0:03
Adam curry
0:04
Jhansi Devorah 18 this is your
0:08
award-winning Gitmo nation media
0:10
assassination episode 1066 this
is no
0:13
agenda northern Silicon Valley
where the
0:27
Zephyr actually hugged its horn
today
0:28
I'm John Steed Evora well you
gotta
0:34
think by now that the guys on
the Zephyr
0:38
know about you and they and
they and
0:41
they've triangulated you by now
surely
0:44
oh by the way we did the
Sacramento
0:48
meetup there was a good one of
the
0:49
conductor's was out in front of
the
0:51
station to say hi yeah because
he and we
0:55
have exclusive audio of that
event I
1:04
mean you know is there a foamer
podcast
1:10
this should be hell yeah and
usually
1:13
most most most of the former
stuff is on
1:17
our FDR rfd-tv
1:20
which is a cable station and
they play
1:23
these these unbelievably long
videos of
1:27
one train just going through
you know
1:30
going here and there just keep
following
1:32
it it's just unbelievably dull
I think
1:37
it would be interesting I would
1:38
certainly listen to it
especially if you
1:40
know they had guests on who
brought
1:42
their own favorite train clips
and and
1:45
have it really high-quality you
know not
1:47
just a 96 kilohertz sample you
know do
1:49
like 192 or do three three
hundred plus
1:52
and really have the binaural
sound of
1:55
the train going by that I would
listen
1:57
to yeah but did you can't
listen to that
2:00
for too long it's a very short
podcast
2:02
oh yeah maybe a 10 minute
podcast listen
2:06
to a bunch of horns anyway it
was busy
2:09
man and finally some stuff to
watch on
2:12
c-span and finally some stuff
to watch on
2:12
sadly at the same time oh my
good and I
2:16
looked at the clip list today
like oh
2:18
this is fantastic
2:19
we have almost no overlap you
did the
2:22
Supreme Court mainly Cavanaugh
and I
2:26
mainly did the I have one clip
from that
2:29
and I mainly did the the what
was the
2:33
exact title of it it was a
foreign
2:37
influence and social media with
Sandberg
2:39
and Dorsey oh yeah I wanted to
watch
2:42
that I didn't
2:44
that's more interesting watch
these guys
2:45
screaming at job I watched that
whole
2:48
opening and like oh really it's
just
2:50
another scripted shit show it's
like I
2:53
don't need to see that although
it's
2:54
entertaining the day before the
first
3:00
day like okay and doing that
and then
3:03
the second day they did it
again one do
3:06
you want to get into it now
first you
3:08
one just want to hear how we're
all
3:09
gonna die just to set the mood
for the
3:10
show well I decided with the I
think we
3:13
can tease the Supreme Court
with this is
3:15
my Supreme Court hearing out of
control
3:17
moment this is the way the
whole first
3:19
day went wait out of control
moment got
3:24
it yes here we go Airmen to
serve a
3:27
justice mr. Chairman I before
we proceed
3:32
mr. chairman I'd like to be
recognized
3:35
to ask a question before we
proceed the
3:37
committee received just last
night less
3:39
than 15 hours ago in pages of
dot and
3:43
this is Kamla Harris from
California or
3:47
as they do on c-span radio
review or
3:52
read or analyze you are you're
out of
3:55
order I'll proceed we cannot
possibly
3:57
move forward there are two
daughters mr.
4:08
chairman or another Harris mr.
chairman
4:12
revenues 40 law clubs and
documents that
4:15
we have everyone else join me
tonight
4:18
and we believe this hearing
should no
4:19
that's not an exciting day for
all of
4:22
you I you know I don't
understand why he
4:27
brought his two daughters that
the whole
4:29
day was an embarrassment for
them they
4:31
were sitting there and they're
pretty
4:32
frocks with mom and mom looks
like she's
4:36
about to kill someone yeah I
mean it was
4:39
it was it's not the most
important part
4:43
of the story but I just felt
bad like
4:45
yeah dude what you knew this
was gonna
4:47
happen dude what you knew this
was gonna
4:48
are you an idiot don't bring
your kids
4:49
to this just gonna suck
4:52
and then the all the
coordinated oh we
4:55
haven't seen the documents
forty-eight
4:57
million documents well the
thing that
5:01
was funny about it is that and
and one
5:03
of the guys called out the
group one of
5:05
the new I can't or don't have
his name I
5:07
got haven't Billy rice
ourselves the
5:09
freshman from the freshmen
class it's
5:12
one of the new guys on the on
the
5:14
committee he's not deal he's
not John
5:16
Kennedy the old the old fart
that's a
5:19
new guy but a younger guy yeah
and he he
5:23
says I'm looking at a tweet
right here
5:24
from Chuck Schumer he's telling
all the
5:27
Democrats to stall do anything
they can
5:29
to postpone these hearings he
said what
5:31
you guys are doing over there
he kept
5:33
bringing tweets apparently was
watching
5:36
his phone the whole time during
the all
5:37
the hearings of course and then
one of
5:40
them pointed out in which I
think should
5:42
have been pointed out more was
the
5:45
Democrats before the hearings
all said
5:47
we're voting no no matter what
uh-huh
5:50
well if you're voting no no
matter what
5:53
if what do you care about the
documents
5:54
coming in late or whatever
you're voting
5:56
no well exactly I mean I don't
come in
5:59
like well I presume that they
tried to
6:02
maybe somehow convince one or
two
6:04
Republicans to vote against him
and that
6:07
way I mean what I heard what I
heard the
6:10
big head the big Talking Heads
talking
6:11
about on cable news was and I
actually
6:15
it was so long ago is beginning
the week
6:17
I didn't think he would look
and clip it
6:19
well how come you guys didn't
walk away
6:21
you know and there was the kind
of this
6:23
push from the media like you
guys should
6:25
walk out you should walk out
really good
6:27
walk away
6:27
just walk out of that just to
fuck up
6:29
and be that was like well we
don't
6:32
really want to do that because
then we
6:34
really lose all the power so
there was
6:36
kind of that discussion and I
think they
6:37
really thought well maybe we can
6:39
convince one or two guys shame
him into
6:40
it with the coordinated people
in the
6:43
audience standing up every 10
minutes ah
6:45
it was there was there somebody
standing
6:48
up and leaving everything it
was the did
6:50
one would get out they get
kicked out
6:51
then another one another one
they're all
6:53
screaming and there's a
high-pitched
6:54
voice yeah I have a bunch of
short
6:57
little guys if you want to hear
oh yeah
6:59
web your T's has become the
segment so
7:01
let's let's move right through
it I'm
7:03
liking what I'm hearing
7:05
all right so let's go with a
couple a
7:06
little blood have we even
talked to what
7:08
this is about that this is the
7:09
confirmation hearing of the
idea to
7:11
mention it yes so this is judge
7:15
Cavanaugh who Trump nammed as
well I
7:21
think he appoints him and then
he has to
7:22
be confirmed
7:23
nothing is nomination okay and
now it
7:27
has to go through the Senate
and Senate
7:30
has to it's just a straight
straight
7:32
majority I think for this yeah
yeah just
7:34
so 51 first let's get out of
this
7:36
committee oh yeah okay yes a
complicated
7:40
process yet this is still the
committee
7:42
yeah this is the committee and
then
7:44
where's it go then he goes to
the devote
7:47
for the everyone gets to vote
on okay I
7:50
got it so what's the what's the
make of
7:53
the committee and what do they
have a
7:55
vote or that just someone says
hey nice
7:57
chat and yeah how does that
work well
8:03
how many Republicans how many
Democrats
8:04
on there's one more Republican
it's it's
8:08
all show right let's just agree
it's a
8:11
big show it's grandstanding
it's a show
8:13
okay hey camel toe Harris was
back and
8:15
forth between this one and
between the
8:17
social media the image they
were busy
8:20
well here's here's a classic
example of
8:23
Camilla Harris this is a short
clip i
8:26
will be playing of course very
close
8:29
attention to your testimony and
I think
8:31
you know the American public
will be
8:34
paying very close attention to
your
8:36
testimony you and I are paying
some
8:45
attention but nobody and then
Lindsey
8:53
Graham of course had a couple
of good
8:54
points he kind of point out
what you
8:57
just said a second ago didn't
play the
8:58
Lindsey Graham hypocrisy clip
to my
9:01
colleagues on those I look
forward to
9:04
working with you but we have a
different
9:06
view here I think you got to be
blind as
9:08
to what's going on here have
you heard
9:10
of Justice Breyer do you know
him you
9:12
can't say anything I guess
where did he
9:14
come from
9:14
he was Ted Kennedy's Senate Jew
9:17
sherry where do you think
Republicans
9:20
are gonna go find the judge the
whole
9:22
argument is you can be a
conservative
9:24
Republican president but you
got to
9:26
nominate a liberal to be fair
to the
9:28
country a liberal to be fair to
the
9:28
that's absurd what do you think
Ruth
9:31
Bader Ginsburg came problem
9:33
choose the general counsel they
see oh
9:35
you wonderful person what
groups do
9:37
y'all use to pick from this is
shaping
9:40
up to be the hypocrisy hearing
and
9:43
that's hard to do in the Senate
Lindsay
9:45
is real it's like the it's like
one
9:48
testicle dropped on the guy
well there
9:51
was this incident that was I
don't
9:53
there's no clip of it I saw
this I saw
9:56
the video at the funeral McCain
funeral
9:59
yeah oh yes explaining this
really good
10:02
well Lindsey Graham was there
and all of
10:04
a sudden luma Abidine comes
running a
10:07
beeline beeline through the
crowd
10:09
yeah beeline through the crowd
gives him
10:11
a big hug and the Yankee kick
and a
10:14
couple sorority sisters and
meanwhile
10:18
John Kelly yeah Kelly and
mattis were
10:22
both there and I think it was
mattis at
10:24
first spotted him and they - he
looked
10:26
around and he said what were
these two
10:28
doing and then by the way
Lindsey Graham
10:31
was doing kind of that I'm at
the
10:33
funeral and no one wants to
talk to me
10:39
after Abidine left that's what
happened
10:42
and then Kelly's turns running
I didn't
10:44
realize how tall that guy is
yeah little
10:46
menacing actually he brought
got to be
10:49
able to stand up to trump
because he's
10:50
at least the same height right
and he's
10:53
stand-in there and then all of
a sudden
10:54
he's just starts staring at
Lindsey and
10:58
with a real like a stare like
what the
11:00
wood is that you're up to
staring at him
11:03
and grandmas no they're not
noticing
11:05
that he looks at him suddenly he
11:07
sketches his eye and he's like
yeah and
11:12
then Kelly gives him some sort
of a song
11:15
well it looks a little it was
yes at
11:17
first like yeah it looks like
he's
11:19
giving cuz he's basically
touching his
11:21
his the bottom underneath his
eye with
11:23
his index finger but it's the
other side
11:25
of his nose than the cameras
position
11:27
and it could also have been
just I got
11:29
some crud in my eye on all
11:31
Lindsey Graham but it could
have been a
11:33
signal like I got my eye on you
yeah
11:36
that's what I thought and so
then after
11:38
that Lindsey becomes just great
11:40
apologist for Trump at these
hearings
11:46
only one testicle dropped
autumn not
11:48
both just one he was doing is
the best
11:53
job of all the people there he
fries but
11:55
there's something something's
up with
11:57
that guy let's see what kind of
hashtag
12:02
meet me two moment we can have
what
12:04
Lindsey Graham wouldn't that be
great so
12:10
this is his little very short
comment
12:12
about election this is a second
clip
12:14
from him you had a chance and
you lost
12:16
if you want to pick judges from
your way
12:20
of thinking then you better win
an
12:22
election that's what I'm
telling you
12:25
Lindsey's got a little ballsy
call on
12:27
the side like I like this
Lindsey just
12:30
you know his dad died okay this
with his
12:33
monstas dad but McCain small
12:40
interjection we make jokes like
this and
12:43
the other night actually
regretted we've
12:46
made a lot of jokes about Ruth
Bader
12:47
Ginsburg house falls asleep
yeah she's
12:52
funny just look at her she's
funny and
12:54
she looks funny and I saw the
12:56
documentary about her oh I've
respect
12:59
for this woman she's still
fantastically
13:01
in fact she is very humorous
but I felt
13:04
like oh man I've been laughing
at her
13:05
without really knowing her
whole story
13:07
her whole story is pretty
outrageously
13:10
cool okay just as an inter when
we laugh
13:15
about oh I'm just saying that's
my
13:19
conscious I just need to get it
off my
13:22
chest now back to laughing
about Lindsey
13:24
Graham and his little testicle
so
13:29
Feinstein comes out and she said
13:30
something that I think she
wanted to say
13:32
one thing and she kind of
drifted off
13:34
and said something else and if
you
13:36
listen listen to the structure
of what
13:38
she's trying to say I think she
wanted
13:40
to say that she wants she says
the
13:43
country is do
13:45
she's a diversity not the
country's
13:47
diverse and we should have a
more I
13:49
think she was saying we don't
want to
13:51
put another white guy in the in
the
13:54
Supreme Court she never
actually said
13:56
that but I think that's what
she wanted
13:58
to say mhm and in a roundabout
way
14:01
behind the noise is really a
very
14:05
sincere belief that it is so
important
14:08
to keep in this country which is
14:11
multi-ethnic multi-religious
14:21
multi-ethnic recei and that's
my worry
14:25
that's my worry so I look
forward to
14:29
your statement and answering the
14:31
questions Thank You mr. chairman
14:33
yeah and I have two clips that
I need to
14:35
play here before you go mm-hmm
what is
14:39
multi economic mean multi-ethnic
14:44
multi-religious multi-ethnic
what does
14:46
that mean it means we have rich
people
14:48
and very poor people Multi
economic so
14:55
we need we need a homeless
person it
14:57
seems to me where Nixon says
somebody
15:03
needs to represent the mediocre
no core
15:06
said that yeah I believe it was
Nixon I
15:09
think people gonna look into
this be
15:10
crazy he was being crude
condemned for
15:14
picking somebody who is
mediocre so
15:17
there's a lot of mediocre a
diamond
15:19
paraphrasing a lot of video
copy which
15:21
is kind of what Feinstein just
said
15:23
there's a lot of mediocre
people in the
15:25
country so they need to be
represented
15:26
with a mediocre justice oh man
you want
15:31
to hear the flub of the week
real quick
15:32
yeah this is uh John Kasich and
he was
15:37
and he was talking on the big
head Cuomo
15:40
kid show on CNN look I learned
early on
15:44
in my job when I had a fight
with the
15:46
unions that and sometimes you
have to
15:49
fight and stand tough but if
you do it
15:51
all the time it's distracting
you can't
15:54
achieve your bigger purposes
and it's
15:56
not about some
15:58
you know it's not about I win
you lose
16:00
the other thing is when you
look at the
16:01
Congress though it's it's like
24 hours
16:04
since John McCain was put to
death and
16:06
look at this the circus of a
hearing
16:08
that's going on 24 hours since
John
16:22
McCain was put to death I know
I'm
16:31
actually cried the first time I
heard it
16:34
good lord thank you for making
the show
16:38
this is a good thirty seconds
worth of
16:40
conversation of will extend it
even it's
16:43
like 24 hours since John McCain
was put
16:46
to death cold cold cold cold
16:50
yeah person not hear that at
that moment
16:57
if the people were listening
that do
17:00
these shows they're actually
listening
17:01
to the other person talk yeah
you know
17:05
he wasn't put to death let's
make that
17:06
clear not that we know not that
we're
17:09
aware of but that's what we
just say
17:11
yeah but they wouldn't say that
but they
17:15
should they would correct him
yes all
17:17
right can I can I go into
Feinstein you
17:19
have a point I probably
interrupt your
17:21
whole point about it no the
Feinstein
17:24
thing I think I've got a card
17:25
essentially what's diversity so
we
17:27
should have you know should
have an
17:28
ethnic another ethnic on the
even though
17:31
we're already at the max it
seems I mean
17:33
they have how many people were
Jewish on
17:35
the Supreme Court three maybe
17:37
I think that's think they're
17:39
over-represented we need
pastafarians on
17:42
there why doesn't she
17:44
bitch about that
17:46
she's not a Pastafarian well
she's
17:49
Jewish okay they just find that
I just
17:54
want to get a couple of living
at this
17:55
out of the way and then you
know this is
17:57
about Feinstein doctor
questioning
18:00
that's why I inserted it here
yes what
18:02
I'd really only saw the the
beginning
18:05
because I was going back to the
social
18:06
Nets thing and I see Feinstein
trying to
18:09
you know trick Cavanaugh into
this
18:11
conversation about you know I
guess in
18:14
93 her office wrote the assault
weapons
18:18
ban which of course had a
sunset clause
18:21
after ten years and they had a
review
18:23
and said well it didn't do a
damn bit of
18:25
good so we don't have to renew
it just
18:28
so you know historical context
but you
18:31
know she was asking about an
opinion he
18:34
wrote and the guy wrote a lot of
18:35
opinions about the the reason
that you
18:38
could have an assault weapon
legally is
18:40
because they were not unusual
they were
18:44
there there's millions of them
and then
18:46
she tries to get him into a
debate of
18:48
well does that mean that these
millions
18:50
are used or they're just in the
closet
18:51
it's not the same thing yeah
she's
18:53
trying to relitigate the Second
18:55
Amendment pretty much it's like
a moron
18:57
wasting everybody's time and
everyone
18:59
could see you could see I mean
even I
19:00
see this coming from a mile
away it's
19:03
like are you really gonna try
this so
19:04
instead of playing that let's
listen to
19:06
NPR's report they spend about
seven
19:08
seconds on it guns abortion the
scope of
19:11
presidential power all issues
being put
19:13
to Supreme Court nominee Brett
Kavanaugh
19:14
today this is the second day of
his
19:16
confirmation hearings and the
first
19:18
chance for senators on the
Judiciary
19:20
Committee to question him in
public in a
19:22
moment we'll hear from one of
those
19:23
senators first NPR legal affairs
19:25
correspondent Nina Totenberg
joins us to
19:27
walk through some of the
nominees
19:28
responses today hi Nina
19:29
hi let's begin with guns has a
19:33
reputation as being a very
pro-gun
19:35
rudosch how was he dressed on
that today
19:37
well as a judge Kavanagh has
staked out
19:40
a starkly different position
for most
19:43
lower court judges on gun rights
19:44
disagreeing even with fellow
19:46
conservatives most notably he
dissented
19:48
when his court upheld the
District of
19:50
Columbia statute banning
assault weapons
19:53
and ammunition magazines of
more than
19:55
ten bullets today questioned by
Senator
19:57
Dianne Feinstein he maintained
that
19:59
under the
20:00
situation and Supreme Court
precedent
20:02
only unusual weapons can be
regulated
20:05
and semi-automatic assault
rifles are
20:07
not unusual they're in common
use let's
20:09
take a listen to the exchange
you're
20:11
saying the numbers determine
common use
20:14
they're widely possessed in the
United
20:17
States Senator beyond guns he
was also
20:20
asked about abortion and we know
20:22
President Trump promised to
name someone
20:23
to the court who would overturn
Roe vs.
20:25
Wade what did Kavanagh have to
say now
20:27
when I heard that I thought
wait a
20:29
minute did he say that the
president we
20:33
know the president said he
would appoint
20:34
someone who would overturn Roe
versus
20:37
Wade who would overturn Roe
versus
20:40
yeah so he said
20:42
I don't know if the president
said that
20:45
well and if he did by the way
let's stop
20:47
right here because we've
listened to
20:49
these media guys long enough if
the
20:51
president ever said that mm-hmm
20:53
they would play the clip so I
went and
20:56
got the only clip that I think
comes
20:58
close to what the claim is here
and
20:59
you're right they would have
had the
21:01
clip they don't because he's oh
let's
21:05
just start with everybody out
there
21:07
listening to this because we've
noticed
21:09
this over the last year if
there is a
21:13
moment where Trump said
something that
21:15
they're making an assertion
about
21:16
they're either gonna lie about
it and
21:17
play a different clip or
they're gonna
21:18
play Trump saying it they did
not play
21:21
Trump saying it that means he
didn't say
21:23
it or we'll see what he did say
cuz you
21:26
have the clip okay so again
here's NPR
21:28
NPR your National Public Radio
state
21:31
senator beyond guns he was also
asked
21:34
about abortion and we know
President
21:36
Trump promised to name someone
to the
21:37
court who would overturn Roe
vs. Wade
21:38
what did Kevin I'll have to say
now
21:40
let's listen to what the
president
21:41
actually said this is from the
final
21:43
debate against Hillary Clinton
and do
21:47
have a date on this and it
doesn't
21:49
matter mr. Trump you're
pro-life but I
21:52
want to ask you specifically do
you want
21:55
the court including the
justices that
21:57
you will name to overturn roe v
wade
21:59
which includes in fact states a
woman's
22:03
right to abortion well if that
would
22:04
happen because I am pro-life
and I will
22:07
be appointing pro-life judges I
would
22:09
think that that will go back to
the
22:10
individual states but I'm
asking you
22:12
specifically would you like they
22:14
overturned it'll go back to the
states
22:15
what I'm asking you sir is do
you want
22:18
to see the court overturn
you've just
22:20
said you want to see the court
protect
22:21
the Second Amendment
22:22
do you want to see the court
overturn
22:24
well if we put another two or
perhaps
22:27
three justices on that's really
what's
22:29
going to be has that's will
happen and
22:31
that'll happen automatically in
my
22:33
opinion because I am putting
pro-life
22:35
and justices on the court I
will say
22:38
this it will go back to the
states and
22:40
the states will then make a
22:41
determination there you go he
didn't say
22:44
it no he's
22:47
he said something really
weaselly but
22:58
yeah news reporting we have we
didn't
23:02
say but he kind of said it and
he
23:04
actually added something
important which
23:06
was omitted from the NPR report
which is
23:08
no matter what happens it goes
back to
23:11
the states where people
California
23:14
shouldn't be worried about
anything
23:15
should be happy they can do
whatever
23:17
they want in fact why don't
they promote
23:19
that yeah later on the show I
got some
23:28
flashbacks and you and I both
will both
23:32
reminisce about when some of
the now
23:34
crazy lefty people were really
on our
23:38
side of thinking interestingly
no we'll
23:41
get to that later the Supreme
Court I
23:43
have two more things I have
Mike Lee I
23:46
had two clips from him one is
extremely
23:49
long you want to play the whole
thing
23:50
but you just get an idea of
what he's
23:53
talking about by playing about
the
23:54
probably the first half of clip
one if
23:57
this is sort of how the
practice of
23:59
holding these hearings began so
the
24:02
Senators could ask nominees how
they
24:04
might vote how they might rule
in
24:08
particular cases but this
didn't always
24:11
happen in fact it it wasn't
until 1916
24:15
that this even started you see
there
24:19
have been 113 justices
confirmed at the
24:22
Supreme Court so far the first
66 were
24:25
confirmed without even holding
a hearing
24:28
any idea of a hearing is
relatively new
24:31
it's about 102 years old yes
see I love
24:33
this John thank you is having a
little
24:35
history lesson on the show is
something
24:37
we need to work on it's really
it's it's
24:39
entertaining even if this
happened
24:41
hundreds of years ago context
that we're
24:45
not getting from the news me
yes now we
24:48
have to do it punch it that's
pathetic
24:51
podcasters 125 130 years under
our
24:54
constitutional republic without
ever
24:56
having a hearing but regardless
we
24:59
started having hearings just
over a cent
25:01
riah go the very first Supreme
Court
25:04
confirmation hearing occurred
in 1916
25:07
with justice Louis Brandeis
after Louis
25:12
Brandeis was nominated to the
court some
25:15
called for a hearing now if
we're honest
25:18
with ourselves for honest about
history
25:20
I think a lot of us maybe had
to do with
25:22
some anti sentiment fervor and
the fact
25:23
that Justice Brandeis was
Jewish but
25:27
senators also wanted to
determine
25:28
whether Brandeis would use his
seat on
25:30
the Supreme Court to advocate
for some
25:35
of the things that he had
advocated for
25:37
as a private citizen as a public
25:40
interest attorney they wanted
to know
25:43
how he might vote in particular
cases
25:46
they didn't ask Justice
Brandeis to
25:49
testify significantly but they
did in
25:53
fact ask some outside witnesses
what
25:56
they thought about his
nomination the
26:00
next important moment one could
argue
26:01
occurred in nineteen thirty
nine when
26:04
Felix Frankfurter became the
first
26:05
nominee to himself testified
before the
26:09
committee at the time
frankfurter was
26:13
controversial in part because
he was
26:15
born overseas but senators also
worried
26:18
that frankfurter was a radical
based on
26:21
his defense of anarchists in
court so
26:25
again senators wanted
assurances about
26:28
how frankfurter might rule in
particular
26:31
cases in particular of what
results he
26:34
might reach in a particular
type of case
26:37
frankfurter however
significantly
26:40
declined to engage with the
senators on
26:42
those topics and insisted that
his
26:45
public record spoke for itself
26:47
justice stewarts nomination in
1959 was
26:51
another turning point senator
is seeking
26:54
to resist Brown versus Board of
26:55
Education one of the grill
Stewart on
26:58
his views on integration others
still
27:02
wanted the grill steward about
his views
27:03
on national security
27:05
so senators turned up the heat
a little
27:07
bit more in that hearing like
27:11
frankfurter before him Justice
Stewart
27:13
did not provide substantive
27:15
answers to their questions huh
27:18
and I played the whole thing as
you can
27:19
tell it goes on and on it he
talks about
27:23
how it yeah now the standard of
27:24
excellence is rouge gator been
a root
27:26
Gator Gator Ruth Bader Ginsburg
are Gigi
27:30
has son she had a rule she says
I'm not
27:32
gonna you know tip my hat and
it's a
27:37
bunch of during her hearings
and I don't
27:39
think I should be answering
these sorts
27:40
of questions and that's the
standard
27:42
that the Republicans keep
throwing in
27:44
the Democrats face what during
these
27:46
hearings was did frankfurter in
that
27:49
clip you see also the guy who
invented
27:50
the hot dog no no surprisingly
enough
27:53
he's not the same guy okay so I
thought
27:57
it might be a little shortcut
were Mike
28:00
Lee kind of does it because a
little
28:03
little ending here that thought
was
28:05
interesting 28 years later 28
years
28:08
after Justice Stewart came
through this
28:10
committee the Senate considered
Robert
28:13
Bork's nomination to the
Supreme Court
28:15
this was another significant
turning
28:16
point and in my view remains
something
28:19
of a rock-bottom moment for the
Senate
28:22
and for the Senate Judiciary
Committee
28:25
without getting into any of the
course
28:28
yeah the gory details here I
think it
28:30
suffice it to say that Senator
Ted
28:32
Kennedy and judge Bork did not
agree on
28:36
certain matters of
constitutional law
28:38
and Kennedy's response was to
savage
28:44
unfairly in my opinion the
results that
28:48
Judge Bork would reach if
confirmed to
28:51
the Supreme Court the history
shows that
28:54
over the better part of a
century the
28:56
Judiciary Committee has
gradually
28:58
created something of a new norm
the norm
29:01
in which members demand that
nominees
29:03
speak about specific cases in
return for
29:07
favorable treatment from the
committee
29:09
as the jurists are going
through this
29:11
process now man he's talking
about he's
29:15
wasting our time talking about
people
29:17
who are wasting our time in
historical
29:18
context of wasting time yes I
only have
29:23
one last clip and this is
actually have
29:26
to another was not really about
this
29:28
hearings another was not really
about this
29:28
but this this one here comes
from the
29:30
government there's a guy a
couple there
29:33
you have a number of historians
that
29:34
like to produce podcasts really
podcasts
29:41
are just kind of like little
books on
29:43
tape are they hosted on pod
beam no
29:45
they're not on pod being
surprisingly
29:47
enough I would say that I
wouldn't be a
29:51
podcaster if I had this guy's
voice
29:53
because this is a guy and I
don't have
29:54
his name in front of it he
gives a
29:56
little Supreme Court early
history that
29:58
was never mentioned by anybody
as
30:00
actually kind of interesting
presidents
30:02
nominate Supreme Court justice
oh my god
30:05
I'm already loving the voices
and the
30:08
Senate has to confirm there has
been
30:10
occasional trouble since the
very
30:12
beginning trouble since the very
30:13
the first justice to be denied
a seat on
30:15
the court was a man named John
Rutledge
30:17
it was 1795 just seven years
into the
30:21
new constitutional experiment
Rutledge
30:24
had written an op-ed piece
critical of
30:25
the Jay Treaty a 1794 treaty
with
30:28
Britain that tried to resolve
certain
30:30
lingering issues from the War of
30:32
Independence that was enough
for a
30:34
federalist Senate to Scotch his
30:36
candidacy Jefferson came into
office in
30:40
1801 in what he called the
second
30:42
American Revolution
30:43
I guess that for saying this
guy needs a
30:46
noise gate real bad
30:49
did you hear that I don't know
man but
30:58
poised to prevent that
revolution was
31:00
Chief Justice John Marshall
Jefferson's
31:03
distant cousin he was put into
his life
31:05
tenured position in the last
months of
31:07
John Adams failed one-term
31:09
administration Adams who
distrusted
31:11
Jefferson's Democratic
radicalism
31:14
essentially engaged in
last-minute court
31:16
packing Marshall and dozens of
other
31:19
midnight appointments to make
sure that
31:21
Jefferson did not take things
too far to
31:23
the left
31:24
Marshall went on to serve for
34 years
31:27
he was perhaps the greatest of
all
31:29
Supreme Court justices he was
indeed a
31:32
foreign in Jefferson side
Marshall
31:34
wanted America to be a great
centralised
31:36
nation state not a
confederation of
31:39
sovereign states he wanted a
nation that
31:42
prized the sanctity of contract
above
31:44
any temporary notion of social
justice
31:46
he despised Jefferson's vision
of a
31:49
lightly governed inward-looking
31:51
agriculturally based loose
Association
31:54
of proud Commonwealth's like
Virginia
31:56
and Pennsylvania we now live in
31:59
Marshalls America not
Jefferson's and
32:02
that's the story Paul Harvey
that was
32:07
probably the right there was the
32:08
fundamental basis for the Civil
War yeah
32:12
Marshall yeah well and that was
social
32:15
justice warriors it sounds like
32:17
Jefferson was a social
Jefferson warrior
32:20
he was and that's what she
called and he
32:23
was a lefty I mean the day
course they
32:25
demean him because he owned
slaves you
32:28
know yeah but he was getting
closer
32:31
he was the og s JW t og slave
Jefferson
32:37
warrior we cannot I'm sorry
that's my
32:44
mistake we cannot I'm sorry
that's my
32:44
yeah we cannot I'm sorry that's
my
32:49
what well--there's I've we need
we
32:53
cannot where is this thing yes
we cannot
32:56
end a segment like that without
this
32:57
jingle I'm sorry I will have it
ready
32:59
next time not tight tight now
this is
33:12
the last thing this was an ad
did you
33:14
see this ad this was Susan they
ad
33:16
against Susan Collins the
social justice
33:19
warriors put up an ad right now
who is
33:21
Susan Collins this is the
senator from
33:23
Maine who is the Republican and
swing
33:31
vote mm-hmm and she has to vote
as do
33:35
every do all the Republicans
they have
33:37
to vote YES on this guy and
they think
33:39
that she's a weak sister a weak
sister
33:44
okay and so the all these
Democrats put
33:48
together this ad claiming to be
likes
33:50
her supporters but you could
just see
33:53
this as a fake in terms of that
and they
33:56
put this ad out which is now
floating
33:58
around trying to get her to
vote against
34:00
Kavanagh and this is the ad
Susan
34:02
college senator I have called
you I have
34:05
emailed I've written letters
day after
34:08
day week after week it has been
pretty
34:10
d'amore week after week it has
been pretty
34:11
to know that your elected
representative
34:15
is ignoring you so we're trying
34:17
something new and hope that
this will
34:19
get your attention
34:20
senator Collins if you vote for
Brett
34:22
Kavanaugh we're gonna fund your
future
34:24
opponent a vote for Cavanaugh
is almost
34:27
certainly a vote to reverse Roe
versus
34:31
Wade as a Mainer who has a
pre-existing
34:33
condition if you vote YES on
Cavanaugh
34:35
you're voting to kill me I got
to hear
34:45
that part again that was just
so good by
34:48
the way it's followed up by the
34:49
non-binary person but also the
the
34:53
cadence the whole delivery of
that line
34:55
was just fantastic if you're
going to
34:58
kill me
34:58
no Manor who has a pre-existing
35:00
condition if you vote YES on
Cavanaugh
35:02
you're voting to kill me if he
was in
35:05
court he could instantly take
away
35:07
rights for people like me as a
35:09
non-binary person or people
nearly under
35:12
marginalized identity you vote
no
35:17
we're not gonna stop fighting
until
35:19
you're defeated Mainers need
you to
35:21
stand up and be a hero be a hero
35:24
being a hero for your hero and
vote no
35:26
and if you don't we will
replace you who
35:32
paid for that that's great I
don't know
35:34
I couldn't have yet to figure
it out
35:36
it's very it's humorous I like
it that's
35:37
very funny
35:38
this is I appreciate this kind
of art
35:41
and I encourage that at any
time in our
35:43
media landscape vote for him to
kill me
35:47
yes yeah I think that is
fantastic
35:50
absolutely good job well let's
35:54
transition to the other side of
Capitol
35:57
Hill and where we had the
foreign
36:01
influence on social media a
hearing and
36:05
this was in the Intelligence
Committee
36:06
and I think we can do a nice
transition
36:08
with the only clips that
overlapped
36:10
during for this program because
John I
36:13
never discussed what we're
gonna do I
36:15
have no idea what he's gonna
talk about
36:16
or what clips he's sending I
just get
36:18
them before we start five
minutes before
36:20
I look at him just to make sure
yeah
36:22
there's not too many doubles I
have one
36:24
clip of Alex Jones versus Marco
Rubio
36:26
you have two so I think that
you should
36:31
run with the segment actually
Marco you
36:37
might want to play your clip
because if
36:38
cuz I mic clips are kind of a
trap it's
36:43
the clip plus a kicker and I
want to see
36:46
what your clip is I just have to
36:48
straight-up clip but I just have
36:50
straight-up clip I think we
should do
36:52
yours this is an executive
decision okay
36:55
well this is the clip that I'm
gonna
36:57
play this is a Alex Jones
versus Ruger
36:59
this is a clip that was
generally
37:01
promoted on the Internet
37:03
yeah and it was Rubio giving a
press
37:07
briefing in the hallway and
Jones
37:10
butting in but but I just want
to say up
37:13
front what I found so
fascinating about
37:16
this clip and of course we'll
hear it
37:17
most the clip is about this a
big
37:19
spoiler Rubio then I've seen
this
37:23
behavior Rubio then I've seen
this
37:25
I'll give you an example in the
37:27
Netherlands for sure in when I
was 20
37:30
very early on when you know
being on TV
37:32
was not as common as it is
today and
37:35
people would of course
recognise me and
37:37
they would always say just
without me
37:39
even asking hi I don't know who
you are
37:42
and I said I never watched it
now I
37:45
never watched music television
you
37:46
kidding man I don't know if I
don't know
37:47
who you are when they when I
it's a very
37:50
I knew for a fact that they
have oh yes
37:52
and it's a very odd reaction
that some
37:54
people had and of all people
for this to
37:57
happen and Marco Rubio to do
this and
38:00
double and triple down on it
with
38:02
shouting in his face
38:04
I give Alex Jones a 10 plus for
this by
38:06
the way I wish I had those
balls to
38:09
promote our show
38:12
cuz you know he's just sticking
his
38:13
facing good info wars.com I
think I wish
38:16
I had both legs it's fantastic
guy very
38:19
this is great could I have a
first
38:21
amendment or should these
companies be
38:22
able to to viola coal safe
harbor hacked
38:25
and all that and then ban
conservatives
38:26
in mash about the First
Amendment yeah I
38:32
support the first question a
couple of
38:38
things we have to start it over
okay
38:39
cause I think it needs to be
prefaced
38:40
that rubra is actually doing an
38:42
interview some woman from local
station
38:45
him and Joe was just standing
on the
38:47
side there it just jumps in
yeah and he
38:49
and I believe he says safe
harbor act
38:52
instead of safe harbor at save
are ver
38:55
yeah like safe harbor act like
oh you
38:58
gonna put Rubio's funny keep
catch that
39:01
term I said what do you talk
about
39:02
putting trees up I know what
you're
39:04
talking about I don't need any
more
39:05
trees oh I didn't even catch
that that's
39:08
pretty funny
39:08
could I have a First Amendment
or should
39:10
these companies be able to to
viola coal
39:12
say barber hacks and all that
and then
39:14
ban conservatives in mash know
about the
39:19
First Amendment yeah I support
the first
39:21
time I just ask questions
39:23
China are guys hired are you
aware that
39:26
he platforming going on in China
39:29
no here big tech companies are
purging
39:31
conservatives their shadow
banning
39:33
people in matter well my
broader concern
39:35
is that what we are trying to
do in
39:37
terms of preventing foreign
interference
39:38
in our elections that
technology could
39:42
be used by authoritarian
governments to
39:44
argue we want you to do the
same thing
39:46
against people that are in our
Jones
39:48
makes an external argument he
says dude
39:50
what are you talking about
that's
39:51
happening here right now under
your very
39:53
nose country operating for
example for
39:55
that misinformation would be
something
39:56
like the truth for that missin
for them
39:59
sowing instability would be
supporting
40:01
democracy and flip the
Democrats are
40:03
doing what you said China does
that you
40:04
got fun shelf Hamburg
40:06
Dorsey on that question I think
Facebook
40:08
now is I think it's important
for them
40:10
not to comply with any efforts
to sort
40:13
of go after freedom of
expression
40:15
conservative the the not
answering just
40:18
Republicans are acting like it
isn't
40:20
happening are acting like it
isn't
40:20
thank God Trump is weird oh
yeah it's
40:23
really weird there's no person
40:24
conservatives shadow banning
well I
40:32
think the bigger biases against
freedom
40:34
of expression everybody should
be
40:35
there's a there's a look I see
more
40:37
going on happening here but you
say I
40:39
don't exist it's not a heckler
I depress
40:41
the goggle look at this guy
he's saying
40:42
that I don't exist and these
very hairy
40:49
he plays dumb here's the common
so he
41:06
calls him snake snake eyes frat
boy and
41:10
then he touches his shoulder
which he
41:11
had done a couple times before
which I
41:12
also found to be quite
aggressive I'd be
41:14
like dude don't touch me and
but then
41:17
Rubio falls for it in some
planes of
41:19
years info play this joke over
here
41:24
that's why the D platforming
didn't work
41:25
but but here's the question
here's a
41:27
question don't touch me again
man I'm
41:29
asking not to touch well sure
I'll just
41:30
pad you nice I know but I don't
want to
41:31
be fed I know who you are it's
not just
41:33
gonna beat me up so mad you're
not gonna
41:40
stylish me people are like you
are
41:44
literally atop what was that
something
41:49
now you're at the end of your
clip there
41:51
shouldn't have been yeah
gangster give
41:55
me ends but then that's the
clip that
41:57
went around but then and you
gave him
41:59
the kudos and I thought it was
pretty
42:01
funny kudos and I thought it
was pretty
42:01
yeah although he's just
annoying kudos
42:05
for promoting his shows I gave
him
42:06
composure savage Michael Savage
has an
42:09
extended version huh that was
that was
42:11
done by Cassandra Fairbanks one
of the
42:14
famous Twitter people done that
it
42:17
follow and she follows me
42:19
and she was there apparently
putting
42:22
this thing on periscope live
uh-huh and
42:25
so when Rubio kinda gave gave
up and we
42:28
started walking away I think I
think
42:32
Jones kind of blew his
credibility by
42:36
calling him out as gay and just
let it
42:42
kind of goes little nuts on
this and
42:43
listen to the way it ends but
well I'm
42:51
playing it but I'm not hearing
it no
42:53
that's not good to argue we
want you to
43:03
do the same thing against
people that
43:05
are I have a fit maybe you
didn't clip
43:06
this about should I move it
this time
43:08
and move it to the end see what
it
43:10
sounds like okay careful about
bro look
43:24
on the ground I think you gave
me the
43:26
outtake I may have well yeah
I'll tell
43:29
you what he says he says sorry
I can get
43:37
that get that clip like goup
stop the
43:39
show go get it no no no no no
you don't
43:41
have that clip no stomping of
the show
43:44
he falls and mad he says go
back to the
43:46
bathhouse no it's too bad you
didn't
43:50
have the clip you know this has
happened
43:52
to me before it's empty you
once maybe
43:55
twice but it's okay because I
have a a
43:57
clip maybe of similar
proportion this
44:00
was really an interesting thing
that
44:01
happened we had all you know
there was
44:04
lots of messy stuff going on the
44:07
audience we had the Democrats
shouting
44:09
and the SCOTUS hearing then we
had all
44:12
kinds of stuff going on with
Alex Jones
44:14
and of course we had the social
media
44:16
network and election hearing
and that
44:20
was interrupted by Laura Loomer
44:22
oh yes now Laurel umer I I'm I
might as
44:27
well just to tell you what I've
been
44:29
thinking for a while yes yeah
she comes
44:31
up with really interesting and
well
44:34
researched and surprising
information
44:38
certainly about the Vegas
shooting and
44:42
she has these just gems of
nuggets from
44:44
time to time and then all of a
sudden
44:46
she's the 25 year old moron
again yams
44:50
like primping for the camera
and so she
44:52
stands up in the back with her
selfie
44:54
stick making sure she's filming
herself
44:57
causing this ruckus shouting
something
44:59
to the effect of Jack Dorsey is
meddling
45:02
in the elections his squashing
45:04
Republican voice as
conservative as us
45:06
okay hold on so I didn't see
any of
45:10
these which is the way I
expected you to
45:13
do I don't know why but I don't
know why
45:15
either Patel you go but she was
at this
45:20
yeah in the back in the audience
45:25
so she stands up and she starts
45:28
interrupting and then and I'm
watching
45:31
this dueling c-span screens and
by the
45:33
way this is great on the on the
surface
45:35
go I didn't know this about
Windows and
45:37
maybe it's just the surface but
you can
45:38
drag a window to the edge and
then poop
45:41
it'll take up half the screen
and I'll
45:42
give you a choice for another
yeah
45:44
that's a day I'll do it that
does it we
45:45
that's a Windows 10 thing yeah
and then
45:47
you hit the escape button after
you've
45:48
done it elegantly once ever
since Steve
45:51
died all that cool stuff that
Apple used
45:53
to do and now someone's gonna
tell me
45:55
they do it too I'm sure they do
45:57
that's beside the point very
long beside
45:59
the point anyway so I'm looking
at this
46:02
and there she is and I'm like
this is
46:04
just grand izing and now she
has this
46:07
thing like you've been Lewis
grant
46:09
standing what I say grand icing
nom
46:12
Nydia grandstanding and she has
this
46:15
you've been Lou murd like no no
you
46:17
gotta be around a little longer
before
46:20
you can say that you've Lou
murd I mean
46:22
I would never say you've been
Dvorak
46:23
tore curried or No Agenda no we
say
46:26
would you been hit in the mouth
that's a
46:28
little different but bloomer
you can
46:29
always tell that chicken that's
been
46:31
curry yes so you've been
humored so i
46:34
have a feeling that she's being
run by
46:36
someone that she has she has
someone
46:39
behind her who's giving her
great
46:41
information and she just knows
how to
46:43
present it she's you know semi
cute
46:45
she's bubbly young energetic
and you
46:48
know so there's something going
on
46:50
behind her that that is putting
46:53
information out anyway so this
is not
46:54
one of those moments this is
really her
46:55
trying to Loomer and it fails
but it
46:59
fails for a very interesting
reason and
47:01
and so I have these two screens
going on
47:03
I'm like is there a third what
is me
47:07
comes Auto Auction on what's
happening
47:09
here now recognizes that get a
mic over
47:13
to her get a mic over order get
a mic
47:16
over now lab order in the air
will be
47:20
asked to leave you you'll
please take a
47:25
seat or we'll have to have you
then
47:27
you'll need to release please
help
47:31
before it is too late because
Jack
47:33
Dorsey is trying to influence
the
47:35
election what she said I can't
47:38
understand 15 $20 figured a
hand viola 7
47:46
half 30 $30 up here at this
point like
47:49
I'm like what's going on $40
she's
47:51
yelling I'm hearing this hey
hot $50
47:54
down here - officer will you
escort this
47:56
young lady out please - half an
hour 5c
47:58
5 1770 up two and a half now
five seven
48:01
five seven I have $80 - five 85
90
48:03
hundred on at hand and to end
the
48:05
quarter one the quarter 1
Hannah said
48:07
about to do to the quarter it -
at
48:09
hancinema 3 able to bond 300 it
three
48:11
and a quarter cut three and a
quarter
48:12
now a quarter cut three and a
quarter
48:12
hanpan through the head of Maya
400 yeah
48:15
but a 4-4-2 quarter fort have
we're
48:16
selling the cell phone there
for the
48:17
court half-dead Ford has
returned about
48:19
a five hundred five and a
quarter fine
48:21
with half I yield back
48:25
that was Senator long from
Missouri was
48:28
fantastic that was a really
creative way
48:32
of lightening the mood that was
really
48:37
good and so everyone just like
it was it
48:39
was perfect and then of course
the it
48:41
ends on such a sour note just
dumb this
48:44
is like great and now is your
moment for
48:46
the for the great line of the
day and
48:48
know what does he do now I
think our
48:50
auctioneer and residents gonna
get
48:51
tweeted about today idiot
48:55
no okay so that was all I
really had of
49:01
the interruptions like that
apparently
49:06
he wasn't that's a that's a
sound of a
49:08
professional - it's like yes
well we
49:10
have a lot of them here in
Tejas so yeah
49:12
I'm familiar with them yeah
otherwise
49:15
you thought it'd be cool to do
that
49:17
there was a song back in the
day I could
49:20
do heavier don't be the
auctioneer I
49:22
could do that I could I could
sing along
49:24
with it the audition it's
called the
49:26
I'll find it for the next show
the
49:28
auctioneer okay so now we have
on the
49:32
other side of the Senate we
have or
49:34
wherever I don't know what if
it's
49:36
really on the other side we
have the
49:37
Intelligence Committee and they
have a
49:39
hearing which is titled foreign
49:41
influence and social media now
although
49:43
all of these things are screwed
49:44
did never and you could even
see both
49:46
Dorsey and Sandberg who were
the only
49:48
two there there was an empty
seat
49:50
ominously empty where Google
didn't show
49:52
up that one reference whoo hey
they
49:58
don't have to they right
everyone's
49:59
checks they don't have to show
up so
50:01
that's what's going on there
and where's
50:03
the outrage where's the media
talking
50:05
about Google being a bunch of
either
50:07
pussies something to hide or
just plain
50:10
rude they talk about it but
only in a
50:15
normal like reporting manner
50:20
Google by the way what is what
shows up
50:22
a big G and we'll logo who
comes for
50:26
Google Eric Schmidt here comes
a Google
50:29
Eric sir he's my age I'm Sante
gigas he
50:32
talks like this you can't
really express
50:34
himself the low voice
50:37
okay I don't know so then out
there good
50:40
and there's no one from Google
yeah but
50:45
you know you can see Sandberg
and Jack
50:48
Dorsey from Twitter they both
have they
50:50
basically have the questions in
50:52
long-form sheets in front of
them's like
50:54
they know who's coming they
know what
50:55
questions are coming I don't
know if was
50:56
abbreviated or not but we know
these
50:58
things are scripted but this is
a topic
51:00
that not everyone is
well-versed in and
51:03
I I sadly that one I forgot to
do was of
51:06
and I will clip that for
Sunday's of
51:08
camallo Harris trying to
understand the
51:11
value of an ad buy which is
really
51:13
important but we can easily
discuss it
51:16
on Sunday it's a lot much longer
51:17
conversation because it's so
convoluted
51:18
but I think you and I can pick
it apart
51:21
okay we'll do that but the
hearing
51:24
started off and this is the the
first
51:26
clip is a little little over
two minutes
51:28
and it it kind of really says
everything
51:31
and it shows you the difference
between
51:32
these two personalities and I
believe
51:33
also the DNA of their companies
I don't
51:37
know why I was up talking and
do my tech
51:46
reporter voice that's what it
was these
51:48
two companies okay let me tell
you all
51:50
about it at least I caught
myself and
51:54
the first question is the only
question
51:56
really we needed to have answer
and
51:58
maybe I should ask you first
for some
51:59
reflection because the first
question is
52:01
from the Chairman is what is
social
52:05
media the Chairman is what is
social
52:06
now what is social media to you
John
52:09
before we hear from our
witnesses social
52:12
media is a construct
52:15
using the internet to
interconnect
52:20
people in groups forums or even
52:24
individually so they can
interact
52:26
without being anywhere near
each other
52:29
someone should write that down
because
52:32
that was very good as you can
imagine
52:35
it's not at all what their
answers work
52:39
and Sandberg now let me just
get my
52:42
other notes here I did take a
number of
52:44
notes even though I'd have just
a few
52:45
clips first of all Sandberg I'm
sorry
52:47
and I tried this out on Tina
last night
52:50
not as a joke but purely is as
just an
52:52
observation and didn't go very
far but
52:54
Sandberg has got to be watching
these
52:57
hearings of herself I'm sure
she saw
52:59
some tape I'm thinking God why
did I
53:02
fuck up my nose so bad I mean
she did
53:05
something with a nose job it was
53:06
probably a second or a third
time and it
53:09
she had a a broad nose if you
look at
53:12
the at the book of knowledge
and you go
53:14
back and but it was cute it was
nothing
53:16
wrong with it and you know now
it has
53:18
kind of that Michael Jackson
thing where
53:19
two sides in a way it's like
Mike it's
53:22
Michael circa 1989 you know
where it's
53:31
and then it starts to fall in
other side
53:33
and then the way the light hits
it it
53:35
just it just looks like you
have a small
53:37
kind of structure left looks
like you
53:39
have a small penis on your face
I mean
53:40
it's really bad to anyway and
I'm sorry
53:43
for her that she did that but
let it be
53:45
a warning people be careful
what you do
53:47
with your face endorsee read
his opening
53:51
of that opening statements
Dorsey read
53:52
his opening statement from his
iPhone
53:54
which I think was a big mistake
he
53:55
looked and he was he's nervous
and he's
53:58
he if he if he hadn't said I'm
shy at
54:01
the beginning was he did you
know I
54:03
usually don't do these things
I'm sure
54:04
he could have been seen as a
much much
54:08
closer to Tony Stark than Elon
Musk
54:10
because he comes across as a
very deep
54:13
thinker he carries his words
very
54:15
carefully and I actually think
he is a
54:18
deep thinker and has thought
about what
54:20
he's doing and what Twitter is
and I
54:21
have to say I'm very impressed
by his
54:23
performance in general let me
see well
54:27
did the typical
54:28
they're about Nome their
business model
54:31
and all that stuff we've heard
it a
54:33
million times but there were
some new
54:36
terms and a couple things I
highlighted
54:37
again the the advertising and
the money
54:40
flow and everything I didn't
get that
54:41
one will do that on Sunday but
let's
54:43
start off with the opening
statements
54:44
with that very question this
question is
54:46
- oh and Samberg hold on a
second before
54:50
you start teasing Sunday oh
you're right
54:53
what am I thinking it's not Sun
that's
54:54
Thunder someday we have a
special show
54:56
yeah you're talking about next
Thursday
54:58
yes next Thursday
55:00
sorry I'll probably forget
55:04
we'll never know you won't I'll
remember
55:06
I will remember the Sandberg
Campbell
55:09
Harris clip okay it's
programmed now
55:12
back to the back to the show
and Sheryl
55:17
Sandberg saw her entire
testimony was
55:19
Miss goody goody two-shoes
borderline
55:22
valley girl had everything all
sewn up
55:25
she's that veteran she knows
Jack's
55:27
nervous and shy this question
is to both
55:34
of you
55:35
how would you define social
media for
55:39
this committee and more
importantly for
55:42
the American people and I'll
start with
55:43
you miss ember social media
enables you
55:47
to share what you want to share
when you
55:48
want to share it without asking
55:50
permission from anyone that's
that's the
55:53
top thing right there share
what you
55:57
want to share with anyone
without any
55:59
permission except permission
from
56:02
Facebook that's how we meet our
mission
56:05
which is giving people a voice
I would
56:08
have stopped right there oh
really so if
56:11
people can share like illegal
images or
56:14
atom bomb plans or anything
they want to
56:18
share or there's you know some
sort of a
56:20
meeting that's gonna do
overthrow the
56:22
government that's all shareable
that's
56:24
that's what social media is all
about is
56:25
but that you are now the
senator from
56:29
Kentucky you have just won your
seat on
56:32
the house and two undies Senate
56:34
Intelligence come on I'll start
with you
56:35
miss ember social media enables
you to
56:39
share what you want to share
when you
56:41
want to share it without asking
56:42
permission I just want that on
a big
56:45
placard anyone and that's how
we meet
56:49
our mission which is really
giving
56:51
people a voice and I think
what's more
56:54
important than just the content
people
56:56
shares the connections they
made rich
56:58
social media enables people to
celebrate
57:00
their birthdays
57:10
when I heard that I said this is
57:13
fantastic I heard that I said
this is
57:15
how do they come up with
approve that
57:19
yeah number two on the list
birthdays
57:23
the Dutch are jumping up and
down and I
57:26
think what's more important
than just
57:27
the content people shares the
57:29
connections they make social
media
57:31
enables people to celebrate
their
57:33
birthdays and I'm sorry I just
want this
57:35
was my first birthday in many
years
57:37
without Facebook
57:40
and you celebrated it just fine
yeah I'm
57:45
still here and it was really
calm and
57:49
the few people that did get
through to
57:51
me few people that did get
through to
57:52
they really love me so it was a
good
57:55
feeling in the last year people
have
57:57
raised 300 million dollars on
Facebook
57:59
on birthday funders for
nonprofits they
58:02
care about birthday funders huh
it's a
58:04
double whammy on the birthdays
for the
58:05
social nets safety check in the
worst
58:09
circumstances of their lives
have let
58:12
their loved ones know they're
safe how
58:14
about a text message does that
work
58:16
still hey I'm still alive phone
oh thank
58:19
god there's Facebook and small
58:23
businesses to grow all around
the
58:25
country I meet with small
businesses
58:27
from a woman making dresses in
her
58:30
living room and selling them on
58:31
Instagram with one arm to a
local
58:33
plumber with no legs were able
to find
58:35
their customers on Facebook and
then
58:38
able to grow and hire people
and live
58:40
their American dream and that's
our
58:43
entire statement that is what
social
58:45
media is it's about sharing
anything you
58:49
want without anyone telling you
what to
58:50
do unless your name is Alex
Jones
58:52
it's about birthdays raising
money for
58:56
birthdays and what was the last
one yeah
59:00
small businesses oh yeah yes
sad people
59:03
with little who would you know
retirees
59:05
who are doing work somewhere
they can
59:07
make a buck that's social media
so Jack
59:12
Dorsey who knew I mean if I was
like a
59:17
burger like dude you didn't do
a good
59:19
job on that that's not how a
social
59:22
media is anyway so Dorsey
doesn't really
59:28
even answer the question he goes
59:30
straight to where what he's
thinking and
59:32
this will come back and I have
just a
59:34
couple other clips this will
come back
59:35
and it's deep and I really
appreciate
59:38
the thinking he put into it and
also
59:40
notice that the senator
addresses him as
59:43
Jack and not mr. Dorsey in this
59:45
particular clip I just thought
that was
59:47
interesting for context able to
find
59:49
their customers on Facebook and
then
59:52
able to grow and hire people
and live
59:54
their American dream
59:58
I believe it's really important
to to
1:00:03
understand how the people see
it and we
1:00:07
believe that the people use
Twitter as
1:00:09
they would a public square and
they
1:00:12
often have the same
expectations that
1:00:14
they would have of any public
space for
1:00:18
our part we see our platform as
hosting
1:00:21
and serving conversations those
1:00:24
conversations are on the public
we think
1:00:27
there's a lot of benefit to
those
1:00:28
conversations being in the
public but
1:00:31
there's obviously a lot of
risks as well
1:00:34
we see that news and
entertainment are
1:00:38
actually byproducts of public
1:00:41
conversation a very astute
observation
1:00:43
I don't know if the media likes
it but I
1:00:46
thought that was good yes it's a
1:00:48
byproduct absolutely media
should like
1:00:50
it and they should use it as an
1:00:52
ammunition against them because
it's not
1:00:55
it's not primary so yeah you can
1:00:58
advertise with Twitter but it's
a
1:00:59
byproduct it's like advertising
with a
1:01:01
byproduct you know byproduct
like a
1:01:03
byproduct of poor with no
there's no no
1:01:06
no no he says something said
news is a
1:01:08
byproduct of tenor
1:01:12
yeah I think what he means by
news is
1:01:14
like reporting news yeah so so
Twitter
1:01:16
is the ground zero the media is
just
1:01:18
taken the the shreds that fly
off the
1:01:21
edge of the mission I think I
think no I
1:01:23
don't think that's what he
meant that's
1:01:25
I think that's exactly what he
meant
1:01:27
well it doesn't matter we can
disagree
1:01:29
on that this yes and
entertainment are
1:01:34
actually byproducts of public
1:01:36
conversation and we see our
role as
1:01:40
helping to not only serve that
public
1:01:43
conversation so that everyone
can
1:01:44
benefit even if they don't have
a
1:01:46
Twitter account I don't know
what that
1:01:49
means account I don't know what
that
1:01:49
everyone can benefit from
Twitter even
1:01:52
if you don't have a Twitter
account well
1:01:54
you know always go on the site
you know
1:01:55
which foot it oh okay I got you
you not
1:01:58
only serve that public
conversation so
1:02:00
that everyone can benefit even
if they
1:02:02
don't have a Twitter account
that's
1:02:04
important but also to increase
the
1:02:06
health of that conversation as
well the
1:02:08
health and nor do that in order
to do
1:02:11
that we need to be able to
measure it we
1:02:13
need to now yeah yeah this is
deep he so
1:02:16
he's saying the health of that
1:02:18
conversation and I and I think
the
1:02:20
health and I and I think the
1:02:21
I think contextually I think I
1:02:22
understand what he's talking
about is it
1:02:24
at the health the health yes
the health
1:02:26
so the healthiness of the of the
1:02:28
conversation the health if it is
1:02:31
something that is making people
happy
1:02:34
and therefore healthy because
they
1:02:37
either iris would say agree
with each
1:02:39
other is one way if you have
everyone
1:02:40
agreeing with each other I
don't know
1:02:42
how that works but okay or
going to
1:02:45
dimension be for a few minutes
on
1:02:47
Twitter you'll know how it
works really
1:02:48
quick right but but do we all
agree that
1:02:52
he's saying healthy
conversations where
1:02:54
people aren't like me and making
1:02:56
themselves sick literally making
1:02:57
themselves sick which is what
social
1:02:59
media is what is social media
Mr curry
1:03:01
it's a place where people go to
get sick
1:03:04
that's my answer but also to
increase
1:03:07
the health of that conversation
as well
1:03:09
and nor do that in order to do
that we
1:03:12
need to be able to measure a
measure we
1:03:14
need to understand what healthy
1:03:16
participation looks like in a
public
1:03:18
square and we need to amplify
that
1:03:21
that's more important
1:03:23
we need to question a lot of the
1:03:26
fundamentals that we started
with 12
1:03:27
years ago in the form of
incentives when
1:03:32
people use our product every
single day
1:03:34
when they open our app up what
are we
1:03:38
incentivizing them to do not
telling
1:03:40
them what to do where are we
actually
1:03:42
incentivizing them to do and
that
1:03:45
certainly speaks to the buttons
that we
1:03:48
have in our service all the way
to our
1:03:51
business model so didn't really
answer
1:03:53
the well he dealt with the
social media
1:03:55
question quite quick quick
quickly it's
1:03:57
a it's a public square and
people expect
1:03:59
the same type of actions they
can take
1:04:03
on the public square although I
would
1:04:06
wager to say because of
anonymity people
1:04:08
actually show themselves their
true
1:04:10
selves and being on Twitter is
like
1:04:11
looking at your own anus
because we're
1:04:14
all like that in to some degree
but then
1:04:16
he goes into this very deep
thinking
1:04:18
which we'll come back to later
about
1:04:19
what exactly are we doing what
are we
1:04:21
doing here now I don't know if
you can
1:04:23
ever measure the health of a
1:04:25
conversation although you never
know
1:04:28
what machine learning and AI
can do
1:04:33
but I thought there was at
least some
1:04:34
thinking and not now this being
the bit
1:04:42
of timecode down I already have
a couple
1:04:48
okay this being the foreign
influence of
1:04:52
social media so you know how
how do we
1:04:55
respond it's just kind of a
general
1:04:56
response to are they working
together we
1:04:59
collaborating are we doing
everything
1:05:01
the minute we see bad actors are
1:05:03
actually a new term will pop up
in a
1:05:05
moment whenever we see these
bad actors
1:05:08
you know is we do we have
systems in
1:05:10
place and man when you listen
to this
1:05:12
and how they're all like
agreeing with
1:05:14
each other and nodding and oh
yeah yeah
1:05:16
we're all locked down I think
where
1:05:18
collaboration has greatly
increased
1:05:20
we've always worked closely
with law
1:05:21
enforcement and we continue to
do that
1:05:23
and particularly the FBI's new
task
1:05:25
force forcibly shared
information with
1:05:27
other companies but I think we
are doing
1:05:29
better and we can continue to
do better
1:05:31
mr. chairman you noted in your
opening
1:05:33
remarks that some of the tips
we got
1:05:36
from came from a private
security firm
1:05:37
in our mind that's the system
working
1:05:40
aha our opponents are very
well-funded
1:05:42
they are very organized and we
are going
1:05:45
to get those tips from law
enforcement
1:05:47
from each other from private
firms those
1:05:53
tips with each other the more
the
1:05:55
stronger our collective
defenses will be
1:05:57
you get too far away from what
would
1:06:00
that was just that was just a
little bit
1:06:02
of a rapport that our opponents
yes
1:06:05
yeah that's opposed to me and
the new
1:06:08
FBI task force that certainly
is great
1:06:11
collaborating with them oh yeah
but is
1:06:14
she mean by our opponents the
Russians
1:06:20
you sure she doesn't mean
Republicans
1:06:22
well she didn't say Russians
she said
1:06:25
opponents so I think that she
meant a
1:06:27
wide variety could be
Republicans who
1:06:31
are influenced by Russians or
who have
1:06:34
ever had a Russian dressing on
their
1:06:36
salad I don't know those are
her words
1:06:38
and they and she's pretty
precise with
1:06:42
how she speaks this is old she's
1:06:43
rehearsed quite well
1:06:45
our opponents our opponents yes
and we
1:06:48
have the specialist especially
now this
1:06:50
really mean right we got to
stop and I
1:06:54
want to look up this word we
have to
1:07:00
assume that there's some
something
1:07:05
within this definition
1:07:11
who compete okay if she says our
1:07:14
opponents yeah she says someone
who it
1:07:17
says someone who competes
against or
1:07:19
fights another in a contest
game or
1:07:23
argument a rival or adversary
yes I
1:07:27
think Russia fits in there but
also
1:07:29
Republicans I think think
Twitter fits
1:07:31
in yes actually when she when I
first
1:07:34
heard this because you know
you're
1:07:36
paying attention a lot of
things the
1:07:38
same time I thought she was
actually
1:07:39
talking about Twitter but then
I went
1:07:41
back and she wasn't she was
referring to
1:07:44
his opening comments about the
attacks
1:07:45
on our democracy
1:07:48
tax on our democracy but we
sure would
1:07:50
buy our Pony means the attacks
on our
1:07:52
democracy I think so yeah
buying one
1:07:55
hundred thousand dollars with
the cheap
1:07:56
advertising that's kind of
silly yes and
1:07:58
and the one hundred thousand
dollars
1:08:00
again I'm sorry a week from
today we'll
1:08:03
pull that apart that did come
up and
1:08:05
it's important all right let me
let me
1:08:07
move on because now we have a
new term
1:08:11
as we're now going to talk
about a
1:08:14
little more about what is
permitted what
1:08:17
can and can't be done on the
platform
1:08:21
and she has all kinds of
interesting
1:08:23
terms you know very much like
unindicted
1:08:27
co-conspirator which is what
will go on
1:08:29
Donald Trump's tombstone if
it's up to
1:08:33
the Democrats unindicted
co-conspirator
1:08:35
who's pre dead at this moment be
1:08:38
precancerous so here we're
going to talk
1:08:43
about well you'll hear it it's
just new
1:08:45
terms and interesting stuff who
what
1:08:47
what entity do you have in each
of your
1:08:49
companies who make these
determinations
1:08:52
our policy team is setting
those and our
1:08:54
security team is finding them
1:08:56
uncoordinated inauthentic
behavior this
1:09:00
is it this is this is her big
thing
1:09:02
inauthentic behavior you want
to look
1:09:05
something up what does that
mean isn't
1:09:07
everybody by definition who's on
1:09:09
Facebook inauthentic that's the
whole
1:09:12
game isn't it yes you're
supposed to be
1:09:14
inauthentic look inauthentic
take
1:09:17
pictures that are inauthentic
posting
1:09:19
authentically in and once in a
while say
1:09:22
Trump is a dick isn't isn't
that what
1:09:24
everyone does that's the only
1:09:26
authenticity I'm seeing
coordinated
1:09:27
inauthentic behavior means
behavior on
1:09:30
our site that's inauthentic so
people
1:09:32
are not representing themselves
to be
1:09:34
who they are to be and
coordinated me
1:09:36
they are presenting themselves
who they
1:09:41
are to be not representing
themselves to
1:09:44
be who they are to be who they
are to be
1:09:48
they are to be who they ought
to be from
1:09:51
arbie's who they are to be
sandwich from
1:09:52
Arby's they're not representing
1:09:55
themselves to who they are who
they
1:09:57
ought to be hablaba they are to
be
1:10:01
okay so she you know she's
trying to
1:10:03
explain inauthentic behavior I
think she
1:10:05
means that they can't really
and if they
1:10:09
think she even refers to it
they can't
1:10:10
really track if someone's being
1:10:12
inauthentic which I guess means
I'm a
1:10:14
Russian spy covering as the hot
girl in
1:10:18
a bikini on Facebook I think
that's what
1:10:20
she means Savior means behavior
on our
1:10:23
site that's inauthentic so
people are
1:10:25
not representing themselves to
be who
1:10:27
they are to be and coordinated
means
1:10:29
they are coordinating and they
can be
1:10:31
coordinating with authentic
actors and
1:10:33
coordinating with inauthentic
actors I
1:10:35
need a roadmap for this I don't
know who
1:10:38
can I coordinate with you I mean
1:10:40
authentic bro sorry
1:10:41
both are unacceptable it
something that
1:10:45
is easy to recognize people
unanimous
1:10:49
about her you wind up with
debates as to
1:10:51
whether or not okay is that guy
for real
1:10:53
isn't that it's not the only
unanswered
1:10:56
question ever certain platforms
should
1:10:58
be shut down I think on a lot
of issues
1:11:00
like hate speech there's broad
debate
1:11:03
when it comes to what is an
inauthentic
1:11:05
actor which is a fake account
posing as
1:11:07
someone they're hard to find
but once we
1:11:10
find them we know what they are
who sets
1:11:12
these Sanders stay same
committee the
1:11:16
same group of people and and
just for
1:11:19
context she said quite clearly
it's I
1:11:21
don't have it in this clip that
Facebook
1:11:24
is not in the business of
determining
1:11:25
what is fact or false what is
true or
1:11:29
false or fake news or fact or
fact check
1:11:32
false whatever the hell it is
it's false
1:11:34
that they use third-party
independent or
1:11:38
independent third parties for
that which
1:11:40
means the independent fact
check network
1:11:44
which includes such luminary
members as
1:11:48
the Daily Caller foundation
Tucker
1:11:51
Carlson's thing head to Snopes
so you
1:11:55
know I don't know what can come
out of
1:11:56
that but okay fine well give me
give me
1:11:59
some examples of standards that
are
1:12:00
unacceptable in the coordinated
and
1:12:03
authentic behavior or in
general in
1:12:05
general yeah so we publish our
community
1:12:07
standards comprehensively and
what that
1:12:09
does is to find what's
permitted on
1:12:11
Facebook and what's not okay
here we
1:12:13
finally what's permitted and
what's not
1:12:15
okay permit it on Facebook so
some
1:12:18
examples are bullying is not
permitted
1:12:20
bullying hate is not permitted
hate is
1:12:23
not permitted not hate speech
hate is
1:12:25
not permitted hey don't a
language that
1:12:28
leads to violence is not
permitted and
1:12:31
this is published in detail
publicly
1:12:33
publicly we publish that
publicly hate
1:12:36
is not allowed this is what is
left of
1:12:40
your social network if hate is
not
1:12:41
allowed hate speech okay we've
we've
1:12:44
tried to define that not
legally but now
1:12:46
just hate so if I go on
Facebook I hate
1:12:48
this guy am I in violation
violation yes
1:12:53
yes you are if you hate
President Trump
1:12:55
you you're in violation
1:12:57
everybody are they all hate
there is a
1:12:59
room there is a Facebook group
when I
1:13:01
was last on it you know when
was that
1:13:03
March um and that is called I
hate
1:13:07
Donald Trump
1:13:09
that should be not allowed well
then
1:13:11
obviously one of the senators
would
1:13:13
bring that up final clip for
this is and
1:13:18
we're now coming back round to
the
1:13:20
incentives and you will hear
Samberg was
1:13:23
said I don't know did I even
put Samberg
1:13:25
in this she has no vision just
bad nose
1:13:29
job and Dorsey he's thinking
deep about
1:13:32
it I want to get to the basic
issue of
1:13:36
whether our incentives in this
case are
1:13:41
aligned to deal with these
challenges
1:13:42
and by the way I'm pretty sure
that
1:13:45
Dorsey because of the jack
comment that
1:13:47
he coordinated this with with
the
1:13:49
chairman but this is where
they're going
1:13:51
towards incentives and how the
social
1:13:54
networks are responsible for a
lot of
1:13:56
this bad behavior and this is a
setup
1:13:59
I'm not sure how they're gonna
play it
1:14:01
out I think it's way too
complicated for
1:14:03
most but I think that's what's
going on
1:14:05
if your users were to lose
conference
1:14:07
confidence in your platforms in
the
1:14:10
authenticity of what you mr.
Dorsey
1:14:13
called a public square I might
call it a
1:14:16
digital public square Wow
inventive I
1:14:19
assume there'd be very serious
economic
1:14:22
implications for your companies
do you
1:14:25
think the the incentives have
aligned
1:14:27
for platform providers of all
types in
1:14:31
the digital space to want to
get at
1:14:34
these issues and have a plan
and be able
1:14:36
to respond in real time miss
Hamburg and
1:14:39
then you mr. Dorsey absolutely
Trust is
1:14:43
the cornerstone of our business
people
1:14:45
have to trust that what they
see on
1:14:46
facebook is authentic people
have to
1:14:49
trust that this is a positive
force for
1:14:51
democracy and the things they
care about
1:14:52
and so this has been a huge
issue for us
1:14:56
and that's why we're here today
and
1:14:57
that's why we're gonna keep
working to
1:14:59
get ahead of these threats and
make sure
1:15:02
we can minimize all of this
activity mr.
1:15:04
chairman I just want you know
we at
1:15:06
Facebook we're all on board
1:15:07
do you like my tight sweater I
mean
1:15:09
seriously is that her vision is
that is
1:15:12
that how concerned she is very
1:15:15
disappointing short Facebook
1:15:17
our incentives are on lines but
I do
1:15:20
believe it goes a lot deeper
than just
1:15:22
the alignment of our company
incentives
1:15:25
with this committee and the
American
1:15:26
people I believe we need to
question the
1:15:29
fundamental incentives are in
our
1:15:33
product today yes this time
someone
1:15:35
opens up our service every time
someone
1:15:37
opens up our app we are
implicitly
1:15:40
incentivizing them to do
something or
1:15:42
not to do something and that
extends all
1:15:44
the way to our business and
those
1:15:47
answers that we get from asking
that
1:15:50
question are going to create
massive
1:15:52
shifts in how Twitter operates
and I
1:15:55
also believe how our industry
operates
1:15:57
so what worked 12 years ago
does not
1:16:00
work today it hasn't evolved
fast enough
1:16:03
but I think it's a layer many
many many
1:16:07
many layers deeper than these
surface
1:16:10
symptoms that we often find
ourselves
1:16:13
discussing I like his answer
1:16:18
yeah you're you're gonna
bromance with I
1:16:21
yeah yeah and I'm no fan of
Jack Dorsey
1:16:23
we know he probably dislikes me
I'm not
1:16:27
verified have asked to have
never even
1:16:29
gotten a straight-up answer
people have
1:16:32
asked on my behalf still do I
don't want
1:16:33
it anymore
1:16:34
because then I will have to
leave
1:16:35
Twitter because it's the mark
of the
1:16:36
beast because it's the mark of
the
1:16:38
um but I like what he says here
no and I
1:16:42
and he is I say it's gonna
change
1:16:45
massively and I think not to
their
1:16:48
benefit I think he realizes that
1:16:52
squares what he's thinking damn
crying I
1:16:55
got into that business
1:16:56
yeah that was a smart move ah
as far as
1:17:03
I'm concerned
1:17:04
Twitter was always the
invention of M
1:17:06
head Robin Williams right who
invented
1:17:10
blogger made you know he's
worth a
1:17:13
billion dollars was blogging it
was all
1:17:15
based on RSS
1:17:18
that's what Twitter were
originally it
1:17:21
was a podcast platform blogger
no no it
1:17:24
was a podcast but it was oh do
1:17:28
od Allah came Twitter odyo was
the
1:17:31
podcast competitor to me vo but
they had
1:17:33
a platform and we just had
content don't
1:17:35
you remember no yeah oh do and
then they
1:17:39
never really launched and they
turned
1:17:41
they came up with this follow
thing
1:17:42
which I think they had in their
podcast
1:17:45
environment and that became
Twitter and
1:17:48
then podcasting just went in
the crapper
1:17:50
for 10 years because then we
had social
1:17:53
nets and that was the the next
next new
1:17:55
new new big thing you're not
sure of
1:17:58
this da I know my history my
friend and
1:18:01
we discussed it on the show we
discussed
1:18:03
it on the show well with that
I'd like
1:18:07
to thank you for your courage
to say in
1:18:09
the morning to you John say you
dance
1:18:11
for Charles Dvorak you're
welcome
1:18:15
all wait I'm sorry well in the
brain to
1:18:17
you too mr. Adam curry also
eldership
1:18:19
sassy boots on the ground feet
in the
1:18:21
air sons in the water and all
the names
1:18:22
and I said and in the morning
to the
1:18:23
troll room no agenda stream
calm good to
1:18:25
see it all the trolls here and
in a good
1:18:29
mood today
1:18:29
everyone's I think everyone had
a lot of
1:18:31
fun watching c-span yeah was
real we're
1:18:36
an energetic Bunch we are we
watch
1:18:38
c-span as a group and in the
morning to
1:18:41
Nick the rat who was awarded
the the
1:18:45
choice of pick for album art
for episode
1:18:47
1065 the tiger got headed of
weekly flux
1:18:51
capacitor was the title of of
the show
1:18:56
and this was Comey James Comey
looking
1:19:00
at his laundry line of drying
1:19:02
counterfeit money or not
counterfeit
1:19:04
washed money laundered laundered
1:19:06
laundered I'm sorry white washed
1:19:08
laundered money as we and you
know it
1:19:12
was interesting because I just
read and
1:19:14
we're talking about we have the
military
1:19:17
intelligence versus the CIA
central
1:19:20
intelligence versus the CIA
central
1:19:21
we have Democrats Republicans
you know
1:19:23
now of course we have Nike
versus Adidas
1:19:26
because Nikes got Kaepernick
and adidas
1:19:29
has Kanye and we have the
bank's poor
1:19:34
laundering money drug money
typically
1:19:36
and then you have the real
estate guys
1:19:38
like Trump who launder money
through
1:19:40
what we use
1:19:41
just call commerce just doing
private
1:19:43
transactions but now we always
think of
1:19:45
everything is a crime who cares
well I
1:19:46
don't care where you got your
money from
1:19:48
you want to buy this apartment
good here
1:19:49
you go
1:19:50
so Trump is just laughing his
ass off
1:19:52
and they hate him for it and I
just read
1:19:54
that ing and the Netherlands
just paid a
1:19:56
seven hundred and seventy five
million
1:19:58
euro claim or if a fine to the
Europeans
1:20:02
I guess the central bank I know
where
1:20:04
this ended to the EU before
money
1:20:07
laundering drug money
laundering because
1:20:08
they weren't paying close enough
1:20:09
attention to the deposits you
see I did
1:20:13
some research on this to figure
out how
1:20:16
to do money laundering as a
real estate
1:20:17
guy you means some job research
turns
1:20:27
out it's a good one it turns
out to be a
1:20:29
very good one and you can the
reason is
1:20:32
because it's essentially legal
1:20:34
completely legal you do not have
1:20:36
breaking any laws by being a
money
1:20:39
launderer if we could want to
call him
1:20:41
that if we even assume were
correct in
1:20:42
our assumptions which I believe
we are
1:20:44
and that is because the
restrictions on
1:20:48
banks taken in cash and not
reporting it
1:20:52
drug companies and stuff still
powdery
1:20:55
as one thing and you have to
redo all
1:20:58
these reporting's and for
example even
1:20:59
when we make a money transfer
if it's if
1:21:01
you I wait way too long it gets
over a
1:21:04
certain amount it gets reported
to the
1:21:05
IRS you know everything you do
in a
1:21:08
banking environment gets
reported real
1:21:10
estate no no holds barred there
is
1:21:14
nothing and then you can take
it some
1:21:16
guy can walk in your office of
your real
1:21:18
estate that with cash with cash
with a
1:21:19
million dollars in cash and you
just put
1:21:23
it into the your account is a
1:21:25
transaction and that's how
commerce used
1:21:29
to work it was and it's okay
now I don't
1:21:31
care where you get your money
from
1:21:32
podcast you know international
drug
1:21:35
trade what's the difference I
would
1:21:37
think that there's a lot of
1:21:39
opportunities all over the
place but the
1:21:41
apparently real estate is the
real
1:21:42
winner and can you imagine how
just to
1:21:45
add insult to injury these guys
also
1:21:48
have to lend to people like
Trump a bit
1:21:50
that must really gall them it's
like
1:21:53
he's must really gall them it's
like
1:21:53
doing this with their money
1:21:56
no wonder they want to screw
him so
1:21:58
badly yeah that makes nothing
but sense
1:22:01
to me
1:22:02
I love I love looking at the
Trump
1:22:05
through that lens it's a very
1:22:07
comfortable feeling feels good
money
1:22:09
launderer but and that's the
whole
1:22:11
reason for doing these big
deals I mean
1:22:13
he obviously got a clue he
worked with
1:22:15
some people that knew how to
outages and
1:22:17
this when he did Trump Tower as
a young
1:22:18
kid and he just coming with you
ever
1:22:22
this is gonna cost more than
you should
1:22:23
be paying this is how you keep
everyone
1:22:25
on your side all the mobsters
yeah I
1:22:29
would say that he definitely
has in fact
1:22:32
if you saw I don't have a clip
of and I
1:22:34
wait I was looking for I
couldn't ever
1:22:35
find a good clip of it Lanny
Davis
1:22:37
coming out and condemning CNN
for
1:22:40
misquoting him I have I have
yes I have
1:22:44
Lanny dog will play that clip
after the
1:22:46
donation segment cuz I want to
comment
1:22:48
on that oh this is have to do
with Chuck
1:22:50
Todd's article no oh but I can
bring
1:22:53
that in too yeah no I have my
comments
1:22:56
different that's good let's get
these
1:22:57
guys let's thank these yes
let's do
1:23:00
something producers for showed
1066
1:23:06
wasn't 1066 to Norman invasion
we could
1:23:09
have made that an issue in it
it's okay
1:23:13
anyway we have no associate
executive
1:23:18
producers we have for a generous
1:23:20
executive producers Brian
Gerard in
1:23:23
Bellevue Washington thank you
for your
1:23:27
courage my recent donation is
long
1:23:29
overdue the instant night
option it
1:23:31
seemed the most appropriate for
the
1:23:32
unwinding of the Gordian knot
that is
1:23:34
the m5m I would like to be
knighted sir
1:23:37
skull and scrotum the Lions
sullen
1:23:41
scrote SKR ot spellin scrote
what is
1:23:45
scrote dare I ask you know what
I don't
1:23:47
want ask I don't want to know
that New
1:23:49
Jersey karma New Jersey and a
karma
1:23:51
furrow no jingles and a karma
for all
1:23:53
here we go
1:23:56
you've got karma so that was
$1,000
1:24:01
against the night donations I
love to
1:24:02
see that yeah a long time since
we had
1:24:05
an instant ight yeah it is
actually it's
1:24:07
been a long time we need more
and then
1:24:09
we have a mix I got mixed up to
me but
1:24:11
Jack swaboda would be next and
from
1:24:14
Cupertino California was 666
and he
1:24:17
actually did send an email
which I
1:24:19
believe I have yes that's the
the mark
1:24:24
of the beast speaking of the
beast the
1:24:26
beast shows up when you least
expect it
1:24:28
comes in as John's wife hello
and
1:24:31
greetings from a no agenda night
1:24:32
Sunday's show was spectacular
as always
1:24:34
in the priests dream for
unexpected
1:24:37
fruit really
1:24:41
did fruit usually it's just
Linux advice
1:24:46
if you check the PayPal
donation you'll
1:24:48
find a 333 donation that I'd
like to
1:24:50
accredit to Nick to
simultaneously lift
1:24:53
his douchebag status and begin
his
1:24:54
journey to in a knighthood as
always for
1:24:59
the fantastic deconstruction of
Maxine
1:25:00
was or say stay woke
1:25:01
this may be a 333 dollar
donation
1:25:06
attached and no interesting
then why may
1:25:09
mmmm okay that's why it might
be out of
1:25:11
sequence I think something in
the
1:25:12
spreadsheet doubled it for some
reason
1:25:14
as it shouldn't be wrong
1:25:18
something doubled it from 3 3 3
to 666
1:25:22
I think we should be worried
you know I
1:25:28
think so too
1:25:30
anyway so we'll give him I will
assume
1:25:32
is 3 3 3 because that's what he
says
1:25:34
here and does he ask for a
jingle or
1:25:39
anything oh he is a mixed by
his friend
1:25:42
Nick current douchebag create
this
1:25:45
afternoon after a drink maybe
so you
1:25:47
will listen to this mix and
then if we
1:25:49
send a mix I don't have a mix I
have a
1:25:52
mix no agenda and is that for
rent oh no
1:25:55
that's not a mix what is it
1:25:57
oh that's hold on that's that's
what
1:26:02
that's this one here we go that
one I
1:26:10
just received that one today is
that
1:26:13
from him from from from him I
don't know
1:26:15
I don't remember
1:26:16
there was no long donation note
for sure
1:26:20
okay well here I'm gonna play
real quick
1:26:22
to myself you got to hold it up
to the
1:26:24
microphone I did not get it
you're not
1:26:27
gonna hear it anyway no why are
you
1:26:28
doing that
1:26:29
no it's something different
it's not
1:26:30
it's nothing like that it's
it's it's a
1:26:33
song what's the guy what's the
guy's
1:26:35
name what's the guy what's the
guy's
1:26:36
Strabo de s wo Bo da and you
are on the
1:26:42
mailing de s wo Bo da and you
are on the
1:26:45
there it is I apologize okay
1:26:50
I download the words that
where's the
1:26:52
where's the file
1:26:55
she bit the bottom outlook is
not
1:27:00
cooperating bit the bottom
outlook is not
1:27:04
I don't know I do not have it's
very odd
1:27:07
John but I do not have a 42 you
deal
1:27:10
with it later okay I got it
1:27:11
geez sorry
1:27:16
I know he done the files no you
what
1:27:19
what what Outlook yeah
1:27:21
use Outlook you know that moly
yeah I've
1:27:24
tricked it out to now where did
this
1:27:26
thing just go I just put it in
here that
1:27:29
out looks fabulous no it's not
it's
1:27:31
crappy where did it go out
donations
1:27:32
okay when to the donation
segment now
1:27:34
here we go okay I finally have
it okay
1:27:44
and the show got it it'll be in
the end
1:27:47
of show
1:27:49
like we did that ok onward it
was Scott
1:27:53
Richardson a happy 54th
birthday Adam
1:27:55
Curry he comes he went three
hundred
1:27:57
seventy nine dollars and thirty
cents it
1:27:59
gives you a happy birthday call
a happy
1:28:00
25th of another Adam you should
be on
1:28:03
the Meili on the list I'm not
sure happy
1:28:05
25th to another Adam my brother
Adam
1:28:07
Richardson mhm and then please
call out
1:28:10
my friend Forman as a douche
bag again
1:28:13
and then give him some dogs are
people
1:28:17
to karma you've got karma sir
Chris or
1:28:29
Chris Wilson did a happy
birthday song
1:28:31
for me but I'll play that end
of show
1:28:33
okay good all right now we have
last or
1:28:37
last guy sister Daniel Miller
who came
1:28:39
in at 3:30 3.33 knee he
actually sent in
1:28:42
a very short note with anybody
had the
1:28:44
sealing wax on it I love it I
love when
1:28:48
I get something with the
sealing wax on
1:28:49
it everyone's gathered around
the table
1:28:53
i choppers opening mail as look
look
1:28:55
sealing wax I popped it open oh
yeah I
1:28:58
got one I couldn't pop it open
that
1:29:00
easily to rip the paper a
little bit and
1:29:01
it stuck to the note on the
inside this
1:29:04
value for value is long overdue
your
1:29:06
analysis and delivery are truly
1:29:08
outstanding and unmatched and
then he
1:29:10
has it in emphasized boldface
type in
1:29:14
all the land no agenda has
helped my
1:29:18
critical thinking and has
undoubtedly
1:29:20
had a positive impact on my
career in
1:29:22
general well-being I know that
many
1:29:24
other producers feel the same
way I
1:29:26
humbly request some jobs coming
from my
1:29:29
smoking-hot wife and all
producers Amen
1:29:32
fist bump now before you play
the thing
1:29:34
he's actually up to enough to
grab a
1:29:38
knighthood no I bet no he is a
nice got
1:29:42
this thing works
1:29:42
I'm sorry baronet haha I think
he didn't
1:29:47
do request baronet upgrading he
may be
1:29:49
just waiting cuz he's very
short I mean
1:29:52
he's very just very close I'm
sorry
1:29:54
close to Baron so maybe he's
just
1:29:56
waiting I just want to mention
to him
1:29:59
because he's gonna listen to
this he
1:30:00
could have been
1:30:01
right now I know what you're
doing you
1:30:03
know for just $5 more you could
have the
1:30:06
nicer model you know people you
know hey
1:30:15
it was really driven by the
producers
1:30:18
who wanted these titles beyond
1:30:20
knighthood and I'm very proud
of our
1:30:21
system and I'm proud that other
people
1:30:23
use that it's the value for
value model
1:30:25
and it's true royalty these
credits are
1:30:27
real you know there's nothing
that says
1:30:29
this there's no magical wall
that makes
1:30:31
these two media professionals
less
1:30:34
valuable than someone else
being an
1:30:36
executive or associate executive
1:30:37
producer in fact once you've
been won
1:30:40
you can automatically pass that
title on
1:30:41
is that not true
1:30:42
yes if you've been an executive
producer
1:30:44
than any production you're
involved in
1:30:46
you can hand out titles you
could if you
1:30:49
wanted nobody does it we do yes
there
1:30:53
you go
1:30:54
so thank you very much to our
executive
1:30:56
and associate executive
producers we
1:30:57
will thank everybody who came
in over
1:30:59
$50 in our second segment and
we have a
1:31:02
special show coming up on
Sunday as I
1:31:05
will be tomorrow morning the
keeper and
1:31:09
I we go to Italy my sister's
25th
1:31:11
wedding anniversary which is
Saturday
1:31:13
night we arrive Saturday morning
1:31:14
Saturday night so there's just
no one be
1:31:16
able to do any type of good show
1:31:19
and quite honestly think we
deserve one
1:31:21
show off but John didn't take
off
1:31:24
he actually added to his
workload yeah
1:31:27
what you got for us on Sunday
1:31:29
Johnny boy that will taste and
I do have
1:31:31
a teaser let me finish the
segment first
1:31:33
let me just get out of
everything I
1:31:35
thought you were just gonna
tease who
1:31:37
you work you and me right -
you're right
1:31:40
I messed it up let me thank
everybody
1:31:42
and get out and then well then
we'll
1:31:43
tease that so
1:31:45
you do want to remember us at
Dvorak org
1:31:48
slash and a we got all kinds of
nuggets
1:31:52
for you today in our formula
including
1:31:54
opponents our formula is this
we go out
1:31:57
or hit people in the mouth
1:32:11
all right
1:32:14
so sunday sunday is sunday
sunday
1:32:17
special show no rehash no remix
no
1:32:23
retake no flash me that nope
1:32:26
brandy and fresh fresh mixes
once well
1:32:30
but this will be two interviews
that
1:32:32
I've done one with Dane Jasper
this CEO
1:32:36
of sonic net talking about
Gigabit
1:32:39
Ethernet sonic net talking
about Gigabit
1:32:40
now why will this be
interesting to
1:32:41
everybody because we have a lot
of dudes
1:32:43
named ban and we want to hear
from a guy
1:32:45
who is who's actually stringing
his own
1:32:47
wires outside of the AT&T
infrastructure
1:32:50
and we're gonna talk about
gigabit why
1:32:52
he's an independent guy he's
like us
1:32:54
he's a part of a separate and
1:32:56
independent of the mainstream
yeah
1:32:59
nice so there's a like wires
out in
1:33:01
front my house that they these
guys came
1:33:03
by these trucks and say Sonic
dinette
1:33:04
there's string and wires not
wires but
1:33:07
cable but fiber so it's fiber
to the
1:33:10
home FDA flavor to the curb fth
yeah
1:33:14
yeah ft nice okay that's a dude
named
1:33:17
Ben yeah god I'm very
interested in that
1:33:19
FTTH got that right ETH yes now
on the
1:33:23
other one I have an exclusive
interview
1:33:25
with Scott Adams whoo and Scott
Wow 25
1:33:31
years I made it a little easier
to do
1:33:32
this interview now can we cut
the court
1:33:36
the questions you have for Dane
into
1:33:37
Scott's answers don't have time
for this
1:33:41
I have to have this produced by
tonight
1:33:43
oh okay so I could it would be
funny but
1:33:47
it wouldn't be that funny
1:33:48
all right but I do have a
teaser destroy
1:33:50
the kind of stuff we'll be
talking about
1:33:52
with the Scott excellent now
you said
1:33:54
you'd known him for 25 years I
don't
1:33:56
think people know that yeah
yeah why tap
1:33:59
dub now I've been over to his
house and
1:34:00
I haven't seen it for at least
I get why
1:34:03
he always talks to shooter
behind his
1:34:04
back I understand he's uh yeah
I'm very
1:34:11
yeah we're good actually I'd
say if I
1:34:14
saw him or we'd be pretty good
friends
1:34:15
like that'd be nice but he
here's an
1:34:21
eight years an example I asked
him a
1:34:22
question I said cuz of course
he hates
1:34:25
the word Trump apologist we
talked about
1:34:27
that a little bit in the
1:34:28
show uh-huh he's not he doesn't
vote he
1:34:31
talks about this right not a
party he
1:34:33
doesn't care he just likes to
analyze
1:34:35
things he just wants to weed to
be
1:34:37
legalized oh it it is well in
California
1:34:40
yes it is is legalized yeah uh
and he I
1:34:46
asked him a question I said
this at this
1:34:48
position you've taken which is
to you
1:34:51
know talk about Trump as a great
1:34:52
persuader or and he's but
smarted
1:34:55
everybody else has this hurt
has this
1:34:59
hurt your income or anything at
all
1:35:01
whatsoever cuz this is a
question I felt
1:35:03
I needed to ask questions I'm
sorry for
1:35:07
interrupting your setup it this
is the
1:35:09
definition of a great question
this is
1:35:11
the question that everybody
should be
1:35:13
asking him wherever he goes
they never
1:35:15
ask him this ever oh sure yeah
no go
1:35:19
ahead sorry nice she stepped on
you I
1:35:22
will say that I got out of him
at least
1:35:24
three things that I've never
heard in
1:35:26
fact I thought too of me ever I
wanted
1:35:28
you almost decided never to
talk about
1:35:29
but I got it you don't you
don't want to
1:35:31
mess with this with Dvorak he's
a real
1:35:33
Jesus he's a juice squeezer
I'll tell ya
1:35:37
okay we go oh sure yeah
probably 40% of
1:35:40
my income he's operated and how
many
1:35:43
five percent of my social
circle yeah
1:35:46
I'm quite an outcast and my and
I I
1:35:49
don't do public speaking
anymore because
1:35:51
it's too dangerous
1:35:53
you know I wouldn't feel
comfortable if
1:35:56
there was any publicity and you
put me
1:35:58
in front of a big crowd right
now cuz it
1:36:00
only takes one person to say
that guy
1:36:02
said something good about the
1:36:04
president's persuasion skills
he must
1:36:06
die so I don't think it's safe
to be in
1:36:10
public when people like you are
branding
1:36:13
me a Trump apologist
1:36:16
people like you did you bring
him that's
1:36:19
funny that's very funny
1:36:20
while he says he's lost 40
percent of
1:36:25
his income that's that's Dilbert
1:36:27
yeah and 75 percent of his
social circle
1:36:30
which does I say or you say
that's a win
1:36:34
that's not a loss what I would
think
1:36:37
you'd win yeah Tina and I'm
like hey you
1:36:41
know what's really great we
live with
1:36:42
our best friends our only
friend yeah
1:36:49
because we're we're best
friends we got
1:36:50
some kids that's about saying
that the
1:36:52
gun range of meet more friends
oh yeah I
1:36:54
got tons of friends there Reds
breads
1:36:57
know so that is the kind of
interview is
1:36:59
a nice no I can't very excited
about
1:37:02
that both very excited it's
very good
1:37:04
very good excellent I enjoyed
it that is
1:37:08
very nice
1:37:10
okay all right Oh you know we
can do
1:37:12
here let me see I think what we
probably
1:37:16
should do yes and now it's time
for your
1:37:20
sexual harassment we had a
full-on
1:37:23
sexual harassment dates but
there are
1:37:27
some moves things are happening
and
1:37:28
things are going down and we're
on top
1:37:31
of it and we start with a very
1:37:33
contrasting report from the CBC
in Kanda
1:37:36
Naevia where they're not paying
1:37:38
attention to in particular NBC
and CBS
1:37:42
the way we do here the south of
their
1:37:44
border but they have some
interesting
1:37:47
observations which have only
marginally
1:37:50
been discussed here their
resignations
1:37:52
were public the backlash Swift
but can
1:37:55
men disgraced in the me to
movement
1:37:57
returned to the spotlight well
this week
1:38:00
we saw some of the first steps
towards
1:38:02
comebacks comedian louis c.k
returned to
1:38:05
the stage for the first time
since he
1:38:07
was accused of masturbating in
front of
1:38:10
female legs page six reported
that fired
1:38:14
Today Show host Matt Lauer
recently told
1:38:16
fans quote I've been busy being
a dad
1:38:18
but don't worry I'll be back on
TV and
1:38:22
for some time it's been rumored
that
1:38:23
former CBS this morning host
Charlie
1:38:25
Rose is looking to host a new
show where
1:38:29
he interviews men brought down
by the
1:38:31
movement how am I ever gonna
get back
1:38:42
over my bathrobe for a second
how am I
1:38:45
ever gonna get back mmm I have
an idea
1:38:50
I'll do a show about my
colleagues tell
1:38:53
me about this sexuality it's in
your DNA
1:38:57
no ice here bind my bathrobe so
I
1:39:01
thought that was pretty
interesting
1:39:03
especially the Charley news I
didn't
1:39:04
realize that and it'll get on
the air
1:39:06
it'll happen
1:39:07
it'll totally help me Matt
Lauer Matt
1:39:10
Lauer well it's too early now
but he'll
1:39:12
come back this America we love
the
1:39:13
comeback kid as long as you eat
enough
1:39:16
shit it's not as your nod Cosby
1:39:19
ah you know what if he played
his cards
1:39:21
differently he could probably
come back
1:39:22
to but he didn't he played is
very wrong
1:39:25
very wrong yeah cuz America
will just
1:39:28
forgive you brother don't worry
about it
1:39:30
and I think Louis see cake he
had
1:39:33
already has an excuse for that
1:39:34
masturbation stuff if he had
said you
1:39:38
know because it was female
comics yeah
1:39:41
he was masturbating who must
have been
1:39:44
in front of a female comic and
if they
1:39:46
see what he should have said
was all I
1:39:48
was read
1:39:49
all I was doing there was
reviewing
1:39:52
their set okay alright I'm
surprised he
1:40:00
hasn't hired you yet as his
attorney big
1:40:04
moves over at CBS this was
breaking news
1:40:06
this morning we do have a story
that we
1:40:08
should be sharing with people
of course
1:40:09
involving CBS a company that of
course
1:40:12
there's been no shortage of
reporting on
1:40:14
lately what we can tell you
this morning
1:40:15
though is that the board of
directors of
1:40:17
CBS is deep in settlement talks
with the
1:40:20
company CEO Leslie Moonves that
would
1:40:22
result in his exit from a
company of
1:40:25
course that he has led for a
very long
1:40:27
time it would also mean the
appointment
1:40:29
of doe I&L oh the current CEO
of CBS as
1:40:32
its interim CEO this according
to people
1:40:36
who are close to the
negotiations
1:40:37
between Moonves and his board
now the
1:40:39
talks between Moonves and the
board
1:40:41
they've been going on for some
time and
1:40:43
they have yet to reach a
conclusion
1:40:44
given what appears to be a
continued
1:40:47
back and forth about moonves's
exit
1:40:50
package while under his
contract he's do
1:40:53
as much as 180 million dollars
in
1:40:55
severance and a production deal
sources
1:40:58
tell me the board right now
offering a
1:41:01
package that would be roughly a
hundred
1:41:02
million dollars made up almost
entirely
1:41:05
though not completely of CBS
stock rest
1:41:08
of it being cash but it also
wants the
1:41:10
right to claw back some of that
1:41:12
compensation if at the
conclusion of an
1:41:14
ongoing investigation into
charges of
1:41:16
sexual harassment
1:41:17
Moonves has been found to have
committed
1:41:19
other inappropriate acts
1:41:24
yep I like the clawback
provision that's
1:41:27
a really good one because if he
fights
1:41:29
that uh you hide something huh
you don't
1:41:33
want the club back do you and
we know
1:41:34
your name right past it
1:41:36
you know the clawbacks these
guys like
1:41:38
to do that because these
numbers are
1:41:40
outrageous they got a lot of
mom thing
1:41:46
there's something going on here
with
1:41:49
moon VII and I think it's the
only who
1:41:51
does it all seems to me that
well hold
1:41:54
on a second it seems to me that
once
1:41:57
Laur went down the next thing
you know
1:41:59
you have you have these three
networks
1:42:01
flower goes down and that
damages NBC
1:42:05
and who's behind it we don't
know but
1:42:08
the decision is made by
somebody either
1:42:10
the same people that took down
Lauer or
1:42:12
NBC's people to take down
Moonves aa CBS
1:42:17
cuz that's hugely damaging
because
1:42:19
Moonves is one of those guys
may or may
1:42:21
not be a jerk but he's one of
those guys
1:42:23
and actually in the Scott Adams
clip or
1:42:25
immunity you're gonna hear a
little
1:42:27
discussion of this sort of
thing where's
1:42:29
it a character is so important
to the
1:42:31
company he's the guy who at
some point
1:42:33
or us is know let's not do that
let's do
1:42:35
this right and those guys are
you know
1:42:37
they look like gentlemen a
major players
1:42:39
until after they're gone then
ABC gets
1:42:42
dinged by getting Lassiter
killed the
1:42:45
same kind of guy well here so I
came up
1:42:48
with kind of a simple
explanation for
1:42:50
all of this because The Daily
Beast has
1:42:52
also been teasing they've got a
huge
1:42:54
expose on Weinstein his
relationship
1:42:57
with Andy lack the president
over there
1:43:00
at NBC News I guess you know dr
tucker
1:43:04
carlson is all over this he's
dragging
1:43:06
in us Chuck Todd that he must
have known
1:43:11
about it they're all covering
you know
1:43:12
there's a lot of stuff going on
about
1:43:14
you know why they didn't report
on it
1:43:17
why they turned Ronan Farrow
away and I
1:43:19
think just from a simple
perspective
1:43:22
and this is based on other
people I've
1:43:24
spoken to about Harvey
Weinstein who
1:43:26
know him that and I'll go back
to all go
1:43:29
back to what patch anak said
he's just
1:43:30
an ugly Jew boy who and this
I'm quoting
1:43:33
him he's poach an ex a Jew so I
get he
1:43:35
gets to say that but that's
what he says
1:43:37
it's just an ugly Jew boy who
figured
1:43:39
out that you could get laid and
then the
1:43:41
women would gladly screw him to
get jobs
1:43:44
and that this network of guys
at the top
1:43:47
have been doing this for
decades this is
1:43:51
the casting couch I think
that's what's
1:43:53
going on and you know you now
see Asia
1:43:56
Argento she's read she's now
flipped the
1:43:59
whole story about her having
paid off
1:44:01
the seventeen-year-old act and
now she
1:44:03
says you know she was sexually
attacked
1:44:05
by him it's all coming off the
rails and
1:44:08
I think totally and I think
sadly sadly
1:44:11
what has happened here is you
know
1:44:14
through simple Pavlovian
response
1:44:17
mechanisms these men who have
been at
1:44:20
the top of their game and Trump
is the
1:44:22
same way come on this is the
grabber by
1:44:24
the pussy crowd it's not just
Trump
1:44:26
power is attractive you could
be ugly
1:44:31
our president can look pretty
ugly at
1:44:33
times I'm sure he's not pretty
naked
1:44:35
look what he's getting it's not
just
1:44:37
money its power and it's
attractive and
1:44:39
people fall for that and I
think sadly
1:44:41
what we've seen here is a lot of
1:44:44
accusations and weinstein may
get off he
1:44:47
may actually get off scot-free
I think
1:44:49
he got enough before guy yes I
was
1:44:52
waiting for that
1:44:53
so is maybe they picked the
wrong
1:44:56
targets but instead of saying
hey this
1:44:57
is war between the networks
which it
1:45:00
could be in a way he's going
down screw
1:45:02
it I'm taking him down before I
go down
1:45:04
I think they're all in it John
and if
1:45:06
they unravel that and they get
anywhere
1:45:08
deeper in with an ABC they main
supply
1:45:10
and some very very ugly stuff
that's why
1:45:13
I'm encouraged about this
exactly so and
1:45:23
there's a beautiful silver
lining to
1:45:26
this for megyn kelly who made
this step
1:45:29
from Fox to NBC as seen of
course is
1:45:32
traitorous because she went
over to the
1:45:34
to the lefty crazy
1:45:36
seaside and she has not found
her
1:45:39
footing miraculously they have
not fired
1:45:41
her she's got the stupid
daytime show
1:45:44
which it was not been working no
1:45:45
traction and all of a sudden
the genius
1:45:48
of either Meg I think it's her
and I'm
1:45:50
very very I'm very proud she
did this
1:45:53
she's decided to take on her
own network
1:45:55
to a degree of course but I do
have a
1:45:58
clip of her discussing this on
her show
1:46:00
as you heard in that report NBC
News
1:46:02
says now that quote there was
not a
1:46:04
single victim of or witnessed to
1:46:07
misconduct by Weinstein who was
willing
1:46:08
to be identified moreover they
say Rose
1:46:11
McGowan had refused to name
Weinstein
1:46:13
and then her lawyer sent a
cease and
1:46:14
desist letter in August 2017
late last
1:46:18
night Rose McGowan and rich
McHugh the
1:46:22
former NBC producer both
challenged that
1:46:25
assertion telling megyn kelly
today that
1:46:28
McGowan did go on the record
with NBC in
1:46:31
February 2017 after that
on-camera
1:46:34
interview with Farrell and that
she did
1:46:36
name Harvey Weinstein as her
rapist both
1:46:40
McGowan and rich McHugh say NBC
had this
1:46:42
on the record off-camera
assertion from
1:46:45
McGowan for eight months long
before her
1:46:49
letter sent a cease and desist
letter
1:46:50
which McHugh says was
communicated to
1:46:53
NBC executives in a statement
to megyn
1:46:55
kelly today this morning NBC
News
1:46:57
responded as follows quote as
the
1:47:00
interview transcript clearly
clearly
1:47:01
indicates McGowan did not name
Weinstein
1:47:04
as her attacker on camera in
Feb you in
1:47:07
the February 2017 interview the
first
1:47:09
time Ronan Farrow submitted a
draft
1:47:11
script on this story was five
months
1:47:13
later on July 23rd 2017 if
Farrell had
1:47:18
McGowan on the record but
off-camera
1:47:21
before that date and wanted to
proceed
1:47:22
with airing the story he did not
1:47:24
indicate that to his editors
within days
1:47:27
of that July 23rd draft script
being
1:47:28
submitted McGowan canceled the
follow-up
1:47:31
on-camera interview and her
attorney
1:47:33
sent NBC a cease and desist
letter
1:47:34
revoking all permission to use
the first
1:47:36
interview it's there's a lot to
unpack
1:47:40
yeah but what what we're seeing
here is
1:47:45
rich Dynamite she's putting a
little a
1:47:47
little and
1:47:48
so hard this is a great career
move
1:47:51
megyn kelly you're a genius
1:47:53
oh so hard for me to do my own
network
1:47:56
but I'm strong I can do this
Ned we're
1:48:00
gonna love it yes interview this
1:48:03
journalistic integrity this is
what
1:48:05
press freedom is about it's
there's a
1:48:08
lot fired no they can't fire
this is why
1:48:12
it's so genius you're gonna
fire her
1:48:14
because she questioned your you
bide
1:48:17
your time yeah but what what
we're
1:48:21
seeing here is rich McHugh who
just
1:48:24
resigned from NBC who was
Ronan's
1:48:25
producer on this story has now
gone
1:48:29
public with his accusations
that NBC he
1:48:31
claimed blocked the story NBC
vehemently
1:48:33
denying that and and saying
they didn't
1:48:37
have anybody they didn't have
anybody on
1:48:39
the record who was willing to
name him
1:48:41
and Rose McGowan telling us she
was on
1:48:44
the record that she was on the
record
1:48:46
for months and they didn't use
the
1:48:47
statement and you heard NBC's
saying if
1:48:49
that's true it wasn't
communicated up
1:48:52
the line and and now you have
that there
1:48:56
that's a dispute now between
NBC and the
1:48:58
reporters on the story but this
is
1:49:00
getting it's getting really in
the weeds
1:49:03
and it's getting really
uncomfortable
1:49:07
it's like oh it's almost like I
was like
1:49:10
I have Braxton Hicks
contractions it's
1:49:12
almost like oh that I have to
credit you
1:49:15
and Ricky for discussing it
right here
1:49:25
brilliant career move
1:49:27
outstanding she's just
outstanding you
1:49:31
watch her fly now this is gonna
be great
1:49:32
she's gonna be doing interviews
1:49:33
everywhere about her tough
stance
1:49:35
against her own company so but
you know
1:49:37
this would journalists do if
she plays
1:49:39
it right I don't know who's
representing
1:49:41
her but if she plays it right
that's the
1:49:42
way to go and we will see and
with all
1:49:44
this just to wrap this up and
make it
1:49:47
real simple after we heard
Twitter the
1:49:48
Twitter stuff and we've all we
all see
1:49:50
what's going on in Twitter that
we hear
1:49:52
about this hashtag nice to
stuff I'm
1:49:54
going to take the veil away
from your
1:49:56
eyes because every human being
on this
1:50:00
earth either has or will cheat
you will
1:50:04
have infidelity in your life
those who
1:50:06
have been through it and it
didn't turn
1:50:08
out so well you probably won't
do it
1:50:09
again so well you probably
won't do it
1:50:10
everybody has horrible thoughts
about
1:50:12
everybody else and given the
chance to
1:50:14
do that safely they will say it
we're
1:50:17
a-holes that safely they will
say it we're
1:50:20
happy humanity day everybody
and this
1:50:23
concludes your sexual
harassment update
1:50:28
thanks for putting the show on
a down
1:50:30
note yeah well I could do some
up stuff
1:50:33
come on just play the foamer
again that
1:50:36
brings us back to normal
1:50:38
oh yeah this is our go-to show
level the
1:50:43
humor back to normal
1:50:44
yes we do need that hold on you
want to
1:50:54
do some climate stuff not
really I want
1:50:57
to get some politics out of the
way
1:50:58
which oh no not more politics
oh okay
1:51:02
climate the climate was the
latest
1:51:05
climate thing that the one of
the tennis
1:51:08
players lost the game according
to the
1:51:09
New York Times because of
climate change
1:51:11
you see that because it was hot
and she
1:51:14
took her that her a veteran no
the US
1:51:22
Open game because of climate
change
1:51:25
Trump I knew didn't lose or die
I knew
1:51:30
Trump had something to do with
it well
1:51:32
no hold on I got to climate
change
1:51:34
things in the media which is
always fun
1:51:35
I do not watch the show
elementary do
1:51:38
you watch the show elementary
yes I do
1:51:41
well I'm surprised you haven't
brought
1:51:42
this clip to the table then all
right
1:51:44
there probably was a tip I
remember when
1:51:45
recently that I was gonna pull
by it
1:51:47
never did this is probably this
is a
1:51:49
FEMA flood that kidnappers were
making
1:51:51
redraw flood zones care to let
the rest
1:51:53
of us in FEMA the federal
government is
1:51:56
in charge of determining the
risk of
1:51:58
flooding for everywhere in the
country
1:52:00
that can hear Norman Lear
tapping away
1:52:03
the keyboard and maps like this
break
1:52:05
the flood risks down into zones
red is
1:52:08
the highest risk orange is
second and so
1:52:10
on highest risk orange is
second and so
1:52:10
there used to plan emergency
responses
1:52:12
and to say who needs flood
insurance and
1:52:14
how much but with climate
change and
1:52:16
rising sea levels FEMA husband
redoing
1:52:18
all the old maps redoing all
the maps
1:52:22
there's a staggering amount of
data that
1:52:24
goes into these measuring then
a lot of
1:52:27
it comes down to statistical
analysis
1:52:28
the likelihood of X event
happening in Y
1:52:30
number of years Oh
1:52:32
p-nut p-values it takes forever
I mean I
1:52:36
heard from a colleague recently
that the
1:52:37
maps we were working on back
then are
1:52:39
just entering the public review
phase
1:52:40
now so you a map sound official
yet no
1:52:43
and your captors wanted you to
change
1:52:46
the math that Harlan was doing
in order
1:52:49
to make maps look different
it's total
1:52:53
Climategate storyline yeah it
kind of
1:52:56
was it wasn't as good as the
other
1:52:58
elementary clip if you recall
that I
1:53:00
played is not a first time we
visited
1:53:02
the show somebody's writing
these
1:53:04
scripts about the patent
stealing
1:53:09
when the government can't find
a good
1:53:12
patent and they just steal it
you don't
1:53:13
get credit yeah that was just a
couple
1:53:15
shows ago yeah that was
Elementary ah
1:53:18
okay ago yeah that was
Elementary ah
1:53:19
well you've spurred people on
because I
1:53:21
don't watch the show it was
sent to me
1:53:23
it's a I enjoy these mysteries
I like to
1:53:27
I know the structure of a of a
detective
1:53:31
story and I'm always trying to
see they
1:53:33
break it very rarely but most
of time
1:53:35
they don't and for people who
like to
1:53:38
watch these things or want to
follow the
1:53:40
basic theories of these stories
they're
1:53:42
all the same and typically just
for your
1:53:45
information when you're
watching one of
1:53:47
these just verse for your
health the
1:53:50
first person you see is the
killer the
1:53:56
first person on screen is
always the
1:53:57
killer person on screen is
always the
1:53:58
well not that mean that the main
1:54:00
characters by talking about the
first
1:54:01
person it has anything to do
where
1:54:03
they're asking about the murder
old
1:54:05
bills dead not actually 90% of
all them
1:54:16
are detective story murder
mysteries the
1:54:18
first person did it and the
rest of the
1:54:20
story is all misdirection
1:54:22
ayah and the way elementary
does it
1:54:24
which i think is one of the
best models
1:54:26
they do misdirection and then
the
1:54:28
misdirection itself leads to
the guy who
1:54:31
did it who is the first person
and the
1:54:36
story very well structured
except it's
1:54:38
completely deconstruct Abul and
1:54:39
therefore no fun once you know
the the
1:54:41
formal detective stories are
1:54:43
deconstructed they're all the
same
1:54:45
well the CBC uncovered
something quite
1:54:49
literally that should be very
alarming
1:54:51
to all of us it's been a summer
full of
1:54:54
Records and extremes just take
a look at
1:54:56
BC the province is now
officially
1:54:58
dealing with its worst wildfire
season
1:55:01
on record in terms of hectares
burned
1:55:03
and that's meant smoky skies
for much of
1:55:06
Western Canada
1:55:07
this is Calgary skyline I'm
sort of
1:55:09
let's not forget Montreal's
deadly
1:55:12
heatwave back in July but we're
not the
1:55:14
only ones feeling the effects
of extreme
1:55:16
temperature ones feeling the
effects of extreme
1:55:17
have a look at Europe for
summer has
1:55:19
felt like a modern-day version
of
1:55:21
biblical plagues and just when
you
1:55:23
thought biblical plagues the
warning
1:55:26
signs couldn't get any worse
bring in
1:55:28
the hunger stones located in
the Czech
1:55:31
Republic along the Elbe River
the rocks
1:55:33
were used to record low water
levels but
1:55:36
starting centuries ago when
those water
1:55:38
levels got dangerously low bad
enough to
1:55:41
result in droughts and terrible
harvests
1:55:43
past generations wrote notes on
those
1:55:45
rocks warnings to the people of
the
1:55:48
future like this one a message
from 1904
1:55:51
saying if you see me weep at
least a
1:55:54
dozen of these hunger stones
and the
1:55:56
Czech Republic and Germany have
now
1:55:57
appeared no one knows how many
there
1:56:00
really are oh my goodness a
giant global
1:56:03
warming in 1904 what was going
on back
1:56:05
then all I know is I'm reading
another
1:56:07
stone and here's what it says
you might
1:56:10
got the hunger I'd like the
hunger stone
1:56:14
the hunger stones is great I've
never
1:56:17
heard of this I liked it I
think it's a
1:56:19
title for a book hunger stones
1:56:21
yeah bunch of kids that kill
each other
1:56:23
with rocks yeah that's creative
the
1:56:27
hunger stones and that is your
climate
1:56:30
update everybody we're all
gonna die
1:56:34
play this clip cuz I don't
remember what
1:56:36
it is this is the sieve it says
CBS n I
1:56:39
must be CNBC looking at fire
idiot
1:56:43
comments so when you look at Bob
1:56:45
Woodward's okay yeah we should
talk
1:56:49
about this this is Bob
Woodward's got a
1:56:53
book I called fire this is
latest thing
1:56:55
and it played it I love this I
love the
1:56:59
book I love the op-ed and all
the whole
1:57:01
story is great
1:57:02
so some phony-baloney op-ed
came out
1:57:04
which is really about the book
because
1:57:06
they've everybody played it the
same way
1:57:07
all that's doing is confirming
Bob
1:57:10
Woodward's book it's completely
it's
1:57:13
completely about the by Mac if
you want
1:57:17
to just run through it's very
short it's
1:57:18
not a long essay but I just
made I
1:57:22
brought down some comments on
even but
1:57:24
why bother reading it because
if you if
1:57:26
you listen to the ABC well
actually ABC
1:57:28
I didn't play though I didn't
clip the
1:57:30
whole thing but ABC didn't let
me here's
1:57:32
the background err this is the
intro
1:57:34
this is a 45 second intro to
what
1:57:37
becomes a for all practical
purposes a
1:57:41
complete paragraph by paragraph
reading
1:57:45
of this stupid essay but play
this ABC
1:57:48
clip version with that
unprecedented
1:57:49
move something we have never
seen before
1:57:51
a letter published late today
by the New
1:57:54
York Times written by someone
inside the
1:57:56
Trump administration an
anonymous senior
1:57:58
official describing what it's
like
1:58:00
inside the White House inside
this
1:58:02
administration saying I work
for the
1:58:04
president but like-minded
colleagues and
1:58:06
I have vowed to thwart part of
the
1:58:08
president's agenda and his worst
1:58:09
inclinations the senior
official writing
1:58:12
in that letter we know what is
happening
1:58:14
adding quote there is a quiet
resistance
1:58:17
within the administration to
put country
1:58:19
first tonight the president
tweeting
1:58:21
just moments ago a one-word
question
1:58:24
treason and it all comes 24
hours after
1:58:27
Bob Woodward's bombshell book
ABC's
1:58:29
chief White House clinic
Jonathan Karl -
1:58:31
leading us off rinse
coincidence no
1:58:35
incidents Jonathan Karl for all
1:58:38
practical purposes reads the
entire
1:58:40
essay it's unbelievable I mean
it goes
1:58:43
on for five minutes now yet
1:58:47
it was it was ridiculous but on
the
1:58:50
other side I think a very good
1:58:51
two-minute rundown of the whole
thing
1:58:53
which includes some clips from
from the
1:58:56
from the essay
1:58:58
not the book but talks about
the book
1:58:59
this is the insider slam this
is Hallie
1:59:03
Jackson an NBC who I think does
a much
1:59:05
better job is still anti-trump
reporter
1:59:08
but much better job than
Jonathan Karl
1:59:11
an extra arm see inside out
1:59:13
jaw dropping charges against the
1:59:15
president by someone who says
they
1:59:17
worked for him an anonymous
source
1:59:19
describing a secret cluster of
top aides
1:59:21
quote working diligently from
within to
1:59:24
frustrate parts of his agenda
and his
1:59:26
worst inclinations I would know
the
1:59:28
author writes I am one of them
the New
1:59:31
York Times late today
publishing that
1:59:33
op-ed choosing not to share who
wrote it
1:59:35
but describing them as an
official whose
1:59:37
job would be jeopardized if
their
1:59:39
identity was revealed the
headline I am
1:59:42
part of the resistance inside
the Trump
1:59:44
administration when you tell me
about
1:59:45
some anonymous source within the
1:59:48
administration probably who's
failing
1:59:50
and probably here for all the
wrong
1:59:52
reasons probably here for all
the wrong
1:59:53
if the failing New York Times
has an
1:59:55
anonymous editorial can you
believe it
1:59:57
anonymous we're doing a great
job
2:00:03
the writer praising some of the
2:00:04
president's successes but
arguing
2:00:06
they've come despite not
because of his
2:00:09
leadership style describing
half-baked
2:00:11
ill-informed and occasionally
reckless
2:00:13
decisions that have to be
walked back at
2:00:16
one point the official
describes early
2:00:18
whispers within the cabinet of
invoking
2:00:20
the 25th amendment to remove the
2:00:22
president but no one wanted to
2:00:24
precipitate a constitutional
crisis
2:00:26
Americans should know that
there are
2:00:28
adults in the room the person
rights we
2:00:30
fully recognize what is
happening and we
2:00:32
are trying to do what's right
even when
2:00:34
Donald Trump won't the
explosive op-ed
2:00:38
echoes the portrait painted in a
2:00:39
bombshell new book of a chaotic
White
2:00:42
House driven by dysfunction the
2:00:44
president doesn't believe any
of it
2:00:45
the book never stops
2:00:47
to fiction everything on the
Trump
2:00:51
rotation dot-com Trump rotation
calm
2:00:54
everything with very few
exceptions on
2:00:57
that list are put into these
reports
2:01:00
it's like an but it's also in
the
2:01:03
article yes in the article to
boppin
2:01:06
it's like the Trump rotation
they still
2:01:09
don't know how to focus on him
they need
2:01:11
a lesson in formats and
rotations
2:01:14
they're just shotgunning the
entire list
2:01:18
that we put online which is the
Trump
2:01:20
rotation calm you can read it by
2:01:22
everything that everyone said
that's bad
2:01:24
about they everything except
the orange
2:01:25
faces in these comments and
then when I
2:01:28
play a later clip with John
Kerry he
2:01:30
manages to bring that if you
look back
2:01:33
at Woodward's past he had the
same
2:01:35
problem with other presidents
he likes
2:01:36
to get publicity sell some
books the
2:01:38
book's author Bob would work
one of the
2:01:40
most well respected journalists
of his
2:01:42
generation who's reporting
helped bring
2:01:45
down Richard Nixon for the
American
2:01:46
people why should they believe
you over
2:01:48
Bob Woodward every time we
wrote a book
2:01:54
they were complaining about it
they were
2:01:55
complaining about the lack of
accuracy
2:01:57
Woodward tells NBC News he
stands by his
2:02:00
reporting and the president
tonight
2:02:03
seemed to refer to that
anonymous op-ed
2:02:05
with a tweet of just a single
word
2:02:08
treason and the press secretary
is now
2:02:11
calling the writer a coward
saying
2:02:13
whoever it was should resign
all of it
2:02:16
Lester it was should resign all
of it
2:02:16
kaping yet another
extraordinary and
2:02:19
explosive day inside this West
Wing
2:02:21
this thing is so
multi-dimensional
2:02:24
there's so many things at play
here
2:02:26
including you know the treason
and
2:02:29
anonymous sources and chaos and
then
2:02:33
please just add to that that Bob
2:02:35
Woodward who brought down a
president
2:02:39
every single member you see to
every
2:02:41
talking head you see on
television
2:02:42
dreams of Bob Woodward they've
got into
2:02:46
journalism because of Bob
Woodward they
2:02:49
want to be Byrnes
2:02:50
Woodward and Bernstein they
want to be
2:02:52
that so badly this guy is the
Pope of
2:02:55
news so badly this guy is the
Pope of
2:02:55
he cannot be questioned
2:03:00
cannot and the obvious
collusion between
2:03:03
the book and this op-ed and I
just want
2:03:06
to pull a few things out in the
CIA well
2:03:08
yeah we'll get to that in a
second so
2:03:10
first of all the New York Times
in their
2:03:12
opening let's just because they
gloss
2:03:14
over that a little bit and
here's what
2:03:16
the time said about their
anonymous op
2:03:20
opinion editor The Times today
is taking
2:03:23
the rare step of publishing an
anonymous
2:03:24
op eds a oh it is Nessa we have
done set
2:03:28
what is the definition of an
essay
2:03:31
that's it you know yeah an ese
heels
2:03:34
like a short a short exposition
of some
2:03:38
idea or thought or or something
to
2:03:41
promote is a million things but
this is
2:03:43
an essay most all op eds RS we
have done
2:03:46
so at the request of the author
comma a
2:03:49
senior official in the Trump
2:03:50
administration whose identity
is known
2:03:52
to us and whose job would be
jeopardized
2:03:55
by its disclosure we believe
publishing
2:03:58
this essay anonymously is the
only way
2:04:00
to deliver an important
perspective to
2:04:02
our readers we invite you to
submit a
2:04:04
question about the essay or a
vetting
2:04:05
process here and I just put a
few
2:04:09
annotations in there in this
note
2:04:12
there's the following in
addition to his
2:04:14
mass marketing of the notion
that the
2:04:16
press is the enemy of the people
2:04:18
president Trump's impulses are
generally
2:04:20
anti trade and anti-democratic
well this
2:04:24
I mean who in the White House
at this
2:04:27
point does not know I'm sure
that the
2:04:29
message has gone out hey the
president
2:04:30
actually said fake news and
maybe he had
2:04:34
he added CNN in there one sort
of the
2:04:36
one or two times worth a
thousand times
2:04:38
he said it but ok then there's
this
2:04:43
meetings with him veer off
topic and off
2:04:46
the rails he engages in
repetitive rants
2:04:48
and his impulsiveness results in
2:04:50
half-baked ill-informed and
occasionally
2:04:51
reckless decisions that have to
be
2:04:53
walked back I believe this to
be true
2:04:55
from a a certain perspective it
may look
2:05:00
that way because it is but it's
healthy
2:05:02
I think how the guy works he
has a knack
2:05:05
for finding the right people to
be
2:05:06
around him doesn't mind getting
rid of
2:05:08
them when they're not good
enough for
2:05:09
not performing and he doesn't
really
2:05:11
even blame them typically he's
like it's
2:05:13
not working out I look like a
dick
2:05:14
you're gone and he throws stuff
out left
2:05:17
and right he's hyperkinetic and
for some
2:05:19
reason and i've seen i were
talking
2:05:21
about this last night john we
know lots
2:05:24
of people like this well let me
tell you
2:05:27
a little scott adams anecdote
oh good
2:05:29
this story was breaking when i
was
2:05:31
showing up a Scott's house and
we're
2:05:34
talking about it for a little
while out
2:05:35
on the interview but how's this
crib by
2:05:38
the way is it is a nice
relationship
2:05:40
it's like is it did you
2:05:44
his girlfriend him no she
wasn't is he
2:05:46
getting married to her I don't
he didn't
2:05:48
say um and I don't usually pry
and it I
2:05:51
sort of think yeah I do yeah
well you do
2:05:56
he says I don't see what the
big deal is
2:06:00
this sounds like because you
know you
2:06:01
have to remember that Scott and
we
2:06:03
talked a little bit about this
on this
2:06:04
show but he he does office is
basically
2:06:07
all his cartoons are about
again in
2:06:10
office it's an office
environment uh-huh
2:06:12
and he's been into offices and
he's
2:06:14
knows that the mechanisms he
says I
2:06:17
don't see that this is anything
more
2:06:19
than typically some guy
bitching and
2:06:22
moaning about his boss exactly
which is
2:06:25
exactly what I think - this is
like some
2:06:28
growl sir this is I neither guy
stick I
2:06:30
mean I've often in many of
office
2:06:33
environments thought the boss
was an
2:06:35
idiot thought the boss was an
2:06:36
absolutely pretty much
everywhere but
2:06:39
how about this oh why is this
such a
2:06:41
revelation all of a sudden I'll
give me
2:06:42
an example my friend Michelle
and you
2:06:44
know rip Michelle because he
owns the
2:06:48
strip bars and the restaurants
and the
2:06:51
big entertainment complex in
Guildford
2:06:53
and also the house and near San
Tropez
2:06:57
will we have vacationed and
Michelle is
2:07:01
illiterate and he'll say Adam
could you
2:07:04
please just write this for me
he'll get
2:07:06
hand me his phone to write
something a
2:07:07
business text cuz that's how he
does
2:07:09
business like in like anything
I'm
2:07:11
illiterate I can't write I
can't write I
2:07:13
can barely read you know
they'll send
2:07:15
him an article it says just can
you just
2:07:17
call me and tell me what that
he can't
2:07:18
read and the guy is wildly
successful
2:07:20
has tonton well not in
everything has
2:07:22
tons of money you know not a
worry in
2:07:26
the world really yeah and he
and I see
2:07:29
his his staff I've seen his
secretaries
2:07:31
you know save his ass his
daughter like
2:07:34
daddy daddy you can't do that
you got to
2:07:35
do it this way okay and you
know this
2:07:37
off the rails thing he knows
how to take
2:07:39
direction from other people it
seems I
2:07:42
know people like this and it's
odd and
2:07:44
you see it a lot in real estate
you see
2:07:46
it in farming you see it in
factory
2:07:50
everywhere you see it everywhere
2:07:52
right what am I talking about
and so
2:07:54
this is a style that works and
you is
2:07:56
successful or not and yeah so
this just
2:07:58
bitching about his boss exam my
note
2:08:01
actually said normal people are
bitching
2:08:03
about their boss now I have a
couple of
2:08:05
things to read from this thing
cuz I
2:08:07
thought this was so I believe
this even
2:08:09
though it's somebody bitched
about their
2:08:10
boss I don't believe anybody I
still
2:08:13
think this was planted by the
agency
2:08:15
because to get Woodward's book
out there
2:08:17
and the agency we know well one
thing I
2:08:20
before you get into that two
more things
2:08:22
one at the bottom it says the
writer is
2:08:25
a senior official in the Trump
2:08:26
administration that could be a
lot of
2:08:28
people - it is definitely
definitely not
2:08:32
military or military
intelligence
2:08:33
because of the entire two
paragraphs
2:08:36
about McCain his farewell
letter we may
2:08:40
no longer have Senator McCain
we will
2:08:42
always have his example a
lodestar a
2:08:44
lodestar load a lodestar what
is a
2:08:49
lodestar well the look a
lodestone is
2:08:54
what I am lodestar while you're
looking
2:09:00
at up a lodestar anybody who
writes
2:09:03
lodestar in my office should be
fired
2:09:05
for restoring honor to public
life in
2:09:08
our national dialogue mr. Trump
may fear
2:09:10
such honorable men but we
should revere
2:09:12
them that is not a military
person no no
2:09:15
or is a star that's used to
guide the
2:09:19
course of a ship especially
Polaris so
2:09:24
nobody in their right mind
would use
2:09:25
that word guiding light would
be a
2:09:27
better term if you wanted to
use you
2:09:29
have no idea
2:09:30
nobody wanted to follow McCain
when he
2:09:32
was landing trust me well he
killed
2:09:38
about McCain so here I'm
reading this
2:09:42
this is the dis again the CIA is
2:09:45
notorious for kind of running
the New
2:09:47
York Times there's plenty of
examples of
2:09:49
how that works
2:09:51
operation Mockingbird it's out
in the
2:09:53
public we put this in there
again and
2:09:56
Woodward is in the book a
family of
2:09:58
secrets everyone should we have
read
2:10:00
this book by now is Woodward
came out of
2:10:03
military and tell it Naval
Intelligence
2:10:04
I believe where
2:10:06
the word lodestar would be used
perhaps
2:10:08
Woodward himself could have
written this
2:10:10
and then I'm not buying the
whole whole
2:10:13
I mean I don't think they'd
live a
2:10:15
senior official but it's
possible that
2:10:18
well here's the result
2:10:22
okay no go ahead no keep going
I'm sorry
2:10:25
I thought you were just
grasping which
2:10:27
is the yeah this is a dis is a
scam I
2:10:32
think that the two belong
together and
2:10:35
it's a scam and I have some
thoughts but
2:10:37
he read a couple of pieces from
it
2:10:39
you've read a couple although
he was now
2:10:41
when I read that I'm gonna
deconstruct
2:10:43
this paragraph for one thing
nobody who
2:10:46
is was very long sentences very
the
2:10:49
structure itself is not typical
of a
2:10:50
government bureaucrat senior
official or
2:10:52
not I just say that although he
was
2:10:56
elected because the editors
come in
2:10:57
maybe the editors did screwed
with it
2:10:59
although he was elected as a
Republican
2:11:01
Republican the president shows
little
2:11:04
affinity for ideals long
espoused by
2:11:07
conservatives wait a minute he
wasn't
2:11:09
elected as a conservative he
was elected
2:11:12
as a Republican mm-hmm so now
they've
2:11:15
mixed up so all of a sudden
Republicans
2:11:18
or conservatives or
conservatives a
2:11:20
Republican they're synonymous
and he was
2:11:22
elected as a conservative by
the way
2:11:24
they structured this bullcrap
he was
2:11:25
elected as a Republican they
got that
2:11:26
right but then they switch it to
2:11:29
conservative he was he shows
little
2:11:31
affinities for ideas long
espoused by
2:11:34
conservatives okay he was
elected as
2:11:36
Republican not as a
conservative free
2:11:39
minds I don't see any
difference of free
2:11:42
markets and free people free
minds free
2:11:45
markets and free people the
things
2:11:49
espoused by conservatives are
liberty
2:11:52
and freedom so they get one of
them in
2:11:54
here liberty and freedom and
and the
2:11:57
Democrat side or the
progressive side is
2:12:00
the other one which is equality
in
2:12:01
justice this is a theme that
was pointed
2:12:03
out in the show long ago and
freedom and
2:12:06
liberty ism is the conservative
side not
2:12:08
free minds free markets and
free people
2:12:12
free your mind and your dress
man follow
2:12:16
it Nace's at best
2:12:19
he has invoked these ideals and
scripted
2:12:22
settings had worse he has
attacked them
2:12:24
outright had worse he has
attacked them
2:12:25
yes he's attacked it as he
attacked free
2:12:28
minds he's attacked it as he
attacked free
2:12:28
do you know of yes he's living
rent free
2:12:32
and a lot of them these days
now as kind
2:12:36
of as kind of a bat walk back
that this
2:12:39
guy did who or woman who wrote
this
2:12:41
thing they throw these
gratuitous
2:12:43
compliments and just as it's
code for
2:12:46
something and I'm not sure why
they're
2:12:47
doing it just maybe so they can
soften
2:12:50
the blow of the critics so two
2:12:52
paragraphs later he says or she
don't
2:12:54
get me wrong I would like to
run this
2:12:56
through I have I have the
feeling it's a
2:12:58
man by the way that by the
writing style
2:13:00
these are bright spots that the
near
2:13:02
ceaseless negative coverage of
the
2:13:04
administration fails to capture
these
2:13:07
there are no I'm sorry there
are bright
2:13:09
spots so he said don't get me
wrong
2:13:11
there are bright spots and
dimensions
2:13:13
effective deregulation which
took some
2:13:15
leadership historic tax reform
which
2:13:17
took some leadership and a more
robust
2:13:19
military and more but then it
continues
2:13:23
these successes have come
despite the
2:13:27
president's leadership style
which is
2:13:28
impetuous adversarial petty and
2:13:31
ineffective if it's ineffective
how do
2:13:34
these things get done well he's
saying
2:13:36
that the burek the bureaucracy
is doing
2:13:39
it but some bureaucracies not
gonna do
2:13:41
that tax break are you ready
for me get
2:13:44
it do you have an opinion on
who this is
2:13:46
and what's going on I don't
have an
2:13:49
opinion on who it is No
2:13:50
okay I have an opinion of what
went down
2:13:52
it's just the theory please
address me
2:13:55
as a conspiracy theorist
because I'm a
2:13:58
conspiracy theory I'm proud of
that
2:14:00
monster this was set up by John
Kelly
2:14:04
his three people involved
2:14:05
John Kelly who is Trump's
handler on
2:14:08
behalf of the defense
intelligence
2:14:10
apparatus it was really
managing the guy
2:14:13
and is very tired but he
manages the guy
2:14:15
we know the military is running
the show
2:14:18
right now it's been CIA for
eight years
2:14:21
and now it's back to the
military
2:14:25
involved where Kellyanne Conway
and the
2:14:27
Raj guy and Trump did not know
about it
2:14:30
and they set it up they gave
2:14:33
Woodward all kinds of great
things I'm
2:14:35
sure Kelly called them a moron
or
2:14:36
whatever I'm sure all of that
happened
2:14:39
because what is the message of
the book
2:14:42
and what is accentuated to put
the the
2:14:46
exclamation point behind the
message in
2:14:49
the New York Times is
2:14:52
it's a shit show
2:14:54
but there are adults in the
room there's
2:14:56
nothing to worry about people
and that
2:14:59
is in effect true that's what
Kelly
2:15:02
knows because that's how things
have
2:15:03
been running and that's what
things are
2:15:05
actually getting done I think
Trump got
2:15:07
in on it I think that they told
him and
2:15:09
that's when he he might have
gone a
2:15:11
little too far with the trees
and they
2:15:12
got a tell but he'll be able to
play
2:15:14
that for a long time and
that'll change
2:15:16
the new cycle everyone will be
focused
2:15:17
on Ken the New York Times do
that and is
2:15:20
it treasonous it's that's why I
think he
2:15:21
invoked the t word treason I
think the
2:15:26
message is don't worry adults
in the
2:15:28
room as you can tell the making
stuff
2:15:30
work hey we'll even take
something off
2:15:32
someone's desk off the guy's
desk if we
2:15:34
have to and look how good
everything's
2:15:36
going that's the message
2:15:38
and I think it's an argue the
message
2:15:40
I'm going to argue the genesis
because
2:15:43
there has to be a middleman
some schmuck
2:15:46
some Schmo a schlemiel perhaps
who takes
2:15:51
us in walks us to the New York
Times
2:15:53
there's no way that the people
you
2:15:55
mentioned can take and walk
this to the
2:15:58
New York Times without getting
busted
2:15:59
for it right some someone
someone is a
2:16:02
very big patriot
2:16:04
and it's going to go down who
maybe used
2:16:08
to work for the Obama
administration who
2:16:11
had a plenty of them in there
that can
2:16:14
walk over there and they could
you know
2:16:16
they covered they covered for
him
2:16:18
well it's problems it's
probably the
2:16:21
national security guy who
already what's
2:16:23
his name dan coats thing could
be him
2:16:25
could be it could be it could
be larry
2:16:28
cudlow it sounds a bit like the
way
2:16:30
larry cudlow it's but the larry
cudlow
2:16:33
would i mean he loves Trump he
wants to
2:16:36
sleep tonight that but he would
they'd
2:16:37
bust him and he would he's
frail he's
2:16:40
fragile right now he's gonna do
it he
2:16:42
can't it's not an act of duty
he's not
2:16:44
one of those guys who would do
two who
2:16:46
doesn't who do thinks this come
this is
2:16:48
a complex this is a complex
mechanism to
2:16:51
sell a lot of Woodward's books
2:16:54
what Woodward wins no matter
what yeah
2:16:57
well which does so you so okay
so what
2:16:59
you're saying is it did happen
and and
2:17:04
the New York Times thought this
was cute
2:17:05
and there are idiots because
they're
2:17:07
actually sending you you agree
with the
2:17:09
message so they're sending that
message
2:17:10
is that don't don't they want
to screw
2:17:13
the president as much as
possible they
2:17:14
don't think that dimensionally
gotcha
2:17:17
and because they're journalists
at heart
2:17:20
and they're just you know
they're just
2:17:22
knee-jerk reactors as look we
got look
2:17:25
what we got oil they're like a
bunch of
2:17:27
little rats
2:17:29
well actually we should talk
about
2:17:30
journals in a minute and then
maybe
2:17:32
we'll bring in your Lib joes
but first
2:17:34
we're running behind today
2:17:36
fooled by donation to no agenda
imagine
2:17:39
all the people who could do
guys oh yeah
2:17:48
and we do have a few people to
thank for
2:17:50
show 1066 which was I was at
the Norman
2:17:54
invasion suppose you got to
look this up
2:17:55
for me forever the what comes
in at the
2:17:58
top here $144 parts unknowns
root Rui
2:18:04
Rui Rui said oh yes I got oh
yeah he's
2:18:09
in Portugal yeah I still got it
might be
2:18:12
pronounced differently - one
two three
2:18:13
four five want to thank him
he's on the
2:18:16
birthday list there was 33 33
and he's
2:18:18
expecting his future he's
expecting his
2:18:20
first human resource of the
front whole
2:18:23
variety horrible people damage
Scoville
2:18:30
106 dollars and 60 cents this
is in
2:18:33
memoriam of England becoming
subject to
2:18:35
a foreign power well sorry
2:18:39
Oh beautiful
2:18:44
the moron invasion oh so right
yeah ten
2:18:49
days got 1066 you were right
sir under
2:18:52
$6 against you and Dennis the
only
2:18:54
people in the world who still
know some
2:18:56
history Marilyn Detroit John
Robin $100
2:19:00
surge Kristin banning $100 in
Toronto
2:19:03
Ontario Kristin banning $100 in
Toronto
2:19:05
somebody hbd Adam
2:19:07
happy birthday yes thank you Oh
sir
2:19:10
Brent Dombroski it $99.99
another
2:19:13
birthday donation for you it's
funny
2:19:15
well it's just 99 it's 54 for
me and 45
2:19:19
for herself
2:19:21
September 3rd okay got you Casey
2:19:25
cribbage on delicious ethnic so
Casey
2:19:27
Crisler in Phoenix Arizona
2:19:28
8086 or her hold on hold on
this makes
2:19:31
me a knight is Casey on yes I
want to
2:19:35
add the extra $10 for Walter
see hitting
2:19:37
me in the mouth but he's never
donated
2:19:39
so a douchebag call it and deed
douching
2:19:42
are in order
2:19:44
you've been a douche these Nike
has sir
2:19:49
some guy in Phoenix I think the
way you
2:19:52
did that was improper
2:19:55
he asked why did he want the D
douching
2:19:59
for the guy he douchebag yes
2:20:01
oh but that was for him no way
you did
2:20:04
it correctly then never mind
sir herb
2:20:06
lamb 808 hopefully you'll get
to see
2:20:10
some boobs for your birthday
Adam dude
2:20:13
named in Muhammad Ali dude
named happy
2:20:17
birthday to you thank you
2:20:19
the way I think there's another
dude
2:20:22
named Boris yeah this dude a
Bahama
2:20:23
dolly and dude named Muhammad
yeah this
2:20:25
dude named Muhammad Ali yeah
2:20:27
Ali Whitaker and a royal
Tunbridge Wells
2:20:30
can't UK royal tongue digs wells
2:20:33
yes Rob Van Dyke in the
Netherlands 808
2:20:40
it's not one of our guys
2:20:42
no oh by the way our guy
Rodrick one you
2:20:47
had the big podcast award the
online
2:20:49
radio award in the jury
2:21:00
yeah you want to be a part of
the online
2:21:02
radio awards and no but you
know you're
2:21:04
the pod father yeah so do have
to do
2:21:07
anything now just vote and of
course
2:21:08
you're like oh send a video
2:21:09
congratulating them why I'm not
gonna do
2:21:11
a stupid ass you know that
shows up on
2:21:14
TV and I look like an idiot
sand now but
2:21:16
so Rodrick and my other mother
protege
2:21:20
me feel faint star and and they
all want
2:21:23
Awards so very had am very
happy for
2:21:26
them yes Nicholas Vossler and
Marina del
2:21:29
Rey 808 she wants to listen to
that horn
2:21:33
I think you've got plenty of it
today
2:21:34
Robert Wood in benbrook texas
75 be a
2:21:38
brush as in amsterdam probably
bruising
2:21:42
oh that's that's Bret's
Rodricks guy
2:21:44
from the award-winning TPO
podcast
2:21:46
there you go 55 person row Sir
Tom
2:21:50
Darian DeForest Wisconsin
double nickels
2:21:52
on the dime
2:21:53
sir Kris and Reno 5454 valued
cardholder
2:21:58
in Queensland 5425 by the way
your bag
2:22:02
Dave in concord california the
2:22:04
award-winning tpo podcast can
be heard
2:22:06
on the no agenda stream
2:22:08
industry calm let's go back to
our reno
2:22:11
tell happy birthday to Adam and
a happy
2:22:13
birthday douchebag call it - my
friend
2:22:15
art in Las Vegas so alright
2:22:21
the Kris and Reno gives you a
douchebag
2:22:23
kholat Karl Schneider 54 Robert
Marsh 54
2:22:27
keep up the important work jobs
karma
2:22:30
dark Google put that the end
Darko
2:22:33
millet X in Buenos Aires
Argentina 54 s
2:22:38
are all do we have any other
2:22:39
Argentinians any not many not
many Ron
2:22:43
link in the Holbrooke New York
these are
2:22:46
all these are all birthdays I'm
sorry
2:22:48
these are all $54 donations the
last of
2:22:50
the thank you for being up
having a
2:22:52
birthday Adam yeah and Ron link
actually
2:22:54
says his smoking hot something
is
2:22:57
celebrating today Ron links
smoking hot
2:23:00
wife okay I'll put that in the
birthdays
2:23:02
it said birthday you put her on
there he
2:23:04
says you'll have an have an
extra child
2:23:06
this is gonna put on your
benefit he
2:23:08
says right there
2:23:09
we'll have to had an extra
child oh I'm
2:23:13
such that scandal nevermind oh
I was
2:23:15
gonna say if it's a child yeah
of course
2:23:17
the child has to be called Adam
well
2:23:20
Adam Clark John Charles
2:23:24
what's his last night linked
rabinowitch
2:23:27
link now his name is link
where's
2:23:29
Rabinowitz I don't see Ruben
Hodges that
2:23:31
would be a good name Angelo see
where
2:23:36
some place in che looks like CH
which is
2:23:39
Switzerland Bart Barton's parts
unknown
2:23:44
sir Brian
2:23:46
Tobias n' in Gardner Kansas
Charles
2:23:49
George in Coral Springs Florida
2:23:51
Brian Moss in Rancho Santa
Margarita
2:23:54
Peter Chung in Lakewood
Washington
2:23:57
Andrea Adriana Oporto Sir
Christopher
2:24:01
Baron of the Buckeye Sam sealer
Alan D
2:24:06
Peterson Rene Latour in Nova
Scotia
2:24:12
Tyler Fox is here Park Texas he
says
2:24:14
maybe we'll get that Muni
flight in
2:24:16
while you're still 54 we have
to go
2:24:19
flying you're still 54 we have
to go
2:24:20
oh it's got the moon that booty
fly in
2:24:22
it and I want to fly it
2:24:23
John Leclerc sir quitting
preacher
2:24:27
preaching in Luxembourg in
Luxembourg
2:24:29
literally from lexan berg
Daniel Roberts
2:24:34
Taylor kuusela in Alpharetta
Georgia
2:24:36
Kurt parts unknown
2:24:38
Daniel gallo and Marietta
Georgia
2:24:41
Christopher Paulie in Verona
Wisconsin
2:24:43
Rob Warren Michael Ragusa a
Raguse Sir
2:24:50
Terry the night of the
Crowley's Ridge
2:24:52
radius it's Reyes Vegas Vegas
2:24:56
hi there it is Reyes it's
pronounced
2:24:58
like Vegas Vegas Sir Terry
night of the
2:25:01
Crowley Ridge Adam Barrett
James Blair
2:25:04
Michael gay and that was James
blur ends
2:25:06
your little your little
congratulations
2:25:10
list yeah it's from the
Michigan local
2:25:11
one local one rocks
2:25:14
I felt very convincing Michael
gates
2:25:20
5280 Eric ho cool I was in a
douche oh
2:25:26
this is hop hop off something
Hoff's
2:25:31
it's it's Norwegian so PayPal
screwed up
2:25:35
again pops well we'll figure it
out next
2:25:39
time I can do that you've been
deduced
2:25:47
he says he like JD CDs
explanation of
2:25:50
property whitewashing and Adams
2:25:51
realization of bitcoins true
purpose
2:25:54
being able to pay when entities
tried to
2:25:57
stop you mm-hmm and now we have
$50
2:25:59
donors name and location
starting with
2:26:01
Andrew Martin in Sydney
Australia vÃctor
2:26:04
muñoz in Miami Florida
2:26:06
Geoff defi BA sir Josh def
about to be
2:26:09
not Jeff yes sir Josh defi ba
Scotty
2:26:13
night in Las wages Paul Van
Cordell are
2:26:17
having her seen him on on the
list in a
2:26:19
while I thought you didn't I'm
out of
2:26:21
course I'm Adam we know Paul
Jan you Gia
2:26:24
Matthew I'm Adam we know Paul
Jan you Gia
2:26:25
Janiszewski in Chicago
Villarreal
2:26:27
Villarreal in mercedes Texas
James
2:26:30
Romano Todd Moore in Arlington
Virginia
2:26:33
and Brian Clem's Zack parts
unknown
2:26:37
Ralph Johnson Lake Isabella
Jason de
2:26:40
Lucia and chats for
Pennsylvania John
2:26:42
Horner in Bay st. Louis
Mississippi and
2:26:45
last but not least our buddy
over here
2:26:47
in Oakland ster Alan bean in
Oakland and
2:26:51
thank all these folks are
producing show
2:26:53
1066 with their generous
contributions
2:26:56
yes and thank you for your your
birthday
2:26:58
wishes as well I really
appreciate that
2:27:00
had a very nice birthday was
very you
2:27:02
know call cool just Tina Marie
and me
2:27:07
and it's very nice to get you
know since
2:27:10
there's no more face bag in my
life with
2:27:11
people who just click a box to
say happy
2:27:14
birthday hbd won't even say
happy
2:27:16
birthday happy birthday click
click hbd
2:27:23
well thank you for the
personalized gift
2:27:26
right well and these are
personalized
2:27:29
I've read I've been reading the
2:27:30
spreadsheet and people have
nice little
2:27:31
notes and so thank you very
much and
2:27:33
also of course thank you so I
do more
2:27:35
than click a box yes yeah they
took like
2:27:38
real money out of their pocket
and
2:27:39
supported the show in my honor
of being
2:27:42
born so they're really they're
honoring
2:27:43
my mom hey yes thank you to
everyone who
2:27:48
came in under $50 on our
subscription
2:27:50
plans our layaway plans we have
the 3333
2:27:54
at eleven eleven to twelve
twelve and
2:27:56
also for reasons of anonymity
and a
2:27:58
reminder we have meetups coming
in
2:28:02
Bucharest Romania
2:28:07
Austin Texas of course although
we're
2:28:09
waiting for a new date it will
no longer
2:28:10
be October 6 because of Austin
City live
2:28:13
and you do not want to be in
Austin when
2:28:15
that takes place unless you are
2:28:16
performing on stage and who was
this the
2:28:21
no agenda meetup so do people
need that
2:28:24
I guess there was a plea to
please look
2:28:26
at the No Agenda show meetup
team but
2:28:28
then there's apparently there's
a
2:28:29
someone's trying to do no
agenda meetup
2:28:31
calm which isn't going anywhere
yet
2:28:33
so we're still a mess Mimi
needs to grab
2:28:35
hold of this John yeah she's
gonna grab
2:28:38
it all right cuz someone's doing
2:28:39
something with changing meetup
domain
2:28:41
names I don't know
2:28:42
in general I encourage it we
want the
2:28:45
meetups to happen yeah it's
always gonna
2:28:46
be a little held skelter I
think all
2:28:50
right our special show on
Sunday which
2:28:53
we do want you to check out
because we
2:28:55
have Dane Dane Danes last name
again
2:29:00
Jasper Dane Jasper
2:29:04
from sonic net and Scott Adams
John's
2:29:07
doubleheader there's nothing
like a
2:29:10
Dvorak doubleheader and you'll
have that
2:29:12
on Sunday
2:29:12
remember the Dvorak
doubleheader at
2:29:14
tsavorite org slash and a we
got some
2:29:19
Karma's to take care of these
jobs jobs
2:29:22
jobs and jobs let's vote for
job you've
2:29:28
got karma
2:29:37
the birthday is for today it is
2:29:40
September 6 2018 Scott
Richardson said
2:29:43
happy birthday to his brother
Adam
2:29:44
Richardson turns 25 Yuri Ruiz
Salgado
2:29:47
turns 33 tomorrow sir Brent
celebrated
2:29:50
on my birthday September 3rd
sir Chris
2:29:53
in Reno's as happy birthday to
his
2:29:55
friend art in Vegas valued Col
2:29:57
cardholder aka Jeff Kenyon says
happy
2:30:01
birthday to himself he turns 25
in
2:30:03
September 8th and we say happy
birthday
2:30:05
to Ron links a smokin hot wife
from
2:30:09
everybody here at the best
podcast in
2:30:10
the universe okay we got two
nights so
2:30:15
there's my blade yeah here we
go you got
2:30:18
a double night blur it matters
not
2:30:28
because both of you are about
to become
2:30:29
Knights and be known by a
knight named
2:30:31
here at the round table of the
No Agenda
2:30:33
knights and dames and we thank
you very
2:30:34
much for supporting the work
and I'm
2:30:36
proud to pronounce the Kate sir
Stalin
2:30:39
scrotes to pronounce the Kate
sir Stalin
2:30:40
of the lambda lions and sir
some guy in
2:30:43
Phoenix gentlemen for you we
have
2:30:46
hookers and blow red boys and
Chardonnay
2:30:48
we got cookies and vodka warm
beer
2:30:49
called women white foots and
waffles
2:30:51
Damon Lisa's limoncello and
salmon fish
2:30:54
my inflate
2:30:55
we have bonnets and bourbon
buck and
2:30:56
vanilla sparkling cider escorts
to jail
2:30:59
and gerbils and mutton and Mead
all over
2:31:02
at the roundtable HQ which is
no agenda
2:31:05
nation.com / rings and that's
where the
2:31:08
show will help you get your
package out
2:31:10
to you as soon as possible
thank you
2:31:12
again for supporting the show
remember
2:31:14
our next one which is a special
double
2:31:15
dvorák doubleheader and
remember us at
2:31:19
Dvorak org slash na and I have
a couple
2:31:21
of cleanup notes to read and
also Eric
2:31:24
did send a note in saying that
our three
2:31:26
to 666 guy actually made two
three three
2:31:29
three dimensions okay he
combined him I
2:31:31
didn't see so you want said no
didn't
2:31:34
than one of them hey listen
Wilson this
2:31:36
I never have like a longer
segment about
2:31:39
journalism which includes a
very long
2:31:42
clip of just let me know that
that's
2:31:46
what I was thinking of doing
would it be
2:31:47
long yeah I think you'll like
it if not
2:31:50
you can always cut me off you
you know
2:31:51
you will I don't do it
sometimes you get
2:31:55
mesmerized by some of these
fabulous
2:31:56
clips I know dear Uncle John
and Adams
2:32:01
is from vÃctor muñoz who did
since the
2:32:04
money in he started a nightly
monthly
2:32:06
layaway donation a couple of
months ago
2:32:08
is officially no it needs a D
douching
2:32:10
okay been on fire for a couple
of months
2:32:17
then stealer ninety-six rights
in
2:32:20
retinue because the big change
is coming
2:32:22
along in the near future for
myself I
2:32:23
was wondering if I could get
some moving
2:32:25
karma and jobs Karma's I'm an
adult
2:32:27
under forty about to move out
I'm on my
2:32:30
own forty about to move out I'm
on my
2:32:30
wellif corner you've got karma
there you
2:32:38
go he's looking forward to our
2:32:41
deconstruction of the Kavanagh
stuff and
2:32:43
I think he probably got it I
think he
2:32:45
got a his yeah you got some
value
2:32:48
yeah okay now there was
something we
2:32:52
were going to discuss it there
was we
2:32:53
had a setup about Chuck Todd
and his
2:32:56
article which he wrote about
journalism
2:33:00
okay can I get these clips out
of the
2:33:03
way and then I think we can go
there
2:33:04
yeah because I they're kind of
similar
2:33:07
relate first I want to play the
seat
2:33:08
this is CBS and that's what
that is it
2:33:11
actually is CB I said this is
the I want
2:33:14
to make a comment about this is
that
2:33:16
show they have online it's like
the
2:33:18
24-hour news of CBS and this is
the fire
2:33:21
the idiot comment which seems
2:33:23
interesting to me anyway but
Trump so
2:33:26
when you look at Bob Woodward's
book at
2:33:29
least the parts that we know
have been
2:33:30
reported about you break down
some of
2:33:32
the specific claims it's
interesting
2:33:34
defense secretary James Madison
eyes
2:33:36
that he compared President
Trump to a
2:33:37
fifth or sixth grader chief of
staff
2:33:39
John Kelly denied calling the
president
2:33:41
unhinged or an idiot the
president
2:33:43
appears to have accepted those
denials
2:33:46
but how do these kinds of
disclosures
2:33:49
and these these assertions and
in this
2:33:52
book how do they complicate the
ability
2:33:55
of Jim mattis and a chief of
staff John
2:33:58
Kelly to do their job Sabrina
well
2:34:01
obviously there is a breakdown
of trust
2:34:04
and presumably now know John
Kelly has
2:34:07
had to refute multiple reports
about
2:34:09
what he has said about the
president the
2:34:11
ways in which he has
characterized him
2:34:13
and they have continued to be
able to
2:34:15
weather those controversies but
do
2:34:18
recall that when Steve been and
made
2:34:20
derogatory comments about the
2:34:23
president's son and the meeting
at Trump
2:34:26
Tower with the Russians in
Michael
2:34:28
Wolf's book that led to a very
public
2:34:30
and dramatic rift between the
president
2:34:33
and the former chief strategist
in his
2:34:35
White House now now that was
then and
2:34:38
this is now Steve Bennett is of
course
2:34:40
different than John Kelly and
James
2:34:42
Madison a lot more enduring and
their
2:34:45
ability to continue and carry
out their
2:34:46
jobs but but we'll see if there
are
2:34:49
going to be any ramifications
from these
2:34:52
comments that that they say
they haven't
2:34:54
made but again it's anyone's
guess
2:34:56
you'll recall also Rex
Tillerson it was
2:34:58
reported that he referred to the
2:34:59
President as
2:35:00
and that was something that he
did not
2:35:02
necessarily deny and that did
continue
2:35:05
that did continue in a road
their
2:35:06
relationship and eventually was
part of
2:35:08
the reason why he was forced
out of the
2:35:10
job huh now I want to just say
that I
2:35:13
don't believe these guys are
lying when
2:35:15
they said they never said these
things
2:35:16
that I doubt if they did
because the
2:35:18
things that most of those guys
are
2:35:20
quoted as saying is right off
the Trump
2:35:21
rotation yeah someone set him
on TV yeah
2:35:26
not necessarily Kelly and then
they both
2:35:29
denied it Tillerson would never
deny it
2:35:31
he just says he wanted to talk
about it
2:35:34
so Tillerson probably did call
Trump an
2:35:35
idiot that's what I have to
assume now
2:35:37
the last thing I have for this
whole
2:35:40
thing series is John Kerry well
they're
2:35:44
clips aren't too long I'm
picked a very
2:35:46
short John Kerry's the
unluckiest guy in
2:35:49
the world look at that head
well besides
2:35:52
his head and the fact that this
guy's
2:35:54
does weird eyebrows at that
flake
2:35:56
everything is watermelon head
lizard he
2:36:01
just came out with a book Oh
what he has
2:36:04
a book too John where's our
bonus book
2:36:06
he's like no one's gonna buy
his book
2:36:08
because he's can't get any
publicity so
2:36:10
they didn't drag him on I think
the only
2:36:13
reason he showed up on the
morning show
2:36:14
and they preface it I don't
have the
2:36:16
clip of the preface but they
put John
2:36:18
Dickerson prefaced it by saying
Simon &
2:36:23
Schuster's owned by CBS and
that's why
2:36:25
we've got this guy on so those
words but
2:36:31
he pretty much said that he
fought in
2:36:36
the Vietnam War and became an
anti-war
2:36:38
activist when he returned home
in 1984
2:36:40
he was elected to the US Senate
he
2:36:42
served for 28 years including
his
2:36:44
chairman of the Senate Foreign
Relations
2:36:45
Committee of the Senate Foreign
Relations
2:36:46
most recently he served as
President
2:36:48
Obama's Secretary of State he
was the
2:36:50
chief negotiator of the Paris
climate
2:36:51
agreement and the Iran nuclear
deal
2:36:53
carries new book is called
every day is
2:36:55
extra he shares his life story
from
2:36:58
growing up as the son of a
diplomat to
2:36:59
becoming America's top diplomat
decades
2:37:02
later every day is extra is
published by
2:37:04
Simon & Schuster a division of
CBS
2:37:06
mr. secretary good morning
thank you
2:37:08
John that's under the guise of
2:37:10
disclaimer like we're forced to
do this
2:37:13
you're with you speaking of the
2:37:15
presidents and presidency you
had an
2:37:18
interview on Face the Nation to
which
2:37:19
the hold on a second job was
this at
2:37:21
2:00 in the morning on CBC is
cbsn no no
2:37:25
this is not CBS and this is the
morning
2:37:27
show the oh oh I thought it was
the
2:37:29
online thing oh I'm sorry I was
the
2:37:31
other okay president President
Trump
2:37:33
tweeted about you possibly
running for
2:37:36
president and he said I should
only be
2:37:38
so lucky
2:37:39
what's your response to that
well you
2:37:42
know the president I I'm really
not
2:37:45
going to get into a back and
forth on
2:37:46
tweets you know I could give
him a
2:37:48
nickname Agent Orange or
something I'm
2:37:56
just giving you just um I can't
give you
2:37:59
anything yet but to catch this
that this
2:38:02
guy has a book out and the
reason you
2:38:04
write a book is to run for
president and
2:38:06
he can't even he has to go up
on his you
2:38:10
know the publishers have to
make sure he
2:38:12
gets some airtime
2:38:13
this is this is I feel bad for
him it's
2:38:15
pathetic it's really sad and
then we'll
2:38:18
call imagine orange oh my
goodness
2:38:22
people who have I call him a
big jerk a
2:38:26
guys will ugly bastard I want a
pussy
2:38:29
grabber gonna get into a
back-and-forth
2:38:31
on tweets you know I could give
him a
2:38:33
nickname Agent Orange or
something and I
2:38:36
could get back and forth but it
doesn't
2:38:38
take you anywhere the president
uses
2:38:41
tweets as a weapon of mass
distraction
2:38:44
and he obviously has exposed
the world
2:38:49
to the potential of a weapon of
mass
2:38:50
destruction in Iran hello 2016
called
2:38:53
they want their memes back John
Kerry by
2:38:55
pulling out of a deal that
everybody in
2:38:57
the world supports so I I'd
rather stay
2:39:00
on the substance because he
wants to
2:39:02
distract it and get into a
fight I want
2:39:04
to stay on the real mrs. point
though
2:39:07
because he's saying he hopes
you run
2:39:08
because he believes he could
beat you is
2:39:09
what he's saying what he says
look
2:39:11
nothing he says can you can
believe and
2:39:14
you always know there's a
different
2:39:15
motive so let's not even get
into that
2:39:17
what's important is frankly in
my book I
2:39:20
lay out the challenge to our
country
2:39:22
it's not it's not a policy book
that's
2:39:25
what's important it's
2:39:26
story of a life that shows how
we can
2:39:29
confront the challenge that we
face in
2:39:31
America today oh that sounds
like a
2:39:33
snooze wants to read that book
2:39:37
nobody's gonna read this is
gonna be a
2:39:38
big show me where someone
called Trump a
2:39:40
moron behind his back that's a
book now
2:39:43
this was a kicker here that I
thought
2:39:46
was worth flipping out and to
me it was
2:39:49
like the eye roll or of the
hold of the
2:39:51
whole date deal and that's
that's really
2:39:54
more important frankly than
listening to
2:39:56
a guy who as president United
States
2:39:59
can't even go to the funeral of
a war
2:40:01
hero he was uninvited he was
not invited
2:40:06
he was uninvited he was
specifically
2:40:08
told not to go and so he gets
slammed by
2:40:12
this jerk it's like 24 hours
since John
2:40:15
McCain was put to death he
didn't know
2:40:25
what the situation was
2:40:27
I believe that believe he
didn't know
2:40:29
news flash there a lot of touch
film at
2:40:32
11:00 flash there a lot of
touch film at
2:40:34
please so how do you tie this
into Chuck
2:40:36
Todd's article all right
2:40:40
well and and there's a reason
for doing
2:40:43
this now with September 11 is
coming up
2:40:47
in five days there you're gonna
be gonna
2:40:49
be crushed to death with
September 11
2:40:51
stuff and truth or stuff and
you name it
2:40:55
we're not gonna do that
2:40:56
on the no agenda show but I do
have some
2:40:59
history some recent history
that I think
2:41:01
is worth listening to to
understand the
2:41:03
interaction between government
2:41:05
intelligence sources and the
media and
2:41:08
people who seriously are
considered
2:41:10
journalists New York Times
journalists
2:41:12
and are performing actual
journalism now
2:41:16
the the reason I got on this is
because
2:41:19
somehow I someone tweeted a
link about
2:41:21
this article that Chuck Todd
had written
2:41:23
apparently he's also a guest
editor at
2:41:25
the Atlantic which I don't know
what
2:41:27
guest editor means if he has
time for
2:41:28
that and you know he's due to
be he
2:41:32
hosts Meet the Press this
prestigious
2:41:33
spot you know he's seen as some
of that
2:41:36
Tim Russert rubbed off on it
2:41:38
and in his article which I
presume you
2:41:41
read John I'm sure your Lib
joes have
2:41:42
been talking about it no no no
I'm just
2:41:47
all news to me I'm listening
intently oh
2:41:48
it's titled it's time for the
press to
2:41:50
stop complaining and to start
fighting
2:41:53
back oh yeah no I knew about
this yeah
2:41:55
I'm sorry I did read it and the
subhead
2:41:59
is a nearly 50 year campaign of
2:42:01
vilification inspired by Fox
News's
2:42:03
Roger Ailes always easy to
blame the
2:42:05
Dead Guy has left many Americans
2:42:07
distrustful of media outlets now
2:42:10
journalists need to speak up
for their
2:42:12
work and paragraph two there's
a new
2:42:15
kind of campaign underway one
of that
2:42:17
most of my colleagues and I
have never
2:42:19
publicly reported on never fully
2:42:21
analyzed and never fully
acknowledged
2:42:23
the campaign to destroy the
legitimate
2:42:26
legitimacy of the American news
media
2:42:30
and so this whole thing goes on
about
2:42:32
how you know everyone's a
student of
2:42:34
Roger Ailes and it's all
discredit and
2:42:36
fair and you're fair and
balances uh
2:42:38
it's all tricks and Trump is
out to
2:42:40
destroy everything and it's
1984 George
2:42:44
Orwell everything everything's
in there
2:42:46
and we're journals and we're
trying to
2:42:48
save you merica screw murca the
world
2:42:51
we're trying to save you and of
course
2:42:54
words your nose we're lip jobs
sometimes
2:42:57
we get things wrong we always
correct
2:42:58
and take responsibility no they
don't
2:43:01
oh really Chuck so I decided to
pull two
2:43:05
clips from the archives the
total will
2:43:07
be about seven minutes of
airtime unless
2:43:09
we interrupt them which we may
want to
2:43:12
and the first one is from 2016
this is
2:43:16
September 11th 2016 so we have
not had
2:43:19
the election yet and Paul
Wolfowitz who
2:43:22
was the deputy department deputy
2:43:25
secretary of defense during
9/11 is on
2:43:28
the show now what you'd expect
is for
2:43:31
Chuck Todd to say you know man
we really
2:43:33
all got this wrong with the
weapons of
2:43:35
mass destruction with the
aluminum tubes
2:43:38
and you know and as journalists
we feel
2:43:41
pretty screwed and you know
it's like
2:43:44
we're really sorry all these
people died
2:43:46
because we got it wrong in Iraq
is there
2:43:49
any of that
2:43:50
no he all he does is deflect
2:43:52
blames everybody else so does
Wolfowitz
2:43:55
by the way and so after we
listen to
2:43:57
Chuck Todd not taking
responsibility not
2:44:00
apologizing blaming his inside
sources
2:44:03
then we'll go to the genesis of
the
2:44:05
weapons of mass destruction
with a Joel
2:44:07
Jon Stewart interview which
will remind
2:44:09
you how refreshing Jon Stewart
was in
2:44:13
2015 before Trump was on the
scene and
2:44:16
before everyone lost their mind
2:44:18
so first Chuck Todd with Paul
Wolfowitz
2:44:20
let me go back to this issue
here we are
2:44:22
a 911 it was mostly Saudis Saudi
2:44:25
nationals that flew those
planes into
2:44:28
those towers
2:44:29
nobody from Iraq and there's a
lot of
2:44:31
people that look today and go
why was
2:44:33
that our first action why was
that yes
2:44:35
we went in Afghanistan but why
was that
2:44:37
our first actually why didn't
we ever
2:44:38
hold Saudi Arabia accountable
yeah why
2:44:41
didn't you report on a Chuck
Todd you
2:44:43
could make a case that a lot
more Saudis
2:44:45
were fuel were funding and
fueling these
2:44:47
terrorist attacks
2:44:48
you know what Saudi money and
things
2:44:50
like that then anybody in a
walk look
2:44:52
there is a big problem with
what the
2:44:54
Saudis have been doing in
propagating
2:44:56
extremist versions of Islam and
I hope
2:44:58
that people right when they say
the new
2:45:00
crown prince or deputy Crown
Prince what
2:45:02
concerned us about a-rockin
people want
2:45:04
to forget this but everybody
believed in
2:45:06
Saddam was doing his best to
convince us
2:45:08
that he had weapons of mass
destruction
2:45:10
in fact we knew he had he had
previously
2:45:12
had anthrax he had previously
had sarin
2:45:15
he was previously working on
nuclear
2:45:17
weapons and that of course is
what we
2:45:19
had the phony-baloney anthrax
scare in
2:45:21
Florida because that's what we
all knew
2:45:23
that's what we all reported on
because
2:45:24
the inside Intel sources had
told us and
2:45:27
he made it clear after he was
captured
2:45:28
that he intended to start all
of those
2:45:30
programs again once the
sanctions
2:45:31
related he was a real danger
and that's
2:45:33
why there was a focus on you it
was hold
2:45:36
on stop it
2:45:38
Saddam was denying that he said
he says
2:45:41
that Saddam was making everyone
think he
2:45:42
had the weapons he was going
out of his
2:45:44
way to deny he let the
inspectors is he
2:45:48
talking about he's lying and
Chuck Todd
2:45:51
is right there letting him
blame other
2:45:52
people he was captured that he
intended
2:45:54
to start all and by the way
where's the
2:45:56
journalist Chuck Todd saying
what you
2:45:58
just said he's not there
programs again
2:46:00
once the sanctions were lifted
he was a
2:46:02
real danger and that's why
there was a
2:46:04
focus on weapons and
2:46:05
destruction and people say
after the
2:46:07
fact that Bush lied and got us
into a
2:46:09
war he wasn't lying he was
saying what
2:46:11
everyone believed is it bad
intelligence
2:46:14
you know somebody got us into
this now
2:46:17
listen to Chuck Todd what he's
doing
2:46:19
like he had no role in this and
then was
2:46:22
it bad but everybody believed
it oh you
2:46:24
mean like Russian collusion
everybody
2:46:27
believed it it was everyone it
was we
2:46:30
knew yeah this is my point
obviously and
2:46:31
somebody convinced the United
States
2:46:33
Congress that weapons of mass
2:46:34
destruction were imminent in in
Iraq
2:46:36
which is why so many Democrats
and
2:46:39
Republicans voted for this war
so they
2:46:40
lied I think they'd written
liars Saddam
2:46:42
Hussein who lied about what he
had and
2:46:44
we discovered he had more later
it seems
2:46:47
he was lying that he had more
than he
2:46:49
really did have because he
wanted to
2:46:51
supposedly deceive the Iranians
fumble
2:46:54
he had more than he said he had
but
2:46:56
something yeah okay the fact is
every
2:46:58
intelligence service in the
world not
2:47:00
just the Americans the British
the
2:47:01
jurors everybody
2:47:02
the French countries that
oppose 97% of
2:47:05
all intelligence sources in the
war all
2:47:08
believed that he had weapons of
mass
2:47:09
destruction gee are you doing
it are you
2:47:12
now concerned at this
essentially we
2:47:14
were wrong and if you think
about the
2:47:17
public have you ever considered
we were
2:47:19
wrong not Chuck Todd got it
wrong no no
2:47:21
we were wrong because that's
all you're
2:47:23
reporting is Chuck Todd is just
2:47:25
parroting what you're told by
your
2:47:26
reliable sources and it got a
lot of
2:47:28
people killed are you do are
you now
2:47:31
concerned that this essentially
we were
2:47:33
wrong and if you think about the
2:47:35
public's lack of trust for
government
2:47:37
right now that's one of the
reasons
2:47:39
that's one of the things over
the last
2:47:41
15 years when you talk about
Wall
2:47:42
Street's of inability to to be
truthful
2:47:44
to us and that now has
undermined trust
2:47:47
in government you do you believe
2:47:49
undermine trust in government
then
2:47:51
remember this is just before the
2:47:52
election we what what's what's
trust in
2:47:55
government got to Wall Street
being
2:47:56
dishonest was then what's he
talking
2:47:58
about Wall Street let's listen
to that
2:48:01
again I wasn't focusing on the
Wall
2:48:02
Street Portland it was lack of
trust for
2:48:04
government right now back a
little
2:48:06
further right now back a little
2:48:10
supposedly to see the Iranians
the fact
2:48:13
is every intelligence service
in the
2:48:15
world not just the Americans
the British
2:48:16
the Germans the French
countries that
2:48:19
oppose us in the war all
believe that he
2:48:21
had weapons of mass destruction
gee are
2:48:23
you do you are you now
concerned that
2:48:25
this essentially we were wrong
and if
2:48:28
you think about the public's
lack of
2:48:30
trust for government right now
that's
2:48:33
one of the reasons that's one
of the
2:48:34
things over the last 15 years
when you
2:48:35
talk about Wall Street's of
inability to
2:48:37
to be truthful to us and that
now has
2:48:40
undermined trust in government
you know
2:48:42
he's just whatever he's doing
he's not
2:48:44
saying hey maybe of the trust
in the
2:48:47
media was undermined because
you kept
2:48:49
telling us one thing and it
turned out
2:48:51
not to be true
2:48:52
we did bother looking into it
on the eve
2:48:54
of the election where everyone
said 95
2:48:57
98 percent Hillary Clinton's
going to
2:48:59
win do you find it strange
Chuck Todd
2:49:01
that there's a loss of faith
and trust
2:49:03
in the media do you believe
that look I
2:49:06
think it's done a lot of harm
but I
2:49:07
think in fact stating
falsehoods like
2:49:11
saying that Bush lied about it
is does a
2:49:13
lot of harm as well I believe
that if we
2:49:15
had had a better strategy in
Iraq from
2:49:17
the beginning lied about it if
the surge
2:49:19
type strategy had been
implemented from
2:49:20
the beginning Iraq would look
very
2:49:22
different today people would
see the
2:49:23
whole issue in a very different
light
2:49:24
yeah I know okay so now again
this was
2:49:30
from 2016 just before the
current
2:49:33
election now we're gonna go
back and
2:49:35
this is my final clip and this
is you
2:49:37
know this is really it's a
piece of
2:49:39
history but it was also so
refreshing to
2:49:41
hear John Stewart not be a
blithering
2:49:42
idiot and believing in what the
2:49:45
intelligence sources said he is
2:49:46
completely undressing Judith
Miller of
2:49:49
the New York Times Judith
Miller is the
2:49:51
one who wrote every article
about the
2:49:54
weapons of mass destruction she
was
2:49:55
getting its spoon-fed from the
2:49:57
intelligence sources and she is
only
2:49:59
blaming them no responsibility
on the
2:50:03
part of the New York Times but
what's
2:50:05
lovely about this clip is that
you
2:50:07
understand welcome to mr. Rogers
2:50:10
neighborhood this clip is
lovely what is
2:50:14
really funny what is lovely
about this
2:50:16
clip is that Stewart is real
he's like
2:50:20
no agenda
2:50:22
the way he used to be before he
got
2:50:25
blindsided by you know Hillary
not
2:50:27
winning or whatever his problem
was that
2:50:29
whatever everyone's problem is
this is
2:50:31
how it used to be on The Daily
Show when
2:50:33
we loved it with Judith Miller
the woman
2:50:35
who wrote about the weapons of
mass
2:50:36
destruction the aluminum tubes
and she's
2:50:39
there promoting her book and he
is gonna
2:50:41
pull her apart you wrote an
article this
2:50:43
is a September 8th 2011 right
this was
2:50:46
the the big article it said the
u.s.
2:50:49
says husain intensifies quest
for a bomb
2:50:52
parts you mean Michael Gordon
and I
2:50:54
wrote an article sure page a
New York
2:50:59
Times next to a giant picture
of never
2:51:02
forget 9/11 it was right around
the
2:51:03
first there it is in memory of
9/11
2:51:05
front page the information came
from the
2:51:11
Bush administration yes broadly
speaking
2:51:15
yes it came from intelligence
analysts
2:51:18
and people in the Bush
administration
2:51:19
yes you came from the Bush
2:51:21
administration right right so
you write
2:51:24
this article right and you have
somebody
2:51:27
named David Albright who is
your source
2:51:30
for whether or not this claim
is wrong
2:51:33
no he wasn't a he's an expert
he's an
2:51:37
expert okay and he's the guy
you rely on
2:51:39
and Trust to tell you if this
is wrong
2:51:41
all right know one of several
experts
2:51:43
because opinion is divided and
you have
2:51:46
to ask a lot of different
people she's
2:51:47
the expert that you write in
your book
2:51:49
that you trust that you're
desperately
2:51:50
trying to reach yes I was
desperately
2:51:52
trying to reach him yes
couldn't reach
2:51:54
him so you just went with it
well
2:51:56
because we had other sources
other
2:51:58
sources the guy in Bush's
office Joseph
2:52:01
who he didn't know who my name
in the
2:52:04
book but not in the article no
but I
2:52:06
named Charles Dilfer in the
article when
2:52:08
I named who was the chief
weapons
2:52:10
inspector and we named Ahmed
Chalabi and
2:52:12
said that he was the man who
wanted to
2:52:14
take us to war right so that
you could
2:52:16
evaluate the information we had
that we
2:52:19
are telling him to spread that
2:52:20
information we had reported
that many
2:52:22
times okay so we we know we're
paying
2:52:24
them so we're paying or the Bush
2:52:28
administration is paying these
guys to
2:52:30
spread information about Saddam
2:52:31
Hussein's weapons of mass
destruction at
2:52:33
the same time this is happening
2:52:35
dick cheney's going on
television in
2:52:37
August and saying there's
nuclear
2:52:39
program there's all these
things and in
2:52:41
September they begin what's
called the
2:52:43
White House a rock group yes
and that's
2:52:46
a group of Karl Rove Karen
Hughes and
2:52:48
all these people Gerson and
their job is
2:52:51
to sell the war to the American
people
2:52:53
because they're not buying it
can I can
2:52:56
I just talk about because there
was
2:52:59
something we knew that was new
that was
2:53:01
really spinning up the
intelligence
2:53:03
community we didn't know what
it was
2:53:05
sound familiar
2:53:06
Oh something's going on it was
talking
2:53:08
about it freshman collusions so
you
2:53:11
report that they've got these
tubes this
2:53:13
Albright guy never calls you
back no so
2:53:15
you run with it now there's a
phrase in
2:53:18
your story on the 8th there
where you an
2:53:21
unnamed source says we don't
want the
2:53:24
smoking gun to be a mushroom
cloud right
2:53:26
right gun to be a mushroom
cloud right
2:53:27
that phrase do you know where
that
2:53:29
phrase comes from no because I
only know
2:53:31
that condi rice repeated it
right it
2:53:33
comes from the White House of
rock group
2:53:35
well she's 5 days before you
write the
2:53:39
article but it's a very
powerful line
2:53:41
and it rains there but it comes
from
2:53:43
Gerson it doesn't it's a
political line
2:53:46
directly tied to the White
House you
2:53:48
said the information doesn't
come from
2:53:51
them John were we not supposed
to report
2:53:53
what it was that had the
community the
2:53:55
intelligence community is so
nervous
2:53:57
Russian collusion in the
context that
2:54:01
this administration was very
clearly
2:54:04
pushing a narrative and by
losing sight
2:54:07
of that context by not
reporting I think
2:54:10
we did sorry sadly heartedly
disagree
2:54:13
with you well that's what makes
2:54:14
journalism I mean it's actually
not what
2:54:17
makes sharland so let's
continue so you
2:54:21
don't run with you run with the
story
2:54:23
when David Albright doesn't
call you
2:54:25
back he calls you back on that
Tuesday
2:54:26
and says there's something
wrong with
2:54:28
this right these tubes are not
used for
2:54:30
that is for rockets right in
your
2:54:33
article on the 18th which runs
on page
2:54:35
13 not on page 1 where and is
still and
2:54:38
is still I don't understand
that but
2:54:40
it's still entitled White House
lists
2:54:43
Iraq steps to build banned
weapons it's
2:54:45
still titled something that
seems like
2:54:47
it's the white
2:54:49
released another paper saying
we more
2:54:51
evidence calls you and said
this is
2:54:53
wrong right okay you don't put
that in
2:54:57
that article why I did put it
in I said
2:55:00
that the community was divided
I didn't
2:55:02
quote David all right he said
you could
2:55:03
quote him by name yes he did
2:55:06
why didn't you I think the
story got cut
2:55:08
for space but I didn't you know
look so
2:55:14
in your original article you
wrote in
2:55:16
there David Albright and they
cut it I
2:55:18
take I really don't remember
cuz I'm
2:55:20
that story is what you saying
the book
2:55:23
is I couldn't corroborate it
that's
2:55:26
right because he said these are
the labs
2:55:28
right that have the people
right that
2:55:31
have that have a different view
of these
2:55:33
two right and I called I must
have
2:55:36
called ten or fifteen people
and nobody
2:55:39
would talk about it and so I
went to
2:55:41
David and I said tell me one
person who
2:55:44
can corroborate this and we'll
put this
2:55:46
you know we'll make the story
as long as
2:55:49
we possibly can really either
couldn't
2:55:51
or wouldn't there was a problem
because
2:55:53
David even though he disagreed
about the
2:55:56
tubes believed that Saddam had
a nuclear
2:55:58
weapons on our planet but this
standard
2:56:00
of proof in all this seems much
higher
2:56:04
on the side of this is not an
issue and
2:56:07
they're not a threat and much
lower on
2:56:08
the side of your being fed but
that's
2:56:11
what the intelligence community
begins
2:56:13
feeding video all right well
we're
2:56:20
obviously we're never gonna see
eye to
2:56:21
eye on it I mean I appreciate
you coming
2:56:24
on the program these
discussions always
2:56:28
make me incredibly sad because
I feel
2:56:31
like they they point to
institutional
2:56:35
failure at the highest levels
and no one
2:56:38
responsibility at the highest
levels and no one
2:56:40
I think they point is pass the
buck to
2:56:42
every individual other than
themselves
2:56:44
I think intelligence failures
that I
2:56:46
still worry about every day
because
2:56:48
we're still relying on the same
2:56:50
intelligence communities to get
a
2:56:52
solution about Iran North Korea
Pakistan
2:56:54
and the other countries that we
have to
2:56:56
deal with well hopefully given
the same
2:56:59
effort we'll get to invade all
2:57:00
themselves we'll get to invade
all
2:57:06
well I have to one commented
that the
2:57:08
audience and you kind of
laughed at when
2:57:11
she said I think that was cut
for space
2:57:14
uh-huh said I think that was
cut for space
2:57:15
what happens in these
situations where
2:57:18
you have the intelligence
community and
2:57:20
and the coziness that they have
with the
2:57:23
other editors in the New York
Times is
2:57:25
you right and there's plenty of
his
2:57:26
stories and there's plenty of
stories
2:57:27
that back this up what happens
is that
2:57:30
she gets the quote from some
guy says
2:57:32
yeah yeah yeah you can quote me
and then
2:57:35
he immediately calls the
editors through
2:57:37
some channel aback chances hey
don't
2:57:39
quote me oops and then okay
2:57:47
you say hey I was cut for space
yeah
2:57:49
exactly say hey I was cut for
space yeah
2:57:51
so she probably did put it in
but it was
2:57:53
cut for space and that was that
yeah it
2:57:56
was good yeah well it's exactly
what's
2:57:58
going on now nothing changes
2:58:00
yeah well that daddy that is
exactly my
2:58:03
Roger as it was obvious that's
my point
2:58:06
it's like all this belief in the
2:58:08
intelligence community and we
have not
2:58:10
learned that they sometimes
really get
2:58:12
it wrong and it might be
agendas at play
2:58:14
you this is the journals this
is the
2:58:16
people who are who we need to
trust
2:58:18
Chuck Todd should be ashamed of
what
2:58:21
he's saying yes it's it's it's
really a
2:58:23
travesty saying yes it's it's
it's really a
2:58:24
and that's why we exist and
there's
2:58:30
clearly a need for what we do
because
2:58:31
people are supporting the show
and we've
2:58:33
been doing that for a decade
despite
2:58:35
there being more podcasts more
media
2:58:37
more news than ever we're still
here and
2:58:41
we have a special show on
Sunday for
2:58:43
y'all the Dvorak double-header
2:58:46
make sure you check that out and
2:58:48
remember us at Dvorak org slash
NA and
2:58:51
the next time we speak I will
be in
2:58:54
Italy still that'll be next
Thursday and
2:58:56
I will remember to have the
clip of
2:58:58
Camilla Harris and Sheryl
Sandberg with
2:59:05
the drone star state FEMA
region number
2:59:07
six on the governmental maps in
the show
2:59:09
Elementary on the governmental
maps in the show
2:59:11
in the five by nine clue do in
the
2:59:13
common-law condo in the morning
2:59:14
everybody I'm Adam curry and
from
2:59:16
northern Silicon Valley where
times run
2:59:18
out I'm John C Dvorak we
returned with
2:59:21
our Dvorak doubleheader on
Sunday until
2:59:23
then Dvorak doubleheader on
Sunday until
2:59:52
okay separation shot by early
no right
3:00:00
on time
3:00:01
that's exactly the time it
shouldn't be
3:00:03
coming by 15 minutes after 9:00
there
3:00:09
was going full-tilt did you
hear that
3:00:11
horn not a foamer stew light
3:00:15
what was cool about there's a
free trade
3:00:17
on the other track going in the
same
3:00:19
direction as past like were
standing
3:00:21
still so you ready most trying
to get
3:00:29
over the coolness of another
train on
3:00:31
the track and and as everyone
by and it
3:00:34
looked like we're standing
still on me
3:00:36
holy crap man holy that's just
just so
3:00:42
cool crap man holy that's just
just so
3:00:43
OMG crap man holy that's just
just so
3:00:45
Thanks crap man holy that's
just just so
3:00:47
Banas duties not a force to lie
to you
3:01:05
happy birthday
3:01:09
into you happy birthday mr.
podcaster
3:01:20
happy birthday
3:01:29
I think this item love you so
however
3:01:39
long people want to take we're
going to
3:01:43
because this whole process is
supposed
3:01:46
to be a simple one where people
get to
3:01:48
ask questions and we get to get
answers
3:01:50
it's an undermining of the
3:01:52
constitutional wall which we've
all
3:01:55
sworn an oath but as President
Obama
3:02:05
famously said elections have
3:02:08
consequences but frankly we're
not here
3:02:12
to consider you as the
president of our
3:02:14
neighborhood services you've
been a
3:02:18
great youth best that should
come with
3:02:20
his time but we'll never eat I
know the
3:02:24
minute those things because
it's the
3:02:26
right thing to do
3:03:09
it's like 24 hours since John
McCain was
3:03:13
put to death
3:03:21
mofo Dvorak dot org slash and a