he's gonna be
bitching and moaning like that.
1:12:36
I want to play that clip that
came out that everyone sent
1:12:40
copies around. Of the BBC cardi
are the cardiac ologists. That
1:12:45
was allowed on BBC. I have it. I
don't know how old this clip is.
1:12:49
But it's not very old. Yeah.
1:12:52
I have it right here.
1:12:53
Yeah, I have it too.
1:12:55
Oh, that's why I have it.
1:12:58
This guy comes on the BBC, and
they let them go. I made this
1:13:03
was shocking to everybody. Like
why did they cut this guy off?
1:13:06
Are you given that? Right? I
can't hear you anymore. What's
1:13:09
your all time favorite? Check.
Breaking up.
1:13:13
Okay, on top of that request. So
one of the reasons I think this
1:13:15
has come into the news just now
is obviously there's been a big
1:13:18
concern. Recently around excess
deaths. Now the British Heart
1:13:22
Foundation have said certainly
during the pandemic, or since
1:13:25
the pandemic there's been 30,000
excess deaths specifically due
1:13:29
to coronary artery disease.
That's my area of expertise. And
1:13:32
they're trying to figure out
what's causing it. Analysis I've
1:13:34
done even call Hennigan the
Director of Central evidence
1:13:36
based medicine Oxford, suggests
that statin pills prescription
1:13:40
hasn't reduced in the pandemic.
So it's unlikely to be a cause.
1:13:44
But what is almost certainly, if
you allow me to say this a
1:13:47
request of what I have my own
research has found is that the
1:13:50
COVID mRNA vaccines do carry a
cardiovascular risk. And I've
1:13:55
actually called for the
suspension of this pending an
1:13:58
inquiry because there's a lot of
uncertainty at the moment about
1:14:00
what's causing the excess
deaths. Some of it will be
1:14:02
ambulance delays. My own father,
it was reported on BBC News in
1:14:06
late 2021. I was the first to
actually highlight the ambulance
1:14:10
delays because my own father
suffered a cardiac arrest at
1:14:12
home, and the ambulance took 30
minutes. And when his post
1:14:15
mortem came out, he had very
severe coronary artery disease,
1:14:18
which is unexplainable. I then
published in a peer reviewed
1:14:20
journal, they accepted my
findings that the likely cause
1:14:23
of his death was two doses of
the Pfizer mRNA vaccine he had
1:14:27
six months earlier.
1:14:28
So what you're saying in terms
of the mRNA link to cardio
1:14:32
versus vascular risk is that
that is a proven it's been
1:14:36
proven medically has it
scientifically? Yeah,
1:14:39
yeah. So the question is, so in
medicine, you know, in any
1:14:42
research that we do, it's very
difficult to always be
1:14:44
absolutely conclusive. So we go
on like, and there are lots of
1:14:48
data now, the original trials of
Pfizer, Maderna, with mRNA
1:14:52
vaccines showed and I just want
to put this in absolute terms.
1:14:54
We don't scare people
unnecessarily, but the absolute
1:14:57
risks of serious adverse events
was at least one in 100. threat.
1:15:00
And a lot of those are
cardiovascular and then it will
1:15:04
you will more likely in those
trials to suffer a serious
1:15:06
adverse event than to be
hospitalized early on, we should
1:15:09
be reassured that Omicron. And
what's circulating is really no
1:15:12
worse than the flu. And this is
really time to pause the vaccine
1:15:16
rollout and to really
investigate this properly. Yeah,
1:15:18
okay,
1:15:18
we have to get you get you off.
There's no good. One of the most
1:15:24
so so the point is, why is
bitching about us a question?
1:15:28
Why do you keep rattling your
mic? When you start talking? I
1:15:31
haven't heard that. Or you keep
doing this every single time.
1:15:36
Something's loose. Oh, okay.
1:15:37
Mommy can tighten it tighten up
man. Need to be tight? Yeah,
1:15:43
it's very readily, very readily.
So one of the most emailed clips
1:15:48
over the past week has been this
spoof called the Institute of
1:15:53
coincidences. And people will
email that to me without the
1:15:57
title, like, you'll love this.
And I wanted to say, I don't
1:16:03
love it. And I want to remind
everybody that more and more
1:16:07
people are realizing that Ooh,
maybe this is not such a good
1:16:11
idea. I think people there's,
I'm sure there's people
1:16:14
listening to this show, but
like, oh, man, what's gonna
1:16:17
happen to me? Please, when so do
not do this, except ever don't
1:16:22
go knee. I'm unleaded. I'm pure
black. No, be nice to people,
1:16:29
approach them with compassion
and love and understanding and
1:16:33
empathy. Don't do that. That
because everyone has tried to
1:16:39
murder all of us. And I mean
that sincerely. So think about
1:16:45
that. Just be be a little
compassionate. Now when it comes
1:16:50
to Australia, I have no
compassion. They're crazy.
1:16:52
Australia is putting a world
first vaccine to the test human
1:16:56
trials getting underway for a
three in one jab. against common
1:17:01
and deadly respiratory
illnesses. The Super shots could
1:17:04
save time and money per shot
pressure on our health system,
1:17:09
combating a triple threat with
one single job,
1:17:12
you could go to the doctor and
get one vaccine that essentially
1:17:16
covers you for influenza COVID
and RSV poster going back
1:17:19
several times in that same year,
that will be helpful,
1:17:22
and it could be closer than we
think the University of the
1:17:25
Sunshine Coast start in clinical
trials of a new Maderna vaccine
1:17:30
for the aim of this trial really
is to see whether a combination
1:17:33
vaccine that includes all three
would be as tolerable as giving
1:17:38
someone each vaccine separately
1:17:42
COVID, RSD, and influenza A
triple barrel shot posing a
1:17:46
major shake up to Australia's
annual Well, helping to ease the
1:17:51
burden on an overloaded system
1:17:53
one visit one vaccination,
possibly a booster as opposed to
1:18:00
potentially three visits three
boosters and I just think that
1:18:03
will take a big load off our
current health system.
1:18:06
It can take several years to
collate enough data before the
1:18:11
vaccine can be rolled out
safely. Researchers here and now
1:18:15
looking to expand their pool of
participants
1:18:17
and are calling for more
volunteers. We're looking for
1:18:21
people who are generally in good
health between 50 and 75. And
1:18:26
they can be male or female.
1:18:27
I'm quite proud to say that in
the years to come If the
1:18:31
sexiness developed that tiny
tiny part and its development.
1:18:36
Wow man. I love that super shot.
triple barrel. I'm seeing a lot
1:18:42
of trolls and the troll room
saying no way no compassion
1:18:45
screw. This is this is exactly
this is the result they want.
1:18:49
This is what they want be
divided and we can do that
1:18:52
forever and it's gonna benefit
nobody. You're stupid. It's not
1:18:57
it's not. It's not okay. Yes,
they wanted you dead. Yes. They
1:19:02
hated you sure they did. The
mind control is so silly. The
1:19:08
vaccinated who Oh, come on,
John, the vaccinated. It was the
1:19:11
pandemic of the unvaccinated.
They're killing us. Jimmy Kimmel
1:19:15
said you know a guy who was
unvaccinated got a heart attack
1:19:18
die. No, no, no show you're
stronger than that. It will make
1:19:23
us all stronger against the very
people who are trying to kill
1:19:26
all of us. All of us to reach
our schwob Reach out to your
1:19:30
brothers and sisters. Gosh, that
is so crazy. So crazy. All
1:19:37
right, do whatever do it.
1:19:38
You're gonna play almost play a
clip that I have a copy of but I
1:19:41
sweetened my version. Oh, let's
play it. What do you what is?
1:19:45
This is the cancer clip. Oh,
yeah, okay.
1:19:49
I will not play mine. Yours will
be much better
1:19:52
cancer deaths in the United
States have dropped 33% In the
1:19:57
last three decades, that's
according to a new A report from
1:20:00
the American Cancer Society.
Among the reports highlights
1:20:03
cervical cancer rates dropped
65% for women in their early
1:20:08
20s. In part thanks to the HPV
vaccine, I think not. But there
1:20:12
are troubling signs as well.
advanced prostate cancer
1:20:16
diagnoses have risen roughly
four and a half percent annually
1:20:19
since 2011. For a closer look,
I'm joined by Karen Knutson, CEO
1:20:24
of the American Cancer Society.
Karen, thank you so much for
1:20:28
joining us. Let's just start
with that good news, a 33% drop
1:20:35
in cancer deaths since 1991.
That translates to an estimated
1:20:39
3.8 million deaths averted. How
did we get there? That's exactly
1:20:44
right. So 1991 was a high
watermark in this country when
1:20:48
we peaked of our cancer for
cancer death rates in the US. So
1:20:53
since that time, the investments
in cancer research by the
1:20:57
American Cancer Society, the
government and other entities
1:21:00
has really borne fruit in giving
us a new strategies for cancer
1:21:04
prevention, for early detection,
which we know is critical for
1:21:08
improved outcome, as well as new
treatments and in some cases
1:21:12
cure for the 200 diseases that
we call cancer.
1:21:15
So we have better screening.
Now. There's fewer smokers out
1:21:18
there as well. But I do want to
highlight that specific 65% Drop
1:21:22
in cervical cancer rates that's
for women in their early 20s. We
1:21:25
know that cancer kills some 4000
women every year, how much of
1:21:30
that decline do you attribute
just to that vaccine?
1:21:32
We see a significant
relationship between vaccination
1:21:35
for HPV and that decline because
it's specific to that group of
1:21:39
women that precipitous decline
in cervical cancer incidents.
1:21:44
Adopted there because it became
a promotion. Yes. For the HPV
1:21:49
vaccine for the next 10 minutes.
That's all they talked about.
1:21:53
Well, yeah, yes. Did they also
talk about boys getting the HPV
1:21:58
shot?
1:21:58
No, they actually they. That's
odd. I found it odd to they just
1:22:03
really were pounding home, the
1:22:07
HPV, and we were we were all
4000
1:22:10
Out of what 300 million people?
Yeah, I mean, it's not as
1:22:15
consequential but there's more
people on the various database
1:22:19
after getting the mRNA vaccine
than 4000 that died.
1:22:24
So we were all over this
Gardasil de Word as they were
1:22:31
promoting this in dorm rooms
hanging little sad, little,
1:22:35
little, little goodie bags on
the doors of college dorm dorm
1:22:39
rooms, and if I recall, of the,
I'm just I'm just, I'm just
1:22:44
throwing out numbers, I think it
was of the 12 different
1:22:47
different types of HPV. This
only really stopped three. It
1:22:55
was very painful. You needed to,
I don't think was covered by
1:22:59
insurance at the time was very
expensive. $300 either total,
1:23:03
or, or one. And, and if you also
remember, there were a lot of
1:23:12
adverse reactions. tell you
there were girls who were
1:23:16
walking back walking backwards?
Yeah. The walking backwards was
1:23:20
the best. They had the tics and
all kinds of and parents. I
1:23:25
mean, it just comes and goes.
They report on it. Move on.
1:23:30
Nothing to see here.
1:23:33
But the fact that this was
triggered by the number 33
1:23:37
twice, Oh, yeah. Yeah, no, I
hear that in the report. I'm
1:23:39
thinking well, there's something
amiss. You're kind
1:23:41
of kind of done there. Yeah, I
agree. Okay, are we done with
1:23:47
the let me see, are we done with
Big Pharma for today? Oh, wait,
1:23:52
wait, no Big Pharma has one
other things. Now, it's not
1:23:56
worth it. To play that. board
with pharma. What else can we
1:24:01
yell about?
1:24:02
Why do we have China in the
COVID? In China update? We
1:24:05
should mostly get data. Oh,
yeah,
1:24:06
of course, if you have that. He
would go.
1:24:09
A top epidemiologist in China is
warning that rampid COVID 19
1:24:13
infections may not subside for
two to three months. Instead he
1:24:17
says the virus will spread from
cities into the countryside as
1:24:20
millions of people travel home
for Lunar New Year celebrations.
1:24:24
That raises new fears. Many of
China's rural communities cannot
1:24:29
cope with major medical
emergencies.
1:24:31
Isn't this exactly the same?
Dare I say it playbook as 2019?
1:24:36
Yeah, but they in 2018 They cut
the travel off. Right but
1:24:41
right okay. But they stuck they
ended up I think they first
1:24:44
they'd let them go for the
Chinese Lunar New Year. No, no,
1:24:46
no, they cut them off. I thought
they'd let him go. No, no would
1:24:51
have been a mess. The and this
is like now they either get the
1:24:55
other analysis I've heard is
that this is this is all Omicron
1:24:58
is not going to be you know
There's going to be something
1:25:01
like 80% of the whole population
has got tests positive it's just
1:25:05
like it's out of control. But
it's just it's not killing that
1:25:10
that man. I mean, they're
killing booty a billion point
1:25:12
for 1.4 billion people. There's
a lot of people we're going to
1:25:14
be dead. details details. They
have to they've put a stop to
1:25:20
the lock downs and that's what
matters. Yeah. Hmm.
1:25:27
Well, Oh, this one last thing.
You I saw that you signed up for
1:25:32
the super secret Mastodon
instance.
1:25:35
Yeah, I did. Pretty cool, right.
Well, what it does it is a super
1:25:40
secret Mastodon instance. And
exactly what so in other words,
1:25:44
so it's unknown. And so it's not
blocked.
1:25:48
Wow, this is one or one or two
found it's blocked. It's curry
1:25:51
blocking.
1:25:53
Why did they How did they figure
that out?
1:25:55
I don't know. It's fashion
adjacent man. I don't know. They
1:26:00
figured it out.
1:26:02
Well, that stinks. You got to
create a whole new it's no,
1:26:05
no, no, it's just it's believe
me. It's an unknown instance.
1:26:08
You're good. And you went to the
federated timeline, because I've
1:26:11
carefully curated all of these
former Twitter people I would
1:26:17
say mainly,
1:26:19
yeah, a bunch of journalists and
other AI holes like Robert Reich
1:26:23
over there at Cal
1:26:24
Yeah, he's Yeah, he's on there a
lot.
1:26:28
And they're all and melodica
Macedon dot social which I
1:26:32
thought was interesting. Which
and that whole group on Macedon
1:26:38
dot social which have blocked no
agenda. They're a bunch of
1:26:42
Nazis, but they're in the guise
of communists. It's
1:26:47
unbelievable. They are shameful
all of them as great. Well, it's
1:26:53
kind of frightening. Kept me up
a little too late. Thanks for
1:26:58
that. Shrek that both of us pull
on each other rarely, I don't do
1:27:03
it much. But he did it. He says
to me this link at about 11 at
1:27:08
night. I'm gonna go to bed in an
hour. And it's this crazy
1:27:12
instance where I go in there
just to check it out. And oh my
1:27:16
god. It's like a goldmine of
creeps. And so all journalists
1:27:21
going well, you know, Trump
sucks. They're still on Trump.
1:27:24
Is there a problem? Did
1:27:25
you see Jeff Jarvis because he
he's he's the he's the master.
1:27:30
He boosts everybody. So if
you're looking for someone to
1:27:32
follow Oh, yeah, no,
1:27:33
you follow Jeff Jarvis, you get
all you get connected to all the
1:27:37
douchebags. So I don't know if
boosts everything. I don't know
1:27:41
if you saw Lena when
1:27:44
I did not catch Lena. Wait, no,
no, she's not not a Muslim. But
1:27:46
she wrote an op ed in the
Washington Post, and bring this
1:27:51
up here. And I found that I had
had not heard of this article.
1:27:55
Luckily, Jeff Jarvis had tweeted
it. And it's we are over
1:27:59
counting COVID deaths and
hospitals, the hospitals,
1:28:02
hospitalization, that's a
problem.
1:28:04
Yeah. Now this is I read this
already, that this piece, which
1:28:09
is like contrary to everything
that's been going on for two
1:28:12
years, claims that they're over,
claims what we claimed over a
1:28:16
year ago, and when the Canadian
guy who is investigating the
1:28:19
Canadian COVID debts, if you
remember that clip, of some guys
1:28:23
going around looking at each and
every COVID death and found that
1:28:27
about 20% of them were actually
from COVID and 80%. Were from
1:28:31
car accidents. So they just
happen to have something else
1:28:34
going on. They're in a hospital,
they died. But they tested
1:28:37
positive and some people were
being actually tested after they
1:28:40
died, even though they weren't
in the hospital for COVID. And
1:28:44
so that was a we've always
assumed they were over
1:28:46
reporting. But all during that
period, and Lena Wen was one of
1:28:50
these people all during that
period. They kept saying the
1:28:53
same words over and over. We
probably could document this
1:28:56
with clips, which was wow, we
think they're probably being
1:28:59
under reported. The numbers
probably low Fauci used to say
1:29:03
that all the time, they now
1:29:06
know much worse, it's much
worse.
1:29:09
It's much worse than that
reporting.
1:29:13
So what was nice about this is
that Jeff Jarvis had something
1:29:17
to say. And Jeff Jarvis by the
way, the bigoted racist, he's a
1:29:22
bigoted racist. Jeff Jarvis has
said this. I don't and I'd have
1:29:30
to do a Jeff Jarvis voice of
thaw. I don't understand. Well,
1:29:35
he's, you're way off here. Can
you pitch guy would it be
1:29:39
better?
1:29:40
I don't understand what happened
to when she's been blank. Let's
1:29:45
not do it. That's better. I'll
do
1:29:48
a little if you could try to
hold that. Well, I don't think
1:29:50
you can do it.
1:29:51
I'm not gonna do it. It triggers
Tina is she doesn't like that
1:29:55
voice. I don't understand
1:29:57
why that's that robot. That
voice is to do about the
1:30:02
firewall, the firewall is
1:30:05
very triggering. I don't
understand what happened to when
1:30:09
she has been playing into the
far rights anti science
1:30:12
campaigns with this pandemic and
the post is helping her. Now
1:30:17
let's read a couple of follow
ups. Matt chambers I don't know
1:30:21
who that is. She's terrible.
Ignore her. Sam Adams federated
1:30:30
dot press, people who believe
this don't know how to read a
1:30:33
death certificate. I've covered
this extensively. The right
1:30:39
claims COVID is not a factor in
death of people who are already
1:30:42
sick when it absolutely is. Many
could have lived years longer if
1:30:46
it were not for COVID. They're
trying to say if a person dies
1:30:50
in a car crash and as COVID
authorities claimed COVID killed
1:30:53
them, which is absolutely false.
I can't figure out what
1:30:56
Republicans think they gain from
this disinformation so now Lena
1:31:00
win is just like a drink Glenn
Greenwald and Matt Taibbi are
1:31:05
now right wing there and far
right
1:31:07
she's about it. She's a lefty
oh, these people turn on
1:31:11
themselves so quickly. This is
the big gripe that bowtie EB and
1:31:15
Greenwald have with the left
because they're extremely left
1:31:19
wing Greenwald in particular is
is a socialist let's try and and
1:31:24
they would try it you know, they
got kicked off all the platforms
1:31:27
because they they questioned
this Russia gate thing and there
1:31:31
was no verboten.
1:31:33
So a doctor who was heralded for
her pin out, we think she's a
1:31:39
shill but heralded for her
heroics during the Boston
1:31:43
Marathon bombing. Who was the
who was running the I think the
1:31:48
Massachusetts US health system
you know, she she was heralded
1:31:54
as fantastic. And you're right
on a dime and Roper Mm hmm. What
1:32:02
do hashtag Republicans gained
from hashtag COVID lies poor
1:32:06
people die so they won't vote
for hashtag Democrats which gave
1:32:09
a hashtag Maga hashtag GOP boost
in the next elections. Ditto for
1:32:13
the older voters who remember
hashtag social democracy ethos
1:32:17
have ye old hashtag USA and
hashtag reps wants to Nick
1:32:22
Social Security welfare payments
Medicare iterations hashtag
1:32:25
gerrymander replace of dead and
threatened voters money diverted
1:32:29
to hashtag Republicans including
private health care rather than
1:32:32
publicly funded hashtag COVID
vaccines and care now and then
1:32:37
Jeff Jarvis
1:32:38
eggs hashtag city now Jeff
Jarvis
1:32:41
answers her. They are
institutional insurrectionists
1:32:47
burning down every institution
of society voting democracy
1:32:52
science education so as not to
share them with those who follow
1:32:59
die denounced Jeff Jarvis says a
human being Wow What an idiot.
1:33:04
Wait, the trouble with me Jeff
job at Jeff Jarvis. I've got to
1:33:08
admit I'm quite shocked by this.
What's happening to your papers
1:33:12
of record over there? Hi, notice
the times is higher David French
1:33:15
recently seemingly Barry Weiss
wasn't right wing enough. This
1:33:22
is this is crazy
1:33:24
is the media and then this the
entire media Jeff Jarvis is a
1:33:28
professor of Media. He was just
he's promoting it.
1:33:33
He's He's they now have a a
scholarship for Macedon at his
1:33:40
university or college or
community college wherever he
1:33:43
works.
1:33:44
I think he's at NYU back. So
1:33:47
wait, let me read the last one.
So then there's,
1:33:49
by the way, the reason I chose
interferon I think this is
1:33:53
replacing my much missed reading
from Facebook. Yeah. But you
1:34:00
bailed on?
1:34:02
I have an actual reading. Well,
I don't have Facebook. We bailed
1:34:07
on Facebook. Six years ago,
almost. At Jeff Jarvis, I can't
1:34:13
read this article due to pay
wall. But hasn't this been her
1:34:16
mo for a long time now the hero
of the Boston Marathon bombing
1:34:23
which was very big for him over
a long time.
1:34:26
So he answers yes. And I don't
want to waste a gift link on her
1:34:32
as I'm sure you'd appreciate. So
he won't give away one of his
1:34:37
gift links so that this person
can read this horrible
1:34:41
Republican leader when you know
when the Republican well, and
1:34:48
walk out was giving her a
platform. So now watch. Now WaPo
1:34:53
is under fire. Isn't that
interesting? So even their paper
1:35:00
Record, The Washington Post.
I've kind of a Facebook thing
1:35:06
for you. I got this email. Now,
did we? We covered the Biden in
1:35:12
Mexico. On the last show.
1:35:15
Did we know a little bit? Yeah.
Well, we'll
1:35:17
do we not covered the agreement
they made? Yeah, you did. Did I
1:35:21
not read them verbatim?
1:35:22
I don't remember. Yeah. Read the
DNA. Read it again. I will
1:35:26
remember.
1:35:26
No, it was all about irregular
immigration. And then we and you
1:35:31
had to refer back to the law. So
there's a green element. And
1:35:33
then we had always all of it and
we had to go back to the Los
1:35:36
Angeles Dec Declaration, which
is all those countries that said
1:35:39
yes, yes, we've got to
streamline irregular
1:35:42
immigration, which is the
wishes, Newspeak for illegal
1:35:47
entry into the country.
1:35:49
Which, right, we did discuss
that. So here's
1:35:53
the email I get. Subject, your
coverage or lack of the ongoing
1:36:02
invasion of the southern border.
Sir, your shows failure to
1:36:08
address the border crisis. And
the US media slant towards
1:36:11
opening borders is puzzling.
Mass immigration is the only
1:36:19
issue that matters, not bugs as
food, not COVID or Vax fears or
1:36:23
whatever topic, you and your co
host obsess over. The
1:36:29
demographic replacement
occurring on an unprecedented
1:36:32
scale will make many other
issues irrelevant. I understand
1:36:37
you are no agenda, but to bury
other any word or comment about
1:36:41
Biden's trip to El Paso and the
white washing that occurred
1:36:45
there prior to his visit. And
the media silence on that issue
1:36:48
is interesting. If you are pro
mass immigration, just come out
1:36:54
and say it. Mike Wilkins,
1:36:58
you might want to trade a little
more comic book guy into that
1:37:02
voice. And you'd nail it. The
problem
1:37:05
is, so this comes in and and
Tina says What are you doing?
1:37:10
And I'm like, I'm typing. I'm
typing email to this guy. I hate
1:37:14
him. She's laughing So yeah, you
got to Calm down son. Because
1:37:20
this guy he doesn't this is I
think this is probably just
1:37:23
someone who doesn't listen or
doesn't hear. We literally
1:37:27
discussed the irregular
immigration. That's the that's
1:37:30
the only thing we discussed
almost on that topic. Yeah, but
1:37:33
he wants the outrage. You see,
people want to hear that.
1:37:37
We don't deliver we don't
deliver outrage. And I believe
1:37:40
that that's probably I mean, I
don't we're not here to deliver
1:37:45
outrageous plenty of people
doing that. Yeah. And you all we
1:37:49
did? Go people should go read
the mission statement at no
1:37:54
agenda show.net. And understand
what we do. We don't we're not
1:37:59
here to be outraged over any of
this. We're here to laugh at
1:38:02
most of it. It's kind of funny,
and pretty much to be to be
1:38:08
outraged is ludicrous, at least
to us. I mean, I get irked about
1:38:13
media coverage, and sometimes
I'll have a little annoyance in
1:38:17
my voice, but outrageous, not
healthy.
1:38:21
No, and people get stuck in that
and then they're outraged over
1:38:26
the over really very minor
things on a grand scale. grand
1:38:30
scale of things outrageous. And
just things that okay, whatever.
1:38:35
Yeah. Are you surprised? Are you
surprised that your Government
1:38:38
wants you dead? Am you surprised
what is the surprise here? Let's
1:38:41
have a good laugh and keep our
keep our heads clear. So we can
1:38:46
you know be aware of what's
going on
1:38:48
to make decisions that are
appropriate
1:38:50
but I guess this is my problem
with most podcasts that that do
1:38:56
anything kind of like we do and
that includes bond Gino and
1:39:00
everybody all these people.
Okay, I got it. It's an outrage.
1:39:05
But let's go and let's look at
some documents and see if we can
1:39:07
figure out what's going on.
Let's laugh at the at the poor
1:39:11
propaganda I mean, advertising
that is being shoveled in front
1:39:15
of you. This this is this is
interesting. This is how you wet
1:39:18
your weaponize yourself. You
defend yourself against what's
1:39:22
next. Not this. You didn't
mention the media cleaned up the
1:39:27
illegal immigrants in the
airport. Come on, man. We talked
1:39:30
about that weeks ago when it was
actually happening and we
1:39:33
weren't outraged. We were like
wow, that's pretty crazy. real
1:39:36
problem. But making a whole show
anybody
1:39:40
be surprised by that? Exactly. I
mean, this is like the Hey, the
1:39:44
bosses come and clean up the
shop. Well, you're running a
1:39:47
pretty clean shop here boys.
Well, thanks, boss. Yeah, thanks
1:39:51
again next year. This is new
good work
1:39:55
brown idea. Remember that good
Word Brown
1:39:57
new idea to people that people
would do this. They can I'd like
1:40:00
to clean up the house a little
bit because you got some guests
1:40:03
coming over. I'm outraged to
play should be a mess.
1:40:07
Yeah, we even we even covered to
the El Paso regional airport
1:40:12
that more people were coming in
or leaving, and we had this
1:40:15
long, doesn't matter. Doesn't
matter
1:40:19
ticked you off. So I
1:40:21
replied this guy and he never
came back, which is too bad
1:40:24
because I know most of them will
come back. Most of them do come
1:40:28
back and then try. So
1:40:29
one guy went back and forth, he
comes back and nothing happened.
1:40:33
I thought that was kind of,
1:40:34
well, what I'd say seven times
out of 10 Someone's outraged
1:40:38
like that and I'll go back and
forth and then events he's like,
1:40:42
Nah, man, I'm sorry. My
girlfriend left me I stepped on
1:40:45
my door. I was drinking is my
favorite. I was drinking Well,
1:40:49
okay. Don't drink and email your
favorite podcaster or podcasters
1:40:55
because man is good. There's two
of us. And with that, I want to
1:40:59
thank you for your courage say
in the morning to the man who
1:41:01
put the sea in the health scare
ladies and gentlemen, please say
1:41:04
hello to my friend on the other
end Mr. Jobs
1:41:13
chips ships as you listen to
ground feet, here are all the
1:41:16
names and
1:41:18
trolls and the troll room. Lots
of trolls here I think 20 2206
1:41:29
to 2206. That's pretty good.
Pretty normal. As predicted. I'm
1:41:33
looking up. I'm
1:41:34
pretty happy about that. During
that donations who are off by Oh
1:41:37
yeah, we're
1:41:38
gonna do the same thing we did
last show. We're going to do all
1:41:42
the donations in one go. Because
it's so short doesn't even make
1:41:44
sense to stop twice. So we're
going to do it all in one go.
1:41:47
Which means there'll be plenty
of show after the donation
1:41:50
segment. For those of you who
bail out thinking nothing's left
1:41:53
just silly fools. I see you. You
can join the trolls at troll
1:41:58
room.io You go that way. What
was that? That's new.
1:42:03
Sorry. Let's say it should have
been. No, no.
1:42:07
No, I want the other one. Do I
do that one.
1:42:13
I like that a whale. Hello
buddies.
1:42:16
I like that one. You can go to
troll room.io. And there you
1:42:21
will be presented with the
stream. You can watch that live
1:42:23
right away. And you can log into
the IRC chat. Now you can also
1:42:27
and there's going to be more and
more apps doing this at new
1:42:30
podcast apps.com currently pod
versus the one you want. Because
1:42:35
you can set an alert and then
when we go live, the bat signal
1:42:38
actually pops up on your podcast
app where you listen to your
1:42:41
podcast anyway. And you can log
right into the troll room there
1:42:44
and listen to the live stream.
It's a crazy concept. We put
1:42:47
live streaming podcast into the
podcast app based genius. Now, a
1:42:53
little something about no agenda
social.com which is the not
1:42:56
super secret and very much
blocked instance which we
1:42:59
started in 2017. Now going in
our sixth year, so we were there
1:43:04
way, way before this hype. Now
we were not new to the fediverse
1:43:08
at all that have been going on
for many years before that. But
1:43:12
it was really cool. It was it we
started as a community we
1:43:15
limited it to 10,000 accounts
and then after we purge once a
1:43:19
year, if you haven't logged in
for a year, you're gone. And the
1:43:22
reason why is this is a very
nice and we've always promoted
1:43:25
it that way a very nice social
network that does not have algos
1:43:31
and that we can have
conversations and do whatever we
1:43:33
want with each other and we're
pretty open you breeze speak
1:43:37
true or free speech free speech
zone. Now I get reports you
1:43:44
know, the you can report
accounts on our server from
1:43:46
anywhere you want. And sometimes
it's like you know, some some
1:43:51
want to guy off here that's what
I'm gonna talk about. There's
1:43:54
you know that we get a lot of
bogus reports like C dot i m
1:43:58
which is a very small instance
and they report everybody for
1:44:01
saying things about vaccines and
that too, okay, so I actually
1:44:04
blocked them go away and and I
kind of was I think it's because
1:44:09
I'm getting older and I'm taking
your advice because you seem to
1:44:13
be living a healthy life and you
seem okay. And I want to be like
1:44:16
you when I grow up and so I get
a report about this one guy. And
1:44:26
all he's doing is having
arguments with people on other
1:44:31
servers. He's not involved in
anything whatsoever on no agenda
1:44:36
social.
1:44:37
Oh, he's just a shit poster off
off site and bit giving us a bad
1:44:42
name. And so
1:44:44
I looked at this and I know
there's a lot of people
1:44:46
reporting because he was very
inflammatory. And I don't
1:44:50
appreciate cake Jew nigger. I
mean, no, it's this is just
1:44:54
that's not You're not minimum.
We don't do that in our
1:44:56
community. I'm not going to make
a problem. If someone throws in
1:44:59
what am I I'm not going to
police anybody on your speech.
1:45:02
But if you're on our server to
only shitpost other people,
1:45:07
you're gone, go get an account
somewhere else. And this and I
1:45:12
posted this, I said, I'm sick
and tired of people using their
1:45:15
account to only shitpost. Other
instances, I have no patience
1:45:20
for that you're gone.
Interesting response most people
1:45:24
cannot read apparently, I got
responses, like, I demand to
1:45:29
know the rules or shitpost. Like
you're missing the point, it's
1:45:35
not about the content. It's
about the fact that you're not
1:45:38
involved in our community. This
is for our community, and anyone
1:45:41
from the outside who wants to
can contribute. And of course,
1:45:44
you can answer anybody you want
from anywhere else, but and I
1:45:47
looked at his whole timeline,
the only thing he was doing is
1:45:51
shitposting other people. That's
not what our servers for the
1:45:56
yes, it's a privilege to be on
no agenda social.com. And so
1:46:00
there's no I
1:46:00
had I had a problem with this.
You suppose say pray tell what.
1:46:07
Pray tell what. So I
1:46:09
look at this thing that you
posted about kicking this guy
1:46:12
off. I have no idea and you
never mentioned who it was, I'd
1:46:15
like to know.
1:46:18
I've noticed someone I'd never
heard of.
1:46:22
I mean, I could go in and look
but I'd have to go ask Who
1:46:24
cares? Now it's not that
important. Just go you're like
1:46:28
blasting some guy with five
barrels of a two barrel shotgun
1:46:32
in your blind leg. I'd lie they
got you suck your body by your
1:46:35
out, gone. And I'm thinking who
is he talking about? Oh, and
1:46:39
the guy was gone. There was
nothing to see. It was just a
1:46:42
guy. All he did was just tell
other people how foolish shit
1:46:46
they were. And you know, calling
him names and alien like and it
1:46:50
had nothing to eat. Had nothing
to do with no agenda. Nothing.
1:46:54
So I'm like, Okay, if you're
here, just as a bad reputation,
1:46:57
guys, like I don't even care
about that. We have this. Okay,
1:47:00
we have a place for our
community. And you don't have to
1:47:03
always be talking but it's
amongst it's like a meet up. If
1:47:07
some guy came into a meet up and
was just yelling at the at the
1:47:10
restaurant staff. You know, we
kick them out to shut up. So
1:47:15
there's not going to be any
rules. There's no, it's not
1:47:18
about shitposting I don't I
really don't care in general
1:47:21
what you say I really don't and
I know no reasoned. I mean,
1:47:26
people report us. I mean, it's
all our own people report us
1:47:30
like I have nothing better to do
you dicks. It's unbelievable. So
1:47:34
I think you'd be labored. I have
it. Indeed. No agenda social.com
1:47:39
It's a great place. Now, let us
thank the artist for episode
1:47:46
1520 of the best podcast in the
university. appropriately titled
1:47:51
Hambone I learned a new word.
And our art was created by
1:47:58
networks. And this was a i a lot
of people liked this art. And
1:48:04
just everybody knows if you're
new to the show, we change the
1:48:07
art on every single one of our
podcasts, the album art and good
1:48:13
podcast apps, new podcasts, I
was gone. They will show this I
1:48:17
think Apple finally figured out
that they should show this. This
1:48:20
was a really dynamite piece
which in at first I didn't even
1:48:26
recognize what was going on
until I saw this. I mean what do
1:48:30
you call this like a DJ on fire
DJ and he was his hair on fire.
1:48:34
His hair was on fire and his
turntables were a gas stove. I
1:48:39
didn't even see that in the
first instance. And we liked it.
1:48:43
It was good.
1:48:46
It was nutty and I liked it
bring the heat. It just had an
1:48:51
it was the best piece of usable
piece now rowdy came in with a
1:48:55
three versions of one piece
after the fact I don't know why
1:48:59
these things are placed where
they are because I don't
1:49:01
remember seeing
1:49:02
used on that you use this in the
newsletter I did I use one of
1:49:05
them proving you that proving to
you that I do read the
1:49:08
newsletter
1:49:13
Well, one time that I get a one
mark one
1:49:18
from backgrounds you and I can
see the blue and the purple
1:49:20
difference. I see that one and
the green it was just three
1:49:23
different backgrounds wasn't it?
It was
1:49:25
also a cupcake cupcake showing.
1:49:29
It was kind of grotesque now I
look at it. Yeah, it
1:49:31
was kind of grotesque and they
probably wouldn't have been a
1:49:33
good piece of it may have not
even been a good piece for the
1:49:35
newsletter because the
newsletter was unrest didn't
1:49:37
work. Oh, I'm blamed the art.
1:49:39
Okay. Thanks. roundy
1:49:42
takes around these browsers
something attractive. Oh, so
1:49:47
this Ukraine wins again.
original art John by Josh. I
1:49:53
don't remember seeing that. It
wasn't going to be picked. I
1:49:56
don't remember seeing that one.
1:49:58
Which one the Taunton. You No by
Josh
1:50:02
corn carnold Connor girl where
is that above it is down is from
1:50:08
the front of the fat baby and
the top there one fat baby go
1:50:12
down 12345 his gut is a blank
colors and a woman with with
1:50:17
wings and feet.
1:50:22
I don't know what I don't have,
either.
1:50:25
I don't remember seeing these
things aren't coming in in
1:50:28
order.
1:50:29
If you are listening to us live,
you can go to no agenda, art
1:50:33
generator.com And you can look
at it live. You'll also see
1:50:36
what's already being created as
we speak by our artists. And if
1:50:39
you're listening to this as a
podcast, that new podcast app
1:50:42
will show it to you as Dr. Scott
uses it for our chapters. We had
1:50:46
make Brazil great again. No. We
had the megaphone was it's an OP
1:50:53
or op. You'll actually mentioned
that one as a possibility.
1:50:56
Yeah, I kind of thought it was
cute. And now I you hate you or
1:51:00
you hate the megaphone? No, I
don't hate it's just like, well,
1:51:04
you called me up by saying oh,
you liked a megaphone every time
1:51:06
one shows up with.
1:51:09
It's true. It's true. It's true.
I think we both thought the the
1:51:16
was it? Was it in this one that
the major league bullshit MLB
1:51:22
comics or Blogger made an MLB
version, which I think I did
1:51:25
mention and there was also a
100% copyright infringing MLB
1:51:31
version.
1:51:32
Where do I see the one that has
actual MLB? MLB logo? Yeah,
1:51:36
there's gonna be a problem. Lots
of eggs stuff. Yeah, what else
1:51:42
was there? Fat Lives Matter and
all the stuff and we're not
1:51:45
gonna We're not trying to insult
people. All the time. Okay,
1:51:52
anything else? Anything else on
this art?
1:51:54
That's I think that covers it.
1:51:56
We appreciate all of our
artists. There's no wrong if you
1:52:00
if you're if you're able to get
it up on that on that knowledge
1:52:04
and art generator.com There's no
wrong it's we'd love it. We now
1:52:07
have goodness. Let me count them
how many we have? We have 28,565
1:52:13
unique pieces.
1:52:15
I'm surprised there hasn't been
some sort of a armed rebellion
1:52:18
in the no agenda social or this
protest over not picking
1:52:23
something?
1:52:24
approach? What are you? Are you
trying to stir the pot? Are you
1:52:28
saying don't stir the pot Jhansi
Dvorak that's not good. It's not
1:52:32
nice. Thank you artists we love
you. We mean that sincerely. It
1:52:36
is one of the highest forms of
talent and time you can you can
1:52:40
dedicate specially because
you're doing it on the fly
1:52:43
probably while you're at work
listening to this pretending to
1:52:45
pay attention to your boss or do
whatever you should be doing is
1:52:48
very much appreciated. No
agenda, art generator.com. Now
1:52:52
we'd like to thank our executive
and Associate Executive
1:52:54
producers for episode 1521.
These are the people who came in
1:53:00
$200 or above. And these are
real credits forever credits.
1:53:03
This is not not a joke. This is
just like when you see the
1:53:06
credits, when you see it rolling
on a Hollywood production,
1:53:09
television, movie, etcetera.
These are the people who get
1:53:12
listed because they they helped
finance it. That's how it works.
1:53:15
Now, you're financing it because
you got something out of it. You
1:53:19
got some value. This is why we
call it the value for value
1:53:21
model. You felt something it did
something for you. Or perhaps
1:53:27
you had a stock tip or
relationship tip or maybe you're
1:53:30
not dead because of us. It's all
possible. Whatever it is, turn
1:53:34
that into a number. Send it back
to us. We appreciate Justin
1:53:37
Varner from Richmond, Virginia
who kicks in and this is
1:53:42
interesting. I've never seen a
pink field on the spreadsheet.
1:53:47
You know things are changing in
the back office when new colors
1:53:50
start to show up. Have you
noticed this pink? It's very
1:53:54
readable. Yeah, I by just I
don't know what it means the
1:53:57
pink. I know blue is night.
Yellow is birthday. Gray is note
1:54:03
pink in the morning, gentlemen.
1:54:05
Purple was also a douchebag
call. Oh, I
1:54:07
know what this is. Oh, this is a
show number donation. 1521. Yes,
1:54:16
teller? Yes. Yes. Yes. We love
that new color. Good work. In
1:54:20
the morning, gentlemen, please
accept this value proposition
1:54:22
demonstration in the amount of
1521 monopoly bills to
1:54:26
commemorate the show number of
the same non false equivalency I
1:54:31
need you once again to call out
bill for being a huge douchebag
1:54:35
sorry, I don't know why that
happens. Douchebag got to fix
1:54:42
that. Not donating since the
last call out in 1424. And now
1:54:48
going on 11 years as a listener.
He is obsessed with the show and
1:54:53
doesn't know how to consume
information outside of that
1:54:55
format. And who can blame him
for our shitty education system?
1:55:00
As such, he is hereby ordered to
donate immediately or the
1:55:03
douching will continue every
episode for perpetuity in the
1:55:07
form of a recurring donation of
$50 with a note bill is a
1:55:11
freeloading, sleazy son of a
bitch. Okay, thank you as always
1:55:18
for really digging into the
shit. There's no one else Bill
1:55:21
Bill is contributing more that
way by not donating
1:55:24
this correct. Yeah, keep it up,
Bill. Good work, Bill. Gotcha.
1:55:31
There's no one else who can do
what you both do, nor would they
1:55:34
want to true. It is such a vow
of poverty is an incredible,
1:55:38
important service to our
country. It's an incredibly
1:55:41
important service to our country
and our hope that this year you
1:55:44
are awarded with the
Presidential Medal of Freedom.
1:55:48
By blow Jaiden Please, man,
please play as much Al Sharpton
1:55:54
as possible. I would even vote
for a show dedicated to Sharpton
1:55:57
super cuts, and I bet others
would too. If only if only there
1:56:01
was enough to do a full show.
Believe me. Now. There's not
1:56:05
enough. Justin Varner dude named
Justin Richmond, Virginia former
1:56:09
resident of Gitmo, Central Texas
slave lands
1:56:11
night is the measure of whether
the country begins in the state
1:56:17
of Wisconsin, a national drive
to push back or whether we have
1:56:24
more to go to build a movement
of resistance. But resist we
1:56:29
must. We must, and we will much
about that. Be committed just a
1:56:37
classic. Joining me now.
1:56:38
classic, classic Sharpton.
1:56:40
I believe that's the original.
1:56:42
That is the OG that's what got
us into the obsession with Al
1:56:46
Sharpton. Yeah.
1:56:49
Who knew? That he's I think they
do a lot of cutters. I listen to
1:56:53
the show infrequently. Maybe
once or twice a month, trying to
1:56:57
catch something I can catch
something a little this all
1:56:59
minor. Now like the good old
days, with respect our ESP ICT,
1:57:05
that sort of thing?
1:57:06
Well, we should play the short
version then since it's respect,
1:57:11
by the way, respect.
1:57:14
Do Richard Gabriel is on the
list. from Tucson, Arizona, he
1:57:18
came at 350 $6. Now he, he I'm
going to read what I have from
1:57:23
him. It may have a note about a
note. And he came to subject
1:57:28
instead of saying donation has
helped, I got perturbed and
1:57:30
confused. I made a hefty
executive order called executive
1:57:36
producer qualifying first time
donation, which is this one. So
1:57:39
let's give a D douching. Right
off the bat. You've been deed
1:57:44
deuced. That I that then I sent
a note that I'd like read to
1:57:51
this address, which is my
address john@divorce.org, which
1:57:54
is where you should be sending
to notes at no agenda show.net.
1:57:59
It's all going to be on the new
donation page q1.
1:58:01
Oh, yeah, it'll be on there
right to top. I'd like to read
1:58:04
for the Sunday show. And it
doesn't attach it. So he just
1:58:06
continues with this complaining.
January 15. For this email
1:58:10
address. All of I did all of
this on Wednesday, January 11. I
1:58:13
checked my email and learned my
message was blocked. Or
1:58:17
disallowed content. Yes. This
happens on my service when I'm
1:58:23
recommend sending, especially if
you're if there's one swear word
1:58:26
in there, like anything, it will
get blocked unless you're on the
1:58:30
whitelist. And I don't have any
reason to put them on the
1:58:32
whitelist and never get a note.
Even if you say
1:58:34
shit, I think he got blocked
from your server. Oh, yeah, you
1:58:36
definitely will. Yeah, please
inform me exactly where to mail
1:58:40
these notes. And I sent him a
note back to be read on the
1:58:43
show. And I even put the word
donation in the subject. I
1:58:46
scoured the no agenda webpage to
understand exactly how to do
1:58:50
this stuff. But it's not very
clear. We make it clear on the
1:58:54
show, but obviously this
1:58:55
and the reason why if I can, if
I could just interject, if I can
1:58:59
just interject. The It was It
has always been the intention
1:59:04
that you can leave and this is
how it started. Leave a small
1:59:08
short note of thanks. On the
PayPal in the PayPal area where
1:59:14
that is intended. And since
people can't figure out PayPal,
1:59:20
they start emailing notes and
now it's become a thing where I
1:59:24
need to email my note how come
it's not clear. So that's why
1:59:27
you know, our incredible staff
which as you know is is we have
1:59:31
so much production help is going
to revamp the donation page to
1:59:36
get this in under crucial order
if q1 So we're very sorry. We
1:59:41
really are we're just two dudes.
1:59:44
Oh, I understand is to email
this account which is my account
1:59:48
and put the donation in Okay, so
we don't have whatever the
1:59:52
original note was that was
cussing or something. I don't
1:59:55
know what it was in there.
Because I could have attached
1:59:58
that note to this you could
Attach it to the as it as an
2:00:03
attachment and probably would
have gotten through because I
2:00:05
don't think those are so
2:00:06
you made your point let's go
when so that's what he said
2:00:09
yeah that's the end of his notes
so we give them let's give him a
2:00:12
Karma
2:00:13
we give them a double up karma
without a note you get a double
2:00:15
up karma you've got karma I have
this one this is a note from
2:00:26
second this is from Sir
Alexander yes Sir Alexander and
2:00:31
I have his note which is nicely
scanned by our crack staff in
2:00:36
the morning gentlemen, ITM
gentleman proud virtue signaler
2:00:39
with an overdue donation, may I
request an R two d two health
2:00:43
karma for all with this donation
I moved to whatever the next
2:00:47
level of knighthood is
accounting below. So he will he
2:00:50
will have a title change today.
My piping hot wife and I have
2:00:53
fled middle Cascadia for the
beautiful hills of Middle
2:00:57
Tennessee. Would it be possible
to request a name change from
2:01:00
Sir Alexander Black Knight of
middle Kent, a Cascadia to Sir
2:01:03
Alexander Black Knight of Middle
Tennessee. May You of course
2:01:07
we're going to do that. May you
keep this wonderful racket going
2:01:10
for another 1500 episodes. Thank
you very much. RTG two for you
2:01:15
sir. You've got
2:01:19
karma. It should be noted that
his donation was 330 806 and it
2:01:26
should also be noted that he
used the word piping trigger me.
2:01:31
Oh, okay. What is the oh six
about then. 3638 coccyx Oh, it
2:01:37
could be and what are the wiping
rice piping?
2:01:40
Why went on a rant about two
three years ago because Martha
2:01:46
Stewart kept saying piping hot
piping hot. And I've yet to hear
2:01:51
any explanation for what piping
me What is piping hot.
2:01:54
I know what is when the stove
pipe the on an old stove is very
2:02:00
very hot. So
2:02:00
what's what's that got to do
with my cup of coffee?
2:02:04
It's just a temperature warning
John.
2:02:09
Mark Stokes Berean center in
Centennial Colorado. Three
2:02:14
Three. And he writes good
morning cracking buzz says
2:02:18
discovering the no agenda show
via the Tom Woods show. Tom
2:02:23
Woods donation. I've been in
Washington and I am well on my
2:02:27
way to knighthood I do want I do
wanna I do want to wish my
2:02:34
sister in law Sarah Stokes
Berry, a happy 44th birthday on
2:02:39
Monday the 16th. And shamelessly
do I think is she's on the list
2:02:43
on Shameless. He directs all of
Gitmo nation to my sub stack at
2:02:47
Mark Stokes
burried.substack.com. And as
2:02:51
Mark Stokes burries what it
sounds like it showcases my art,
2:02:55
much of which I think even John
would appreciate. I looked at it
2:03:00
he's got he's got a nice style
very professional. No jingles
2:03:04
but I'd love to some marriage
karma as I tie the knot later
2:03:08
this year best Mark Stokes
Berean Centennial Colorado Thank
2:03:13
you very much Mark our final
executive producer for episode
2:03:16
1521 You've got karma onto our
associate execs Ilan Homburg in
2:03:25
Bellingham Washington my son Ari
and I share a birthday my
2:03:28
birthday is 116 81 which is
$160.81 plus his birthday 116 19
2:03:36
equals to 33 Pence the donation
amount and thank you for your
2:03:40
courage please add us both to
the birthday list it Consider it
2:03:43
done
2:03:46
onward with the Eric Eric I'm
sorry Erica Callahan in to
2:03:52
actually sue it so excellent
2:03:55
weekly sewak civically Subic so
2:03:57
quickly so quickly Pennsylvania
$20 My dog is giving me the sad
2:04:04
puppy face must be time to
donate thanks for all you do.
2:04:10
Yes we don't getting a lot of
donations from her
2:04:13
and you're spot on because this
is the last one for the
2:04:16
Executive Associate exec sir
ready kilowatt from battlement
2:04:20
Mesa Colorado 200 Hello sir
ready kilowatt from the troll
2:04:24
room annual donation earlier
than usual this year since the
2:04:27
last show was so light Thank
you. Can I get a little
2:04:30
entrepreneur karma from my now
full time drone business? No
2:04:34
jingles no karma? You literally
asked for karma and then you
2:04:37
said no jingles no karma. But
you know what we'll give it to
2:04:40
you. Anyway. Thank you. Carla.
Thank you to these execs and
2:04:46
Associate Executive producers
for ever credits they do not
2:04:50
expire. They will not expire.
You can put them anywhere you
2:04:54
want will vouch for you if
anyone questions and put them on
2:04:57
IMDb that is the be forever
credit. place and just have a
2:05:01
search and see what kind of
actual heavyweights including
2:05:04
Hollywood heavyweights have one
of these coveted forever titles
2:05:07
and thank you for supporting the
best podcast in the universe.
2:05:12
Shall we continue right on with
the yes with
2:05:15
short wins in Langley Washington
125 Dakota Walker from Boise,
2:05:21
Idaho One, one 3.85 of the
birthday donation on January 13.
2:05:26
Dylan Edmonds in Santa Maria,
California in some jobs karma at
2:05:30
the end $100 from him. Lucas
Williams. Roswell, New Mexico.
2:05:36
Me, sir slam Bob rolling in San
Jose at 33. Sir Kevin
2:05:45
McLaughlin. He hasn't missed a
beat. Lucas, North Carolina 808.
2:05:52
Boobs. Peter arreglar registered
brother reg.
2:05:58
Do I have to open it up and take
a look?
2:06:01
Reg? Reg? Reg, it's just shink
NYG. But yeah,
2:06:05
wow. Hold on a second. Let me I
want to see this name now.
2:06:09
Peter. Reg nig he's a reg. Reg.
Reg. Reg. ixnay. ragged snag.
2:06:19
Westminister Colorado. 6923 Adam
moves Monza anger in Brookfield,
2:06:25
Wisconsin 6869. Sir Don and Chan
Chandler, Arizona. 606 small
2:06:32
boobs. Christopher Dexter ft.
678 Angela Pickering 55 Ken and
2:06:42
in a loca o n o n a local 512.
2:06:49
Live living NL loca
2:06:52
in a loci in Austin, Texas.
5120. Poor showing there at the
2:06:57
local Paul DuBois is from
MacKerricher I'm sorry,
2:07:03
I'm sorry, don't do that. Most
meetups don't say that poor
2:07:07
showing people gave what they
could. That's not nice call.
2:07:13
Yeah, okay. Paul, they know
better. Paul DuBois and Kerr
2:07:18
Hudson, New York 50 bucks and
the rest of these all be $50
2:07:22
donors. Brandon Sivan port
orchard. John Bremen our in
2:07:31
Lemont furnace is that the name
of a town in Pennsylvania,
2:07:35
it's again Pennsylvania is to be
avoided.
2:07:39
Christian Freeman San Marcos,
but not San Marcos, California,
2:07:43
San Marcos, Texas. Kevin deals
in Huntersville North Carolina
2:07:47
Patricia Dane Patricia
Worthington in Miami. Real deals
2:07:52
now. In San Antonio real
2:07:56
deals now San Antonio.
2:07:59
Phillip blue in Louisville,
Kentucky. Kelly make a deal in
2:08:03
Mission Hills, Kansas. Chris
Lewinsky in Sherwood Park,
2:08:08
California easy landscapes in
North Stonington Connecticut. If
2:08:14
you're in North Stonington go to
easy landscapes sir Eric and
2:08:17
Richardson, Texas. Sarah Gordon
and Tucson Daniel Galloway in
2:08:24
Marietta, Georgia, Gerald wing
and Roth in Saugus and last on
2:08:30
the list is Leanne Shipley and
Covington Washington. I want to
2:08:33
thank all these people including
the local they're in in Austin,
2:08:39
for helping us do this show and
contributing thanks.
2:08:42
And as a reminder, we have a
great donation page. See it now
2:08:46
before it's vintage
vorak.org/and Thank you all for
2:08:51
your time, talent and treasure
for episode 1521 Our formula is
2:08:56
this we go out we hit people in
the mouth
2:09:10
shut us by regressed jobs, jobs,
jobs and jobs for jobs.
2:09:29
Interestingly, we do have a
longer birthday list than
2:09:31
typical Dakota Walker celebrates
on the celebrated on the 13th
2:09:35
mark Stokes Murray wishing his
sister in law Sarah Stokes Bria
2:09:38
Happy Birthday turns 44 on the
16th ilan Hamburg January 16.
2:09:44
And Elon also wishes his son
ARIA Happy birthday on January
2:09:48
16. Ciao Jow Best Wishes their
daughter Elena a happy birthday.
2:09:52
She turns five on January 17.
Happy birthday from everybody.
2:09:56
He had the best podcast in the
universe. You
2:10:07
don't want to be and you just
heard it only one title change
2:10:11
for today's episode Sir
Alexander Fleming Black Knight
2:10:14
of the middle Cascadia, now
known and honored as Sir
2:10:17
Alexander Burnett of Middle
Tennessee and we of course
2:10:20
support his additional or
appreciate as a traditional
2:10:23
support of the best podcast in
the universe No knights no
2:10:26
dame's today should we go
straight to the meetup?
2:10:35
And the party's coming up in
Indiana.
2:10:38
You don't produce this if you're
in Central Indiana then come
2:10:40
attend our New Years no agenda
meetup on 15th January we'll be
2:10:44
going to the bladder brewery on
Binford Boulevard in
2:10:47
Indianapolis good food good
drink good conversation and the
2:10:52
donation rebel find us and no
agenda minutes of comfortable
2:10:56
information and to RSVP
2:10:59
in the morning get more nation
in John and Adam This is Sir
2:11:02
camera Chris with BJJ mats I'm
reporting to you live to tape
2:11:05
from the newsroom called next
door to the safe house since we
2:11:08
got kicked out of there
2:11:09
in the morning John and Adam.
Master overhand no agenda social
2:11:13
it's a big scam.
2:11:14
This is Sir spooky of the Elm
streets a bat out of hell known
2:11:18
as Chicago in the morning Adam
from Milwaukee in the morning,
2:11:22
sir a mountain mon saw
2:11:24
in the morning sir Matt Nick
later night of Edgewater
2:11:27
drew from Wisconsin from Lake
Geneva in the morning. This is a
2:11:30
great night to meet other like
minded people. I am so deeply
2:11:35
grateful for the community.
Thank you John and Adam
2:11:39
ITM. This is James smokin hot
stew coming to you live from the
2:11:43
newsroom pub. It was a great
meet up
2:11:46
sir BMA and then K ye in the
morning.
2:11:49
I misspoke. This is Brian from
Union Grove in the morning. This
2:11:52
is John thank you for your
courage. Ito gents are having a
2:11:55
great time. You're gonna have a
good run. John from West Dallas,
2:11:59
I can't believe you read my
email address on
2:12:01
the air. Hi, John and Adam. My
name is Chris in the morning,
2:12:06
John and Adam at the hairballs
show. I wish you were here.
2:12:10
Adam. You should have never cut
your hair. And I'm not wearing
2:12:13
pants.
2:12:14
Hi, John and Adam. I'm Missy
from once Ben.
2:12:18
And with that we're off to see
Chris box and hairball.
2:12:23
Yeah. But don't try to do stick
Okay. Doesn't help. Now over to
2:12:27
Columbus. Oh, yeah. Also, don't
try to be cute with your
2:12:32
production. Just don't put music
just just get to the I'll do
2:12:37
that if it needs it. Okay. This
is a Wild Bill
2:12:40
with a central Ohio meetup.
Thank you, Adam and John, for
2:12:43
your courage and I'm going to
hand it off to the next person
2:12:45
in line. This is Anthony.
2:12:47
John am thank you for all you
do. This is Mark, thank
2:12:50
you for your courage in the
morning in the morning. This is
2:12:53
PBR street gang. Still looking
for another mission.
2:12:57
Next CC from C bus in the
morning. This is Josh in the
2:13:02
morning. This is Eric, I do want
to thank you for
2:13:05
your courage.
2:13:06
This is Sir Leary at Dempsey's
pub. It's been a great time and
2:13:12
started meeting people.
2:13:13
Three pronunciation guidance ag
you lar from Bell fountain?
2:13:17
This is Dame Trinity having a
great time in Columbus in the
2:13:21
morning in the morning thank you
gentlemen
2:13:27
and why why the Genesis cover is
beyond me it is complete
2:13:32
copyright violation don't do
that. But I did I like to echo
2:13:36
on the on the that would that
would that kind of work for me.
2:13:39
That today there is a meet up.
And yeah, I guess you can just
2:13:44
make it why you're even thinking
of doing that not just sitting
2:13:47
at home listen to the show at
the Oxford Saloon in Snohomish,
2:13:50
Washington two o'clock. The New
Year Crossroads America Indy
2:13:55
tribal resolution meetup. You
just heard that there'll be
2:13:57
three that's underway now today.
Again, I'm doing this on
2:14:00
Sundays. It's very disturbing
blind. Oh, our brewery. We have
2:14:05
the TMI evac zone 333 These are
all underway. Evergreen brewing
2:14:09
in Camp Hill, PA. I do believe
this will be a good meet up six
2:14:13
o'clock at skippers pier coastal
Cajun kitchen in Gladewater.
2:14:17
Texas. You can obviously make
that one. On Wednesday, the Fort
2:14:19
Wayne Indiana red pillars club
33 meeting at 633 at Xenos
2:14:24
Italian eatery. That's DuPont
Road in Fort Wayne, Indiana and
2:14:27
they got a lot going on in
Indiana. And then on show day,
2:14:31
the New Year omega A new
amygdala cleanse 633 at MC
2:14:35
thirsties pub in Peterborough,
Ontario. That's Canada.
2:14:38
Charlotte's Thursday. I'm
getting my teeth adjusted on
2:14:42
Tuesday, Charlotte's thirsty
third third. This is this is
2:14:45
mean. My temporary teeth of just
slipping all over the place with
2:14:50
this one. Charlotte's thirsty
Third Thursday monthly meetups.
2:14:55
Keep using that one people oh no
2:14:57
Tuesday we're adjusting it. It's
tough. Going in Charlotte, North
2:15:01
Carolina, and the Shot Show
shitshow 730 at Gilley's in
2:15:05
Treasure Island, Las Vegas,
Nevada. So Ramsey Kane who does
2:15:08
not know and will be hosting
that fantastic these are the no
2:15:11
agenda meetups there's many more
on the calendar through February
2:15:14
to the end of February and
beyond if you'd like to see it
2:15:17
go to no agenda meetups.com If
you can't find one near you
2:15:20
start one yourself always a
punch a
2:15:23
sometimes you want to go out
with a nice day you'd be
2:15:32
triggered you wouldn't be used
say is like
2:15:44
I have I have couple of ISOs if
any of them are going to beat
2:15:49
anything you might have.
2:15:50
What do you have anything good,
so you probably can do it. Okay.
2:15:54
This one was sent by I think
Nola check meats
2:16:04
is cute for the show but I don't
know if it's
2:16:07
not necessarily end of show and
yeah this one
2:16:12
did thank god that's actually
not bad. Yeah,
2:16:17
it's not but and then this one
not hearing anything. That's all
2:16:21
I got. Really?
2:16:22
I can't even hear that.
2:16:23
Let me listen to you. You have
this one. Yeah, this one okay,
2:16:25
here we go. How does he do that?
I think thank God let me see if
2:16:31
I queued up a little tighter How
long is it hold on thank God if
2:16:36
I can
2:16:37
beat has to be taken out has to
be taken out of the between
2:16:42
thanking God it doesn't need to
have that long.
2:16:45
Oh, hold on. Let me see if I can
do that. Probably because I am I
2:16:51
am the master see how this
works. Ready? Thank god
2:16:56
that's that I like it.
2:16:58
All right. That will require
extra work at the end
2:17:03
so just as as we wrote some what
somebody I got an email as we're
2:17:08
doing the show about that clip I
played from the BBC. Within
2:17:13
minutes I guess of that clip
going over the air on the BBC.
2:17:17
The Guardian comes out with a
with a headline BBC criticized
2:17:23
for letting cardiologists hijack
interview with false COVID Jab
2:17:28
claim. Wow, love has seen Mel
Horton, male heart, murmur
2:17:34
Hathras Malhotra has misguided
in quotes, views Lincoln some
2:17:40
COVID vaccines to excess heart
disease deaths should not have
2:17:44
aired, say experts. And then the
whole story done by this woman.
2:17:53
Our our wha Modra doll and she
finishes it with her little she
2:18:01
does her little bits at the end
where she has stuff like this.
2:18:06
In other news, Peter Davidson is
now dating Martha Stewart Donald
2:18:10
Trump is still threatening to
run for president threatening
2:18:14
and British tabloids are still
churning out 100 articles a day
2:18:17
about whether murder Megan
Markel eating lunches and
2:18:21
outrageous snub to the royal
family. It goes on so she's
2:18:27
right to
2:18:28
talk about the Guardian is under
a current I think still
2:18:32
ransomware attack and all
journalists have been ordered to
2:18:35
work from home on their own
computers until I think the 26th
2:18:38
of January. No, I did not know
this. Yeah, that all their
2:18:42
systems are ransomware I'd say
that's a good start. Ransomware
2:18:45
all of them Fox, CNN NBC, MSNBC
CNN. CNBC is funny leave those
2:18:51
guys on ransomware I'm all that
I don't understand why people
2:18:55
don't do this. I think you can
make so much money particularly
2:18:59
around election time. Or when
you know Pfizer launch launches
2:19:02
a new super jab super shot
2:19:05
I don't think is I think it's
not I don't think it's a trivial
2:19:08
exploit.
2:19:10
What are you talking about it
wouldn't you get the news about
2:19:13
the newsroom? When you get to
newsroom that's a problem yeah,
2:19:18
probably and then and then they
don't
2:19:20
work out people you don't like
you know backup backup every
2:19:23
week at least once a week a full
backup a ghost you want to go
2:19:30
back if you don't want just you
know a bunch of files backed up.
2:19:33
You need a whole something you
know, as safe The trouble is
2:19:37
Chris the rants are smart. They
would plant like a month in
2:19:40
advance. Oh, exactly. I just
don't there's no reason to
2:19:44
because nobody backs up.
2:19:46
I'm just gonna set up the I'm
just going back for a second I
2:19:51
realized I have a clip of about
the debt limit being raised. And
2:19:55
then I have an interesting
associated clip which came up on
2:19:59
the same day that we're denounce
from Black Rocks? Larry Fink so
2:20:03
here's Yeah, we're gonna
2:20:04
turn now to a critical time in
Washington Congress is on the
2:20:07
verge of a political showdown
after the Treasury Secretary
2:20:10
warned lawmakers that the US is
projected to reach its debt
2:20:14
limit on Thursday ABCs. And win
has the latest now from
2:20:18
Washington. And good morning to
you.
2:20:20
Good morning, Gao, Treasury
Secretary Janet Yellen is urging
2:20:23
Congress to quickly pass
legislation to either raise the
2:20:27
federal debt limit or
temporarily suspended and that
2:20:29
deadline is January 19. That's
Thursday. And Yellen says before
2:20:33
the government will have to
resort to quote, extraordinary
2:20:36
measures to avoid defaulting on
the nation's more than $30
2:20:39
trillion borrowing capacity.
Failure to address the debt
2:20:42
ceiling, she says would cause
irreparable harm to the US
2:20:45
economy. Some analysts
suggesting a default could crash
2:20:48
financial markets and
potentially lead to a credit
2:20:50
downgrade. And if the issue
drags on, it could lead to a
2:20:54
partial government shutdown.
Raising the limit does not need
2:20:57
more spending, but rather just
allows the government finds
2:20:59
existing obligations, including
tax refunds Social Security and
2:21:03
Medicare payments. debate over
the issue will almost certainly
2:21:06
trigger a major political
showdown in the house between
2:21:09
Republicans who now have control
and Democratic lawmakers, House
2:21:13
Republicans have pushed back
expressing interest and using
2:21:16
these negotiations to cut
spending. And the debt ceiling
2:21:19
was raised three times under the
Trump administration without
2:21:22
issue when Democrats held the
majority. And now Democratic
2:21:25
leaders say there's no reason
Republicans can't do the same.
2:21:30
Everything we said was true.
Now, I'm going to connect that
2:21:33
clip without evidence to the
CNBC clip of Larry Fink. So
2:21:38
let's just say because you know,
I know that you say it'll never
2:21:41
happen. I'm always looking at
what is the CBD? Is the central
2:21:45
bank digital currency? When is
it? How are they going to
2:21:47
shepherd it in? I don't think
it'll be a bank holiday, and
2:21:51
then we wake up and it's
happened now, I'm thinking
2:21:54
something like this would be a
really good opportunity to kind
2:21:58
of shuttle something in like
where everyone's arguing and
2:22:01
we're all gonna die. We can't
fund anything we can't eat, we
2:22:04
have no money, we could just
created a different way. And
2:22:08
well, here's here's some
understanding from Larry Fink,
2:22:11
how many digital coins
2:22:12
you think will exist, and in a
year from now? Well, that's
2:22:16
where I don't think we need that
many we need we need a digital
2:22:21
digitized dollar, let's start
there, or a some form of stable
2:22:25
coin. And then we need some form
of a crypto asset, whether it's
2:22:30
a Bitcoin or a new Bitcoin,
Bitcoin, where we were, where if
2:22:36
people want to invest in things
that are uncorrelated to, to any
2:22:41
one currency, uncorrelated to
one market, and that's what gold
2:22:46
used to be. And can we create
this uncorrelated asset class
2:22:51
that that can play that role
beyond that, in most cases, what
2:22:56
digitization of crypto is it's
just digitizing $1 Having the
2:23:01
ability to transact business on
the internet. And so, to me,
2:23:05
there's a lot more hype than
what what what it really
2:23:08
basically is we're doing a great
deal of studying on it we
2:23:11
invested in one company that's
doing very very well and in the
2:23:17
stable coin arena. And so we're
doing a great deal of studying
2:23:21
I'm meeting many people can you
say which one publicly invested
2:23:26
in circle and circle is one of
the you know, every invest
2:23:32
investors money goes into a
government security. It's and so
2:23:37
there are companies that are
doing the right thing
2:23:40
continuously?
2:23:41
Hmm. A lot they're new, a new
Bitcoin and circle they make the
2:23:47
stable coin USDC I don't know.
I've always felt stable coins
2:23:51
were inflationary by their very
nature. They sit on top of
2:23:55
apparent assets, which would be
government assets. So he
2:24:00
literally said they wanted it
the way I understand it. They
2:24:02
want to have a stable coin that
tokenized his government bonds
2:24:06
so I think that means you're
you're trading on top of stuff
2:24:09
that is a bond that is already a
debt from the country.
2:24:13
I don't understand right? Yeah,
I
2:24:15
don't understand it but But
Larry Fink man when he comes out
2:24:18
you know something's gonna
happen. That's and and all hell
2:24:21
is gonna break loose and you're
gonna need a Bitcoin, a new one
2:24:24
new big new Bitcoin
2:24:27
to have a series of clips about
the Marines. Okay. I didn't know
2:24:33
any of this was going on, but
the Marines are being thanks to
2:24:39
Lloyd Austin and I think even
the marine commandant. We have a
2:24:43
lot of Marines who listen to the
show. Yes, we do. And they're
2:24:47
trying to ruin the service
completely. It sounds like if
2:24:51
you listen to one of the old
timers who had to they have on
2:24:54
one of these, this anti D clip
and I thought it would be worth
2:24:59
rolling out this information
because I don't know anything
2:25:01
about this until I heard this.
And it's just seems pretty.
2:25:07
Pretty screwy. This is the US
Marines. One repurpose,
2:25:10
and the Marines will repurpose
their presence in Japan into
2:25:13
what they call a portal
regiment. It's designed to be
2:25:16
more money.
2:25:18
Stop, stop. Sorry. This is from
PBS, which makes it even more
2:25:23
interesting that MPs would cover
this, because they go into a
2:25:27
pretty good job of taking this
repurposing the Marines apart,
2:25:32
Eric and the
2:25:32
Marines will repurpose their
presence in Japan into what they
2:25:35
call a torille regiment is
designed to be more mobile
2:25:38
better conduct reconnaissance
and fight from remote islands.
2:25:42
They'll be equipped with not yet
acquired anti ship and anti
2:25:46
aircraft missiles. The Marines
portray themselves as the best
2:25:49
of the best capable of
responding quickly anywhere on
2:25:52
the planet, including for the
last 20 years fighting land
2:25:55
based counterinsurgency. We will
focus now on China and maritime
2:26:01
campaigns from the current
commander called and the
2:26:04
revolution
2:26:05
from the hill fights of Vietnam
to the global war on terrorism.
2:26:09
Third, marines has adapted its
mission, its structure, its
2:26:12
training with drittes evolving
in the Pacific,
2:26:15
it's time to adapt again. The
Marines goal operate within
2:26:19
what's known as the first island
chain inside the area vulnerable
2:26:22
to Chinese missiles. As some
other US military weapons such
2:26:26
as ships and aircraft stay at a
distance standing in Marine
2:26:30
Corps Commandant David Berger,
2:26:32
you're there side by side
shoulder by shoulder with Pat
2:26:35
with a partners with the allies
that the US has. You're not
2:26:39
You're not leaving them, you're
not going back to the rear.
2:26:43
This week, Secretary of Defense
Lloyd Austin provided his most
2:26:45
public support for the Marines
shifts.
2:26:48
These actions will bolster
2:26:50
deterrence in the region and
allow us to defend Japan and its
2:26:54
people more effectively. Oh
yeah. This is great.
2:26:59
Didn't you put this in the
newsletter as well?
2:27:01
Why would I put it in the
newsletter was the fact that
2:27:04
they're trying to rearm the
Japanese was not what allied
2:27:07
Austin just said there? Yeah,
kind of but now they want to put
2:27:10
these marine marine battalions
here in their craw long all
2:27:14
these.
2:27:15
Let me say, put them at our
border. Okay. I've covered all
2:27:18
the bases. John.
2:27:20
Good work. All right. Onward.
2:27:24
A senior Administration official
told me the Marines his moves
2:27:27
represents a significant posture
change, and Japan's agreed to
2:27:30
the change reflects a major
development in the Alliance. For
2:27:34
more on the Marine Corps plan to
take on China and redesign their
2:27:38
force structure. We turn to
retired Lieutenant General Paul
2:27:41
Van Riper. General, thank you
very much. Welcome to the
2:27:44
program. We've spoken to a half
dozen, three and four star
2:27:47
retired Marine generals like
yourself who voiced concerns
2:27:51
about the Marines, his plans,
you've been particularly public,
2:27:54
in your criticism, what are your
worries about the vulnerability,
2:27:58
the sustainability and the
access for these Marines being
2:28:01
deployed in the Pacific?
2:28:02
The Marines have always been an
offensive organization. The few
2:28:06
times we've been in the defense,
it hasn't gone well. In fact,
2:28:10
there's an analogy. In the
Second World War, the Marines
2:28:14
had a defense Battalion on Wake
Island. They weren't able to
2:28:17
resupply, to provide any
support. And of course, the
2:28:22
island fell with tremendous
casualties in pressors. What
2:28:26
we're talking about now is
putting Marines on islands in
2:28:29
the first island chain on the
western Pacific. There is no
2:28:33
ability logistically and even
the Marine Corps was in business
2:28:37
now to support them, or you
won't be able to get casualties
2:28:41
up.
2:28:41
I spoke to the current marine
commanders on Okinawa, and they
2:28:45
acknowledged some of your
concerns about logistics, but
2:28:48
they point out that they do not
have to do everything themselves
2:28:52
that they'll be supported by the
Navy and the Air Force. Will
2:28:55
that be possible?
2:28:56
No. Oh, okay. This is this is
old trauma. Old South Pacific
2:29:02
trauma.
2:29:05
Well, I guess, but this guy,
this guy is great. He just
2:29:10
thinks no, no. To get we do that
now can't be done. And I think
2:29:15
he's right. Because it seems to
me because I don't think much of
2:29:19
Lloyd Austin. No, I think he's a
blowhard. And he's got a great
2:29:24
voice though. I mean, he's got
the voice for the job, but
2:29:26
that's about it. And he's just
seems like a stooge, a
2:29:29
government stooge, a
2:29:31
memory with a mask and the face
shield and
2:29:35
a mask and a face shield? He's
sure.
2:29:38
He's not shows us like we're
weak. We're pussies. That was
2:29:40
horrible. Horrible. I
2:29:42
forgot to face in the mouth. I
didn't rest I didn't forget this
2:29:45
guy's horrible. So he's a
horrible person that ran the
2:29:49
marine commandant and the rest
of them and like Mark Miley,
2:29:53
they're just Yes, men. So I
mean, the Marine commandant, I
2:29:56
think is just so yeah, yeah,
whatever boss whatever,
2:29:59
whatever. Like Get the stars. I
also
2:30:01
believe there is a contingent,
upper level contingent of the
2:30:04
Marines who may be running a lot
of the military industrial
2:30:08
complex and all kinds of crap
stuff that that removed that
2:30:12
does not represent the Marines
that I know. There's something
2:30:17
going on something going on, I
think
2:30:18
something is going on to try to
eliminate this as part of the
2:30:22
service, you watch
2:30:24
the Navy and the Air Force, will
that be possible?
2:30:27
No, there have been articles
written where the actual numbers
2:30:32
have been done. And it's over
900 metric tons a day. Even with
2:30:37
the Marines and the joint force,
they can't keep them supplied.
2:30:41
Let's talk about the overall
strategy when it comes to China
2:30:44
in defense officials I speak to
in this Pacific say they support
2:30:48
these changes, because they need
the Marines and the Army to
2:30:52
operate within the first island
chain and make Chinese targeting
2:30:56
much more complicated since the
Chinese are trying to keep the
2:30:59
Navy and the Air Force out.
Doesn't that make sense?
2:31:03
No.
2:31:06
It could have been an Ask alum.
What's he going to say?
2:31:10
So I gotta get guy this guy. No.
But he was just adamant about
2:31:14
it. I think the guy
2:31:16
did all fairness. He's like,
command, why do I have to do the
2:31:19
NTD interview? No one watches
that maybe some podcaster.
2:31:23
That's about it. So he was
annoyed that he had to do this
2:31:26
interview.
2:31:27
He's on PBS is
2:31:29
just as bad. What are you
talking about? That's actually
2:31:34
interesting. on PBS, he would
just give those short answers.
2:31:37
No, he was flat.
2:31:38
He does elucidate. So here we go
with this news clip for
2:31:42
doesn't that make sense? No.
2:31:44
The Marine Corps in their
initial documents. So this would
2:31:47
be a low observable unit. I've
looked at all the equipment,
2:31:52
there's not one item of
equipment that has any stealth
2:31:56
or low observable capabilities.
Now the Marine Corps is saying
2:32:01
what we will do, we will tell
people where those units are as
2:32:05
a deterrent to the Chinese,
which is going to be there's
2:32:09
going to be little observable,
but there's no indication, none
2:32:11
of the equipment in that unit
has still played capabilities.
2:32:16
The Chinese are going to target
these right at the outset, and
2:32:19
take them up.
2:32:20
Marine leaders say they do
acknowledge some of the concerns
2:32:24
that you're raising, but that if
the Marines are gonna play a
2:32:27
major part in what the Defense
Department calls the pacing
2:32:30
challenge, China, they'll have
to make bold changes, and that
2:32:33
they're working to solve some of
the vulnerabilities. What's your
2:32:37
response to that?
2:32:38
The mistake is divesting
yourself of current
2:32:42
capabilities. And as you know,
the Marines have gotten rid of
2:32:45
all their tanks in the process
of getting rid of cannon
2:32:48
artillery, cutting squadrons.
Why would you cut these things
2:32:53
before you have the capability
they claim that we'll have in
2:32:56
the future? So we're going to
have a vulnerability gap here of
2:33:00
anywhere from eight to 10 years
for an unproven capability. Wow.
2:33:10
Okay, then you have a fifth one
a long one.
2:33:14
Yeah, the last last one, he kind
of wraps things up but what he's
2:33:17
saying is that they want to be
essentially disarmed the Marines
2:33:23
and then rearm them with all
this fancy missiles and make
2:33:27
them a missile operation cool
shit, but they don't have any,
2:33:31
but they do. But there's nothing
in between. It's gonna take 10
2:33:34
years to do that, and they're
gonna they're gonna be
2:33:35
weaponless. In the meantime, for
all practical purposes, it This
2:33:40
is ludicrous.
2:33:41
Oh, certainly, since everything
is being sent to Ukraine.
2:33:45
That does well, he mentioned
that this last clip,
2:33:47
a senior defense official told
me that the the items that
2:33:52
you're talking about that why
doesn't he
2:33:53
just say who it was a senior
defense official. And when
2:33:56
you're talking to this guy, PBS,
why don't they just say it? Is
2:34:01
that? Is that crap journalism?
Am I just too critical?
2:34:05
I think it's as good. I think
this is a legitimate complaint.
2:34:11
A senior defense official told
me that the the items that
2:34:15
you're talking about that have
been cut are more relevant to
2:34:18
invading Afghanistan, rather
than taking on China, which
2:34:22
again, the Defense Department
identifies as the future threat.
2:34:25
All I can say is look at
Ukraine. What do we need in
2:34:29
Ukraine, they're crying for
artillery, they're looking for
2:34:32
armored tanks. They want six
wing close support aircraft,
2:34:37
though they want helicopters.
Those are the kinds of things
2:34:41
the Marine Corps as cut or as
well on the way to cutting the
2:34:45
Marine Corps in the western
Pacific will be a missile force.
2:34:49
It'll have no infantry maneuver
units on the ground. What people
2:34:54
think of the Marine Corps will
not exist. They're rapidly
2:34:57
cutting it. So instead of being
a forces able to deploy
2:35:02
worldwide for contingencies is
going to be sitting on islands
2:35:07
in the defense is an untested
concept. But we're making we're
2:35:11
actually making the structure
cuts and cutting the weapons
2:35:15
before we have this capability
that I don't think we even even
2:35:19
exist,
2:35:19
was there a way for the Marines
to become more relevant to the
2:35:22
fight in the Pacific without
losing that global response
2:35:25
capacity.
2:35:26
What the Marine Corps always
done is been a it's been a
2:35:29
global response force, it's been
able to move on globally,
2:35:33
because of that was born
amphibious ships, it had air
2:35:37
alert forces, it was on scene,
all of those capabilities are
2:35:41
being cut for a promise in the
future, that those of us who are
2:35:45
resisting this and arguing
against it, don't think will
2:35:48
ever come to fruition.
2:35:50
So first of all, I can get you
an appointment with Dr. Zack for
2:35:54
that Shiva lunch. We should work
on that sector. I think he's. So
2:35:59
if I now put this all together,
what what they're doing here is
2:36:05
moving these guys out of the
way. But his complaint is we
2:36:07
know one, I think it's not just
the Marines, no one has any new
2:36:10
gear. Yeah, we know, it's all
going in there. And the and the
2:36:13
deals have been you know,
they're all the money is going
2:36:16
into the manufacturers, but we
really don't have anything yet.
2:36:19
And this is good, because this
brings me right to a couple of
2:36:21
Russia things that I have. And a
junior defense official told me
2:36:27
that there's a lot of reports of
tuberculosis in Ukraine amongst
2:36:32
the Ukrainian soldiers, which
was very predictable. And if
2:36:38
they get a full on TB outbreak,
not very good. Second, from the
2:36:44
same Junior defense official. I
am informed that President
2:36:50
Zelensky of Ukraine is offering
anyone who wants to fight and I
2:36:56
know that there's a lot of mercs
in Ukraine, mercenaries, US
2:37:00
mercenaries, hired soldiers not
should not be surprised anybody.
2:37:05
A lot of them go just they'll
fight anywhere for money. That
2:37:11
anyone who fights for the
Ukrainian cause is offered a
2:37:16
Ukrainian passport. And you can
put any name on it you want. So
2:37:21
there are terrorists, there are
criminals. Apparently even some
2:37:26
Antifa like real hardcore Antifa
are all getting these Ukrainian
2:37:30
passports and they are flooding
into Europe. So that's what the
2:37:34
officials say. Now let's turn to
Germany, Germany is under the
2:37:38
loop and there's something going
on Germany has a problem. And
2:37:42
heads are rolling. As we are now
all asked to send our our tanks,
2:37:49
our Bradley Fighting Vehicles
anything we got send it to
2:37:52
Ukraine,
2:37:53
the United Kingdom has now
confirmed it will send a
2:37:55
challenger to tanks to Ukraine.
These will be the first advanced
2:37:59
tanks given to Ukraine by its
allies since the war began.
2:38:03
Keith has been pleading for more
modern weaponry for months and
2:38:08
hopes the British decision will
put greater pressure on Germany
2:38:11
to allow the delivery of its own
2:38:14
leopard tax. So the leopard
tanks. This is also very soon
2:38:18
we'll talk about both the
Bradley Fighting Vehicles and
2:38:20
the leopard tanks in a moment.
This is a point of contention
2:38:25
amongst the Germans in their
parliament.
2:38:28
Now we've got an ongoing debate
whether or not Western allies
2:38:32
should supply Ukraine with
Western built battle tanks such
2:38:36
as the leopard. What's your
stance?
2:38:39
Well, I think we have a debate
that is only focused on new
2:38:43
weapons, which is I think, a
wrong idea. We just decided to
2:38:50
send vehicles to the Ukraine and
in the moment that was decided
2:38:57
the next questions were raised
whether we shouldn't send
2:39:04
Western tanks and what's the
next Western airplanes and
2:39:08
Sunday we're talking about
Western troops? I don't know. So
2:39:12
I don't think that this is the
right thing to do. Oh,
2:39:14
please don't try to be sensical
you moron. You can't have that.
2:39:18
The problem is all of Germany's
metrio is crap. It hasn't been
2:39:24
maintained. That half of it is
just broken. And this week if it
2:39:29
hasn't been announced already,
the German defense minister will
2:39:32
resign her position
2:39:34
here in Germany media reports
suggest the defense minister is
2:39:37
planning to resign because in a
lumbar left has come under
2:39:41
scrutiny for a number of
blunders most recently
2:39:44
asked John what kind of what
kind of mistakes you think she
2:39:48
made that would make force her
to resign?
2:39:53
Well, I don't know what kind of
mistake could she make
2:39:55
official unofficial New Year's
message that critics found
2:39:58
distasteful but She also allowed
her son to fly with her on
2:40:02
official business in a
government helicopter. So what
2:40:05
has she been? Like?
2:40:07
Tweet?
2:40:08
Wait, wait, wait, listen to the
reporter who's coming to tell
2:40:11
you what's what the problem
really is
2:40:13
government helicopter. So what
has she been like, as a defense
2:40:16
minister? What are some of these
blunders that have taken place?
2:40:20
On a smaller scale, these
blunders have been you know,
2:40:23
she, she showed up at a at a
military training site, and she
2:40:25
was wearing high heels. So just
she just looked out of step out
2:40:28
of touch with her surroundings.
She you, you know, then it also
2:40:34
turned out that she had an A
nail appointment, during
2:40:37
official working
2:40:38
hours, this was an outrage, she
has to resign.
2:40:41
It's like small things where you
think you're not taking your job
2:40:44
seriously. And the problem of
that is obviously the context,
2:40:48
right? We're dealing with the
war in Ukraine, the German
2:40:52
reputation already appears to be
very hesitant when it comes to
2:40:55
arms deliveries. When you look
at the state of the German army,
2:40:58
it doesn't look very good, you
know, recently had a training
2:41:02
exercise with Pumas that were
meant to be sent to the NATO,
2:41:06
eastern flank. They all failed.
So you know, we're already in
2:41:10
the middle of, you know, a
difficult time for the German
2:41:14
government where it is under
pressure for its behavior for
2:41:16
its attitude and for its
behavior in this whole conflict.
2:41:20
And then you have a defense
minister who appears not fit for
2:41:23
the job.
2:41:24
No kidding. None of these people
are fit for the job. There was
2:41:28
never supposed to be even a
European army or German army. So
2:41:34
yeah, they put some woke person
in there just like Lloyd Austin,
2:41:38
and now their stuff doesn't
work. Now, the suggestion here
2:41:43
in the United States is we need
to send Bradley Fighting
2:41:46
Vehicles, B, F V's the BFBS
Bradley Fighting Vehicles are
2:41:53
the so called tank busters. And
they have these tank missiles on
2:41:57
top, which is actually turned
out to be not so great, because
2:42:02
if you target one of these
vehicles, and you hit it right
2:42:05
on top, then pretty much
everyone inside melts. And I
2:42:11
have sorry,
2:42:12
I believe that there was I
remember when this thing was
2:42:15
first being developed. And it
was controversial at the time. I
2:42:19
remember this is like a was some
sort of massive waste of
2:42:23
development money. I have Am I
wrong? And then after that, I
2:42:27
have a
2:42:27
bootstrapped. Yeah. No. What
would happen is it would blow
2:42:31
these things up. If I hit it on
top where these tank busters
2:42:34
are, and the way it's built, it
would actually weld the top
2:42:38
shut, and fry everybody inside.
I think that was a design flaw.
2:42:43
We have boots on the ground from
an armor officer, who of course
2:42:47
will shall go unnamed known to
me, and I've served as a
2:42:49
battalion commander, Lieutenant
Colonel, I've operated in and
2:42:52
lead soldiers in Bradley
Fighting Vehicles and Abrams
2:42:55
tanks. I've been to combat more
than once and I've seen these
2:42:59
systems in battle. All
information I'm sharing is open
2:43:01
source. My opinions are my own.
I maintain my position that a
2:43:05
secondary objective of US
involvement in the Russia
2:43:07
Ukraine war is to study the
effectiveness of our legacy
2:43:11
equipment against the current
threat systems. There are
2:43:14
parallels to this war and the
Yom Kippur War, where we studied
2:43:18
the outcomes of the battles
between the Israelis who
2:43:21
supplied were supplied with us
equipment and the Arabs supplied
2:43:24
with Soviet equipment. This is
good. This is good analysis
2:43:27
here. The conclusions of the
study of outcomes of the Yom
2:43:31
Kippur War and the battle damage
of the equipment led to the
2:43:34
development and fielding of the
US Army's Big Five whatever that
2:43:40
is, the BF the Bradley fighting
vehicle is good, but not all
2:43:46
that. There's been a push in the
army to equip equip the Bradley
2:43:50
fighting vehicle and other
systems with 30 millimeter
2:43:52
cannon versus a 25 millimeter
cannon because the Russians
2:43:57
outgunned us. The fight the
Bradley fighting vehicle
2:44:00
requires crews that are highly
trained and that work well
2:44:04
together to be effective. They
have a role on the battlefield
2:44:08
as a scout platform or infantry
transport fighting vehicle. Yes,
2:44:12
they can kill tanks, but do not
protect crews very well, to just
2:44:16
said the variant of the Bradley
fighting vehicle that will be
2:44:19
given to Ukraine has not been
specified yet. That may make a
2:44:23
difference. The most modern bFV
variant is the m A m two a
2:44:27
three. It was the new hotness
when I was Lieutenant 21 years
2:44:32
ago. The OS for the computers is
Windows 95. My process of
2:44:40
spiking likely will get shipped
to Europe is the m two a two
2:44:46
from Operation Desert Storm,
which is not as advanced. It is
2:44:51
a viable fighting platform with
a train but only with a trained
2:44:54
crew. Training the crew to be
proficient proficient on this
2:44:57
platform takes months if These
crews were trained to standard
2:45:01
it will take about six months
from when the Ukrainian start
2:45:04
training up when we should see
them in combat. Given an
2:45:07
accelerated timeline, the US has
given the bFV to other partners
2:45:11
with limited success. I don't
believe the hype around the bFV
2:45:15
going back to war against an old
threat. It's counterintuitive to
2:45:19
the military industrial complex
argument that Russia outguns us.
2:45:22
Therefore we need better stuff.
future battles may tell but
2:45:25
perhaps the Pentagon is shorting
the bFV. I believe that with
2:45:30
well trained cruise train crews,
and robust robust logistic
2:45:33
support, the bFV would likely
provide viable so this none of
2:45:38
this is going to happen. Of
course, there's not going to be
2:45:41
enough training. It's not gonna
enough time to train at all. So
2:45:47
this is a farce, but the farce
is taken very seriously by the
2:45:53
Ukrainians. This is the
Ukrainian defense minister on
2:45:56
BBC,
2:45:57
Ukraine's defense minister says
his country has become a de
2:46:00
facto member of the NATO
military alliance, as Western
2:46:04
nations continue to supply
weapons for the war against
2:46:06
Russia. Speaking to the BBC,
Alexei Resnikoff, said there had
2:46:10
been a change among some allies,
once concerned that the military
2:46:14
assistance could be seen as an
escalation by Russia. Well, our
2:46:17
correspondent Hugo chega, sat
down with him.
2:46:19
We have a lot of modern NATO
standard weaponry, it means that
2:46:25
Ukraine, as a country, and the
armed forces of Ukraine or our
2:46:31
sector of security and defense,
became the member of NATO de
2:46:37
facto not the euro, but the fact
that because we have weaponry,
2:46:41
we have the understanding how to
use it. We have this
2:46:44
interoperability level of the
communication while they're with
2:46:48
our partners. And I'm sure that
in next future we will became
2:46:54
the member of NATO, the EU. So
that's a controversial
2:46:58
statement. You're saying that
Ukraine is a de facto NATO
2:47:02
member? Why controversial? It's
true. It's a fact I'm a lawyer,
2:47:07
you know, I I I'm operated with
the facts. The perception has
2:47:13
been that any kind of let's say
tanks being sent to Ukraine
2:47:16
would be seen as an escalation
by Russia. You're not concerned
2:47:19
about how Russia could respond.
I have a war in my country
2:47:27
them's fightin words. I say de
facto NATO. This is so stupid.
2:47:34
The Russians must be in the game
somehow.
2:47:37
There's something fishy about
the whole
2:47:41
I don't like any of this. The
mind control was fantastic
2:47:44
though. Because man there it's a
money bonanza. Check this out in
2:47:48
Sweden,
2:47:49
Europe has a new gateway to
space. Today, the EU inaugurated
2:47:53
its first orbital launch pad on
the European mainland. It's the
2:47:57
latest sign that the space race
is heating up here in Europe as
2:48:01
well. The new EU facility in
Arctic Sweden will complement
2:48:05
Europe's other Spaceport in
tropical French Guiana. It's
2:48:09
designed to launch small
satellites, which can be used,
2:48:12
for example, to track natural
disasters in real time or to
2:48:15
monitor active conflicts like
the war in Ukraine. European
2:48:19
Commission president was enough
on deadline joins Swedish and EU
2:48:22
dignitaries at the ribbon
cutting ceremony today.
2:48:25
It's a big moment. It's a big
moment for Europe. It's a big
2:48:29
moment for Europe space
industry. This space port offers
2:48:34
an independent European gateway
to space.
2:48:39
The current geopolitical
situation, not least, of course,
2:48:43
the Russian invasion of Ukraine
has demonstrated how important
2:48:48
it is that the European Union
has access to
2:48:51
space. Who Are they kidding? Do
they have engines or do they do
2:48:57
they also get them from Russia?
2:49:00
This is very me all the engines.
The good engines all come from
2:49:03
Russia, but they know that oh,
what are you gonna do?
2:49:08
I have to climate change clips,
short ones. I think
2:49:11
because I got to drought
Eclipse,
2:49:14
you want to hit us with the
drought hit us with the drought.
2:49:16
We have our drought here in
California. Here's a drought
2:49:20
quickie.
2:49:20
And despite the amount of
rainfall the drought that has
2:49:24
gripped the western US is far
from over.
2:49:26
Yeah, of course. We could have
rain for Here to Eternity and
2:49:31
there's gonna be a drop because
it keeps the prices high. But
2:49:34
But then what's causing all
this? Well, it's climate change
2:49:38
the other Cliff course.
2:49:39
So one of the issues that has
come up about climate change is
2:49:42
no longer an existential future
threat in California, it's here.
2:49:46
And what we're seeing is drier
dry years and wetter wet years.
2:49:50
So this way, you can't attribute
this what's happening right now
2:49:54
to climate change, but it is
consistent with what we're
2:49:57
seeing and that is these
atmospheric rivers getting
2:50:00
juiced up by the warm air out in
the Pacific because they're just
2:50:03
holding more water as they come
in. And so this is what all our
2:50:06
predictions are like this is
what the future probably looks
2:50:08
like and in fact, I would argue
the future is here it's here now
2:50:12
did you listen to the what he
said first is climate change and
2:50:15
then he says you can't attribute
it to climate change.
2:50:18
No, you can't attribute the you
can't attribute the this wet
2:50:21
weather to climate change that's
just an anomaly which actually
2:50:24
comes from global warming. We
all know this. You're going to
2:50:27
you're going to you're going to
have no water because of the
2:50:30
water that from global warming.
We were talking earlier about
2:50:38
you know how how news models are
often given the you know that
2:50:42
the control room che Okay, yeah,
you gotta say this or ask this
2:50:46
question. And we had one of
those crop up. This week. This
2:50:52
was CNN discussing the very
dangerous gas stoves because
2:50:58
they are noxious fumes are
killing our children and even
2:51:02
older people noxious fumes from
gas stoves. That's why we need
2:51:06
to get rid of them. gas stoves
2:51:09
could soon get 86 to from
kitchens across the country
2:51:12
going forward. The US Consumer
Product Safety Commissioner is
2:51:15
considering a ban on the
appliances for new builds. It
2:51:20
says those appliances can be a
source of indoor pollution,
2:51:24
sometimes linked to childhood
asthma,
2:51:26
but also the gas no gas
2:51:28
lines in new construction. Is
that about fossil fuels, or is
2:51:31
it about sorry, I'm getting in
trouble. No, no, that's That's
2:51:35
the short answer. It's about
climate change.
2:51:37
I will now do the part of the
control room
2:51:41
and gas lines in new
construction. Is that about
2:51:43
fossil fuels? Or is it about
Shut up? jasha Deville trouble
2:51:47
no no, that's That's the short
answer. It's about climate
2:51:50
change because methane is more
powerful than co2 when it comes
2:51:53
to heating up the planet. So big
time but in small spaces it's
2:51:57
personal health Excellent.
2:51:58
Well we'll save built good work
2:52:04
now know what your control room
I'm going to change you don't
2:52:07
like? Like my control room? I
like the older control room.
2:52:11
Okay. Yeah, that's more
believable. Okay.
2:52:15
I'm sorry. Yes, Michelle, move
on with the show. We have a
2:52:24
shill or not no agenda show
listeners know exactly what's up
2:52:27
when you hear about the new what
is his title? Chief note new
2:52:36
leader of the cop 28 climate
talks. So this we just had top
2:52:41
20 Cop 27 With the new Greta and
all out soft now cop 28. We're
2:52:46
going to discuss again how we're
going to pay for it who's going
2:52:49
to who how America is going to
just get it so who's gonna get
2:52:52
soaked. But now Whoa. Climate
2:52:55
change. Campaigners have
expressed outrage and the
2:52:57
appointment of the head of one
of the world's biggest oil
2:52:59
companies as president of this
year's UN Climate Summit in the
2:53:03
United Arab Emirates saw Tom
Athonite algebra who had Abu
2:53:07
Dhabi's national oil company is
the nation's climate and boy,
2:53:11
his office said he would play a
central role in building
2:53:14
consensus, the cop 28
conference, The move comes amid
2:53:18
controversy over the prominence
of fossil fuel interests at
2:53:21
climate talks. The recent cop 27
gathering in Egypt was described
2:53:25
by some attendees as a glorified
fossil fuel trade show.
2:53:30
I haven't ever, ever thought why
why this guy is going to be the
2:53:33
lead.
2:53:35
Well, first of all, before you
have your thought, I never heard
2:53:38
that it was a glorified trade
show for the fossil fuel
2:53:42
industry. Amy was there she
never mentioned that it's
2:53:44
only this guy did now that this
guy is going to be the new guy
2:53:48
for 24. The 2828 doesn't I don't
know. Is it been 28 years?
2:53:55
Isn't it every other year? It's
not every year, it's been
2:53:57
60 years. I think this guy is is
the guy because it's going to be
2:54:05
green hydrogen.
2:54:07
Maybe that could be you might be
right that I think
2:54:10
that. And this is the
switcheroo. I mean, someone
2:54:14
pointed out to me although I
think we we knew it. That the
2:54:19
inflation Reduction Act includes
money for green hydrogen, clean
2:54:24
hydrogen. And we need to invest
now so that in 10 years we'll
2:54:28
have green hydrogen from steamer
Monza, European Union, Green
2:54:32
Deal Guy, clean hydrogen. Now of
course, to get to green, clean
2:54:37
hydrogen, you have to go through
brown and blue and purple
2:54:41
hydrogen, which is not made with
wind power, or whatever else. I
2:54:47
think they're gonna make it
with. I think the whole the
2:54:50
whole thing is coming full
circle. They're scamming this
2:54:53
now that the scamming
everybody's taking away from
2:54:55
batteries and I think there's
we're gonna see more here More
2:55:00
of these reports
2:55:01
we have an important consumer
alert tonight for people who own
2:55:03
Bissell cordless vacuums. More
than 60,000 multiservice wet dry
2:55:08
vacuums have been recalled. A
government watchdog group says
2:55:11
some models can overheat and
even catch fire. At least one
2:55:15
person was burned. Contact this
oh for a free replacement
2:55:18
battery pack.
2:55:20
Now do you think that they
bought that airtime? Nor was
2:55:23
that truly a consumer
2:55:25
wouldn't be bad bissa wouldn't
be buying it. That that's not
2:55:28
the kind of thing you can buy
airtime for different things,
2:55:31
but you're not going to do it
for some negative story. It
2:55:34
seems to me but that negative
story is interesting in and of
2:55:37
itself because they are starting
to target
2:55:41
batteries batteries, yeah. And
why those targeting
2:55:43
and in Tesla's being targeted to
there's no doubt about it. I
2:55:46
mean, they were given a free
free pass for a long time now
2:55:49
they're being targeted. I know
locally, we've had a number of
2:55:51
stories about there's a crash in
the in the tunnel that goes to
2:55:56
go across the bay, the Yerba
Buena tunnel and there are some
2:56:00
and they have pictures of it.
They showing movies. I've never
2:56:03
seen this before, because they
might be able to do this
2:56:05
everywhere. But they have a
camera shot of a Tesla in the
2:56:09
fast lane, going across the
bridge, hitting the tunnel and
2:56:12
then stopping dead and then just
stopping dead and then bang,
2:56:16
bang, bang, bang bang that's six
cars, including one that got
2:56:19
jammed up into the side became
kind of get flying almost
2:56:23
flipped over. And then there's
updated a whole feature on what
2:56:26
happened.
2:56:27
Wow. Dynamite. Yeah. Well, Elon,
Elon, is I think Elon may have
2:56:35
taken just bitten off too much.
He couldn't chew it. You know?
2:56:39
He I think he may have been more
alone in this in his insanity
2:56:44
and incessant desire to build
x.com Because Pay Pal isn't what
2:56:49
I wanted it to be. Has to be
x.com I would talk about the
2:56:53
Twitter coin you're gonna pay
with a Twitter coin and Twitter.
2:56:56
Maybe I was wrong. Maybe he's
really just freewheeling this.
2:57:01
Because it's not I mean, Twitter
is I always predicted it will
2:57:05
destroy Twitter. I think that is
really happening. I mean, Jeff
2:57:09
Jarvis is on Mastodon lexicon
that's got to be the canary in
2:57:13
the coal mine.
2:57:16
Or not?
2:57:18
I can I can I have only one last
clip just to remind everybody,
2:57:24
the way I started out, they want
to kill us. They want to kill us
2:57:27
all. They want to kill us with
their climate change. They want
2:57:30
to kill us with a with a crap
food that isn't food. Where the?
2:57:36
What was it? What was what what
cereal was better than beef, I
2:57:40
forgot what it was. It wasn't
Cheerios, it was Froot Loops, I
2:57:46
think Froot Loops.
2:57:47
Froot Loops is a classic. It's
on the it's on the recommended
2:57:50
list,
2:57:51
I think from the
2:57:54
recommended number of artificial
dyes.
2:57:58
So we have one more classic from
Paul Ehrlich, the guy who was
2:58:02
still an advisor to the White
House today on climate change.
2:58:07
But this one is where he shows
his true colors,
2:58:10
a population growth expert, but
now he's a climate change expert
2:58:14
too. Is that what you're telling
me?
2:58:16
I'd like to return to his true
self, when he was a population
2:58:20
expert in the 1970s. And I'd
like you to hear his
2:58:23
recommendations for curtailing
the population. And then just
2:58:28
think about these people walking
around right now. And how they
2:58:31
want most of us dead,
2:58:34
given the population explosion,
let alone in this country. What
2:58:39
can the government what ought
the government to do about this?
2:58:41
Well, what it ought to do is,
that's the first thing you want,
2:58:44
you don't want to put I'm
against government interference
2:58:47
in our lives, you want to
minimize that. So the very first
2:58:49
thing the government should do
is try and take the pressure off
2:58:52
to reproduce. There's a lot of
pressure in our society now to
2:58:54
reproduce. If you're single,
people try and push you into
2:58:56
getting married, you know, your
wife, you have a bachelor over
2:59:01
and your wife says you shouldn't
I have a nice girl over the
2:59:03
ideas. You know, nobody should
escape. So there's pressure to
2:59:05
get married. Young couples have
they don't have children. People
2:59:08
say gee, they must be sterile.
They never say, gee, maybe they
2:59:11
like good wine and go into the
theater and so on. They prefer
2:59:13
that the scraping diapers so
there's pressure to have
2:59:16
children. So the first thing
that should happen is that the
2:59:18
President wants to say from now
here on out no intelligent,
2:59:22
patriotic American family, or to
have more than two children,
2:59:26
preferably one if you're
starting a family now, and I'm
2:59:28
not any law, but just say this
is what responsible people do.
2:59:32
You ought to make the FCC See to
it that large families are
2:59:35
always treated in a negative
light on television, wherever
2:59:37
they appear. There ought to be a
tremendous amount of television
2:59:39
time devoted to spot commercials
this where we've had against
2:59:42
smoking. But the ones in the
middle of say in the middle of
2:59:45
Beverly Hillbillies, you get a
scene which shows Los Angeles
2:59:47
and the smog and it just as a
city as a fatal disease. It's
2:59:49
called overpopulation and so
long. Now that sort of campaign
2:59:54
you can you can have a census, a
sample census, which we'll see
2:59:57
whether that was having a
desired effect. If that didn't
3:00:00
you'd move to giving women
bonuses for not having babies,
3:00:02
that almost certainly would do
the job. If that didn't have the
3:00:05
effect, then you could move to
changing the tax structure. So
3:00:08
that people who had the money
and had the children paid for
3:00:11
the children. In other words,
you would increase taxes on
3:00:13
people with children, rather
than decrease them, since they
3:00:15
when they have the children,
they require more services. If
3:00:18
that doesn't work, then you will
have the government legislating
3:00:20
the size of the family and
people say, Oh, that's
3:00:22
impossible. Government can never
intrude and tell you how many
3:00:25
children to have. Well, I got
news, you know what intruded a
3:00:27
long time ago and told you how
many wives you can have. And
3:00:29
there's not the slightest
question that if we don't get
3:00:31
the population under control
with voluntary means that in the
3:00:33
not too distant future, the
governor will simply tell you
3:00:35
how many children you can have
and throw you in jail if you
3:00:37
have too many.
3:00:37
This is the thinking. And it's
the same thing behind climate
3:00:41
change behind the Froot Loops.
They want you dead. They don't
3:00:45
want you to reproduce. They need
less of you. And of course, they
3:00:49
hit upon the genius idea of
convincing everybody they needed
3:00:53
to be the opposite sex to
sterilize themselves. It is so
3:00:57
good. Paul Ehrlich should go
home.
3:01:01
That's a yeah, do others to self
serve sterilization, deciding
3:01:05
and changing his sex and
sterilizing yourself in the
3:01:08
process is definitely part of
some sort of screwball movement.
3:01:12
Don't like it?
3:01:13
No, of course not. But that's
why we break it down and
3:01:16
deconstruct as best we can.
Early go home. Okay, we have end
3:01:26
of show mixes from Tom
Starkweather. We got Rolando
3:01:30
Gonzalez, we got Maddie J and
one more. Sir Michael Anthony.
3:01:37
Erica. Coming up next on no
agenda stream.com If you're in
3:01:42
the troll room, you can stick
right where you are. It's bowl
3:01:44
after bowl, Episode 217. Coming
to you from the heart of the
3:01:51
Texas hill country here in FEMA
Region number six in the
3:01:53
morning, everybody. I'm Adam
curry
3:01:55
in from Northern California
where it started raining just
3:01:59
now. Climate change, I'm John C.
Dvorak.
3:02:04
We return on Thursday with
another episode of your
3:02:07
deconstruction right here on no
agenda. Get pod verse app to be
3:02:12
alerted when we go live. And
make sure you go to no agenda
3:02:15
show.net And subscribe to the
newsletter. Remember us at the
3:02:19
boruch.org/na Until next time,
everybody. Adios and
3:02:36
we take this very seriously. The
president takes this very
3:02:39
seriously. He was not aware that
the records were there.
3:02:42
Ukraine has refuted Russian
claims it's captured the eastern
3:02:46
town of solidar.
3:02:47
Pfizer board member Scott
Gottlieb use the same Twitter
3:02:50
lobbyists the White House uses
to encourage Twitter to hide
3:02:54
post challenging his company's
massively profitable COVID Jab,
3:02:58
Lucky lottery player just one
big and I'm talking huge, but
3:03:02
unless you were in Maine
recently, it was
3:03:05
Treasury Secretary Jenny Yellen
is urging Congress to quickly
3:03:08
pass legislation to either raise
the federal debt limit or
3:03:11
temporarily suspend it
3:03:13
with more rain on the way the
flooding may not be over just as
3:03:16
many people are cleaning up from
the last door
3:03:19
CDC says it has found a safety
concern linking Pfizer's updated
3:03:24
by baileigh vaccine to possible
stroke health
3:03:26
officials are reassuring older
Americans that the latest
3:03:29
COVID-19 Booster is safe
3:03:46
nothing would be happy for me
3:04:03
you must be your advice is the
only highlight of the month.
3:04:43
Is yours
3:05:04
If the freedom to dream or a
spear, I proudly present a human
3:05:09
being who tonight represents
that Spears most honed kit
3:05:12
that is in judgment. Wow. Wow.
You know, for us Ukraine losing
3:05:17
this was simply not an option
because it's also about our way
3:05:20
of life and our freedoms, that
is in job
3:05:23
training of about 100. Ukrainian
soldiers will begin as early as
3:05:26
next week at Fort Sill,
Oklahoma. My difference is not
3:05:32
that I'm pleased to yield to the
distinguished President of
3:05:35
Ukraine, the courageous,
determined unified President of
3:05:39
Ukraine, President Solinsky,
ladies and gentlemen,
3:05:42
supporting Ukraine fully and
completely is in the best
3:05:45
interest of the United States.
I'm trying
3:05:48
to make a statistical point.
Okay, that is in JAMA,
3:05:51
we are willing to stick to
Ukraine and that we are willing
3:05:54
to do whatever it takes, and as
long as it takes,
3:05:57
but the Ukrainian see more than
that.
3:05:59
That is in judgment.
3:06:00
I think really giving Ukraine
these capabilities, I think can
3:06:04
be a deterrent. For example,
3:06:05
long range fires, that calculus
has clearly changed that is in
3:06:09
JAMA giving in to Putin's
aggression is absolutely the
3:06:15
wrong answer to this challenge,
not a joke. That isn't jonkman
3:06:19
eggs.
3:06:21
Nothing embarrassing about it.
And you'd better lay one out if
3:06:25
you're hired, given the old
needle once in a while. egg
3:06:30
prices are continuing to soar
the cost of
3:06:34
eggs has been soaring across the
country by
3:06:37
cost of eggs. So what's behind
egg inflation,
3:06:40
pathogenic avian influenza, more
commonly known as bird flu,
3:06:44
the worst bird flu outbreak in
years, swept through the
3:06:48
country. 10s of millions of
birds have died or been
3:06:51
slaughtered first, we
3:06:52
have reduced the egg laying hen
population by more than 40
3:06:55
million 40 million that's
astounding to think about that
3:06:58
looks like eggs are the new
toilet paper. extremely bad news
3:07:03
you
3:07:03
might want to consider
alternatives. This is
3:07:06
an egg replacement item.
3:07:07
These chickens that were laying
eggs those are mature hens right
3:07:11
so we don't get a mature hen
overnight. It takes some time
3:07:15
for a chicken patches out of an
egg to be ready to lasting us
3:07:18
into the summer
3:07:20
for you and nice egg in this
prime. Got an egg?
3:07:35
borak.org/in A thank God