Cover for No Agenda Show 1066: Hunger Stones
September 6th, 2018 • 3h 3m

1066: Hunger Stones

Transcript

The transcripts of No Agenda are automatically generated and therefore, not fully accurate. Discretion is advised.

Click the text to start playing from that position in the show. Click the timestamp to copy a direct link to that position to your clipboard in order to propagate the formula.

0:03
Adam curry
0:04
Jhansi Devorah 18 this is your
0:08
award-winning Gitmo nation media
0:10
assassination episode 1066 this is no
0:13
agenda northern Silicon Valley where the
0:27
Zephyr actually hugged its horn today
0:28
I'm John Steed Evora well you gotta
0:34
think by now that the guys on the Zephyr
0:38
know about you and they and they and
0:41
they've triangulated you by now surely
0:44
oh by the way we did the Sacramento
0:48
meetup there was a good one of the
0:49
conductor's was out in front of the
0:51
station to say hi yeah because he and we
0:55
have exclusive audio of that event I
1:04
mean you know is there a foamer podcast
1:10
this should be hell yeah and usually
1:13
most most most of the former stuff is on
1:17
our FDR rfd-tv
1:20
which is a cable station and they play
1:23
these these unbelievably long videos of
1:27
one train just going through you know
1:30
going here and there just keep following
1:32
it it's just unbelievably dull I think
1:37
it would be interesting I would
1:38
certainly listen to it especially if you
1:40
know they had guests on who brought
1:42
their own favorite train clips and and
1:45
have it really high-quality you know not
1:47
just a 96 kilohertz sample you know do
1:49
like 192 or do three three hundred plus
1:52
and really have the binaural sound of
1:55
the train going by that I would listen
1:57
to yeah but did you can't listen to that
2:00
for too long it's a very short podcast
2:02
oh yeah maybe a 10 minute podcast listen
2:06
to a bunch of horns anyway it was busy
2:09
man and finally some stuff to watch on
2:12
c-span and finally some stuff to watch on
2:12
sadly at the same time oh my good and I
2:16
looked at the clip list today like oh
2:18
this is fantastic
2:19
we have almost no overlap you did the
2:22
Supreme Court mainly Cavanaugh and I
2:26
mainly did the I have one clip from that
2:29
and I mainly did the the what was the
2:33
exact title of it it was a foreign
2:37
influence and social media with Sandberg
2:39
and Dorsey oh yeah I wanted to watch
2:42
that I didn't
2:44
that's more interesting watch these guys
2:45
screaming at job I watched that whole
2:48
opening and like oh really it's just
2:50
another scripted shit show it's like I
2:53
don't need to see that although it's
2:54
entertaining the day before the first
3:00
day like okay and doing that and then
3:03
the second day they did it again one do
3:06
you want to get into it now first you
3:08
one just want to hear how we're all
3:09
gonna die just to set the mood for the
3:10
show well I decided with the I think we
3:13
can tease the Supreme Court with this is
3:15
my Supreme Court hearing out of control
3:17
moment this is the way the whole first
3:19
day went wait out of control moment got
3:24
it yes here we go Airmen to serve a
3:27
justice mr. Chairman I before we proceed
3:32
mr. chairman I'd like to be recognized
3:35
to ask a question before we proceed the
3:37
committee received just last night less
3:39
than 15 hours ago in pages of dot and
3:43
this is Kamla Harris from California or
3:47
as they do on c-span radio review or
3:52
read or analyze you are you're out of
3:55
order I'll proceed we cannot possibly
3:57
move forward there are two daughters mr.
4:08
chairman or another Harris mr. chairman
4:12
revenues 40 law clubs and documents that
4:15
we have everyone else join me tonight
4:18
and we believe this hearing should no
4:19
that's not an exciting day for all of
4:22
you I you know I don't understand why he
4:27
brought his two daughters that the whole
4:29
day was an embarrassment for them they
4:31
were sitting there and they're pretty
4:32
frocks with mom and mom looks like she's
4:36
about to kill someone yeah I mean it was
4:39
it was it's not the most important part
4:43
of the story but I just felt bad like
4:45
yeah dude what you knew this was gonna
4:47
happen dude what you knew this was gonna
4:48
are you an idiot don't bring your kids
4:49
to this just gonna suck
4:52
and then the all the coordinated oh we
4:55
haven't seen the documents forty-eight
4:57
million documents well the thing that
5:01
was funny about it is that and and one
5:03
of the guys called out the group one of
5:05
the new I can't or don't have his name I
5:07
got haven't Billy rice ourselves the
5:09
freshman from the freshmen class it's
5:12
one of the new guys on the on the
5:14
committee he's not deal he's not John
5:16
Kennedy the old the old fart that's a
5:19
new guy but a younger guy yeah and he he
5:23
says I'm looking at a tweet right here
5:24
from Chuck Schumer he's telling all the
5:27
Democrats to stall do anything they can
5:29
to postpone these hearings he said what
5:31
you guys are doing over there he kept
5:33
bringing tweets apparently was watching
5:36
his phone the whole time during the all
5:37
the hearings of course and then one of
5:40
them pointed out in which I think should
5:42
have been pointed out more was the
5:45
Democrats before the hearings all said
5:47
we're voting no no matter what uh-huh
5:50
well if you're voting no no matter what
5:53
if what do you care about the documents
5:54
coming in late or whatever you're voting
5:56
no well exactly I mean I don't come in
5:59
like well I presume that they tried to
6:02
maybe somehow convince one or two
6:04
Republicans to vote against him and that
6:07
way I mean what I heard what I heard the
6:10
big head the big Talking Heads talking
6:11
about on cable news was and I actually
6:15
it was so long ago is beginning the week
6:17
I didn't think he would look and clip it
6:19
well how come you guys didn't walk away
6:21
you know and there was the kind of this
6:23
push from the media like you guys should
6:25
walk out you should walk out really good
6:27
walk away
6:27
just walk out of that just to fuck up
6:29
and be that was like well we don't
6:32
really want to do that because then we
6:34
really lose all the power so there was
6:36
kind of that discussion and I think they
6:37
really thought well maybe we can
6:39
convince one or two guys shame him into
6:40
it with the coordinated people in the
6:43
audience standing up every 10 minutes ah
6:45
it was there was there somebody standing
6:48
up and leaving everything it was the did
6:50
one would get out they get kicked out
6:51
then another one another one they're all
6:53
screaming and there's a high-pitched
6:54
voice yeah I have a bunch of short
6:57
little guys if you want to hear oh yeah
6:59
web your T's has become the segment so
7:01
let's let's move right through it I'm
7:03
liking what I'm hearing
7:05
all right so let's go with a couple a
7:06
little blood have we even talked to what
7:08
this is about that this is the
7:09
confirmation hearing of the idea to
7:11
mention it yes so this is judge
7:15
Cavanaugh who Trump nammed as well I
7:21
think he appoints him and then he has to
7:22
be confirmed
7:23
nothing is nomination okay and now it
7:27
has to go through the Senate and Senate
7:30
has to it's just a straight straight
7:32
majority I think for this yeah yeah just
7:34
so 51 first let's get out of this
7:36
committee oh yeah okay yes a complicated
7:40
process yet this is still the committee
7:42
yeah this is the committee and then
7:44
where's it go then he goes to the devote
7:47
for the everyone gets to vote on okay I
7:50
got it so what's the what's the make of
7:53
the committee and what do they have a
7:55
vote or that just someone says hey nice
7:57
chat and yeah how does that work well
8:03
how many Republicans how many Democrats
8:04
on there's one more Republican it's it's
8:08
all show right let's just agree it's a
8:11
big show it's grandstanding it's a show
8:13
okay hey camel toe Harris was back and
8:15
forth between this one and between the
8:17
social media the image they were busy
8:20
well here's here's a classic example of
8:23
Camilla Harris this is a short clip i
8:26
will be playing of course very close
8:29
attention to your testimony and I think
8:31
you know the American public will be
8:34
paying very close attention to your
8:36
testimony you and I are paying some
8:45
attention but nobody and then Lindsey
8:53
Graham of course had a couple of good
8:54
points he kind of point out what you
8:57
just said a second ago didn't play the
8:58
Lindsey Graham hypocrisy clip to my
9:01
colleagues on those I look forward to
9:04
working with you but we have a different
9:06
view here I think you got to be blind as
9:08
to what's going on here have you heard
9:10
of Justice Breyer do you know him you
9:12
can't say anything I guess where did he
9:14
come from
9:14
he was Ted Kennedy's Senate Jew
9:17
sherry where do you think Republicans
9:20
are gonna go find the judge the whole
9:22
argument is you can be a conservative
9:24
Republican president but you got to
9:26
nominate a liberal to be fair to the
9:28
country a liberal to be fair to the
9:28
that's absurd what do you think Ruth
9:31
Bader Ginsburg came problem
9:33
choose the general counsel they see oh
9:35
you wonderful person what groups do
9:37
y'all use to pick from this is shaping
9:40
up to be the hypocrisy hearing and
9:43
that's hard to do in the Senate Lindsay
9:45
is real it's like the it's like one
9:48
testicle dropped on the guy well there
9:51
was this incident that was I don't
9:53
there's no clip of it I saw this I saw
9:56
the video at the funeral McCain funeral
9:59
yeah oh yes explaining this really good
10:02
well Lindsey Graham was there and all of
10:04
a sudden luma Abidine comes running a
10:07
beeline beeline through the crowd
10:09
yeah beeline through the crowd gives him
10:11
a big hug and the Yankee kick and a
10:14
couple sorority sisters and meanwhile
10:18
John Kelly yeah Kelly and mattis were
10:22
both there and I think it was mattis at
10:24
first spotted him and they - he looked
10:26
around and he said what were these two
10:28
doing and then by the way Lindsey Graham
10:31
was doing kind of that I'm at the
10:33
funeral and no one wants to talk to me
10:39
after Abidine left that's what happened
10:42
and then Kelly's turns running I didn't
10:44
realize how tall that guy is yeah little
10:46
menacing actually he brought got to be
10:49
able to stand up to trump because he's
10:50
at least the same height right and he's
10:53
stand-in there and then all of a sudden
10:54
he's just starts staring at Lindsey and
10:58
with a real like a stare like what the
11:00
wood is that you're up to staring at him
11:03
and grandmas no they're not noticing
11:05
that he looks at him suddenly he
11:07
sketches his eye and he's like yeah and
11:12
then Kelly gives him some sort of a song
11:15
well it looks a little it was yes at
11:17
first like yeah it looks like he's
11:19
giving cuz he's basically touching his
11:21
his the bottom underneath his eye with
11:23
his index finger but it's the other side
11:25
of his nose than the cameras position
11:27
and it could also have been just I got
11:29
some crud in my eye on all
11:31
Lindsey Graham but it could have been a
11:33
signal like I got my eye on you yeah
11:36
that's what I thought and so then after
11:38
that Lindsey becomes just great
11:40
apologist for Trump at these hearings
11:46
only one testicle dropped autumn not
11:48
both just one he was doing is the best
11:53
job of all the people there he fries but
11:55
there's something something's up with
11:57
that guy let's see what kind of hashtag
12:02
meet me two moment we can have what
12:04
Lindsey Graham wouldn't that be great so
12:10
this is his little very short comment
12:12
about election this is a second clip
12:14
from him you had a chance and you lost
12:16
if you want to pick judges from your way
12:20
of thinking then you better win an
12:22
election that's what I'm telling you
12:25
Lindsey's got a little ballsy call on
12:27
the side like I like this Lindsey just
12:30
you know his dad died okay this with his
12:33
monstas dad but McCain small
12:40
interjection we make jokes like this and
12:43
the other night actually regretted we've
12:46
made a lot of jokes about Ruth Bader
12:47
Ginsburg house falls asleep yeah she's
12:52
funny just look at her she's funny and
12:54
she looks funny and I saw the
12:56
documentary about her oh I've respect
12:59
for this woman she's still fantastically
13:01
in fact she is very humorous but I felt
13:04
like oh man I've been laughing at her
13:05
without really knowing her whole story
13:07
her whole story is pretty outrageously
13:10
cool okay just as an inter when we laugh
13:15
about oh I'm just saying that's my
13:19
conscious I just need to get it off my
13:22
chest now back to laughing about Lindsey
13:24
Graham and his little testicle so
13:29
Feinstein comes out and she said
13:30
something that I think she wanted to say
13:32
one thing and she kind of drifted off
13:34
and said something else and if you
13:36
listen listen to the structure of what
13:38
she's trying to say I think she wanted
13:40
to say that she wants she says the
13:43
country is do
13:45
she's a diversity not the country's
13:47
diverse and we should have a more I
13:49
think she was saying we don't want to
13:51
put another white guy in the in the
13:54
Supreme Court she never actually said
13:56
that but I think that's what she wanted
13:58
to say mhm and in a roundabout way
14:01
behind the noise is really a very
14:05
sincere belief that it is so important
14:08
to keep in this country which is
14:11
multi-ethnic multi-religious
14:21
multi-ethnic recei and that's my worry
14:25
that's my worry so I look forward to
14:29
your statement and answering the
14:31
questions Thank You mr. chairman
14:33
yeah and I have two clips that I need to
14:35
play here before you go mm-hmm what is
14:39
multi economic mean multi-ethnic
14:44
multi-religious multi-ethnic what does
14:46
that mean it means we have rich people
14:48
and very poor people Multi economic so
14:55
we need we need a homeless person it
14:57
seems to me where Nixon says somebody
15:03
needs to represent the mediocre no core
15:06
said that yeah I believe it was Nixon I
15:09
think people gonna look into this be
15:10
crazy he was being crude condemned for
15:14
picking somebody who is mediocre so
15:17
there's a lot of mediocre a diamond
15:19
paraphrasing a lot of video copy which
15:21
is kind of what Feinstein just said
15:23
there's a lot of mediocre people in the
15:25
country so they need to be represented
15:26
with a mediocre justice oh man you want
15:31
to hear the flub of the week real quick
15:32
yeah this is uh John Kasich and he was
15:37
and he was talking on the big head Cuomo
15:40
kid show on CNN look I learned early on
15:44
in my job when I had a fight with the
15:46
unions that and sometimes you have to
15:49
fight and stand tough but if you do it
15:51
all the time it's distracting you can't
15:54
achieve your bigger purposes and it's
15:56
not about some
15:58
you know it's not about I win you lose
16:00
the other thing is when you look at the
16:01
Congress though it's it's like 24 hours
16:04
since John McCain was put to death and
16:06
look at this the circus of a hearing
16:08
that's going on 24 hours since John
16:22
McCain was put to death I know I'm
16:31
actually cried the first time I heard it
16:34
good lord thank you for making the show
16:38
this is a good thirty seconds worth of
16:40
conversation of will extend it even it's
16:43
like 24 hours since John McCain was put
16:46
to death cold cold cold cold
16:50
yeah person not hear that at that moment
16:57
if the people were listening that do
17:00
these shows they're actually listening
17:01
to the other person talk yeah you know
17:05
he wasn't put to death let's make that
17:06
clear not that we know not that we're
17:09
aware of but that's what we just say
17:11
yeah but they wouldn't say that but they
17:15
should they would correct him yes all
17:17
right can I can I go into Feinstein you
17:19
have a point I probably interrupt your
17:21
whole point about it no the Feinstein
17:24
thing I think I've got a card
17:25
essentially what's diversity so we
17:27
should have you know should have an
17:28
ethnic another ethnic on the even though
17:31
we're already at the max it seems I mean
17:33
they have how many people were Jewish on
17:35
the Supreme Court three maybe
17:37
I think that's think they're
17:39
over-represented we need pastafarians on
17:42
there why doesn't she
17:44
bitch about that
17:46
she's not a Pastafarian well she's
17:49
Jewish okay they just find that I just
17:54
want to get a couple of living at this
17:55
out of the way and then you know this is
17:57
about Feinstein doctor questioning
18:00
that's why I inserted it here yes what
18:02
I'd really only saw the the beginning
18:05
because I was going back to the social
18:06
Nets thing and I see Feinstein trying to
18:09
you know trick Cavanaugh into this
18:11
conversation about you know I guess in
18:14
93 her office wrote the assault weapons
18:18
ban which of course had a sunset clause
18:21
after ten years and they had a review
18:23
and said well it didn't do a damn bit of
18:25
good so we don't have to renew it just
18:28
so you know historical context but you
18:31
know she was asking about an opinion he
18:34
wrote and the guy wrote a lot of
18:35
opinions about the the reason that you
18:38
could have an assault weapon legally is
18:40
because they were not unusual they were
18:44
there there's millions of them and then
18:46
she tries to get him into a debate of
18:48
well does that mean that these millions
18:50
are used or they're just in the closet
18:51
it's not the same thing yeah she's
18:53
trying to relitigate the Second
18:55
Amendment pretty much it's like a moron
18:57
wasting everybody's time and everyone
18:59
could see you could see I mean even I
19:00
see this coming from a mile away it's
19:03
like are you really gonna try this so
19:04
instead of playing that let's listen to
19:06
NPR's report they spend about seven
19:08
seconds on it guns abortion the scope of
19:11
presidential power all issues being put
19:13
to Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh
19:14
today this is the second day of his
19:16
confirmation hearings and the first
19:18
chance for senators on the Judiciary
19:20
Committee to question him in public in a
19:22
moment we'll hear from one of those
19:23
senators first NPR legal affairs
19:25
correspondent Nina Totenberg joins us to
19:27
walk through some of the nominees
19:28
responses today hi Nina
19:29
hi let's begin with guns has a
19:33
reputation as being a very pro-gun
19:35
rudosch how was he dressed on that today
19:37
well as a judge Kavanagh has staked out
19:40
a starkly different position for most
19:43
lower court judges on gun rights
19:44
disagreeing even with fellow
19:46
conservatives most notably he dissented
19:48
when his court upheld the District of
19:50
Columbia statute banning assault weapons
19:53
and ammunition magazines of more than
19:55
ten bullets today questioned by Senator
19:57
Dianne Feinstein he maintained that
19:59
under the
20:00
situation and Supreme Court precedent
20:02
only unusual weapons can be regulated
20:05
and semi-automatic assault rifles are
20:07
not unusual they're in common use let's
20:09
take a listen to the exchange you're
20:11
saying the numbers determine common use
20:14
they're widely possessed in the United
20:17
States Senator beyond guns he was also
20:20
asked about abortion and we know
20:22
President Trump promised to name someone
20:23
to the court who would overturn Roe vs.
20:25
Wade what did Kavanagh have to say now
20:27
when I heard that I thought wait a
20:29
minute did he say that the president we
20:33
know the president said he would appoint
20:34
someone who would overturn Roe versus
20:37
Wade who would overturn Roe versus
20:40
yeah so he said
20:42
I don't know if the president said that
20:45
well and if he did by the way let's stop
20:47
right here because we've listened to
20:49
these media guys long enough if the
20:51
president ever said that mm-hmm
20:53
they would play the clip so I went and
20:56
got the only clip that I think comes
20:58
close to what the claim is here and
20:59
you're right they would have had the
21:01
clip they don't because he's oh let's
21:05
just start with everybody out there
21:07
listening to this because we've noticed
21:09
this over the last year if there is a
21:13
moment where Trump said something that
21:15
they're making an assertion about
21:16
they're either gonna lie about it and
21:17
play a different clip or they're gonna
21:18
play Trump saying it they did not play
21:21
Trump saying it that means he didn't say
21:23
it or we'll see what he did say cuz you
21:26
have the clip okay so again here's NPR
21:28
NPR your National Public Radio state
21:31
senator beyond guns he was also asked
21:34
about abortion and we know President
21:36
Trump promised to name someone to the
21:37
court who would overturn Roe vs. Wade
21:38
what did Kevin I'll have to say now
21:40
let's listen to what the president
21:41
actually said this is from the final
21:43
debate against Hillary Clinton and do
21:47
have a date on this and it doesn't
21:49
matter mr. Trump you're pro-life but I
21:52
want to ask you specifically do you want
21:55
the court including the justices that
21:57
you will name to overturn roe v wade
21:59
which includes in fact states a woman's
22:03
right to abortion well if that would
22:04
happen because I am pro-life and I will
22:07
be appointing pro-life judges I would
22:09
think that that will go back to the
22:10
individual states but I'm asking you
22:12
specifically would you like they
22:14
overturned it'll go back to the states
22:15
what I'm asking you sir is do you want
22:18
to see the court overturn you've just
22:20
said you want to see the court protect
22:21
the Second Amendment
22:22
do you want to see the court overturn
22:24
well if we put another two or perhaps
22:27
three justices on that's really what's
22:29
going to be has that's will happen and
22:31
that'll happen automatically in my
22:33
opinion because I am putting pro-life
22:35
and justices on the court I will say
22:38
this it will go back to the states and
22:40
the states will then make a
22:41
determination there you go he didn't say
22:44
it no he's
22:47
he said something really weaselly but
22:58
yeah news reporting we have we didn't
23:02
say but he kind of said it and he
23:04
actually added something important which
23:06
was omitted from the NPR report which is
23:08
no matter what happens it goes back to
23:11
the states where people California
23:14
shouldn't be worried about anything
23:15
should be happy they can do whatever
23:17
they want in fact why don't they promote
23:19
that yeah later on the show I got some
23:28
flashbacks and you and I both will both
23:32
reminisce about when some of the now
23:34
crazy lefty people were really on our
23:38
side of thinking interestingly no we'll
23:41
get to that later the Supreme Court I
23:43
have two more things I have Mike Lee I
23:46
had two clips from him one is extremely
23:49
long you want to play the whole thing
23:50
but you just get an idea of what he's
23:53
talking about by playing about the
23:54
probably the first half of clip one if
23:57
this is sort of how the practice of
23:59
holding these hearings began so the
24:02
Senators could ask nominees how they
24:04
might vote how they might rule in
24:08
particular cases but this didn't always
24:11
happen in fact it it wasn't until 1916
24:15
that this even started you see there
24:19
have been 113 justices confirmed at the
24:22
Supreme Court so far the first 66 were
24:25
confirmed without even holding a hearing
24:28
any idea of a hearing is relatively new
24:31
it's about 102 years old yes see I love
24:33
this John thank you is having a little
24:35
history lesson on the show is something
24:37
we need to work on it's really it's it's
24:39
entertaining even if this happened
24:41
hundreds of years ago context that we're
24:45
not getting from the news me yes now we
24:48
have to do it punch it that's pathetic
24:51
podcasters 125 130 years under our
24:54
constitutional republic without ever
24:56
having a hearing but regardless we
24:59
started having hearings just over a cent
25:01
riah go the very first Supreme Court
25:04
confirmation hearing occurred in 1916
25:07
with justice Louis Brandeis after Louis
25:12
Brandeis was nominated to the court some
25:15
called for a hearing now if we're honest
25:18
with ourselves for honest about history
25:20
I think a lot of us maybe had to do with
25:22
some anti sentiment fervor and the fact
25:23
that Justice Brandeis was Jewish but
25:27
senators also wanted to determine
25:28
whether Brandeis would use his seat on
25:30
the Supreme Court to advocate for some
25:35
of the things that he had advocated for
25:37
as a private citizen as a public
25:40
interest attorney they wanted to know
25:43
how he might vote in particular cases
25:46
they didn't ask Justice Brandeis to
25:49
testify significantly but they did in
25:53
fact ask some outside witnesses what
25:56
they thought about his nomination the
26:00
next important moment one could argue
26:01
occurred in nineteen thirty nine when
26:04
Felix Frankfurter became the first
26:05
nominee to himself testified before the
26:09
committee at the time frankfurter was
26:13
controversial in part because he was
26:15
born overseas but senators also worried
26:18
that frankfurter was a radical based on
26:21
his defense of anarchists in court so
26:25
again senators wanted assurances about
26:28
how frankfurter might rule in particular
26:31
cases in particular of what results he
26:34
might reach in a particular type of case
26:37
frankfurter however significantly
26:40
declined to engage with the senators on
26:42
those topics and insisted that his
26:45
public record spoke for itself
26:47
justice stewarts nomination in 1959 was
26:51
another turning point senator is seeking
26:54
to resist Brown versus Board of
26:55
Education one of the grill Stewart on
26:58
his views on integration others still
27:02
wanted the grill steward about his views
27:03
on national security
27:05
so senators turned up the heat a little
27:07
bit more in that hearing like
27:11
frankfurter before him Justice Stewart
27:13
did not provide substantive
27:15
answers to their questions huh
27:18
and I played the whole thing as you can
27:19
tell it goes on and on it he talks about
27:23
how it yeah now the standard of
27:24
excellence is rouge gator been a root
27:26
Gator Gator Ruth Bader Ginsburg are Gigi
27:30
has son she had a rule she says I'm not
27:32
gonna you know tip my hat and it's a
27:37
bunch of during her hearings and I don't
27:39
think I should be answering these sorts
27:40
of questions and that's the standard
27:42
that the Republicans keep throwing in
27:44
the Democrats face what during these
27:46
hearings was did frankfurter in that
27:49
clip you see also the guy who invented
27:50
the hot dog no no surprisingly enough
27:53
he's not the same guy okay so I thought
27:57
it might be a little shortcut were Mike
28:00
Lee kind of does it because a little
28:03
little ending here that thought was
28:05
interesting 28 years later 28 years
28:08
after Justice Stewart came through this
28:10
committee the Senate considered Robert
28:13
Bork's nomination to the Supreme Court
28:15
this was another significant turning
28:16
point and in my view remains something
28:19
of a rock-bottom moment for the Senate
28:22
and for the Senate Judiciary Committee
28:25
without getting into any of the course
28:28
yeah the gory details here I think it
28:30
suffice it to say that Senator Ted
28:32
Kennedy and judge Bork did not agree on
28:36
certain matters of constitutional law
28:38
and Kennedy's response was to savage
28:44
unfairly in my opinion the results that
28:48
Judge Bork would reach if confirmed to
28:51
the Supreme Court the history shows that
28:54
over the better part of a century the
28:56
Judiciary Committee has gradually
28:58
created something of a new norm the norm
29:01
in which members demand that nominees
29:03
speak about specific cases in return for
29:07
favorable treatment from the committee
29:09
as the jurists are going through this
29:11
process now man he's talking about he's
29:15
wasting our time talking about people
29:17
who are wasting our time in historical
29:18
context of wasting time yes I only have
29:23
one last clip and this is actually have
29:26
to another was not really about this
29:28
hearings another was not really about this
29:28
but this this one here comes from the
29:30
government there's a guy a couple there
29:33
you have a number of historians that
29:34
like to produce podcasts really podcasts
29:41
are just kind of like little books on
29:43
tape are they hosted on pod beam no
29:45
they're not on pod being surprisingly
29:47
enough I would say that I wouldn't be a
29:51
podcaster if I had this guy's voice
29:53
because this is a guy and I don't have
29:54
his name in front of it he gives a
29:56
little Supreme Court early history that
29:58
was never mentioned by anybody as
30:00
actually kind of interesting presidents
30:02
nominate Supreme Court justice oh my god
30:05
I'm already loving the voices and the
30:08
Senate has to confirm there has been
30:10
occasional trouble since the very
30:12
beginning trouble since the very
30:13
the first justice to be denied a seat on
30:15
the court was a man named John Rutledge
30:17
it was 1795 just seven years into the
30:21
new constitutional experiment Rutledge
30:24
had written an op-ed piece critical of
30:25
the Jay Treaty a 1794 treaty with
30:28
Britain that tried to resolve certain
30:30
lingering issues from the War of
30:32
Independence that was enough for a
30:34
federalist Senate to Scotch his
30:36
candidacy Jefferson came into office in
30:40
1801 in what he called the second
30:42
American Revolution
30:43
I guess that for saying this guy needs a
30:46
noise gate real bad
30:49
did you hear that I don't know man but
30:58
poised to prevent that revolution was
31:00
Chief Justice John Marshall Jefferson's
31:03
distant cousin he was put into his life
31:05
tenured position in the last months of
31:07
John Adams failed one-term
31:09
administration Adams who distrusted
31:11
Jefferson's Democratic radicalism
31:14
essentially engaged in last-minute court
31:16
packing Marshall and dozens of other
31:19
midnight appointments to make sure that
31:21
Jefferson did not take things too far to
31:23
the left
31:24
Marshall went on to serve for 34 years
31:27
he was perhaps the greatest of all
31:29
Supreme Court justices he was indeed a
31:32
foreign in Jefferson side Marshall
31:34
wanted America to be a great centralised
31:36
nation state not a confederation of
31:39
sovereign states he wanted a nation that
31:42
prized the sanctity of contract above
31:44
any temporary notion of social justice
31:46
he despised Jefferson's vision of a
31:49
lightly governed inward-looking
31:51
agriculturally based loose Association
31:54
of proud Commonwealth's like Virginia
31:56
and Pennsylvania we now live in
31:59
Marshalls America not Jefferson's and
32:02
that's the story Paul Harvey that was
32:07
probably the right there was the
32:08
fundamental basis for the Civil War yeah
32:12
Marshall yeah well and that was social
32:15
justice warriors it sounds like
32:17
Jefferson was a social Jefferson warrior
32:20
he was and that's what she called and he
32:23
was a lefty I mean the day course they
32:25
demean him because he owned slaves you
32:28
know yeah but he was getting closer
32:31
he was the og s JW t og slave Jefferson
32:37
warrior we cannot I'm sorry that's my
32:44
mistake we cannot I'm sorry that's my
32:44
yeah we cannot I'm sorry that's my
32:49
what well--there's I've we need we
32:53
cannot where is this thing yes we cannot
32:56
end a segment like that without this
32:57
jingle I'm sorry I will have it ready
32:59
next time not tight tight now this is
33:12
the last thing this was an ad did you
33:14
see this ad this was Susan they ad
33:16
against Susan Collins the social justice
33:19
warriors put up an ad right now who is
33:21
Susan Collins this is the senator from
33:23
Maine who is the Republican and swing
33:31
vote mm-hmm and she has to vote as do
33:35
every do all the Republicans they have
33:37
to vote YES on this guy and they think
33:39
that she's a weak sister a weak sister
33:44
okay and so the all these Democrats put
33:48
together this ad claiming to be likes
33:50
her supporters but you could just see
33:53
this as a fake in terms of that and they
33:56
put this ad out which is now floating
33:58
around trying to get her to vote against
34:00
Kavanagh and this is the ad Susan
34:02
college senator I have called you I have
34:05
emailed I've written letters day after
34:08
day week after week it has been pretty
34:10
d'amore week after week it has been pretty
34:11
to know that your elected representative
34:15
is ignoring you so we're trying
34:17
something new and hope that this will
34:19
get your attention
34:20
senator Collins if you vote for Brett
34:22
Kavanaugh we're gonna fund your future
34:24
opponent a vote for Cavanaugh is almost
34:27
certainly a vote to reverse Roe versus
34:31
Wade as a Mainer who has a pre-existing
34:33
condition if you vote YES on Cavanaugh
34:35
you're voting to kill me I got to hear
34:45
that part again that was just so good by
34:48
the way it's followed up by the
34:49
non-binary person but also the the
34:53
cadence the whole delivery of that line
34:55
was just fantastic if you're going to
34:58
kill me
34:58
no Manor who has a pre-existing
35:00
condition if you vote YES on Cavanaugh
35:02
you're voting to kill me if he was in
35:05
court he could instantly take away
35:07
rights for people like me as a
35:09
non-binary person or people nearly under
35:12
marginalized identity you vote no
35:17
we're not gonna stop fighting until
35:19
you're defeated Mainers need you to
35:21
stand up and be a hero be a hero
35:24
being a hero for your hero and vote no
35:26
and if you don't we will replace you who
35:32
paid for that that's great I don't know
35:34
I couldn't have yet to figure it out
35:36
it's very it's humorous I like it that's
35:37
very funny
35:38
this is I appreciate this kind of art
35:41
and I encourage that at any time in our
35:43
media landscape vote for him to kill me
35:47
yes yeah I think that is fantastic
35:50
absolutely good job well let's
35:54
transition to the other side of Capitol
35:57
Hill and where we had the foreign
36:01
influence on social media a hearing and
36:05
this was in the Intelligence Committee
36:06
and I think we can do a nice transition
36:08
with the only clips that overlapped
36:10
during for this program because John I
36:13
never discussed what we're gonna do I
36:15
have no idea what he's gonna talk about
36:16
or what clips he's sending I just get
36:18
them before we start five minutes before
36:20
I look at him just to make sure yeah
36:22
there's not too many doubles I have one
36:24
clip of Alex Jones versus Marco Rubio
36:26
you have two so I think that you should
36:31
run with the segment actually Marco you
36:37
might want to play your clip because if
36:38
cuz I mic clips are kind of a trap it's
36:43
the clip plus a kicker and I want to see
36:46
what your clip is I just have to
36:48
straight-up clip but I just have
36:50
straight-up clip I think we should do
36:52
yours this is an executive decision okay
36:55
well this is the clip that I'm gonna
36:57
play this is a Alex Jones versus Ruger
36:59
this is a clip that was generally
37:01
promoted on the Internet
37:03
yeah and it was Rubio giving a press
37:07
briefing in the hallway and Jones
37:10
butting in but but I just want to say up
37:13
front what I found so fascinating about
37:16
this clip and of course we'll hear it
37:17
most the clip is about this a big
37:19
spoiler Rubio then I've seen this
37:23
behavior Rubio then I've seen this
37:25
I'll give you an example in the
37:27
Netherlands for sure in when I was 20
37:30
very early on when you know being on TV
37:32
was not as common as it is today and
37:35
people would of course recognise me and
37:37
they would always say just without me
37:39
even asking hi I don't know who you are
37:42
and I said I never watched it now I
37:45
never watched music television you
37:46
kidding man I don't know if I don't know
37:47
who you are when they when I it's a very
37:50
I knew for a fact that they have oh yes
37:52
and it's a very odd reaction that some
37:54
people had and of all people for this to
37:57
happen and Marco Rubio to do this and
38:00
double and triple down on it with
38:02
shouting in his face
38:04
I give Alex Jones a 10 plus for this by
38:06
the way I wish I had those balls to
38:09
promote our show
38:12
cuz you know he's just sticking his
38:13
facing good info wars.com I think I wish
38:16
I had both legs it's fantastic guy very
38:19
this is great could I have a first
38:21
amendment or should these companies be
38:22
able to to viola coal safe harbor hacked
38:25
and all that and then ban conservatives
38:26
in mash about the First Amendment yeah I
38:32
support the first question a couple of
38:38
things we have to start it over okay
38:39
cause I think it needs to be prefaced
38:40
that rubra is actually doing an
38:42
interview some woman from local station
38:45
him and Joe was just standing on the
38:47
side there it just jumps in yeah and he
38:49
and I believe he says safe harbor act
38:52
instead of safe harbor at save are ver
38:55
yeah like safe harbor act like oh you
38:58
gonna put Rubio's funny keep catch that
39:01
term I said what do you talk about
39:02
putting trees up I know what you're
39:04
talking about I don't need any more
39:05
trees oh I didn't even catch that that's
39:08
pretty funny
39:08
could I have a First Amendment or should
39:10
these companies be able to to viola coal
39:12
say barber hacks and all that and then
39:14
ban conservatives in mash know about the
39:19
First Amendment yeah I support the first
39:21
time I just ask questions
39:23
China are guys hired are you aware that
39:26
he platforming going on in China
39:29
no here big tech companies are purging
39:31
conservatives their shadow banning
39:33
people in matter well my broader concern
39:35
is that what we are trying to do in
39:37
terms of preventing foreign interference
39:38
in our elections that technology could
39:42
be used by authoritarian governments to
39:44
argue we want you to do the same thing
39:46
against people that are in our Jones
39:48
makes an external argument he says dude
39:50
what are you talking about that's
39:51
happening here right now under your very
39:53
nose country operating for example for
39:55
that misinformation would be something
39:56
like the truth for that missin for them
39:59
sowing instability would be supporting
40:01
democracy and flip the Democrats are
40:03
doing what you said China does that you
40:04
got fun shelf Hamburg
40:06
Dorsey on that question I think Facebook
40:08
now is I think it's important for them
40:10
not to comply with any efforts to sort
40:13
of go after freedom of expression
40:15
conservative the the not answering just
40:18
Republicans are acting like it isn't
40:20
happening are acting like it isn't
40:20
thank God Trump is weird oh yeah it's
40:23
really weird there's no person
40:24
conservatives shadow banning well I
40:32
think the bigger biases against freedom
40:34
of expression everybody should be
40:35
there's a there's a look I see more
40:37
going on happening here but you say I
40:39
don't exist it's not a heckler I depress
40:41
the goggle look at this guy he's saying
40:42
that I don't exist and these very hairy
40:49
he plays dumb here's the common so he
41:06
calls him snake snake eyes frat boy and
41:10
then he touches his shoulder which he
41:11
had done a couple times before which I
41:12
also found to be quite aggressive I'd be
41:14
like dude don't touch me and but then
41:17
Rubio falls for it in some planes of
41:19
years info play this joke over here
41:24
that's why the D platforming didn't work
41:25
but but here's the question here's a
41:27
question don't touch me again man I'm
41:29
asking not to touch well sure I'll just
41:30
pad you nice I know but I don't want to
41:31
be fed I know who you are it's not just
41:33
gonna beat me up so mad you're not gonna
41:40
stylish me people are like you are
41:44
literally atop what was that something
41:49
now you're at the end of your clip there
41:51
shouldn't have been yeah gangster give
41:55
me ends but then that's the clip that
41:57
went around but then and you gave him
41:59
the kudos and I thought it was pretty
42:01
funny kudos and I thought it was pretty
42:01
yeah although he's just annoying kudos
42:05
for promoting his shows I gave him
42:06
composure savage Michael Savage has an
42:09
extended version huh that was that was
42:11
done by Cassandra Fairbanks one of the
42:14
famous Twitter people done that it
42:17
follow and she follows me
42:19
and she was there apparently putting
42:22
this thing on periscope live uh-huh and
42:25
so when Rubio kinda gave gave up and we
42:28
started walking away I think I think
42:32
Jones kind of blew his credibility by
42:36
calling him out as gay and just let it
42:42
kind of goes little nuts on this and
42:43
listen to the way it ends but well I'm
42:51
playing it but I'm not hearing it no
42:53
that's not good to argue we want you to
43:03
do the same thing against people that
43:05
are I have a fit maybe you didn't clip
43:06
this about should I move it this time
43:08
and move it to the end see what it
43:10
sounds like okay careful about bro look
43:24
on the ground I think you gave me the
43:26
outtake I may have well yeah I'll tell
43:29
you what he says he says sorry I can get
43:37
that get that clip like goup stop the
43:39
show go get it no no no no no you don't
43:41
have that clip no stomping of the show
43:44
he falls and mad he says go back to the
43:46
bathhouse no it's too bad you didn't
43:50
have the clip you know this has happened
43:52
to me before it's empty you once maybe
43:55
twice but it's okay because I have a a
43:57
clip maybe of similar proportion this
44:00
was really an interesting thing that
44:01
happened we had all you know there was
44:04
lots of messy stuff going on the
44:07
audience we had the Democrats shouting
44:09
and the SCOTUS hearing then we had all
44:12
kinds of stuff going on with Alex Jones
44:14
and of course we had the social media
44:16
network and election hearing and that
44:20
was interrupted by Laura Loomer
44:22
oh yes now Laurel umer I I'm I might as
44:27
well just to tell you what I've been
44:29
thinking for a while yes yeah she comes
44:31
up with really interesting and well
44:34
researched and surprising information
44:38
certainly about the Vegas shooting and
44:42
she has these just gems of nuggets from
44:44
time to time and then all of a sudden
44:46
she's the 25 year old moron again yams
44:50
like primping for the camera and so she
44:52
stands up in the back with her selfie
44:54
stick making sure she's filming herself
44:57
causing this ruckus shouting something
44:59
to the effect of Jack Dorsey is meddling
45:02
in the elections his squashing
45:04
Republican voice as conservative as us
45:06
okay hold on so I didn't see any of
45:10
these which is the way I expected you to
45:13
do I don't know why but I don't know why
45:15
either Patel you go but she was at this
45:20
yeah in the back in the audience
45:25
so she stands up and she starts
45:28
interrupting and then and I'm watching
45:31
this dueling c-span screens and by the
45:33
way this is great on the on the surface
45:35
go I didn't know this about Windows and
45:37
maybe it's just the surface but you can
45:38
drag a window to the edge and then poop
45:41
it'll take up half the screen and I'll
45:42
give you a choice for another yeah
45:44
that's a day I'll do it that does it we
45:45
that's a Windows 10 thing yeah and then
45:47
you hit the escape button after you've
45:48
done it elegantly once ever since Steve
45:51
died all that cool stuff that Apple used
45:53
to do and now someone's gonna tell me
45:55
they do it too I'm sure they do
45:57
that's beside the point very long beside
45:59
the point anyway so I'm looking at this
46:02
and there she is and I'm like this is
46:04
just grand izing and now she has this
46:07
thing like you've been Lewis grant
46:09
standing what I say grand icing nom
46:12
Nydia grandstanding and she has this
46:15
you've been Lou murd like no no you
46:17
gotta be around a little longer before
46:20
you can say that you've Lou murd I mean
46:22
I would never say you've been Dvorak
46:23
tore curried or No Agenda no we say
46:26
would you been hit in the mouth that's a
46:28
little different but bloomer you can
46:29
always tell that chicken that's been
46:31
curry yes so you've been humored so i
46:34
have a feeling that she's being run by
46:36
someone that she has she has someone
46:39
behind her who's giving her great
46:41
information and she just knows how to
46:43
present it she's you know semi cute
46:45
she's bubbly young energetic and you
46:48
know so there's something going on
46:50
behind her that that is putting
46:53
information out anyway so this is not
46:54
one of those moments this is really her
46:55
trying to Loomer and it fails but it
46:59
fails for a very interesting reason and
47:01
and so I have these two screens going on
47:03
I'm like is there a third what is me
47:07
comes Auto Auction on what's happening
47:09
here now recognizes that get a mic over
47:13
to her get a mic over order get a mic
47:16
over now lab order in the air will be
47:20
asked to leave you you'll please take a
47:25
seat or we'll have to have you then
47:27
you'll need to release please help
47:31
before it is too late because Jack
47:33
Dorsey is trying to influence the
47:35
election what she said I can't
47:38
understand 15 $20 figured a hand viola 7
47:46
half 30 $30 up here at this point like
47:49
I'm like what's going on $40 she's
47:51
yelling I'm hearing this hey hot $50
47:54
down here - officer will you escort this
47:56
young lady out please - half an hour 5c
47:58
5 1770 up two and a half now five seven
48:01
five seven I have $80 - five 85 90
48:03
hundred on at hand and to end the
48:05
quarter one the quarter 1 Hannah said
48:07
about to do to the quarter it - at
48:09
hancinema 3 able to bond 300 it three
48:11
and a quarter cut three and a quarter
48:12
now a quarter cut three and a quarter
48:12
hanpan through the head of Maya 400 yeah
48:15
but a 4-4-2 quarter fort have we're
48:16
selling the cell phone there for the
48:17
court half-dead Ford has returned about
48:19
a five hundred five and a quarter fine
48:21
with half I yield back
48:25
that was Senator long from Missouri was
48:28
fantastic that was a really creative way
48:32
of lightening the mood that was really
48:37
good and so everyone just like it was it
48:39
was perfect and then of course the it
48:41
ends on such a sour note just dumb this
48:44
is like great and now is your moment for
48:46
the for the great line of the day and
48:48
know what does he do now I think our
48:50
auctioneer and residents gonna get
48:51
tweeted about today idiot
48:55
no okay so that was all I really had of
49:01
the interruptions like that apparently
49:06
he wasn't that's a that's a sound of a
49:08
professional - it's like yes well we
49:10
have a lot of them here in Tejas so yeah
49:12
I'm familiar with them yeah otherwise
49:15
you thought it'd be cool to do that
49:17
there was a song back in the day I could
49:20
do heavier don't be the auctioneer I
49:22
could do that I could I could sing along
49:24
with it the audition it's called the
49:26
I'll find it for the next show the
49:28
auctioneer okay so now we have on the
49:32
other side of the Senate we have or
49:34
wherever I don't know what if it's
49:36
really on the other side we have the
49:37
Intelligence Committee and they have a
49:39
hearing which is titled foreign
49:41
influence and social media now although
49:43
all of these things are screwed
49:44
did never and you could even see both
49:46
Dorsey and Sandberg who were the only
49:48
two there there was an empty seat
49:50
ominously empty where Google didn't show
49:52
up that one reference whoo hey they
49:58
don't have to they right everyone's
49:59
checks they don't have to show up so
50:01
that's what's going on there and where's
50:03
the outrage where's the media talking
50:05
about Google being a bunch of either
50:07
pussies something to hide or just plain
50:10
rude they talk about it but only in a
50:15
normal like reporting manner
50:20
Google by the way what is what shows up
50:22
a big G and we'll logo who comes for
50:26
Google Eric Schmidt here comes a Google
50:29
Eric sir he's my age I'm Sante gigas he
50:32
talks like this you can't really express
50:34
himself the low voice
50:37
okay I don't know so then out there good
50:40
and there's no one from Google yeah but
50:45
you know you can see Sandberg and Jack
50:48
Dorsey from Twitter they both have they
50:50
basically have the questions in
50:52
long-form sheets in front of them's like
50:54
they know who's coming they know what
50:55
questions are coming I don't know if was
50:56
abbreviated or not but we know these
50:58
things are scripted but this is a topic
51:00
that not everyone is well-versed in and
51:03
I I sadly that one I forgot to do was of
51:06
and I will clip that for Sunday's of
51:08
camallo Harris trying to understand the
51:11
value of an ad buy which is really
51:13
important but we can easily discuss it
51:16
on Sunday it's a lot much longer
51:17
conversation because it's so convoluted
51:18
but I think you and I can pick it apart
51:21
okay we'll do that but the hearing
51:24
started off and this is the the first
51:26
clip is a little little over two minutes
51:28
and it it kind of really says everything
51:31
and it shows you the difference between
51:32
these two personalities and I believe
51:33
also the DNA of their companies I don't
51:37
know why I was up talking and do my tech
51:46
reporter voice that's what it was these
51:48
two companies okay let me tell you all
51:50
about it at least I caught myself and
51:54
the first question is the only question
51:56
really we needed to have answer and
51:58
maybe I should ask you first for some
51:59
reflection because the first question is
52:01
from the Chairman is what is social
52:05
media the Chairman is what is social
52:06
now what is social media to you John
52:09
before we hear from our witnesses social
52:12
media is a construct
52:15
using the internet to interconnect
52:20
people in groups forums or even
52:24
individually so they can interact
52:26
without being anywhere near each other
52:29
someone should write that down because
52:32
that was very good as you can imagine
52:35
it's not at all what their answers work
52:39
and Sandberg now let me just get my
52:42
other notes here I did take a number of
52:44
notes even though I'd have just a few
52:45
clips first of all Sandberg I'm sorry
52:47
and I tried this out on Tina last night
52:50
not as a joke but purely is as just an
52:52
observation and didn't go very far but
52:54
Sandberg has got to be watching these
52:57
hearings of herself I'm sure she saw
52:59
some tape I'm thinking God why did I
53:02
fuck up my nose so bad I mean she did
53:05
something with a nose job it was
53:06
probably a second or a third time and it
53:09
she had a a broad nose if you look at
53:12
the at the book of knowledge and you go
53:14
back and but it was cute it was nothing
53:16
wrong with it and you know now it has
53:18
kind of that Michael Jackson thing where
53:19
two sides in a way it's like Mike it's
53:22
Michael circa 1989 you know where it's
53:31
and then it starts to fall in other side
53:33
and then the way the light hits it it
53:35
just it just looks like you have a small
53:37
kind of structure left looks like you
53:39
have a small penis on your face I mean
53:40
it's really bad to anyway and I'm sorry
53:43
for her that she did that but let it be
53:45
a warning people be careful what you do
53:47
with your face endorsee read his opening
53:51
of that opening statements Dorsey read
53:52
his opening statement from his iPhone
53:54
which I think was a big mistake he
53:55
looked and he was he's nervous and he's
53:58
he if he if he hadn't said I'm shy at
54:01
the beginning was he did you know I
54:03
usually don't do these things I'm sure
54:04
he could have been seen as a much much
54:08
closer to Tony Stark than Elon Musk
54:10
because he comes across as a very deep
54:13
thinker he carries his words very
54:15
carefully and I actually think he is a
54:18
deep thinker and has thought about what
54:20
he's doing and what Twitter is and I
54:21
have to say I'm very impressed by his
54:23
performance in general let me see well
54:27
did the typical
54:28
they're about Nome their business model
54:31
and all that stuff we've heard it a
54:33
million times but there were some new
54:36
terms and a couple things I highlighted
54:37
again the the advertising and the money
54:40
flow and everything I didn't get that
54:41
one will do that on Sunday but let's
54:43
start off with the opening statements
54:44
with that very question this question is
54:46
- oh and Samberg hold on a second before
54:50
you start teasing Sunday oh you're right
54:53
what am I thinking it's not Sun that's
54:54
Thunder someday we have a special show
54:56
yeah you're talking about next Thursday
54:58
yes next Thursday
55:00
sorry I'll probably forget
55:04
we'll never know you won't I'll remember
55:06
I will remember the Sandberg Campbell
55:09
Harris clip okay it's programmed now
55:12
back to the back to the show and Sheryl
55:17
Sandberg saw her entire testimony was
55:19
Miss goody goody two-shoes borderline
55:22
valley girl had everything all sewn up
55:25
she's that veteran she knows Jack's
55:27
nervous and shy this question is to both
55:34
of you
55:35
how would you define social media for
55:39
this committee and more importantly for
55:42
the American people and I'll start with
55:43
you miss ember social media enables you
55:47
to share what you want to share when you
55:48
want to share it without asking
55:50
permission from anyone that's that's the
55:53
top thing right there share what you
55:57
want to share with anyone without any
55:59
permission except permission from
56:02
Facebook that's how we meet our mission
56:05
which is giving people a voice I would
56:08
have stopped right there oh really so if
56:11
people can share like illegal images or
56:14
atom bomb plans or anything they want to
56:18
share or there's you know some sort of a
56:20
meeting that's gonna do overthrow the
56:22
government that's all shareable that's
56:24
that's what social media is all about is
56:25
but that you are now the senator from
56:29
Kentucky you have just won your seat on
56:32
the house and two undies Senate
56:34
Intelligence come on I'll start with you
56:35
miss ember social media enables you to
56:39
share what you want to share when you
56:41
want to share it without asking
56:42
permission I just want that on a big
56:45
placard anyone and that's how we meet
56:49
our mission which is really giving
56:51
people a voice and I think what's more
56:54
important than just the content people
56:56
shares the connections they made rich
56:58
social media enables people to celebrate
57:00
their birthdays
57:10
when I heard that I said this is
57:13
fantastic I heard that I said this is
57:15
how do they come up with approve that
57:19
yeah number two on the list birthdays
57:23
the Dutch are jumping up and down and I
57:26
think what's more important than just
57:27
the content people shares the
57:29
connections they make social media
57:31
enables people to celebrate their
57:33
birthdays and I'm sorry I just want this
57:35
was my first birthday in many years
57:37
without Facebook
57:40
and you celebrated it just fine yeah I'm
57:45
still here and it was really calm and
57:49
the few people that did get through to
57:51
me few people that did get through to
57:52
they really love me so it was a good
57:55
feeling in the last year people have
57:57
raised 300 million dollars on Facebook
57:59
on birthday funders for nonprofits they
58:02
care about birthday funders huh it's a
58:04
double whammy on the birthdays for the
58:05
social nets safety check in the worst
58:09
circumstances of their lives have let
58:12
their loved ones know they're safe how
58:14
about a text message does that work
58:16
still hey I'm still alive phone oh thank
58:19
god there's Facebook and small
58:23
businesses to grow all around the
58:25
country I meet with small businesses
58:27
from a woman making dresses in her
58:30
living room and selling them on
58:31
Instagram with one arm to a local
58:33
plumber with no legs were able to find
58:35
their customers on Facebook and then
58:38
able to grow and hire people and live
58:40
their American dream and that's our
58:43
entire statement that is what social
58:45
media is it's about sharing anything you
58:49
want without anyone telling you what to
58:50
do unless your name is Alex Jones
58:52
it's about birthdays raising money for
58:56
birthdays and what was the last one yeah
59:00
small businesses oh yeah yes sad people
59:03
with little who would you know retirees
59:05
who are doing work somewhere they can
59:07
make a buck that's social media so Jack
59:12
Dorsey who knew I mean if I was like a
59:17
burger like dude you didn't do a good
59:19
job on that that's not how a social
59:22
media is anyway so Dorsey doesn't really
59:28
even answer the question he goes
59:30
straight to where what he's thinking and
59:32
this will come back and I have just a
59:34
couple other clips this will come back
59:35
and it's deep and I really appreciate
59:38
the thinking he put into it and also
59:40
notice that the senator addresses him as
59:43
Jack and not mr. Dorsey in this
59:45
particular clip I just thought that was
59:47
interesting for context able to find
59:49
their customers on Facebook and then
59:52
able to grow and hire people and live
59:54
their American dream
59:58
I believe it's really important to to
1:00:03
understand how the people see it and we
1:00:07
believe that the people use Twitter as
1:00:09
they would a public square and they
1:00:12
often have the same expectations that
1:00:14
they would have of any public space for
1:00:18
our part we see our platform as hosting
1:00:21
and serving conversations those
1:00:24
conversations are on the public we think
1:00:27
there's a lot of benefit to those
1:00:28
conversations being in the public but
1:00:31
there's obviously a lot of risks as well
1:00:34
we see that news and entertainment are
1:00:38
actually byproducts of public
1:00:41
conversation a very astute observation
1:00:43
I don't know if the media likes it but I
1:00:46
thought that was good yes it's a
1:00:48
byproduct absolutely media should like
1:00:50
it and they should use it as an
1:00:52
ammunition against them because it's not
1:00:55
it's not primary so yeah you can
1:00:58
advertise with Twitter but it's a
1:00:59
byproduct it's like advertising with a
1:01:01
byproduct you know byproduct like a
1:01:03
byproduct of poor with no there's no no
1:01:06
no no he says something said news is a
1:01:08
byproduct of tenor
1:01:12
yeah I think what he means by news is
1:01:14
like reporting news yeah so so Twitter
1:01:16
is the ground zero the media is just
1:01:18
taken the the shreds that fly off the
1:01:21
edge of the mission I think I think no I
1:01:23
don't think that's what he meant that's
1:01:25
I think that's exactly what he meant
1:01:27
well it doesn't matter we can disagree
1:01:29
on that this yes and entertainment are
1:01:34
actually byproducts of public
1:01:36
conversation and we see our role as
1:01:40
helping to not only serve that public
1:01:43
conversation so that everyone can
1:01:44
benefit even if they don't have a
1:01:46
Twitter account I don't know what that
1:01:49
means account I don't know what that
1:01:49
everyone can benefit from Twitter even
1:01:52
if you don't have a Twitter account well
1:01:54
you know always go on the site you know
1:01:55
which foot it oh okay I got you you not
1:01:58
only serve that public conversation so
1:02:00
that everyone can benefit even if they
1:02:02
don't have a Twitter account that's
1:02:04
important but also to increase the
1:02:06
health of that conversation as well the
1:02:08
health and nor do that in order to do
1:02:11
that we need to be able to measure it we
1:02:13
need to now yeah yeah this is deep he so
1:02:16
he's saying the health of that
1:02:18
conversation and I and I think the
1:02:20
health and I and I think the
1:02:21
I think contextually I think I
1:02:22
understand what he's talking about is it
1:02:24
at the health the health yes the health
1:02:26
so the healthiness of the of the
1:02:28
conversation the health if it is
1:02:31
something that is making people happy
1:02:34
and therefore healthy because they
1:02:37
either iris would say agree with each
1:02:39
other is one way if you have everyone
1:02:40
agreeing with each other I don't know
1:02:42
how that works but okay or going to
1:02:45
dimension be for a few minutes on
1:02:47
Twitter you'll know how it works really
1:02:48
quick right but but do we all agree that
1:02:52
he's saying healthy conversations where
1:02:54
people aren't like me and making
1:02:56
themselves sick literally making
1:02:57
themselves sick which is what social
1:02:59
media is what is social media Mr curry
1:03:01
it's a place where people go to get sick
1:03:04
that's my answer but also to increase
1:03:07
the health of that conversation as well
1:03:09
and nor do that in order to do that we
1:03:12
need to be able to measure a measure we
1:03:14
need to understand what healthy
1:03:16
participation looks like in a public
1:03:18
square and we need to amplify that
1:03:21
that's more important
1:03:23
we need to question a lot of the
1:03:26
fundamentals that we started with 12
1:03:27
years ago in the form of incentives when
1:03:32
people use our product every single day
1:03:34
when they open our app up what are we
1:03:38
incentivizing them to do not telling
1:03:40
them what to do where are we actually
1:03:42
incentivizing them to do and that
1:03:45
certainly speaks to the buttons that we
1:03:48
have in our service all the way to our
1:03:51
business model so didn't really answer
1:03:53
the well he dealt with the social media
1:03:55
question quite quick quick quickly it's
1:03:57
a it's a public square and people expect
1:03:59
the same type of actions they can take
1:04:03
on the public square although I would
1:04:06
wager to say because of anonymity people
1:04:08
actually show themselves their true
1:04:10
selves and being on Twitter is like
1:04:11
looking at your own anus because we're
1:04:14
all like that in to some degree but then
1:04:16
he goes into this very deep thinking
1:04:18
which we'll come back to later about
1:04:19
what exactly are we doing what are we
1:04:21
doing here now I don't know if you can
1:04:23
ever measure the health of a
1:04:25
conversation although you never know
1:04:28
what machine learning and AI can do
1:04:33
but I thought there was at least some
1:04:34
thinking and not now this being the bit
1:04:42
of timecode down I already have a couple
1:04:48
okay this being the foreign influence of
1:04:52
social media so you know how how do we
1:04:55
respond it's just kind of a general
1:04:56
response to are they working together we
1:04:59
collaborating are we doing everything
1:05:01
the minute we see bad actors are
1:05:03
actually a new term will pop up in a
1:05:05
moment whenever we see these bad actors
1:05:08
you know is we do we have systems in
1:05:10
place and man when you listen to this
1:05:12
and how they're all like agreeing with
1:05:14
each other and nodding and oh yeah yeah
1:05:16
we're all locked down I think where
1:05:18
collaboration has greatly increased
1:05:20
we've always worked closely with law
1:05:21
enforcement and we continue to do that
1:05:23
and particularly the FBI's new task
1:05:25
force forcibly shared information with
1:05:27
other companies but I think we are doing
1:05:29
better and we can continue to do better
1:05:31
mr. chairman you noted in your opening
1:05:33
remarks that some of the tips we got
1:05:36
from came from a private security firm
1:05:37
in our mind that's the system working
1:05:40
aha our opponents are very well-funded
1:05:42
they are very organized and we are going
1:05:45
to get those tips from law enforcement
1:05:47
from each other from private firms those
1:05:53
tips with each other the more the
1:05:55
stronger our collective defenses will be
1:05:57
you get too far away from what would
1:06:00
that was just that was just a little bit
1:06:02
of a rapport that our opponents yes
1:06:05
yeah that's opposed to me and the new
1:06:08
FBI task force that certainly is great
1:06:11
collaborating with them oh yeah but is
1:06:14
she mean by our opponents the Russians
1:06:20
you sure she doesn't mean Republicans
1:06:22
well she didn't say Russians she said
1:06:25
opponents so I think that she meant a
1:06:27
wide variety could be Republicans who
1:06:31
are influenced by Russians or who have
1:06:34
ever had a Russian dressing on their
1:06:36
salad I don't know those are her words
1:06:38
and they and she's pretty precise with
1:06:42
how she speaks this is old she's
1:06:43
rehearsed quite well
1:06:45
our opponents our opponents yes and we
1:06:48
have the specialist especially now this
1:06:50
really mean right we got to stop and I
1:06:54
want to look up this word we have to
1:07:00
assume that there's some something
1:07:05
within this definition
1:07:11
who compete okay if she says our
1:07:14
opponents yeah she says someone who it
1:07:17
says someone who competes against or
1:07:19
fights another in a contest game or
1:07:23
argument a rival or adversary yes I
1:07:27
think Russia fits in there but also
1:07:29
Republicans I think think Twitter fits
1:07:31
in yes actually when she when I first
1:07:34
heard this because you know you're
1:07:36
paying attention a lot of things the
1:07:38
same time I thought she was actually
1:07:39
talking about Twitter but then I went
1:07:41
back and she wasn't she was referring to
1:07:44
his opening comments about the attacks
1:07:45
on our democracy
1:07:48
tax on our democracy but we sure would
1:07:50
buy our Pony means the attacks on our
1:07:52
democracy I think so yeah buying one
1:07:55
hundred thousand dollars with the cheap
1:07:56
advertising that's kind of silly yes and
1:07:58
and the one hundred thousand dollars
1:08:00
again I'm sorry a week from today we'll
1:08:03
pull that apart that did come up and
1:08:05
it's important all right let me let me
1:08:07
move on because now we have a new term
1:08:11
as we're now going to talk about a
1:08:14
little more about what is permitted what
1:08:17
can and can't be done on the platform
1:08:21
and she has all kinds of interesting
1:08:23
terms you know very much like unindicted
1:08:27
co-conspirator which is what will go on
1:08:29
Donald Trump's tombstone if it's up to
1:08:33
the Democrats unindicted co-conspirator
1:08:35
who's pre dead at this moment be
1:08:38
precancerous so here we're going to talk
1:08:43
about well you'll hear it it's just new
1:08:45
terms and interesting stuff who what
1:08:47
what entity do you have in each of your
1:08:49
companies who make these determinations
1:08:52
our policy team is setting those and our
1:08:54
security team is finding them
1:08:56
uncoordinated inauthentic behavior this
1:09:00
is it this is this is her big thing
1:09:02
inauthentic behavior you want to look
1:09:05
something up what does that mean isn't
1:09:07
everybody by definition who's on
1:09:09
Facebook inauthentic that's the whole
1:09:12
game isn't it yes you're supposed to be
1:09:14
inauthentic look inauthentic take
1:09:17
pictures that are inauthentic posting
1:09:19
authentically in and once in a while say
1:09:22
Trump is a dick isn't isn't that what
1:09:24
everyone does that's the only
1:09:26
authenticity I'm seeing coordinated
1:09:27
inauthentic behavior means behavior on
1:09:30
our site that's inauthentic so people
1:09:32
are not representing themselves to be
1:09:34
who they are to be and coordinated me
1:09:36
they are presenting themselves who they
1:09:41
are to be not representing themselves to
1:09:44
be who they are to be who they are to be
1:09:48
they are to be who they ought to be from
1:09:51
arbie's who they are to be sandwich from
1:09:52
Arby's they're not representing
1:09:55
themselves to who they are who they
1:09:57
ought to be hablaba they are to be
1:10:01
okay so she you know she's trying to
1:10:03
explain inauthentic behavior I think she
1:10:05
means that they can't really and if they
1:10:09
think she even refers to it they can't
1:10:10
really track if someone's being
1:10:12
inauthentic which I guess means I'm a
1:10:14
Russian spy covering as the hot girl in
1:10:18
a bikini on Facebook I think that's what
1:10:20
she means Savior means behavior on our
1:10:23
site that's inauthentic so people are
1:10:25
not representing themselves to be who
1:10:27
they are to be and coordinated means
1:10:29
they are coordinating and they can be
1:10:31
coordinating with authentic actors and
1:10:33
coordinating with inauthentic actors I
1:10:35
need a roadmap for this I don't know who
1:10:38
can I coordinate with you I mean
1:10:40
authentic bro sorry
1:10:41
both are unacceptable it something that
1:10:45
is easy to recognize people unanimous
1:10:49
about her you wind up with debates as to
1:10:51
whether or not okay is that guy for real
1:10:53
isn't that it's not the only unanswered
1:10:56
question ever certain platforms should
1:10:58
be shut down I think on a lot of issues
1:11:00
like hate speech there's broad debate
1:11:03
when it comes to what is an inauthentic
1:11:05
actor which is a fake account posing as
1:11:07
someone they're hard to find but once we
1:11:10
find them we know what they are who sets
1:11:12
these Sanders stay same committee the
1:11:16
same group of people and and just for
1:11:19
context she said quite clearly it's I
1:11:21
don't have it in this clip that Facebook
1:11:24
is not in the business of determining
1:11:25
what is fact or false what is true or
1:11:29
false or fake news or fact or fact check
1:11:32
false whatever the hell it is it's false
1:11:34
that they use third-party independent or
1:11:38
independent third parties for that which
1:11:40
means the independent fact check network
1:11:44
which includes such luminary members as
1:11:48
the Daily Caller foundation Tucker
1:11:51
Carlson's thing head to Snopes so you
1:11:55
know I don't know what can come out of
1:11:56
that but okay fine well give me give me
1:11:59
some examples of standards that are
1:12:00
unacceptable in the coordinated and
1:12:03
authentic behavior or in general in
1:12:05
general yeah so we publish our community
1:12:07
standards comprehensively and what that
1:12:09
does is to find what's permitted on
1:12:11
Facebook and what's not okay here we
1:12:13
finally what's permitted and what's not
1:12:15
okay permit it on Facebook so some
1:12:18
examples are bullying is not permitted
1:12:20
bullying hate is not permitted hate is
1:12:23
not permitted not hate speech hate is
1:12:25
not permitted hey don't a language that
1:12:28
leads to violence is not permitted and
1:12:31
this is published in detail publicly
1:12:33
publicly we publish that publicly hate
1:12:36
is not allowed this is what is left of
1:12:40
your social network if hate is not
1:12:41
allowed hate speech okay we've we've
1:12:44
tried to define that not legally but now
1:12:46
just hate so if I go on Facebook I hate
1:12:48
this guy am I in violation violation yes
1:12:53
yes you are if you hate President Trump
1:12:55
you you're in violation
1:12:57
everybody are they all hate there is a
1:12:59
room there is a Facebook group when I
1:13:01
was last on it you know when was that
1:13:03
March um and that is called I hate
1:13:07
Donald Trump
1:13:09
that should be not allowed well then
1:13:11
obviously one of the senators would
1:13:13
bring that up final clip for this is and
1:13:18
we're now coming back round to the
1:13:20
incentives and you will hear Samberg was
1:13:23
said I don't know did I even put Samberg
1:13:25
in this she has no vision just bad nose
1:13:29
job and Dorsey he's thinking deep about
1:13:32
it I want to get to the basic issue of
1:13:36
whether our incentives in this case are
1:13:41
aligned to deal with these challenges
1:13:42
and by the way I'm pretty sure that
1:13:45
Dorsey because of the jack comment that
1:13:47
he coordinated this with with the
1:13:49
chairman but this is where they're going
1:13:51
towards incentives and how the social
1:13:54
networks are responsible for a lot of
1:13:56
this bad behavior and this is a setup
1:13:59
I'm not sure how they're gonna play it
1:14:01
out I think it's way too complicated for
1:14:03
most but I think that's what's going on
1:14:05
if your users were to lose conference
1:14:07
confidence in your platforms in the
1:14:10
authenticity of what you mr. Dorsey
1:14:13
called a public square I might call it a
1:14:16
digital public square Wow inventive I
1:14:19
assume there'd be very serious economic
1:14:22
implications for your companies do you
1:14:25
think the the incentives have aligned
1:14:27
for platform providers of all types in
1:14:31
the digital space to want to get at
1:14:34
these issues and have a plan and be able
1:14:36
to respond in real time miss Hamburg and
1:14:39
then you mr. Dorsey absolutely Trust is
1:14:43
the cornerstone of our business people
1:14:45
have to trust that what they see on
1:14:46
facebook is authentic people have to
1:14:49
trust that this is a positive force for
1:14:51
democracy and the things they care about
1:14:52
and so this has been a huge issue for us
1:14:56
and that's why we're here today and
1:14:57
that's why we're gonna keep working to
1:14:59
get ahead of these threats and make sure
1:15:02
we can minimize all of this activity mr.
1:15:04
chairman I just want you know we at
1:15:06
Facebook we're all on board
1:15:07
do you like my tight sweater I mean
1:15:09
seriously is that her vision is that is
1:15:12
that how concerned she is very
1:15:15
disappointing short Facebook
1:15:17
our incentives are on lines but I do
1:15:20
believe it goes a lot deeper than just
1:15:22
the alignment of our company incentives
1:15:25
with this committee and the American
1:15:26
people I believe we need to question the
1:15:29
fundamental incentives are in our
1:15:33
product today yes this time someone
1:15:35
opens up our service every time someone
1:15:37
opens up our app we are implicitly
1:15:40
incentivizing them to do something or
1:15:42
not to do something and that extends all
1:15:44
the way to our business and those
1:15:47
answers that we get from asking that
1:15:50
question are going to create massive
1:15:52
shifts in how Twitter operates and I
1:15:55
also believe how our industry operates
1:15:57
so what worked 12 years ago does not
1:16:00
work today it hasn't evolved fast enough
1:16:03
but I think it's a layer many many many
1:16:07
many layers deeper than these surface
1:16:10
symptoms that we often find ourselves
1:16:13
discussing I like his answer
1:16:18
yeah you're you're gonna bromance with I
1:16:21
yeah yeah and I'm no fan of Jack Dorsey
1:16:23
we know he probably dislikes me I'm not
1:16:27
verified have asked to have never even
1:16:29
gotten a straight-up answer people have
1:16:32
asked on my behalf still do I don't want
1:16:33
it anymore
1:16:34
because then I will have to leave
1:16:35
Twitter because it's the mark of the
1:16:36
beast because it's the mark of the
1:16:38
um but I like what he says here no and I
1:16:42
and he is I say it's gonna change
1:16:45
massively and I think not to their
1:16:48
benefit I think he realizes that
1:16:52
squares what he's thinking damn crying I
1:16:55
got into that business
1:16:56
yeah that was a smart move ah as far as
1:17:03
I'm concerned
1:17:04
Twitter was always the invention of M
1:17:06
head Robin Williams right who invented
1:17:10
blogger made you know he's worth a
1:17:13
billion dollars was blogging it was all
1:17:15
based on RSS
1:17:18
that's what Twitter were originally it
1:17:21
was a podcast platform blogger no no it
1:17:24
was a podcast but it was oh do
1:17:28
od Allah came Twitter odyo was the
1:17:31
podcast competitor to me vo but they had
1:17:33
a platform and we just had content don't
1:17:35
you remember no yeah oh do and then they
1:17:39
never really launched and they turned
1:17:41
they came up with this follow thing
1:17:42
which I think they had in their podcast
1:17:45
environment and that became Twitter and
1:17:48
then podcasting just went in the crapper
1:17:50
for 10 years because then we had social
1:17:53
nets and that was the the next next new
1:17:55
new new big thing you're not sure of
1:17:58
this da I know my history my friend and
1:18:01
we discussed it on the show we discussed
1:18:03
it on the show well with that I'd like
1:18:07
to thank you for your courage to say in
1:18:09
the morning to you John say you dance
1:18:11
for Charles Dvorak you're welcome
1:18:15
all wait I'm sorry well in the brain to
1:18:17
you too mr. Adam curry also eldership
1:18:19
sassy boots on the ground feet in the
1:18:21
air sons in the water and all the names
1:18:22
and I said and in the morning to the
1:18:23
troll room no agenda stream calm good to
1:18:25
see it all the trolls here and in a good
1:18:29
mood today
1:18:29
everyone's I think everyone had a lot of
1:18:31
fun watching c-span yeah was real we're
1:18:36
an energetic Bunch we are we watch
1:18:38
c-span as a group and in the morning to
1:18:41
Nick the rat who was awarded the the
1:18:45
choice of pick for album art for episode
1:18:47
1065 the tiger got headed of weekly flux
1:18:51
capacitor was the title of of the show
1:18:56
and this was Comey James Comey looking
1:19:00
at his laundry line of drying
1:19:02
counterfeit money or not counterfeit
1:19:04
washed money laundered laundered
1:19:06
laundered I'm sorry white washed
1:19:08
laundered money as we and you know it
1:19:12
was interesting because I just read and
1:19:14
we're talking about we have the military
1:19:17
intelligence versus the CIA central
1:19:20
intelligence versus the CIA central
1:19:21
we have Democrats Republicans you know
1:19:23
now of course we have Nike versus Adidas
1:19:26
because Nikes got Kaepernick and adidas
1:19:29
has Kanye and we have the bank's poor
1:19:34
laundering money drug money typically
1:19:36
and then you have the real estate guys
1:19:38
like Trump who launder money through
1:19:40
what we use
1:19:41
just call commerce just doing private
1:19:43
transactions but now we always think of
1:19:45
everything is a crime who cares well I
1:19:46
don't care where you got your money from
1:19:48
you want to buy this apartment good here
1:19:49
you go
1:19:50
so Trump is just laughing his ass off
1:19:52
and they hate him for it and I just read
1:19:54
that ing and the Netherlands just paid a
1:19:56
seven hundred and seventy five million
1:19:58
euro claim or if a fine to the Europeans
1:20:02
I guess the central bank I know where
1:20:04
this ended to the EU before money
1:20:07
laundering drug money laundering because
1:20:08
they weren't paying close enough
1:20:09
attention to the deposits you see I did
1:20:13
some research on this to figure out how
1:20:16
to do money laundering as a real estate
1:20:17
guy you means some job research turns
1:20:27
out it's a good one it turns out to be a
1:20:29
very good one and you can the reason is
1:20:32
because it's essentially legal
1:20:34
completely legal you do not have
1:20:36
breaking any laws by being a money
1:20:39
launderer if we could want to call him
1:20:41
that if we even assume were correct in
1:20:42
our assumptions which I believe we are
1:20:44
and that is because the restrictions on
1:20:48
banks taken in cash and not reporting it
1:20:52
drug companies and stuff still powdery
1:20:55
as one thing and you have to redo all
1:20:58
these reporting's and for example even
1:20:59
when we make a money transfer if it's if
1:21:01
you I wait way too long it gets over a
1:21:04
certain amount it gets reported to the
1:21:05
IRS you know everything you do in a
1:21:08
banking environment gets reported real
1:21:10
estate no no holds barred there is
1:21:14
nothing and then you can take it some
1:21:16
guy can walk in your office of your real
1:21:18
estate that with cash with cash with a
1:21:19
million dollars in cash and you just put
1:21:23
it into the your account is a
1:21:25
transaction and that's how commerce used
1:21:29
to work it was and it's okay now I don't
1:21:31
care where you get your money from
1:21:32
podcast you know international drug
1:21:35
trade what's the difference I would
1:21:37
think that there's a lot of
1:21:39
opportunities all over the place but the
1:21:41
apparently real estate is the real
1:21:42
winner and can you imagine how just to
1:21:45
add insult to injury these guys also
1:21:48
have to lend to people like Trump a bit
1:21:50
that must really gall them it's like
1:21:53
he's must really gall them it's like
1:21:53
doing this with their money
1:21:56
no wonder they want to screw him so
1:21:58
badly yeah that makes nothing but sense
1:22:01
to me
1:22:02
I love I love looking at the Trump
1:22:05
through that lens it's a very
1:22:07
comfortable feeling feels good money
1:22:09
launderer but and that's the whole
1:22:11
reason for doing these big deals I mean
1:22:13
he obviously got a clue he worked with
1:22:15
some people that knew how to outages and
1:22:17
this when he did Trump Tower as a young
1:22:18
kid and he just coming with you ever
1:22:22
this is gonna cost more than you should
1:22:23
be paying this is how you keep everyone
1:22:25
on your side all the mobsters yeah I
1:22:29
would say that he definitely has in fact
1:22:32
if you saw I don't have a clip of and I
1:22:34
wait I was looking for I couldn't ever
1:22:35
find a good clip of it Lanny Davis
1:22:37
coming out and condemning CNN for
1:22:40
misquoting him I have I have yes I have
1:22:44
Lanny dog will play that clip after the
1:22:46
donation segment cuz I want to comment
1:22:48
on that oh this is have to do with Chuck
1:22:50
Todd's article no oh but I can bring
1:22:53
that in too yeah no I have my comments
1:22:56
different that's good let's get these
1:22:57
guys let's thank these yes let's do
1:23:00
something producers for showed 1066
1:23:06
wasn't 1066 to Norman invasion we could
1:23:09
have made that an issue in it it's okay
1:23:13
anyway we have no associate executive
1:23:18
producers we have for a generous
1:23:20
executive producers Brian Gerard in
1:23:23
Bellevue Washington thank you for your
1:23:27
courage my recent donation is long
1:23:29
overdue the instant night option it
1:23:31
seemed the most appropriate for the
1:23:32
unwinding of the Gordian knot that is
1:23:34
the m5m I would like to be knighted sir
1:23:37
skull and scrotum the Lions sullen
1:23:41
scrote SKR ot spellin scrote what is
1:23:45
scrote dare I ask you know what I don't
1:23:47
want ask I don't want to know that New
1:23:49
Jersey karma New Jersey and a karma
1:23:51
furrow no jingles and a karma for all
1:23:53
here we go
1:23:56
you've got karma so that was $1,000
1:24:01
against the night donations I love to
1:24:02
see that yeah a long time since we had
1:24:05
an instant ight yeah it is actually it's
1:24:07
been a long time we need more and then
1:24:09
we have a mix I got mixed up to me but
1:24:11
Jack swaboda would be next and from
1:24:14
Cupertino California was 666 and he
1:24:17
actually did send an email which I
1:24:19
believe I have yes that's the the mark
1:24:24
of the beast speaking of the beast the
1:24:26
beast shows up when you least expect it
1:24:28
comes in as John's wife hello and
1:24:31
greetings from a no agenda night
1:24:32
Sunday's show was spectacular as always
1:24:34
in the priests dream for unexpected
1:24:37
fruit really
1:24:41
did fruit usually it's just Linux advice
1:24:46
if you check the PayPal donation you'll
1:24:48
find a 333 donation that I'd like to
1:24:50
accredit to Nick to simultaneously lift
1:24:53
his douchebag status and begin his
1:24:54
journey to in a knighthood as always for
1:24:59
the fantastic deconstruction of Maxine
1:25:00
was or say stay woke
1:25:01
this may be a 333 dollar donation
1:25:06
attached and no interesting then why may
1:25:09
mmmm okay that's why it might be out of
1:25:11
sequence I think something in the
1:25:12
spreadsheet doubled it for some reason
1:25:14
as it shouldn't be wrong
1:25:18
something doubled it from 3 3 3 to 666
1:25:22
I think we should be worried you know I
1:25:28
think so too
1:25:30
anyway so we'll give him I will assume
1:25:32
is 3 3 3 because that's what he says
1:25:34
here and does he ask for a jingle or
1:25:39
anything oh he is a mixed by his friend
1:25:42
Nick current douchebag create this
1:25:45
afternoon after a drink maybe so you
1:25:47
will listen to this mix and then if we
1:25:49
send a mix I don't have a mix I have a
1:25:52
mix no agenda and is that for rent oh no
1:25:55
that's not a mix what is it
1:25:57
oh that's hold on that's that's what
1:26:02
that's this one here we go that one I
1:26:10
just received that one today is that
1:26:13
from him from from from him I don't know
1:26:15
I don't remember
1:26:16
there was no long donation note for sure
1:26:20
okay well here I'm gonna play real quick
1:26:22
to myself you got to hold it up to the
1:26:24
microphone I did not get it you're not
1:26:27
gonna hear it anyway no why are you
1:26:28
doing that
1:26:29
no it's something different it's not
1:26:30
it's nothing like that it's it's it's a
1:26:33
song what's the guy what's the guy's
1:26:35
name what's the guy what's the guy's
1:26:36
Strabo de s wo Bo da and you are on the
1:26:42
mailing de s wo Bo da and you are on the
1:26:45
there it is I apologize okay
1:26:50
I download the words that where's the
1:26:52
where's the file
1:26:55
she bit the bottom outlook is not
1:27:00
cooperating bit the bottom outlook is not
1:27:04
I don't know I do not have it's very odd
1:27:07
John but I do not have a 42 you deal
1:27:10
with it later okay I got it
1:27:11
geez sorry
1:27:16
I know he done the files no you what
1:27:19
what what Outlook yeah
1:27:21
use Outlook you know that moly yeah I've
1:27:24
tricked it out to now where did this
1:27:26
thing just go I just put it in here that
1:27:29
out looks fabulous no it's not it's
1:27:31
crappy where did it go out donations
1:27:32
okay when to the donation segment now
1:27:34
here we go okay I finally have it okay
1:27:44
and the show got it it'll be in the end
1:27:47
of show
1:27:49
like we did that ok onward it was Scott
1:27:53
Richardson a happy 54th birthday Adam
1:27:55
Curry he comes he went three hundred
1:27:57
seventy nine dollars and thirty cents it
1:27:59
gives you a happy birthday call a happy
1:28:00
25th of another Adam you should be on
1:28:03
the Meili on the list I'm not sure happy
1:28:05
25th to another Adam my brother Adam
1:28:07
Richardson mhm and then please call out
1:28:10
my friend Forman as a douche bag again
1:28:13
and then give him some dogs are people
1:28:17
to karma you've got karma sir Chris or
1:28:29
Chris Wilson did a happy birthday song
1:28:31
for me but I'll play that end of show
1:28:33
okay good all right now we have last or
1:28:37
last guy sister Daniel Miller who came
1:28:39
in at 3:30 3.33 knee he actually sent in
1:28:42
a very short note with anybody had the
1:28:44
sealing wax on it I love it I love when
1:28:48
I get something with the sealing wax on
1:28:49
it everyone's gathered around the table
1:28:53
i choppers opening mail as look look
1:28:55
sealing wax I popped it open oh yeah I
1:28:58
got one I couldn't pop it open that
1:29:00
easily to rip the paper a little bit and
1:29:01
it stuck to the note on the inside this
1:29:04
value for value is long overdue your
1:29:06
analysis and delivery are truly
1:29:08
outstanding and unmatched and then he
1:29:10
has it in emphasized boldface type in
1:29:14
all the land no agenda has helped my
1:29:18
critical thinking and has undoubtedly
1:29:20
had a positive impact on my career in
1:29:22
general well-being I know that many
1:29:24
other producers feel the same way I
1:29:26
humbly request some jobs coming from my
1:29:29
smoking-hot wife and all producers Amen
1:29:32
fist bump now before you play the thing
1:29:34
he's actually up to enough to grab a
1:29:38
knighthood no I bet no he is a nice got
1:29:42
this thing works
1:29:42
I'm sorry baronet haha I think he didn't
1:29:47
do request baronet upgrading he may be
1:29:49
just waiting cuz he's very short I mean
1:29:52
he's very just very close I'm sorry
1:29:54
close to Baron so maybe he's just
1:29:56
waiting I just want to mention to him
1:29:59
because he's gonna listen to this he
1:30:00
could have been
1:30:01
right now I know what you're doing you
1:30:03
know for just $5 more you could have the
1:30:06
nicer model you know people you know hey
1:30:15
it was really driven by the producers
1:30:18
who wanted these titles beyond
1:30:20
knighthood and I'm very proud of our
1:30:21
system and I'm proud that other people
1:30:23
use that it's the value for value model
1:30:25
and it's true royalty these credits are
1:30:27
real you know there's nothing that says
1:30:29
this there's no magical wall that makes
1:30:31
these two media professionals less
1:30:34
valuable than someone else being an
1:30:36
executive or associate executive
1:30:37
producer in fact once you've been won
1:30:40
you can automatically pass that title on
1:30:41
is that not true
1:30:42
yes if you've been an executive producer
1:30:44
than any production you're involved in
1:30:46
you can hand out titles you could if you
1:30:49
wanted nobody does it we do yes there
1:30:53
you go
1:30:54
so thank you very much to our executive
1:30:56
and associate executive producers we
1:30:57
will thank everybody who came in over
1:30:59
$50 in our second segment and we have a
1:31:02
special show coming up on Sunday as I
1:31:05
will be tomorrow morning the keeper and
1:31:09
I we go to Italy my sister's 25th
1:31:11
wedding anniversary which is Saturday
1:31:13
night we arrive Saturday morning
1:31:14
Saturday night so there's just no one be
1:31:16
able to do any type of good show
1:31:19
and quite honestly think we deserve one
1:31:21
show off but John didn't take off
1:31:24
he actually added to his workload yeah
1:31:27
what you got for us on Sunday
1:31:29
Johnny boy that will taste and I do have
1:31:31
a teaser let me finish the segment first
1:31:33
let me just get out of everything I
1:31:35
thought you were just gonna tease who
1:31:37
you work you and me right - you're right
1:31:40
I messed it up let me thank everybody
1:31:42
and get out and then well then we'll
1:31:43
tease that so
1:31:45
you do want to remember us at Dvorak org
1:31:48
slash and a we got all kinds of nuggets
1:31:52
for you today in our formula including
1:31:54
opponents our formula is this we go out
1:31:57
or hit people in the mouth
1:32:11
all right
1:32:14
so sunday sunday is sunday sunday
1:32:17
special show no rehash no remix no
1:32:23
retake no flash me that nope
1:32:26
brandy and fresh fresh mixes once well
1:32:30
but this will be two interviews that
1:32:32
I've done one with Dane Jasper this CEO
1:32:36
of sonic net talking about Gigabit
1:32:39
Ethernet sonic net talking about Gigabit
1:32:40
now why will this be interesting to
1:32:41
everybody because we have a lot of dudes
1:32:43
named ban and we want to hear from a guy
1:32:45
who is who's actually stringing his own
1:32:47
wires outside of the AT&T infrastructure
1:32:50
and we're gonna talk about gigabit why
1:32:52
he's an independent guy he's like us
1:32:54
he's a part of a separate and
1:32:56
independent of the mainstream yeah
1:32:59
nice so there's a like wires out in
1:33:01
front my house that they these guys came
1:33:03
by these trucks and say Sonic dinette
1:33:04
there's string and wires not wires but
1:33:07
cable but fiber so it's fiber to the
1:33:10
home FDA flavor to the curb fth yeah
1:33:14
yeah ft nice okay that's a dude named
1:33:17
Ben yeah god I'm very interested in that
1:33:19
FTTH got that right ETH yes now on the
1:33:23
other one I have an exclusive interview
1:33:25
with Scott Adams whoo and Scott Wow 25
1:33:31
years I made it a little easier to do
1:33:32
this interview now can we cut the court
1:33:36
the questions you have for Dane into
1:33:37
Scott's answers don't have time for this
1:33:41
I have to have this produced by tonight
1:33:43
oh okay so I could it would be funny but
1:33:47
it wouldn't be that funny
1:33:48
all right but I do have a teaser destroy
1:33:50
the kind of stuff we'll be talking about
1:33:52
with the Scott excellent now you said
1:33:54
you'd known him for 25 years I don't
1:33:56
think people know that yeah yeah why tap
1:33:59
dub now I've been over to his house and
1:34:00
I haven't seen it for at least I get why
1:34:03
he always talks to shooter behind his
1:34:04
back I understand he's uh yeah I'm very
1:34:11
yeah we're good actually I'd say if I
1:34:14
saw him or we'd be pretty good friends
1:34:15
like that'd be nice but he here's an
1:34:21
eight years an example I asked him a
1:34:22
question I said cuz of course he hates
1:34:25
the word Trump apologist we talked about
1:34:27
that a little bit in the
1:34:28
show uh-huh he's not he doesn't vote he
1:34:31
talks about this right not a party he
1:34:33
doesn't care he just likes to analyze
1:34:35
things he just wants to weed to be
1:34:37
legalized oh it it is well in California
1:34:40
yes it is is legalized yeah uh and he I
1:34:46
asked him a question I said this at this
1:34:48
position you've taken which is to you
1:34:51
know talk about Trump as a great
1:34:52
persuader or and he's but smarted
1:34:55
everybody else has this hurt has this
1:34:59
hurt your income or anything at all
1:35:01
whatsoever cuz this is a question I felt
1:35:03
I needed to ask questions I'm sorry for
1:35:07
interrupting your setup it this is the
1:35:09
definition of a great question this is
1:35:11
the question that everybody should be
1:35:13
asking him wherever he goes they never
1:35:15
ask him this ever oh sure yeah no go
1:35:19
ahead sorry nice she stepped on you I
1:35:22
will say that I got out of him at least
1:35:24
three things that I've never heard in
1:35:26
fact I thought too of me ever I wanted
1:35:28
you almost decided never to talk about
1:35:29
but I got it you don't you don't want to
1:35:31
mess with this with Dvorak he's a real
1:35:33
Jesus he's a juice squeezer I'll tell ya
1:35:37
okay we go oh sure yeah probably 40% of
1:35:40
my income he's operated and how many
1:35:43
five percent of my social circle yeah
1:35:46
I'm quite an outcast and my and I I
1:35:49
don't do public speaking anymore because
1:35:51
it's too dangerous
1:35:53
you know I wouldn't feel comfortable if
1:35:56
there was any publicity and you put me
1:35:58
in front of a big crowd right now cuz it
1:36:00
only takes one person to say that guy
1:36:02
said something good about the
1:36:04
president's persuasion skills he must
1:36:06
die so I don't think it's safe to be in
1:36:10
public when people like you are branding
1:36:13
me a Trump apologist
1:36:16
people like you did you bring him that's
1:36:19
funny that's very funny
1:36:20
while he says he's lost 40 percent of
1:36:25
his income that's that's Dilbert
1:36:27
yeah and 75 percent of his social circle
1:36:30
which does I say or you say that's a win
1:36:34
that's not a loss what I would think
1:36:37
you'd win yeah Tina and I'm like hey you
1:36:41
know what's really great we live with
1:36:42
our best friends our only friend yeah
1:36:49
because we're we're best friends we got
1:36:50
some kids that's about saying that the
1:36:52
gun range of meet more friends oh yeah I
1:36:54
got tons of friends there Reds breads
1:36:57
know so that is the kind of interview is
1:36:59
a nice no I can't very excited about
1:37:02
that both very excited it's very good
1:37:04
very good excellent I enjoyed it that is
1:37:08
very nice
1:37:10
okay all right Oh you know we can do
1:37:12
here let me see I think what we probably
1:37:16
should do yes and now it's time for your
1:37:20
sexual harassment we had a full-on
1:37:23
sexual harassment dates but there are
1:37:27
some moves things are happening and
1:37:28
things are going down and we're on top
1:37:31
of it and we start with a very
1:37:33
contrasting report from the CBC in Kanda
1:37:36
Naevia where they're not paying
1:37:38
attention to in particular NBC and CBS
1:37:42
the way we do here the south of their
1:37:44
border but they have some interesting
1:37:47
observations which have only marginally
1:37:50
been discussed here their resignations
1:37:52
were public the backlash Swift but can
1:37:55
men disgraced in the me to movement
1:37:57
returned to the spotlight well this week
1:38:00
we saw some of the first steps towards
1:38:02
comebacks comedian louis c.k returned to
1:38:05
the stage for the first time since he
1:38:07
was accused of masturbating in front of
1:38:10
female legs page six reported that fired
1:38:14
Today Show host Matt Lauer recently told
1:38:16
fans quote I've been busy being a dad
1:38:18
but don't worry I'll be back on TV and
1:38:22
for some time it's been rumored that
1:38:23
former CBS this morning host Charlie
1:38:25
Rose is looking to host a new show where
1:38:29
he interviews men brought down by the
1:38:31
movement how am I ever gonna get back
1:38:42
over my bathrobe for a second how am I
1:38:45
ever gonna get back mmm I have an idea
1:38:50
I'll do a show about my colleagues tell
1:38:53
me about this sexuality it's in your DNA
1:38:57
no ice here bind my bathrobe so I
1:39:01
thought that was pretty interesting
1:39:03
especially the Charley news I didn't
1:39:04
realize that and it'll get on the air
1:39:06
it'll happen
1:39:07
it'll totally help me Matt Lauer Matt
1:39:10
Lauer well it's too early now but he'll
1:39:12
come back this America we love the
1:39:13
comeback kid as long as you eat enough
1:39:16
shit it's not as your nod Cosby
1:39:19
ah you know what if he played his cards
1:39:21
differently he could probably come back
1:39:22
to but he didn't he played is very wrong
1:39:25
very wrong yeah cuz America will just
1:39:28
forgive you brother don't worry about it
1:39:30
and I think Louis see cake he had
1:39:33
already has an excuse for that
1:39:34
masturbation stuff if he had said you
1:39:38
know because it was female comics yeah
1:39:41
he was masturbating who must have been
1:39:44
in front of a female comic and if they
1:39:46
see what he should have said was all I
1:39:48
was read
1:39:49
all I was doing there was reviewing
1:39:52
their set okay alright I'm surprised he
1:40:00
hasn't hired you yet as his attorney big
1:40:04
moves over at CBS this was breaking news
1:40:06
this morning we do have a story that we
1:40:08
should be sharing with people of course
1:40:09
involving CBS a company that of course
1:40:12
there's been no shortage of reporting on
1:40:14
lately what we can tell you this morning
1:40:15
though is that the board of directors of
1:40:17
CBS is deep in settlement talks with the
1:40:20
company CEO Leslie Moonves that would
1:40:22
result in his exit from a company of
1:40:25
course that he has led for a very long
1:40:27
time it would also mean the appointment
1:40:29
of doe I&L oh the current CEO of CBS as
1:40:32
its interim CEO this according to people
1:40:36
who are close to the negotiations
1:40:37
between Moonves and his board now the
1:40:39
talks between Moonves and the board
1:40:41
they've been going on for some time and
1:40:43
they have yet to reach a conclusion
1:40:44
given what appears to be a continued
1:40:47
back and forth about moonves's exit
1:40:50
package while under his contract he's do
1:40:53
as much as 180 million dollars in
1:40:55
severance and a production deal sources
1:40:58
tell me the board right now offering a
1:41:01
package that would be roughly a hundred
1:41:02
million dollars made up almost entirely
1:41:05
though not completely of CBS stock rest
1:41:08
of it being cash but it also wants the
1:41:10
right to claw back some of that
1:41:12
compensation if at the conclusion of an
1:41:14
ongoing investigation into charges of
1:41:16
sexual harassment
1:41:17
Moonves has been found to have committed
1:41:19
other inappropriate acts
1:41:24
yep I like the clawback provision that's
1:41:27
a really good one because if he fights
1:41:29
that uh you hide something huh you don't
1:41:33
want the club back do you and we know
1:41:34
your name right past it
1:41:36
you know the clawbacks these guys like
1:41:38
to do that because these numbers are
1:41:40
outrageous they got a lot of mom thing
1:41:46
there's something going on here with
1:41:49
moon VII and I think it's the only who
1:41:51
does it all seems to me that well hold
1:41:54
on a second it seems to me that once
1:41:57
Laur went down the next thing you know
1:41:59
you have you have these three networks
1:42:01
flower goes down and that damages NBC
1:42:05
and who's behind it we don't know but
1:42:08
the decision is made by somebody either
1:42:10
the same people that took down Lauer or
1:42:12
NBC's people to take down Moonves aa CBS
1:42:17
cuz that's hugely damaging because
1:42:19
Moonves is one of those guys may or may
1:42:21
not be a jerk but he's one of those guys
1:42:23
and actually in the Scott Adams clip or
1:42:25
immunity you're gonna hear a little
1:42:27
discussion of this sort of thing where's
1:42:29
it a character is so important to the
1:42:31
company he's the guy who at some point
1:42:33
or us is know let's not do that let's do
1:42:35
this right and those guys are you know
1:42:37
they look like gentlemen a major players
1:42:39
until after they're gone then ABC gets
1:42:42
dinged by getting Lassiter killed the
1:42:45
same kind of guy well here so I came up
1:42:48
with kind of a simple explanation for
1:42:50
all of this because The Daily Beast has
1:42:52
also been teasing they've got a huge
1:42:54
expose on Weinstein his relationship
1:42:57
with Andy lack the president over there
1:43:00
at NBC News I guess you know dr tucker
1:43:04
carlson is all over this he's dragging
1:43:06
in us Chuck Todd that he must have known
1:43:11
about it they're all covering you know
1:43:12
there's a lot of stuff going on about
1:43:14
you know why they didn't report on it
1:43:17
why they turned Ronan Farrow away and I
1:43:19
think just from a simple perspective
1:43:22
and this is based on other people I've
1:43:24
spoken to about Harvey Weinstein who
1:43:26
know him that and I'll go back to all go
1:43:29
back to what patch anak said he's just
1:43:30
an ugly Jew boy who and this I'm quoting
1:43:33
him he's poach an ex a Jew so I get he
1:43:35
gets to say that but that's what he says
1:43:37
it's just an ugly Jew boy who figured
1:43:39
out that you could get laid and then the
1:43:41
women would gladly screw him to get jobs
1:43:44
and that this network of guys at the top
1:43:47
have been doing this for decades this is
1:43:51
the casting couch I think that's what's
1:43:53
going on and you know you now see Asia
1:43:56
Argento she's read she's now flipped the
1:43:59
whole story about her having paid off
1:44:01
the seventeen-year-old act and now she
1:44:03
says you know she was sexually attacked
1:44:05
by him it's all coming off the rails and
1:44:08
I think totally and I think sadly sadly
1:44:11
what has happened here is you know
1:44:14
through simple Pavlovian response
1:44:17
mechanisms these men who have been at
1:44:20
the top of their game and Trump is the
1:44:22
same way come on this is the grabber by
1:44:24
the pussy crowd it's not just Trump
1:44:26
power is attractive you could be ugly
1:44:31
our president can look pretty ugly at
1:44:33
times I'm sure he's not pretty naked
1:44:35
look what he's getting it's not just
1:44:37
money its power and it's attractive and
1:44:39
people fall for that and I think sadly
1:44:41
what we've seen here is a lot of
1:44:44
accusations and weinstein may get off he
1:44:47
may actually get off scot-free I think
1:44:49
he got enough before guy yes I was
1:44:52
waiting for that
1:44:53
so is maybe they picked the wrong
1:44:56
targets but instead of saying hey this
1:44:57
is war between the networks which it
1:45:00
could be in a way he's going down screw
1:45:02
it I'm taking him down before I go down
1:45:04
I think they're all in it John and if
1:45:06
they unravel that and they get anywhere
1:45:08
deeper in with an ABC they main supply
1:45:10
and some very very ugly stuff that's why
1:45:13
I'm encouraged about this exactly so and
1:45:23
there's a beautiful silver lining to
1:45:26
this for megyn kelly who made this step
1:45:29
from Fox to NBC as seen of course is
1:45:32
traitorous because she went over to the
1:45:34
to the lefty crazy
1:45:36
seaside and she has not found her
1:45:39
footing miraculously they have not fired
1:45:41
her she's got the stupid daytime show
1:45:44
which it was not been working no
1:45:45
traction and all of a sudden the genius
1:45:48
of either Meg I think it's her and I'm
1:45:50
very very I'm very proud she did this
1:45:53
she's decided to take on her own network
1:45:55
to a degree of course but I do have a
1:45:58
clip of her discussing this on her show
1:46:00
as you heard in that report NBC News
1:46:02
says now that quote there was not a
1:46:04
single victim of or witnessed to
1:46:07
misconduct by Weinstein who was willing
1:46:08
to be identified moreover they say Rose
1:46:11
McGowan had refused to name Weinstein
1:46:13
and then her lawyer sent a cease and
1:46:14
desist letter in August 2017 late last
1:46:18
night Rose McGowan and rich McHugh the
1:46:22
former NBC producer both challenged that
1:46:25
assertion telling megyn kelly today that
1:46:28
McGowan did go on the record with NBC in
1:46:31
February 2017 after that on-camera
1:46:34
interview with Farrell and that she did
1:46:36
name Harvey Weinstein as her rapist both
1:46:40
McGowan and rich McHugh say NBC had this
1:46:42
on the record off-camera assertion from
1:46:45
McGowan for eight months long before her
1:46:49
letter sent a cease and desist letter
1:46:50
which McHugh says was communicated to
1:46:53
NBC executives in a statement to megyn
1:46:55
kelly today this morning NBC News
1:46:57
responded as follows quote as the
1:47:00
interview transcript clearly clearly
1:47:01
indicates McGowan did not name Weinstein
1:47:04
as her attacker on camera in Feb you in
1:47:07
the February 2017 interview the first
1:47:09
time Ronan Farrow submitted a draft
1:47:11
script on this story was five months
1:47:13
later on July 23rd 2017 if Farrell had
1:47:18
McGowan on the record but off-camera
1:47:21
before that date and wanted to proceed
1:47:22
with airing the story he did not
1:47:24
indicate that to his editors within days
1:47:27
of that July 23rd draft script being
1:47:28
submitted McGowan canceled the follow-up
1:47:31
on-camera interview and her attorney
1:47:33
sent NBC a cease and desist letter
1:47:34
revoking all permission to use the first
1:47:36
interview it's there's a lot to unpack
1:47:40
yeah but what what we're seeing here is
1:47:45
rich Dynamite she's putting a little a
1:47:47
little and
1:47:48
so hard this is a great career move
1:47:51
megyn kelly you're a genius
1:47:53
oh so hard for me to do my own network
1:47:56
but I'm strong I can do this Ned we're
1:48:00
gonna love it yes interview this
1:48:03
journalistic integrity this is what
1:48:05
press freedom is about it's there's a
1:48:08
lot fired no they can't fire this is why
1:48:12
it's so genius you're gonna fire her
1:48:14
because she questioned your you bide
1:48:17
your time yeah but what what we're
1:48:21
seeing here is rich McHugh who just
1:48:24
resigned from NBC who was Ronan's
1:48:25
producer on this story has now gone
1:48:29
public with his accusations that NBC he
1:48:31
claimed blocked the story NBC vehemently
1:48:33
denying that and and saying they didn't
1:48:37
have anybody they didn't have anybody on
1:48:39
the record who was willing to name him
1:48:41
and Rose McGowan telling us she was on
1:48:44
the record that she was on the record
1:48:46
for months and they didn'