Cover for No Agenda Show 1521: Healthscare System
January 15th, 2023 • 3h 7m

1521: Healthscare System

Transcript

The transcripts of No Agenda are automatically generated and therefore, not fully accurate. Discretion is advised.

Click the text to start playing from that position in the show. Click the timestamp to copy a direct link to that position to your clipboard in order to propagate the formula.

0:00
Hey, guess what?
0:01
Adam curry Jhansi Devora.
0:03
Sunday January 15 2023. This is your award winning combination
0:07
media assassination episode 1521.
0:10
This is no agenda.
0:13
We are classified and broadcasting live from the heart
0:16
of the Texas hill country here in FEMA Region number six in the
0:19
morning, everybody. I'm Adam curry
0:21
and from Northern Silicon Valley, we're all asking the
0:24
question, how do you blow a 27 point lead? I'm John C. Dvorak.
0:30
Buzzkill. Here I was thinking that you'd have a Miss Universe
0:37
opening but no, it's sports.
0:42
Yeah, I was in the Miss Universe things.
0:45
This is your beat. Oh, it
0:47
was never because it was my beat five years ago, and we made a
0:50
decision that we were going to stop it. You that You got sick
0:55
of it?
0:57
Did I really get sick of it? No, I don't think
1:00
so. I don't know. I don't think we've jointly got sick of it.
1:03
But we were sick of it. Family Miss America one. It was the
1:06
same. Of course it was in New Orleans. They always do. That's
1:09
a scam. Where did miss Ukraine come in?
1:14
Not even in the top 20 As far as I know. Well, you don't know
1:17
though. No, I looked at the top five and looked at the top 20
1:20
She wasn't in there. So I don't know what happened.
1:23
She didn't you know, and I know what didn't happen. What didn't
1:27
happen. She didn't do her job.
1:32
there what do we need? I gotta play one on clip for you. This
1:36
just came I didn't see it. Obviously. You know me. I didn't
1:39
see it. This is the owner of the of the pageant. Yeah, well used
1:45
to be Donald Trump. Yes. Now it's an jakirah Juta tip.
1:52
For you to say listen to this
1:54
Miss Universe Organization. From now on is going to be ran by
2:00
women. Owned by a sponsor a woman owned by a trans woman.
2:08
Oh, that's great.
2:11
And everyone goes crazy
2:20
the world has officially gone crazy.
2:23
Is kind of nutty. So, so the freeway is backed up completely.
2:28
It's like, majorly backed
2:30
back to important news. Yes. Okay. The freeway.
2:33
I've never seen this ever. So it's backed up into the fire
2:37
truck. There's a fire truck they had trying to get their unit
2:39
trained going on the soft shoulder to get there. But it
2:42
wasn't a regular fire truck. And I can't imagine what's going on
2:46
at the end of this wreck. Whatever it is. Oh, it was a
2:48
hook and ladder. Yeah. What do you need a hook and ladder? For
2:55
at a traffic wreck? Unless the cars are piled high?
2:59
Maybe it's all they had left? Maybe everything else was on on
3:03
duty?
3:04
I don't think so. This is you know what you need to know what
3:07
you need. I'm going to Okay, when is your birthday? Everybody
3:12
remind me remind me everybody when it's your birthday, I am
3:15
giving you a Bearcat scanner. You might get us America you
3:20
need to sit there by your window and go hey
3:25
you know they actually have a good CHP cited me meal list.
3:30
That's not the point they posted don't No no. You
3:33
want the old school with the lights going? With you put
3:38
crystals in Yes.
3:39
What i Hey, guess what? There is a wreck. There's a wreck there
3:44
on the ad.
3:45
Do you remember the bear county have you had to buy crystals of
3:48
the right frequency and stick them in there? So the frequency?
3:51
Oh, it's the best part is these days. They're all they're all
3:55
encrypted. That's why everyone's going to encryption. And it's
3:58
people are kind of worried about that because now you can't
4:01
listen to what the cops or the or your services are doing. You
4:05
used to be able to just listen.
4:07
Yeah, well you still get it right here on crow they
4:10
encrypting
4:11
everywhere. They are encrypting, it's all digital. I do have some
4:16
important news that I would like to share from boots on the
4:19
ground. And I'm gonna set it up with this short clip
4:22
operations at the FAA and major airlines have returned to
4:25
normal. But the lingering effects of yesterday's outage
4:27
the grounded flights that may take days to recover from more
4:31
than 4500 flights were disrupted today, mostly because of the bad
4:34
weather. More than 12,000 were delayed or canceled on
4:37
Wednesday. The FAA is blaming a damaged database file in a
4:41
system that is nearly 30 years old.
4:43
And of course this resulted in in calls for upgrading the
4:48
system and money for the for the Department of Transportation run
4:51
by Mayor Pete But for 15 years we've been doing this show we
4:56
have held one group of people in very high regard That being sis
5:01
admins, IT administrators, dudes named Ben dudettes named
5:06
Bernadette. And the reason why we've always done that is
5:09
because a they're shit on and every single corporation did it
5:13
no gig. And we know that they truly hold the keys to that. And
5:20
I think maybe for that whole time, we've always said when it
5:23
really comes down to it, it's not going to be the ham radio
5:25
operators, it's going to be the SIS admins who are going to save
5:28
the world or at least save those who who are nice to them. So I
5:34
have confirmed from two sis admins sources known to me and
5:40
no and confirm that they are in the right areas. That the no
5:44
time ground stop was, in fact, a cyber intrusion. The law in the
5:49
US and in Canada,
5:51
I'm glad somebody finally came up with some information. But
5:55
here's what's because it never made the fat finger thing known
5:59
is always suspicious.
6:02
And didn't they immediately come out and say not a cyber
6:04
intrusion?
6:06
That's always suspicious for doing any investigation, come
6:11
out with some statement like that.
6:13
What's What what happened was someone else as a pop the
6:17
system, they were in and they were changing things, but weird
6:21
things like instead of three lights are out one lights out,
6:24
not really big things. And it's confirmed by another source who
6:28
works on infrastructure, no tam input that you know, things were
6:32
quote unquote wonky, like things wouldn't stick or maybe things
6:36
went in wrong. We just inconsistent. So the question
6:40
is, was this someone mucking around just to create some
6:46
confusion and get the desired result of more money and etc?
6:53
Was it someone looking to enter other systems? And no one has an
6:59
explanation as to why all all the Jets were scrambled right
7:03
after that happened and the air borne tankers that there's no
7:07
explanation for that from anyone but everyone, everyone knows
7:10
there's more than just those two possibilities. There's the
7:13
possibility of a goofball.
7:16
Yeah, oh, totally, totally, totally goofball,
7:19
there is a possibility of a bad actor who was just testing the
7:22
system to see how far he could get before it's someone noticed.
7:25
There's, yeah, there's a lot of possibilities. But the one
7:30
possibility obvious was the bad actor that had that required the
7:34
scrambling of jets, but the fact that the media now we we just
7:39
this is just secondhand information for us, but it makes
7:42
more sense than the stories we've been given. Absolute,
7:46
especially with the jets flying around. Yeah,
7:48
that's that's the part that's very odd. And, you know, as if
7:54
they were, I think the quote is, they probably had eyes on
7:58
someone, I don't know what that means. Don't know what that
8:02
means. So that's it. Your your government lies to you once
8:08
again. Of course,
8:09
it's kind of pathetic how much they do that.
8:13
It really is.
8:15
So I have talking about lying. I have a welcome to the show. I
8:20
have about, I have a lot of clips on this Biden thing with
8:24
these different these different perspectives on on what's really
8:28
going on, and I have two or three different perspectives
8:31
than the one we came up with. And I'd like to if you want to
8:34
discuss it now.
8:36
Let's go for it. I mean, we've had the real news, which was
8:39
cyber intrusion in our federal aviation airspace systems. Don't
8:44
No, no. News Media concentrate on this. It's the prep time take
8:49
down with the President.
8:50
It or it's not. I've heard I've heard. The other thing is we
8:56
could talk more about the other if you want it, you but we don't
8:58
have any information. Oh, no, no,
8:59
no, no, I meant the mainstream media is all over this.
9:03
Oh, no, they won't touch the other thing, because it might,
9:06
it might. I don't know
9:09
that someone might find out what the truth is,
9:11
they might find out what's going on and have a can of that. So we
9:15
can only deconstruct what we have in front of us. So let's
9:17
start with the thesis that you brought forth, which is that the
9:21
thing was an OP that started with Trump. They find his docs
9:26
and then it was just trying to get rid of Joe. And then I don't
9:30
have any clips from this. But I mentioned Tucker Carlson's
9:33
thesis, which is this very similar to yours, except it
9:36
began with he doesn't have the elaboration where Trump's
9:41
discovery has anything to do with it. Right. But he felt that
9:45
today that Biden said, I'm going to run for reelection. They went
9:52
after him for that. This is what I've heard as well. Okay, well,
9:56
that's that Tucker's The one is promoting that the most, but
9:59
let's go to Italy. II Smith and Lee Smith. We had Lee Smith
10:06
clips on before least miss the guy who wrote the book The plot
10:10
against Trump. He's right, right, right. And he does a
10:14
bunch of he's, he's really good at his analysis, and he comes up
10:17
with something that is different. And then I have
10:21
another one that's different than that. But let's start with
10:24
Lee. And if Scott unfortunately spelled it smoth,
10:28
it happens to the best of us. Distracted by the scanner,
10:33
and then every one of them is of course, they just copy the other
10:36
one, I found him. So let's go at least Smith on Biden Doc's one.
10:40
And earlier
10:40
today, I spoke with Lee Smith for his analysis, Smith wrote
10:44
the book, the plot against the president, and as host of the
10:47
show over the target on Epic TV, we start with recent allegations
10:52
that these documents could have been planted as a way to
10:55
undermine Biden, Lee Smith, welcome to our show. Thanks so
10:58
much for joining us. Now, some say the revelation of classified
11:01
documents in Biden's personal possession may be a way to
11:04
thwart any chances of the president running again. How do
11:08
you see it?
11:08
Yeah, I don't think so. The way that I don't think it's an
11:13
internal Democratic National Committee coup, I think rather
11:17
it's a cover up. I mean, first of all the the media aligned
11:21
with the party. If you watch MSNBC, CNN, you see that
11:26
everyone on there is very supportive of Biden. They're all
11:29
comparing it to how bad Trump is. So there's no one who's
11:33
coming out for there's no one who's coming out against Biden.
11:37
And this is not the way that Democrats would it's not an
11:40
issue that Democrats would use, right? Classified information
11:43
doesn't matter to them. And that's why, you know, that's why
11:45
there was no problem with Hillary Clinton's candidacy in
11:48
2016. They would use another instrument to bring down Joe
11:52
Biden if they were trying to bring down Joe Biden, and I
11:55
don't believe they are.
11:56
Okay. Is this empty? He, by the way, I'm just curious. Yeah.
12:01
Because someone's visit.
12:02
Oh, they only bring him on NTD. I don't know why no one else had
12:06
ever talk to the guy
12:07
because we have something good here.
12:11
And TD, just
12:13
mixing it up a bit for you.
12:16
Let's go to
12:17
the DOJ is investigating Trump for something that Biden may
12:20
also have done. So what do you think the way the department is
12:23
handling Biden's case?
12:25
i The special counsel who was appointed Robert her. I mean,
12:30
this is this is an aspect of the cover up. I mean, the man is
12:34
presumably identifies as a Republican, but he's an anti
12:38
Trump Republican. Right. He was a protege of rod Rosenstein rod
12:42
Rosenstein was the Deputy Attorney General who said he was
12:46
going to who said he was willing to wear a wire to spy on Trump.
12:51
That's what an internal coup looks like. When the Deputy
12:54
Attorney General says I'm going I'll wear a wire to spy on the
12:58
President of the United States. What's happening with Biden does
13:01
not look like an internal coup. When they appointed guy who is a
13:05
who is against Trump, and sides with the establishment Deep
13:11
State however we want to put it that's moving toward a cover up.
13:15
And this is what this is what my sources on Capitol Hill had been
13:20
telling me. And I think they're 100%. Correct.
13:24
What a cover up.
13:27
Yeah, this is the problem I have with this because he never, no,
13:31
another guy comes on a different show. And I think that cover up.
13:35
When you hear the clip that's going to finalize these clips
13:39
you're going to take well, maybe because the possibility existed
13:44
this whole thing is you use the term a few times on the show,
13:47
but we've never really explained limited
13:49
hands. Oh, goodness, I hate that term. Yeah, because it's a made
13:55
up term.
13:56
I don't like it either. But I there was a guy that said some
13:59
one of these guys out there talking about vaccines. And he
14:04
he described limited hangout. Do you want it? Do you not have a
14:08
good definition for it that you can tell the people? Well,
14:10
from what I understand it was during the Nixon era, and they
14:14
were talking about letting some guy leak out a little bit of
14:17
information in regard to Watergate. And Nixon apparently
14:21
said, so it's like, limited. He's hanging out in a limited
14:24
way. And no one ever said in that conversation, as far as
14:27
I've seen transcripts. Oh, it's a limited hangout. But no one
14:32
I've ever encountered an intelligence has ever used that.
14:36
It's Whitney Webb. She's the one who keeps you know, keeps using
14:41
that term.
14:42
Well, you just said that no one intelligence ever used it. And
14:45
then you said Whitney Webb, what are you talking about? Oh,
14:47
nice one. Good one. You're so slick. You're so sweet. Love it.
14:54
So a limited hangout is the idea that you can solve. I think it's
14:58
just a version of false flag. but not a false flag and in it
15:03
false flag in a public relations way. In other words, you put
15:06
something out there and you make it look great, what this what is
15:08
good. And the limited hangout is being used in terms of the by
15:13
Vaillant vaccine causing strokes. The idea is that it's
15:17
going to be a limited, you're gonna push this little narrative
15:20
out there about the strokes and this and they're gonna say, oh,
15:23
okay, well, we're gonna just take this by valen off the
15:25
market, you leave all the other vaccines out there, and you
15:27
don't look into anything else.
15:29
I call that a strategy in crisis. I don't think it's a
15:33
limited hangout.
15:34
I know, I would call it anything else. But I'm just saying it's
15:37
gonna it's gonna start showing up because it's, I don't like
15:40
it. I don't like it. I don't like it either. I didn't like it
15:43
the first time I heard it. But I'm just saying it's possible
15:46
that this, that this is what this is going on here. Which is
15:49
a phony baloney deal. But let's go to step three.
15:53
And the Justice Department found out about these documents about
15:56
a week before the midterms, but we're only just learning about
15:58
it. Now. Why do you think that is?
16:01
I think it's not just about the elections. I think it's I assume
16:05
it's something much more serious. Because, you know,
16:08
they've been they've been holding on to this. That's not
16:14
like it just came out after the election. Right. They said they
16:17
found the documents November 2. And look, that story is in
16:22
itself improbable. Right? Because look at what you have to
16:25
believe about the story, you have to believe about the story
16:27
either, every other time that Joe Biden's belongings moved.
16:33
Right, the lawyers missed it? Or do you have to believe that this
16:36
time is the time that lawyers went through his belongings? And
16:39
normally, it was staffers who didn't know what classified
16:41
would classifications on documents look like. So the
16:45
story is highly improbable. And remember, these documents have
16:48
been moved at least twice, once out of the White House and to an
16:51
interim space, and then a second time to the Penn Biden center.
16:55
Because remember, Penn Biden Center did not open up till
16:58
2018. So between January 2017, and 2018, these documents were
17:04
somewhere else, we have no insight yet as to where they
17:06
are. So but they'd been moved twice. And it appears this was
17:11
in preparation to move them a third time. So again, the idea
17:14
that the lawyers that Biden's lawyer somehow just noticed
17:17
this, that doesn't make sense.
17:24
Okay, so that was interesting. And so it really brings a lot of
17:27
doubts for let's go with the last of these clips.
17:31
There's a CNN piece today saying, talking about again,
17:35
it's more of the press cover up, the CNN piece is going on about
17:38
oh, it was very chaotic. And as Joe Biden was leaving the White
17:41
House in January 2017, they never knew who is what was going
17:45
into the boxes and the belongings. It was just chaotic.
17:48
And so it's just meant to cover up for what's going on with Joe
17:50
Biden. So you're telling me that the aids the aids at that time
17:55
packed it up, but now they've got the professionals in there.
17:58
And since when the lawyers go through belongings, the story
18:03
doesn't make sense, right? People are right. The people who
18:07
are saying they wonder if it's a coup or they're not right that
18:10
it's a coup, but they are right to say that the story does not
18:14
make sense the way it's being told and that's why I believe
18:17
there is something there there whatever is in these documents
18:23
or whatever the backstory behind it is likely to be extremely
18:26
damaging and that's why it's a cover up not a coup
18:31
ha So covering every cover up for what
18:35
for for Ukraine is the only thing that can come to mind has
18:38
to be a cover on crane
18:40
Yeah, well there's a cover up that comes up which is the way
18:43
it would be a good because they keep if you notice that was used
18:46
Ukraine Ukraine Ukraine even Tucker does that as though this
18:49
is some of Ukraine things got something to do with the kid who
18:52
knows what it could be a cover up for something even more
18:55
sinister. At least that's the theory bitch by this guy. This
19:01
guy's Phil Philip Klein, you used to be a Kansas Attorney
19:04
General and he was on one of these shows he was on bond. Gino
19:07
show. Yeah, but I kept by Gino out of this. Just have field
19:14
going on about this. Listen to this.
19:18
And when you look at the special counsel as it relates to
19:21
President Biden, they have a very narrow authority according
19:24
to the appointment letter, only to look at the documents. Now
19:28
let's take a look at it for a second Dan. What Attorney
19:31
General garland knew when he made this decision. He knew that
19:35
the documents were found at the Penn Biden Center. He knew that
19:38
the pin Biden center when they located at the University of
19:41
Pennsylvania that the University of Pennsylvania received $47
19:45
million. While that center was there, that the University of
19:49
Pennsylvania push that money to Biden and 10 of his Cabinet
19:53
members receive salary up to 10 at the Penn Biden center,
19:57
including Mr. Biden a additionally, at the same time
20:01
Hunter is on the Burisma. Board, the documents pertain to
20:04
Ukraine. And that would be of interest to those who are
20:08
concerned about Hunter Biden and who he's dealing with, and those
20:13
who are paying his salary. So you have some evidence of intent
20:18
as to why the documents should be there. And that evidence of
20:22
intent relates to the flow of money. There's something else
20:26
that Attorney General garland knew, he knew that he had
20:29
received a letter from the University of Pennsylvania,
20:32
asking that he end the China initiative of the Department of
20:36
Justice, which is looking at economic espionage by China.
20:40
Now, you have to understand that 50% of the most wanted list on
20:46
the FBI fugitive list relate to espionage by China, he ended it
20:52
at the request of the University of Pennsylvania, that is a
20:55
conflict of interest, yet he only gave the special prosecutor
21:00
a very narrow focus, while President Trump's special
21:03
prosecutor can look at everything.
21:07
I have some new thinking on this. I'm all ears. How about
21:12
simpler, simpler? Everything is is about the power and politics
21:20
it was I'm just gonna, it's hard because I love the cover up. I
21:24
love the China. I love the I love. I want it to be that when
21:29
we see the documents, but what if the Democrat Party can't
21:36
convince Michelle Obama to run they know that they have Newsom
21:39
on deck? They know they can't be Kamala Harris. They're very
21:44
worried about DeSantis, who now has big money billionaires
21:50
behind him Wall Street basically positioning themselves behind
21:54
DeSantis. They actually can't indict Trump, because they need
22:00
him to run they need him to run. He can't be taken off the
22:04
playing field because they feel that DeSantis will be stronger.
22:08
And and what will this this will come down to a sputtering of
22:14
well, you know what? We have to keep justice equal on both
22:17
sides. No one gets prosecuted, but let's not do that again.
22:24
Let's not do what again,
22:26
let's not, you know, you, let's be clear about classified
22:30
documents, you can't take them home, etc. Just we can't if
22:33
we're not going to prosecute Biden, we can't prosecute Trump,
22:36
and we won't want to prosecute Trump because key has to run.
22:44
Well, I don't like it. From the basis of the fact that you used
22:49
to always thought that Michelle Obama was Obama was in play.
22:53
I've never believed that. I
22:54
still think she's in play. I'm just giving you a scenario. I'm
22:56
not saying that. Yeah, I
22:58
like the Chinese scenario the best because this is the best
23:01
way to cover it anything going on this suspicious? I didn't
23:04
know that they garlin has pulled the plug on going after the
23:08
Chinese espionage, which was a big deal. When you had Pompeo
23:13
and people like that floating around. I'm just very suspicious
23:16
of this university of Penn Biden Center. This is getting tased
23:20
Pennsylvania
23:21
Hello, guys in New Jersey. New Jersey people know it's no good
23:27
but
23:27
this brought me to a series of super cuts which I think are
23:31
worth playing even though it's anti climactic in some way been
23:36
Gino had a super cut of the of the not a super cut, but I'd
23:41
call it mini cut of when Trump was first discovered with the
23:46
with the documents. And I just got a kick out of it. This is
23:49
the short super cut over Trump classified documents clip, this
23:54
classic picture of
23:55
the walls closing in
23:57
why in the world? Would he need to have these kinds of sensitive
24:00
documents in Florida or really anywhere?
24:02
So you're not above the law, you're not in the lead? You're
24:05
not untouchable? And so it's nice to see that the
24:07
rule of law has returned. My top level expert legal analysis of
24:13
the affidavit is why this dude in jail
24:17
in many ways, it feels like the walls are closing in on Donald
24:20
Trump.
24:21
Right? No, that's immediate for you. So so that brought me to I
24:26
have no hate to go into classics. But I have to that I
24:31
just have to fake as there's something about his walls
24:34
closing in. It began right after he got elected in 2017.
24:40
recollected this super cut in 2017. Mind you of the walls
24:46
closing and I want to play this the 2017 bombshell walls medley
24:50
BREAKING NEWS
24:51
A bombshell today is a turning point today was historically bad
24:55
for President Trump today was a turning point a turning point
24:59
we're at a turning point here At the beginning of the end for the
25:02
Trump presidency,
25:03
we have another bombshell Mike
25:04
Pence might have to assume the office of the presidency
25:07
rumblings
25:08
of the word impeachment breaking news of the bombshell out of the
25:11
White House.
25:11
I believe this is the beginning of the end. I did say
25:14
that it's really the beginning of the end he may be feeling the
25:16
walls closing in on him all the walls closing in on him and
25:19
walls closing in on him. Breaking news a new bombshell
25:22
one astrologer
25:23
says this means the beginning of the end for President Donald
25:26
Trump, Trump will resign Trump is going to resign. Is this
25:29
the tipping point? I know we've said it over and over. You think
25:32
this is a tipping point and over and over this tipping point and
25:36
over and over breaking news President
25:38
Trump off the rails. It was the beginning of the end today is
25:40
the beginning
25:41
of the end. Breaking news tonight. New
25:43
bombshells is the beginning, not the end,
25:45
the beginning of the end of walls are closing in the walls
25:48
closing and closing it breaking overnight. bombshells is
25:52
a very dramatic day and I think it might be near a tipping point
25:54
of using this as a tipping point.
25:56
December 1 2017. You
25:58
can mark it down. This is the day that everything changed the
26:01
beginning
26:01
of the end, beginning of the
26:03
end, the beginning of the end of the beginning of
26:05
the end of the beginning of the year. We begin tonight with a
26:07
bombshell Donald Trump has a lot of trouble.
26:09
Trump is in trouble. The President will resign another
26:11
hour and this is a tipping point Trump's going down this
26:15
president could be impeached
26:17
resignation resignation.
26:18
I don't think this President is going to serve out his term. Mr.
26:21
Trump will not serve out his term. He will not serve out his
26:24
term. No way. No How breaking
26:26
news and absolute bombs Donald Trump is not he's done. And it's
26:30
over. It's over
26:31
walls closing in walls closing
26:33
in this is going to be the Achilles heel breaking news
26:36
tonight. I expect Trump to depart
26:38
this week will be the watershed week Trump is in big trouble.
26:41
Trouble. It's a sign of a terrified old man who feels the
26:44
walls close again. The walls are increasingly closing in on him
26:48
tonight the walls are closing in a day changed everything. This
26:51
is the beginning of the end day the biggest tipping point for
26:54
the Trump administration. What
26:55
a historic day, the bombshells he's
26:57
underwater. He feels
26:58
the walls closing in earning fight. We may be at a tipping
27:01
point. It's
27:02
the beginning of the end. It's the beginning of the end.
27:04
Another bombshell bombshell
27:05
bombshell bombshell bombshell, bombshell bombshell,
27:08
this is a bombshell.
27:10
Oh man that gives me flashbacks. How was so annoying that period
27:15
and way go to I got one more bombs. How do we go from 2017 to
27:23
2018? And here's another super clip these are the same
27:27
boneheads that they're feeding the public this crap no wonder
27:31
this guy. I mean, years and years of this but this is just
27:35
too early in his in his before 2020 is 2018 play these.
27:39
Why do you think these attacks are becoming so much more
27:42
frequent now?
27:44
It's not surprising that Donald Trump is increasing his attacks.
27:47
The walls are closing in on him feels like
27:50
the walls are closing in on the White House. It feels as if the
27:54
walls are closing in here that
27:56
I think the walls of Justice are closing in on President Trump
28:00
increasingly desperate feeling like the walls are closing in
28:03
the president. Clearly feel all the walls closing in on him in
28:08
terms of the Russia investigation. The walls are
28:09
closing. I think at this point the walls
28:12
are spinning. It does feel like the walls are closing in but
28:14
seeing that the administration at this point can start to see
28:17
the walls closing in the fields
28:19
the walls closing in on him everybody he talks to says the
28:22
walls are closing in
28:24
this is another potential wall closing
28:26
it
28:26
this President is feeling the walls are closing in
28:29
walls meanwhile are closing in on the President of the United
28:32
States.
28:32
I think he's feeling the Russia investigation. I
28:34
think he's filling the wheels. The walls closing in on him.
28:37
Vicki knows
28:38
that the walls are closing in the walls
28:40
may be closing in higher up at the White House President
28:43
apparently believes that the walls are closing in on him
28:45
these walls are closing in on the President right now to
28:48
Donald Trump feels the walls closing in that feeling like
28:50
the walls are closing in around? Yes, it
28:52
doesn't seem like the walls could be closing in on this
28:56
president
28:56
feels like we are finally at a tipping
28:58
point the walls are closing in on President Trump feels
29:01
like the presidency in the White House of the walls are closing
29:04
in around him and that's
29:05
why there's this sense of the walls closing and as it appears
29:08
the walls are closing in. In terms of the Muller
29:12
investigation. The walls are closing in. The walls are
29:15
closing and I do feel that he feels the walls closing in on
29:19
him legal walls are closing in on Donald Trump tonight. From a
29:22
democratic perspective. This is the President feels like the
29:24
walls are closing and it feels the walls are closing in any
29:27
indication
29:28
that legally speaking, the rise of closing in
29:30
on the President feel some of the walls closing in on him he
29:33
actually closed on President Trump and the walls are closing
29:37
in in the present. Okay, so what what this really proves in this
29:41
context is that the mainstream media had very clear talking
29:45
points in these years. But they don't seem to have any real a
29:50
coherent talking points right now. Let me just play something
29:54
this is casey RW, leftist media up in your neck of the woods
30:00
There are differences between what we know about Donald
30:04
Trump's mishandling of classified information and what
30:06
we know about Joe Biden's mishandling of classified
30:08
information. But there's also a whole lot we don't know about
30:11
the Joe Biden side. So I want to come back to that. But first,
30:16
legally speaking, done. Donald Trump is in jeopardy under two
30:21
issues, the mishandling part and the obstruction part. We don't
30:25
have any evidence right now of sort of that obstruction side
30:29
for Joe Biden. So in that sense, that's one difference. But on
30:33
the mishandling of classified information, actually, the two
30:37
are looking more and more similar, frankly. And I have to
30:42
say, you know, I don't think the White House has handled this.
30:44
Well, I don't think they've been forthcoming. The fact that they
30:48
found these documents, and rather turn them over to the
30:53
National Archives at least six days before the midterm
30:56
elections when they were hammering Donald Trump over the
30:59
mishandling of documents, and didn't want to mention that to
31:02
the American people, I think politically, not legally, is
31:06
telling. And the fact that then two months later, they're
31:10
finding more documents in the garage of his house. Not great
31:14
Bob. And I just, they've lost a lot of credibility here. But
31:19
I'll tell you about the best week in Washington, Merrick
31:22
Garland. Congratulations, Mr. Attorney General, you had a
31:25
really hard decision on your plate. And it just got a lot
31:28
easier because I don't see a world in which these
31:31
distinctions will have a big enough legal difference, where
31:36
he'll really at this point move forward with one versus the
31:40
other. And frankly, he's not going to move forward with
31:42
either
31:44
kind of kind of sets up the theory I spoke about, I know you
31:47
don't like that could be a talking point. It sounds like
31:52
Kareem Abdul Jabbar, John Pierre Van Damme. Here's a mini cut.
31:57
He said he takes classified documents and information
32:00
seriously, he takes classified documents very seriously. He
32:03
takes classified information and materials seriously. He takes
32:07
classified documents and information very seriously. He
32:11
takes this very seriously. He takes this very seriously. The
32:14
president takes this very seriously. The president takes
32:16
this very seriously. The President takes very seriously
32:19
very seriously, very seriously very, very seriously.
32:23
So I think they're trying to say that's the difference. Now,
32:26
Trump's a baboon doesn't take it seriously. And this President
32:30
takes it seriously.
32:35
Yeah. Well, they're definitely saying he's takes it seriously.
32:42
I thought it was fun to hear the
32:44
good supercut by the way,
32:46
so many cut. This is Hakeem Jeffries, who at one point was
32:53
almost neck and neck with Kevin McCarthy to be the speaker of
32:57
the house. So he's the minority leader for the Democrats in the
33:00
House of Representatives. This is this guy may be dumb. I'm not
33:05
sure. But I think
33:06
he you know, that's funny. You mentioned it, because he's not
33:09
Nancy Pelosi is conniving. And he is. I think he might be dumb.
33:16
On declassified documents, we've learned the President was
33:19
informed of the initial classified documents on the same
33:21
day they were found more than two months ago. Are you
33:24
concerned the White House didn't disclose this sooner?
33:26
I have full faith and credit in President Biden believe that
33:31
doing everything Yeah. To take the
33:35
steps. Don't you have full faith and credit like a bank or
33:38
something? The full
33:39
faith and credit of which we I'm sure we'll be talking about
33:42
today is typically regarding the that we pay our bills, and that
33:47
the dollar is solid and stable? Yeah,
33:50
what's it got to do with a person? Hey,
33:53
man, the guy's dumb
33:54
President Biden, believe that he's doing everything to take
34:00
the appropriate steps to determine what happened, and how
34:04
to move forward in a responsible fashion take seriously. And I'm
34:08
confident that he will continue to do so what does
34:10
it say to you that documents have been found at another
34:12
patient?
34:14
Again, I haven't been briefed on the full set of facts in this
34:17
regard. But I have full faith in President Joe Biden.
34:22
Isn't that interesting? Full Faith is the kind of the full
34:25
faith for faith and credit. I mean, what did what is going on
34:28
with this guy? I don't. He's not read in whatever's going on. He
34:33
doesn't know. Oh, that's
34:35
a good point. Yes. Obvious. He's not read in the somebody. They
34:40
don't trust him.
34:41
I have a CBS report about the special counsel and see if it's
34:47
if it's any good
34:47
today, Attorney General Merrick Garland tapped Robert her a
34:51
veteran prosecutor who served under former President Trump to
34:54
investigate the possible unauthorized removal and
34:57
retention of classified documents.
34:59
So you say he's an anti Trumper
35:02
I never said it was an anti Trump er it was said by the by
35:06
both the lease myth and the and the Ag from the Kansas they both
35:11
say he's anti Trump. Okay. The President's
35:13
stunning announcement came just hours after the White House
35:16
admitted that a small number of classified documents had been
35:18
found in the garage small number, Biden's Wilmington
35:22
residents and in a room next door.
35:25
Mind you, this is CBS and these are these are the ones that
35:27
discovered all of these troves Biden material. Next year,
35:31
Corvette,
35:32
President Biden was asked about it this morning.
35:35
So the material was in a locked garage. Yes, as well as my
35:38
Corvette.
35:41
This is I'm gonna go back to elder abuse now, because they're
35:45
letting this poor guy hang out in the wind so much now it's
35:49
it's pathetic, of what you can go to any crisis management
35:55
firm. The last thing they will say is, hey, it was safe man
35:57
because it was next my Corvette, by the way, a gasoline burning
36:02
earth shattering Corvette.
36:05
Yeah, that thing probably that bet he has probably gets about
36:08
14 miles to the gallon at the best
36:10
Yes, as well as my Corvette. But as I said earlier this week,
36:15
people know I take classified documents of classified material
36:19
serious
36:19
serious. The latest revelation follows Monday's admission by
36:22
the White House after questioning by CBS News that Mr.
36:25
Biden's lawyers had found 10 classified documents in this
36:29
building roughly a mile from the White House, where Biden once
36:32
had an office.
36:33
That office was not authorized for storage of classified
36:36
documents.
36:37
Less than two weeks later on November 14, the Justice
36:40
Department started its preliminary review on December
36:43
20. President Biden's lawyers found the additional classified
36:46
materials at his Wilmington home. His lawyers also searched
36:50
his Delaware vacation house. They said no classified records
36:54
were found there. I find
36:55
it odd that the lawyers are searching his house. I've had
37:00
lawyers, no lawyer is going to come to my house. I just
37:02
searched around for anything. That's
37:05
former National Security Official Javed Ali says the
37:08
matter brings up serious questions about how Mr. Biden
37:11
and his team handled classified material.
37:14
But as a former intelligence professional, you're we were all
37:17
indoctrinated to never leave our offices with any classified
37:21
material whatsoever. And that's the whole point of the worst.
37:24
Garland has now appointed to special counsels in two months
37:28
to investigate the handling of sensitive materials by the
37:31
sitting president and former President Trump who had over 300
37:35
classified documents at his Mar a Lago with state. Today House
37:38
Speaker Kevin McCarthy questioned Biden's transparency.
37:42
They knew this has happened to President Biden before the
37:45
election, but they kept it a secret from the American public.
37:48
Now we find another location that it's at.
37:51
Yeah, that that obviously is kind of lame that they knew
37:55
about this, just before the midterm election, and they
37:58
clearly covered that up. Here's a here's a question that Tina
38:03
asked me this night. I didn't have an answer. She said, Where
38:07
are classified documents stored? Are they not stored digitally?
38:10
Are these just things that are done on a typewriter with carbon
38:14
carbon paper? I mean, who where are these things stored?
38:19
Well, they're supposed to be stored in a skiff.
38:23
Now that's where you can view them. You can view them in the
38:26
skiff. Okay. What? River? What server? Are they on? Where the
38:29
who's in charge of that? I mean, are they in?
38:33
Need, we have dude's name
38:35
keys in order to open up the classified documents. You know,
38:41
this whole thing could be one big joke. Classified. They're
38:47
stored somewhere. They're printed out. He prints them out,
38:52
takes them home. Can anyone print them out? Can you only
38:54
print them out in the skiff? So then he would have done that in
38:57
the school. I mean, these are all questions that will never be
39:00
answered.
39:01
No, because nobody's gonna look into that there's something else
39:04
going on. Yeah, that's why I'm kind of in with Lee Smith is
39:07
something there's something wrong with the entire narrative.
39:11
And there's something that we're not we're not finding out and no
39:13
one seems to be interested in finding it out to just say
39:16
whatever. Whatever. John Pierre Claude down, tells him to play
39:20
including including the sea faces seriously, man.
39:23
I mean, really, all everyone is doing is just the outrage. No
39:27
one's actually doing any investigative reporting. You
39:30
know, these guys had an opinion. I like that had a different
39:34
opinion. The guys you played but no one seems to be taking him
39:39
seriously at all.
39:45
I'm just baffled as
39:46
you are. I see you have a clip. And it's an ask Adam. I'd like
39:50
to handle this right now because it's it's relevant to the full
39:54
faith and credit of the United States of America. And this is
39:57
the the debt limit. with Janet Yellen came out and said, Boy,
40:03
oh, boy, boy, we got to raise the debt limit because we're
40:07
going to reach it by Thursday. And if we don't reach, if we
40:10
don't raise the debt limit by Thursday, then we're gonna have
40:13
to start cutting things left and right. So the full faith and
40:17
credit of the United States will still be good. So we can play,
40:20
pay our debts. And it never ceases to amaze me how clueless
40:25
people are in the United States about this. They say, it's
40:29
unAmerican not to raise the debt limit. I mean, it's, it's what
40:34
we do, and now stands at, I think, $31.6 trillion.
40:41
And it's just ridiculous. And,
40:45
you know, they would have to raise and see if I explained
40:48
this correctly. So the shortfall that we have from our tax
40:53
revenue, which I think the tax revenue that comes in is
40:57
probably just paying off the interest at this point. So we
41:00
have to create more money. And the way we do that is the
41:03
Federal Reserve gets to go ahead, hey, we want to borrow
41:06
some more money. And then they create it. And we have to pay
41:09
that back. So it gets added to the to the to the the debt
41:14
limit. And of course, with the higher interest rates, it's all
41:18
going to it could potentially spiral out of control. Maybe
41:23
it's already spiraling out of control. So you haven't asked
41:28
Adam about this?
41:29
Yeah. As as as going to ask you what do you think the current
41:32
debt limit they want what they want to set the new debt limit
41:35
at?
41:37
Play the jingle? Sorry? You've confused? I don't even know what
41:43
my ask Adam is anymore. All right. I do not know the answer
41:49
to this. But the last time they raise it, I think two or $3
41:53
trillion. I'm just going to guess seeing as inflation is
41:58
probably probably really a 10% average, that they would have to
42:04
raise it by $3 trillion. I don't know why I'm coming up with that
42:08
number just feels right.
42:10
Well, here's the here's the answer.
42:12
Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen warned Congress that the federal
42:15
government will hit its debt limit next Thursday. After that
42:19
date, Yellen said the Treasury will take what she called
42:22
extraordinary measures to shift funds around and prevent a
42:25
national default. In turn, the White House urged Congress to
42:28
quickly raise the limit. Now set it $31.4 trillion.
42:35
So what are they raising it to?
42:37
They never said
42:39
this is this is a bogus Adam. I'm glad I didn't find the
42:43
jingles. It's okay. I'm going to give you the answer. That how we
42:48
solve this this is this is the same every single since we're
42:51
doing the show. How many times have we heard time to raise the
42:54
debt limit? How many?
42:56
More than once a year? Hmm, no, no, no. Yes. No. More than one?
43:02
Yes, yes. But when?
43:03
Okay. I'm sorry, how many times we heard there was a crisis, a
43:06
political crisis? And one party said, No, we don't want to raise
43:11
it
43:12
more than once a year. I this is not a one time deal. No, I just
43:18
happened.
43:18
The political crisis. When it really comes down. It's always
43:22
when Republicans are running the show. That's when the media goes
43:26
and makes a big deal about it. That's we've never we only
43:29
handle one
43:30
idea. That's a good point. So in the Democrats running things,
43:33
yeah. Because there's taking a point now, right, because the
43:36
Republicans just took over. We didn't hear this last year.
43:39
No. And the answer is always the same. And I have it here. In
43:46
this case, it's from let me see, it's from Forbes and I'm not
43:54
going to tell you what Forbes said. But they gave the same
43:58
solution they give every single time the Republicans are at bat
44:02
and can stop the raising of the debt limit. And we play the same
44:07
clip every single time it happens from The Simpsons, and
44:10
1945. The people of Europe have struggled to rebuild following
44:14
the war. Saddam Simpson
44:18
believes this crisis President Truman promised really, American
44:22
tax dollars
44:23
will help our allies who fought so poorly and surrendered so
44:27
readily.
44:30
make good on this drunken post drum unauthorized the one time
44:34
printing of the largest denomination currency ever a
44:37
trillion dollar bill. trillion dollar bill spicy meatball
44:48
and here it is forms the trillion dollar coin and other
44:51
long shot debt crisis solutions. Richard McGehee who wrote this
44:56
shame on you douchebag I can't believe If they do this every
45:01
single time, the President could fix it by minting a trillion
45:04
dollar platinum coin and deposit that with the Federal Reserve.
45:10
You're right. We have this has cropped up at least five times
45:14
and 50. We even named
45:16
the show the trillion dollar bill show or coin we've coin
45:21
coin here. 2013 2013. Now that was the oh, let me see if we
45:26
have truly here ABC one, two years this from this is
45:33
Have you heard of the ABC act? No.
45:38
This is a proposal. ABC stands for automatic boost to
45:42
communities. It would provide a boost debit card, we would all
45:46
get this. By the way all of us, taxpayers dependents, non
45:51
citizens, even if you don't have a bank account or social
45:54
security number, even if you don't have an address, everybody
45:58
gets $2,000 and then your card would be reloaded with $1,000
46:04
Every month until one year after the end of the virus crisis.
46:09
This is stupid. This is from 2020 So you're not wrong that it
46:14
was pretty frequent. This is Pelosi on Tapper
46:17
and the fact is that an all for the bills that have passed
46:20
before they've all been bipartisan, and we've all in our
46:24
caucus have agreed that everything is Coronavirus,
46:27
centric and also in a timely way that relates to the virus. It's
46:32
too deadly to our lives to our livelihood, to our democracy for
46:36
us to use it for any other purpose. So when the money for
46:39
state and local is to allay the cost of the defray the cost of
46:45
the outlays they've made for Coronavirus, and the revenue
46:49
loss because of the Coronavirus Testing, testing the three
46:52
pillars, honor our heroes by supporting our state so that
46:57
they don't lose their jobs, these heroes don't lose their
47:00
jobs, open up government by testing, tracing, treatment,
47:05
etc. And the third is putting money in the pockets of American
47:09
people. All of it timed and centric to the Coronavirus. We
47:15
would be an endless amount of money if we put our wish list
47:18
for the future in there. But that is not what the case is.
47:21
And sometimes I get a little heat from my own folks who say
47:25
why can we do this in this bill and that in the budget, because
47:27
that's not what the bill is about. This bill is for this
47:30
purpose. And it's a big price. But it's a big problem. And as
47:35
chairman of the Fed said think big because the interest rates
47:37
will never be lower. And so we are they've used the interest
47:41
rates to give confidence that credit will be available because
47:45
the interest rates are low. We want those same interest rates
47:49
and they use it to bolster the stock market. We want to use it
47:52
to bolster
47:53
the other people what the heck, I'm sorry, I would cut that out
47:56
of the show. It said trillion dollar coin right there on the
47:59
title. So I'm so wow, you were just you biggest dud ever. I
48:04
really apologize must have been some series that we were doing
48:07
there is we did I definitely recall at least twice before,
48:13
like in 20. I don't know if 13. At least there was a trillion
48:23
dollar coin segment on our show now to 23 least twice. Yeah.
48:28
2013
48:29
is when I had the that's where I had that or the original
48:33
Simpsons clip from. I guess it did come back. 2020 21 it was
48:40
I'm just looking at some searches anyway. It's dumb. It
48:43
never happens. Shame on you, Forbes. What are you thinking?
48:46
Stupid?
48:48
Well, it was this idiotic voice.
48:51
Alright, let's go to the other big story, which is going to be
48:55
a very interesting media war. This is the report that came
49:00
out. I think it came out during our show even Thursday that
49:05
there's some up some up with the bio valium with the bio vandal
49:09
shot. It could be giving people strokes, and right away on
49:15
Friday, right away. I have all these great, great little
49:22
articles New York Times the CDC. But before we do that, let's
49:26
listen to Good Morning America. The
49:28
FDA and CDC are standing by the safety of Pfizer's updated
49:32
booster after concerns about a possible safety risk. The agency
49:36
launching an investigation after data from the vaccine monitoring
49:39
system suggested a link between the booster and an increased
49:43
risk of stroke and people over 65. The CDC says they acted
49:47
quickly in assessing the concern which was detected in late
49:50
November and after a review of safety databases. Databases the
49:55
CDC found no other safety system have shown a similar signal they
49:59
also said Multiple subsequent analysis have not validated this
50:03
sign concluding that it is very unlikely that the vaccine poses
50:07
a true risk the FDA and CDC will continue to analyze data from
50:11
those safety systems. But you guys, no changes have been made
50:14
to the COVID-19 guidance. Well, don't do
50:17
ma'am. Now. Now this
50:18
is important. So well, like crap. You know, this reminds me
50:22
of that of the meme that I put in the newsletter, where they're
50:25
sitting there, you know, the panel on CNN, and we're just
50:27
getting this and Dana Bash is listening to it. Oh, and from
50:31
our sources at Pfizer, they say is not the vaccine.
50:35
What she said though, was exactly the answer that CDC has
50:39
given. So the New York Times is where I first started this
50:42
trail. I'm just going to read you a little pieces from this
50:44
article. No increased stroke risks linked to Pfizer's COVID,
50:48
boosters federal officials say. And here's here's in this
50:51
article, among about 550,000 people aged 65 and older, so
50:57
we're only talking about 65 and older who had received the
51:00
Pfizer bio and tech by Valen. Booster 130 had ischemic
51:05
strokes. And they use that term, specifically. So I'm sure that's
51:09
a very specific type of stroke, which I think is blood clot
51:12
related in the 21st days after receiving the shots. So they've
51:16
already narrowed it down to 21 days after receiving the shot,
51:20
raising fears that the two events were related, but
51:23
analysis, listen, but analysis of the data using a different
51:28
method did not reveal an increased risk of ischemic
51:32
stroke. Are you kidding me? They didn't explain what the analysis
51:40
using a different method. But you would you do count with
51:43
Common Core if something is I mean, so I go to look at the
51:48
CDC. CDC and FDA identify preliminary COVID 19 vaccine
51:55
safety signal for persons aged 65 years and older, the CDC
51:59
themselves. This preliminary signal has not been identified
52:03
with the moderna COVID-19 vaccine by Vaillant. There also
52:07
may be other confounding factors contributing to the signal
52:12
identified in the VSD that merit further investigation.
52:17
Furthermore, it is important to note that To date, no other
52:21
safety systems have shown a similar signal. And multiple
52:26
subsequent analyses have not validated this signal
52:29
gobbledygook. What are their signals, they say very clearly,
52:33
the various database all of a sudden, they using the various
52:36
database. And the V safe. V safe is the app you're you can
52:44
download after you've received your vaccination, and then you
52:47
can report if you're dead. So the V safe didn't did not, you
52:52
know, if you got a stroke, then you're not going to report it to
52:54
V safe. And the vaccine safety DataLink VSD, which I had not
53:00
heard of before. These are 13 sites that provide clinical,
53:09
methodological and data expertise. Only 11 of them
53:14
provide data and all of them are Kaiser Permanente outfits. So
53:22
they get data from Kaiser Permanente in California, New
53:25
York, New Hampshire, nothing in the middle, except I think,
53:29
maybe Montana and they may not even be reporting and that is
53:34
where they get signals from. So they see someone Oh, yeah, you
53:38
know, we heard someone Someone killed over a stroke and we're
53:41
reporting it. This is they did no test. They did no actual
53:45
clinical test. They just said got any signals got no signal,
53:49
you got a signal we got no signal. And that all of a sudden
53:53
is is how the refuting this. This is adverse events report
53:59
after by valen booster dose appear appear. You love these
54:03
words, John, consistent with those reported after a mono
54:06
valen booster, and are less common and less serious than
54:10
health impacts associated with COVID 19 illness so there was
54:14
something going on. But COVID is worse, again, did just that.
54:20
They're just they're just giving you lip lip service. Let's go
54:24
back to ABC more on it. Let's
54:25
bring in ABC medical contributor Dr. I love Patel joining us from
54:28
San Francisco this morning. We just heard Mona say the CDC is
54:32
not changing any recommendation saying it's very unlikely that
54:36
the vaccine poses a true risk. How have they come to that
54:39
conclusion?
54:40
And what does this mean going forward? Well, you simply put
54:44
the CDC did see this early signal for something called the
54:47
vaccine safety DataLink which is designed to try to detect these
54:51
early signals, which could be rare side effects.
54:53
It's not designed. They make it sound like we have everybody
54:57
wired up will know immediately when something happened side
54:59
effects happened we're on the we're on the case. No, you
55:01
don't. It just didn't. They're waiting for some hospital to
55:05
tell you that something's wrong. Well, that's not going to
55:07
happen.
55:08
But as we just heard, that was one signal from vaccine safety
55:11
DataLink, which has been around for almost 30 years. From other
55:14
studies, including data from other countries, there was no
55:17
link found.
55:18
Other countries. This is this is your circular recording and
55:21
reporting according to the Uganda times we can report here
55:25
in the New York Times is everything is okay. So we got
55:29
data from other countries and they said fine,
55:31
30 years, but from other studies, including data from
55:34
other countries, there was no link found. So this is is
55:37
reassuring and should actually give the public trust and more
55:40
faith in the FDA and the CDC to look for any potential side
55:43
effects not only now but moving forward.
55:45
Now, of course, the big problem is we have all of these skeptics
55:48
out there people who are clearly Kuna
55:52
vaccine skepticism out there. So I have to ask you the question,
55:55
should people still get a booster right now?
55:59
Yes, should especially people who are high risk such as the
56:02
elderly or anyone who is immunocompromised, and either we
56:05
need to be honest here and say that the power of vaccines and
56:08
boosters is to prevent severe illness and hospitalizations.
56:13
approvable provable power, it's
56:14
the power of a baby and not
56:16
just out there to prevent every single positive test or mild
56:19
infection. It's also important to remind people that these
56:21
Bible and vaccine are still protective against SB 1.5, which
56:25
comes from the Omicron family and people have any questions to
56:28
chat with their doctors and make sure they're getting good,
56:31
trusted information?
56:33
What happened to talk to your, your medical professional chat
56:36
with your doctor? Have a chat? Hey, Doc, I wanna have a chat.
56:40
Who is this guy? He's really a stooge.
56:42
That's a doctor. I love Patel. We've we've we've excoriated him
56:47
before, but our favorite is Dr. Jenn Ashton from ABC, ABC must
56:51
be making bank off of Pfizer, in this case now with
56:54
Dr. Kenan, we're talking about long COVID The long
56:57
term effects
56:58
so we've heard many, many times since the pandemic and how many
57:02
people confirmed in this country have had COVID 19 infection
57:06
again, estimates are that it could be 10 times that high, who
57:09
had it never was tested never was confirmed, long COVID as
57:14
much of an issue as those acute infections. And now a recent
57:18
study published in the British Medical Journal, looked at about
57:21
300,000 people in Israel vaccinated versus unvaccinated
57:26
COVID versus
57:28
there's no unvaccinated people in Israel. This is but on its
57:32
face is ridiculous. You could not breathe in Israel without
57:36
having a vaccination. This is total total crap. But you see
57:43
what's happening. But the reason you're dying. And getting
57:47
strokes is long COVID
57:49
people who didn't have COVID and found the incidence of long
57:52
COVID, much higher than we thought. And this is by
57:56
definition symptoms that can persist for weeks or more after
58:00
the initial infection, regardless of how severe that
58:03
infection is. Very, very high respiratory problems, brain fog,
58:08
mood disorders, difficult musculoskeletal pain, fatigue,
58:12
it runs the gamut. And so I think this bears repeating,
58:16
there is some evidence that suggests that people who have
58:18
been vaccinated are at lower risk of developing long COVID
58:23
Which of course is just one more reason to get vaccinated cars.
58:26
But it's not just about that acute infection, you've not
58:29
listened to her own personal story, guys. It's something that
58:31
10s of millions of people may be dealing with for months or even
58:35
a year or more afterwards. And
58:37
I saw the average age of this study was 25 years old. Were
58:40
kids
58:41
included in this is that also the case with not as much we
58:43
don't know, in the pediatric population as well. We don't
58:46
have that same kind of data. But you guys I was asking you in the
58:49
break if you've had COVID I've had COVID twice the first time I
58:52
actually did have some benign a arrhythmia that lasted for a
58:56
couple of months irregular heartbeat after my infection. So
59:00
this is something we all need to be on the lookout for
59:02
long COVID gives you arrhythmia. Okay, all right. Dr. Jim,
59:06
wait, she had COVID Twice.
59:09
Yeah.
59:10
Did she ever get she was she should have gotten vaccinated?
59:13
She did
59:13
she? Yes. This is what happens. It's long. COVID You can't
59:17
fight? Look, she's not dead. She's not you know what the next
59:21
next stage is? That Okay, well, it doesn't actually prevent you
59:27
from getting sick and dying, but you'll go to heaven. That would
59:30
be the be the obvious next benefit of getting getting your
59:34
booster back to ABC again
59:37
to COVID. Tonight and after a lengthy investigation. Some
59:40
reassuring news to share with you the FDA and CDC tonight are
59:43
now revealing the results of an investigation into the safety of
59:46
the Pfizer booster shot and any potential stroke risk. Health
59:49
officials finding that the updated booster does not
59:52
increase the risk of stroke and people 65 and older. The
59:55
investigation began after data raised concerns about a possible
59:58
risk. They remain convinced Pfizer booster is safe and
1:00:01
effective. They say no change to current recommendations.
1:00:04
Now I am willing to accept that. That the by valen booster does
1:00:09
not kill people or give them strokes over 65. The people
1:00:13
we're seeing are under 30. This is not discussed anywhere. Oh 65
1:00:19
Nothing wrong here. No signals. We're seeing young people we're
1:00:23
seeing Yeah.
1:00:26
For the concerned man, men
1:00:27
men, let's go to some breaking news, Fox News alert at the CDC
1:00:31
investigates
1:00:32
a possible link between Pfizer's COVID 19 vaccine and an
1:00:35
increased risk of strokes. The agency says the safety concern
1:00:39
is limited to people 65 and older. Here to explain Fox News
1:00:43
Medical contributor Dr. Jeanette national, well,
1:00:45
they actually positioned it that way. Strokes people stroking out
1:00:49
65 Not a problem,
1:00:51
Doc, you know, this kind of scares me. Can you put it into
1:00:56
detail? You know, I know. They said it's only 65 and above but
1:01:00
all of us that took the vaccine that were supportive of the
1:01:02
vaccine, should we be concerned?
1:01:06
No, I don't think you should be concerned. I think we should all
1:01:09
just This is Fox. I love it.
1:01:10
Be aware know your risk.
1:01:12
This is just a safety sneak signal. What does that mean? The
1:01:15
CDC has programs in place to track and to figure out, Okay,
1:01:20
how many people are suffering from a certain condition after
1:01:23
they receive the vaccine,
1:01:24
the certain condition is a stroke. They're not reporting
1:01:26
that and what they
1:01:27
found here was at a 550,000 Seniors those 65 and older
1:01:33
within 21 days of receiving a booster Pfizer vaccine, not
1:01:38
Maderna. But the Pfizer booster the new one.
1:01:40
This is what's interesting that they're really starting to
1:01:43
hammer that this is this is Pfizer, not Maderna,
1:01:49
which makes it sound like a promotion.
1:01:51
Well, interesting. You say that? Because something very
1:01:56
interesting is happening at this very moment we go to
1:02:00
P b s cancer deaths in the United States have dropped.
1:02:04
This is the wrong one. Yeah, this is the one I meant. Here we
1:02:07
go. PBS
1:02:08
ever since COVID. Vaccines first became available in the United
1:02:11
States, the Federal Government has been buying them from
1:02:14
manufacturers and distributing them from free. But that was
1:02:17
never intended to be permanent. And soon they'll be distributed
1:02:20
by the manufacturers at prices they set. The government was
1:02:25
paying $26 a dose for modern has updated boosters. But Maderna
1:02:30
and Pfizer have both said they're considering a range of
1:02:33
$110 to $130 a dose on the open market. Why the jump? And what
1:02:39
does this mean for the future of vaccine cost as new variants
1:02:43
emerge, especially for those without insurance? Jennifer
1:02:47
Cates is Senior Vice President and Director of Global Health at
1:02:51
K FF, the Kaiser Family Foundation. Jennifer first let's
1:02:55
be clear
1:02:55
that the Kaiser Family Foundation, the very people who
1:02:58
said don't worry about it VSD the one thing we maintained all
1:03:01
say Family Foundation Oh signal Jennifer, first, let's
1:03:04
be clear that $110 to $130 range. What do those numbers
1:03:10
represent? A rip off
1:03:12
what we think they represent what the manufacturers have said
1:03:15
they might charge when the vaccines are in the commercial
1:03:18
market, they could end up charging more. But this is
1:03:21
before Jack. And essentially that would be the price per dose
1:03:24
about four or close to five times what the federal
1:03:27
government paid even at the high end. Who would they be charging
1:03:30
that too? Right. So good. There's good news and bad news
1:03:33
here. The good news is that for most people with public or
1:03:36
private insurance, we will not be paying for those vaccines, we
1:03:39
are protected against costs. It's the buyers, the insurers
1:03:43
who are the purchasers who are going to be paying that and it
1:03:47
is possible that will have a trickle down effect on premiums,
1:03:50
and certainly will increase costs for this healthcare system
1:03:53
for individuals who
1:03:54
say healthcare system
1:03:58
that will have a trickle down effect on premiums, and
1:04:01
certainly will increase costs for this healthcare system. For
1:04:04
individuals, mostly most individuals with insurance will
1:04:07
be okay.
1:04:07
Yeah, no, you're not going to be okay. It's gonna raise
1:04:10
everybody's rates. This this might be related. This is a
1:04:14
little more backstory to it.
1:04:16
So why this increase? Why go from charging the government $26
1:04:21
to this big increase?
1:04:22
So if we think back to 2020, when COVID first was emerging
1:04:28
and becoming a huge emergency, there were no vaccines. And the
1:04:31
government made a bet that if it purchased vaccines and advanced
1:04:35
candidates that weren't even authorized yet, and helped fund
1:04:38
the research that one of those candidates would be good enough.
1:04:41
And in fact, we had more than one, and the government
1:04:44
continued to buy in bulk. And by doing so the federal government
1:04:48
basically was saying to the manufacturers, we're taking care
1:04:51
of your risk here. We're buying these from you to distribute so
1:04:54
you don't have that risk of losing money in the marketplace.
1:04:58
Now that we're going into a commercialized environment, it's
1:05:02
the market. And these manufacturers are trying to
1:05:04
assess who's going to want my vaccine. What are they? What's
1:05:07
it going to be worth to them? Is there going to be demand? And
1:05:10
they're just they're going to try to make some profit. That's
1:05:12
not how it worked before.
1:05:13
So could it be possible that we have a two warring factions
1:05:18
fizer versus Maderna. And Maderna saying, Hey, man, their
1:05:23
stuff sucks, man, just gonna kill you, bro. And this is
1:05:27
coming right around the time when advertising will be cranked
1:05:30
up massively
1:05:32
reminding me of the Boeing Airbus wars from some years back
1:05:37
in the early part of the show. Yeah, there's a couple of things
1:05:40
at play here. It looks like
1:05:41
two more clips if you after you say whatever you got to
1:05:44
well, that I think there's an element there. But there's also
1:05:46
kind of a sub sub text messaging going on about about the value
1:05:53
of an NH s or the French healthcare says something is,
1:05:58
the government gets a better deal, you know, because they put
1:06:02
us off it was we had government if we had true health care,
1:06:06
government sponsored one pay single payer health care, we
1:06:10
wouldn't have these profit tears, because everybody in the
1:06:13
back of their minds knows that both Pfizer and Maderna had a
1:06:17
huge profits from the 10 and $20 shots that they were selling to
1:06:21
the government, huge eight, I think one of them 18 billion
1:06:25
other ones and 30 or something like that huge profit. So so the
1:06:29
idea that they need to do this to make a profit is bullcrap.
1:06:33
But just continue, is there
1:06:34
any way the government can create a safety net here?
1:06:37
So it's interesting, the Biden administration did come out with
1:06:40
a proposal to do that, in their budget request, they basically
1:06:43
said, look, there's a problem. The uninsured in the United
1:06:46
States, adults don't get guaranteed access to any vaccine
1:06:50
that's recommended, whether it's flu or COVID. And we want to
1:06:53
change that let's create a program called a vaccines for
1:06:56
adults program modeled after a really successful one that's for
1:06:59
kids. Well, Congress didn't bite on that. And so there is no
1:07:03
program. I think the question is, Will Congress at some point
1:07:07
appropriate additional funds, so that that could that could
1:07:10
happen, at least for COVID? That hasn't happened yet.
1:07:15
Just harkening back to the raising of the debt limit. If
1:07:18
you raise the debt limit by $3 trillion, isn't that by
1:07:21
definition, once again, inflationary? We're only when we
1:07:25
use it. I don't know. Okay, final one from this. This PBS
1:07:31
Weekend Report.
1:07:32
Are there potential public health implications from this?
1:07:36
There certainly are. I mean, for all of the noise around the
1:07:39
vaccines, what we know about these vaccines is
1:07:41
noise, noise, noise, concern noise, it's noise, people just
1:07:47
noise they work
1:07:48
really well to prevent people from getting sick, and hospital.
1:07:52
How well, really well really
1:07:55
well about these vaccines is a they work really well to prevent
1:07:59
getting sick, and hospitalized and even dying. If they get
1:08:03
COVID. You certainly don't want people who are uninsured
1:08:05
or even dying. If they get COPD, wait a minute, to get
1:08:09
sicker just because they can't afford this. B even though the
1:08:12
vaccines do not 100% prevent transmission. They don't
1:08:15
like 0% to reduce. They reduce it, I'm sorry, they do reduce it
1:08:21
100% prevent transmission, they do reduce it. And we know that
1:08:25
if you give people a vaccine, they're going to be less likely
1:08:28
to be infectious, they're going to be less likely to transmit to
1:08:30
everyone's you this
1:08:33
Jennifer Cates of KF F to Kaiser Family Foundation. Thank you
1:08:36
very much.
1:08:38
Hello, Kaiser Family Kaiser family right there to give you
1:08:41
the signal or no signal. Now we have to wrap this up with with
1:08:46
our boy Osterholm. Who's doing podcasts
1:08:50
I'd also like to ask you about the conspiracy theory that has
1:08:53
been floating around on social media following the incident
1:08:56
involving Demar. Hamlin, the buffalo basketball player who
1:08:59
went into cardiac arrest during a game against the Cincinnati
1:09:02
Bengals. This theory suggests that the COVID-19 vaccines
1:09:05
played a role. There's been similar speculation about the
1:09:08
death of soccer journalist grant wall. Now, we don't want to give
1:09:12
this theory more oxygen than we need to. But the reality is,
1:09:16
it's out there. And it's part of a familiar pattern we've been
1:09:19
seeing since vaccines became available. What's your response?
1:09:23
What say you?
1:09:24
Let me be really clear, there are a number of people who have
1:09:26
alleged that grant actually died from COVID or something to do
1:09:29
with COVID vaccination and that in a sense, implying that Selene
1:09:34
must have something to do with this all because she's such a
1:09:37
pro COVID vaccine scientist is absolutely not true. The rumors,
1:09:43
disinformation and almost terroristic comments have no
1:09:46
validity whatsoever in this tragedy. Grant died from aortic
1:09:50
aneurysm confirmed by autopsy here in the United States in an
1:09:54
unembodied body meaning that they made every effort to get
1:09:57
every piece of information they could so this one I'm put to
1:10:00
rest has nothing to do with COVID.
1:10:03
Is this published it? Did this family put out the autopsy
1:10:08
cremation No. Well, let's talk about Hamlet. But let me I'm
1:10:12
sorry.
1:10:13
Wait, assume they did.
1:10:16
So let me move now to Mr. Hamlin. Now he suffered a blow
1:10:20
to his chest, which has been known in other activities to
1:10:23
actually cause the kind of cardiac corrosivity experience.
1:10:26
Yeah, right
1:10:27
away.
1:10:28
There were those disinformation, almost evil people out there.
1:10:32
That would be Austrian disinformation, almost, we're
1:10:35
not quite
1:10:36
all we do is just play these clips where we get Wow, we
1:10:39
evil because we're disinformation is
1:10:41
those different for me in that clip nation, almost evil people
1:10:46
out there that aha, this had to be COVID related myocarditis
1:10:50
associated with a vaccine myocarditis being an
1:10:53
inflammation of the heart muscle. All I can tell you at
1:10:56
this point, there are no data, none nothing that would support
1:11:00
that COVID vaccination or COVID infection even had anything to
1:11:04
do with this particular event.
1:11:07
Even COVID infection could have nothing to do with this event.
1:11:10
This is great.
1:11:11
And
1:11:12
I found that to be a botch.
1:11:14
I think it's a botch to do even though the no disinformation is
1:11:18
almost evil people said, Hey, man, maybe it's because of COVID
1:11:22
piece, just throwing that out. And that's a mistake, because he
1:11:25
has to make sure that long COVID Long COVID is on deck for the
1:11:29
blame. And long COVID is probably because you waited too
1:11:33
long to get your booster COVID vaccination
1:11:35
or COVID infection even had anything to do with this
1:11:38
particular event. And it does nothing to promote anything
1:11:44
about the truth just to continue to say that and to cause this
1:11:47
kind of fear and panic about the vaccine. So I hope no one no one
1:11:53
will avert getting the vaccine, who should, as we've talked so
1:11:56
many times before about who those people are based on this
1:11:59
case alone. And while I don't believe whether it be grants
1:12:03
case, or whether it be you know, Mr. Hammonds case, we're going
1:12:08
to see those people change what their messaging is, but we in
1:12:13
the public should not stand for that. We can't stand for that.
1:12:16
Put it down every time you see it. Don't be afraid to put it
1:12:19
down. It's what we should do. And and as part of this podcast
1:12:24
family, this is how we take care of each other. Put that
1:12:27
information down. I don't know. But
1:12:29
I want to be a podcast family too.
1:12:31
I don't want to podcast family so I can just kind of Puck, I
1:12:34
don't know, if he's gonna be bitching and moaning like that.
1:12:36
I want to play that clip that came out that everyone sent
1:12:40
copies around. Of the BBC cardi are the cardiac ologists. That
1:12:45
was allowed on BBC. I have it. I don't know how old this clip is.
1:12:49
But it's not very old. Yeah.
1:12:52
I have it right here.
1:12:53
Yeah, I have it too.
1:12:55
Oh, that's why I have it.
1:12:58
This guy comes on the BBC, and they let them go. I made this
1:13:03
was shocking to everybody. Like why did they cut this guy off?
1:13:06
Are you given that? Right? I can't hear you anymore. What's
1:13:09
your all time favorite? Check. Breaking up.
1:13:13
Okay, on top of that request. So one of the reasons I think this
1:13:15
has come into the news just now is obviously there's been a big
1:13:18
concern. Recently around excess deaths. Now the British Heart
1:13:22
Foundation have said certainly during the pandemic, or since
1:13:25
the pandemic there's been 30,000 excess deaths specifically due
1:13:29
to coronary artery disease. That's my area of expertise. And
1:13:32
they're trying to figure out what's causing it. Analysis I've
1:13:34
done even call Hennigan the Director of Central evidence
1:13:36
based medicine Oxford, suggests that statin pills prescription
1:13:40
hasn't reduced in the pandemic. So it's unlikely to be a cause.
1:13:44
But what is almost certainly, if you allow me to say this a
1:13:47
request of what I have my own research has found is that the
1:13:50
COVID mRNA vaccines do carry a cardiovascular risk. And I've
1:13:55
actually called for the suspension of this pending an
1:13:58
inquiry because there's a lot of uncertainty at the moment about
1:14:00
what's causing the excess deaths. Some of it will be
1:14:02
ambulance delays. My own father, it was reported on BBC News in
1:14:06
late 2021. I was the first to actually highlight the ambulance
1:14:10
delays because my own father suffered a cardiac arrest at
1:14:12
home, and the ambulance took 30 minutes. And when his post
1:14:15
mortem came out, he had very severe coronary artery disease,
1:14:18
which is unexplainable. I then published in a peer reviewed
1:14:20
journal, they accepted my findings that the likely cause
1:14:23
of his death was two doses of the Pfizer mRNA vaccine he had
1:14:27
six months earlier.
1:14:28
So what you're saying in terms of the mRNA link to cardio
1:14:32
versus vascular risk is that that is a proven it's been
1:14:36
proven medically has it scientifically? Yeah,
1:14:39
yeah. So the question is, so in medicine, you know, in any
1:14:42
research that we do, it's very difficult to always be
1:14:44
absolutely conclusive. So we go on like, and there are lots of
1:14:48
data now, the original trials of Pfizer, Maderna, with mRNA
1:14:52
vaccines showed and I just want to put this in absolute terms.
1:14:54
We don't scare people unnecessarily, but the absolute
1:14:57
risks of serious adverse events was at least one in 100. threat.
1:15:00
And a lot of those are cardiovascular and then it will
1:15:04
you will more likely in those trials to suffer a serious
1:15:06
adverse event than to be hospitalized early on, we should
1:15:09
be reassured that Omicron. And what's circulating is really no
1:15:12
worse than the flu. And this is really time to pause the vaccine
1:15:16
rollout and to really investigate this properly. Yeah,
1:15:18
okay,
1:15:18
we have to get you get you off. There's no good. One of the most
1:15:24
so so the point is, why is bitching about us a question?
1:15:28
Why do you keep rattling your mic? When you start talking? I
1:15:31
haven't heard that. Or you keep doing this every single time.
1:15:36
Something's loose. Oh, okay.
1:15:37
Mommy can tighten it tighten up man. Need to be tight? Yeah,
1:15:43
it's very readily, very readily. So one of the most emailed clips
1:15:48
over the past week has been this spoof called the Institute of
1:15:53
coincidences. And people will email that to me without the
1:15:57
title, like, you'll love this. And I wanted to say, I don't
1:16:03
love it. And I want to remind everybody that more and more
1:16:07
people are realizing that Ooh, maybe this is not such a good
1:16:11
idea. I think people there's, I'm sure there's people
1:16:14
listening to this show, but like, oh, man, what's gonna
1:16:17
happen to me? Please, when so do not do this, except ever don't
1:16:22
go knee. I'm unleaded. I'm pure black. No, be nice to people,
1:16:29
approach them with compassion and love and understanding and
1:16:33
empathy. Don't do that. That because everyone has tried to
1:16:39
murder all of us. And I mean that sincerely. So think about
1:16:45
that. Just be be a little compassionate. Now when it comes
1:16:50
to Australia, I have no compassion. They're crazy.
1:16:52
Australia is putting a world first vaccine to the test human
1:16:56
trials getting underway for a three in one jab. against common
1:17:01
and deadly respiratory illnesses. The Super shots could
1:17:04
save time and money per shot pressure on our health system,
1:17:09
combating a triple threat with one single job,
1:17:12
you could go to the doctor and get one vaccine that essentially
1:17:16
covers you for influenza COVID and RSV poster going back
1:17:19
several times in that same year, that will be helpful,
1:17:22
and it could be closer than we think the University of the
1:17:25
Sunshine Coast start in clinical trials of a new Maderna vaccine
1:17:30
for the aim of this trial really is to see whether a combination
1:17:33
vaccine that includes all three would be as tolerable as giving
1:17:38
someone each vaccine separately
1:17:42
COVID, RSD, and influenza A triple barrel shot posing a
1:17:46
major shake up to Australia's annual Well, helping to ease the
1:17:51
burden on an overloaded system
1:17:53
one visit one vaccination, possibly a booster as opposed to
1:18:00
potentially three visits three boosters and I just think that
1:18:03
will take a big load off our current health system.
1:18:06
It can take several years to collate enough data before the
1:18:11
vaccine can be rolled out safely. Researchers here and now
1:18:15
looking to expand their pool of participants
1:18:17
and are calling for more volunteers. We're looking for
1:18:21
people who are generally in good health between 50 and 75. And
1:18:26
they can be male or female.
1:18:27
I'm quite proud to say that in the years to come If the
1:18:31
sexiness developed that tiny tiny part and its development.
1:18:36
Wow man. I love that super shot. triple barrel. I'm seeing a lot
1:18:42
of trolls and the troll room saying no way no compassion
1:18:45
screw. This is this is exactly this is the result they want.
1:18:49
This is what they want be divided and we can do that
1:18:52
forever and it's gonna benefit nobody. You're stupid. It's not
1:18:57
it's not. It's not okay. Yes, they wanted you dead. Yes. They
1:19:02
hated you sure they did. The mind control is so silly. The
1:19:08
vaccinated who Oh, come on, John, the vaccinated. It was the
1:19:11
pandemic of the unvaccinated. They're killing us. Jimmy Kimmel
1:19:15
said you know a guy who was unvaccinated got a heart attack
1:19:18
die. No, no, no show you're stronger than that. It will make
1:19:23
us all stronger against the very people who are trying to kill
1:19:26
all of us. All of us to reach our schwob Reach out to your
1:19:30
brothers and sisters. Gosh, that is so crazy. So crazy. All
1:19:37
right, do whatever do it.
1:19:38
You're gonna play almost play a clip that I have a copy of but I
1:19:41
sweetened my version. Oh, let's play it. What do you what is?
1:19:45
This is the cancer clip. Oh, yeah, okay.
1:19:49
I will not play mine. Yours will be much better
1:19:52
cancer deaths in the United States have dropped 33% In the
1:19:57
last three decades, that's according to a new A report from
1:20:00
the American Cancer Society. Among the reports highlights
1:20:03
cervical cancer rates dropped 65% for women in their early
1:20:08
20s. In part thanks to the HPV vaccine, I think not. But there
1:20:12
are troubling signs as well. advanced prostate cancer
1:20:16
diagnoses have risen roughly four and a half percent annually
1:20:19
since 2011. For a closer look, I'm joined by Karen Knutson, CEO
1:20:24
of the American Cancer Society. Karen, thank you so much for
1:20:28
joining us. Let's just start with that good news, a 33% drop
1:20:35
in cancer deaths since 1991. That translates to an estimated
1:20:39
3.8 million deaths averted. How did we get there? That's exactly
1:20:44
right. So 1991 was a high watermark in this country when
1:20:48
we peaked of our cancer for cancer death rates in the US. So
1:20:53
since that time, the investments in cancer research by the
1:20:57
American Cancer Society, the government and other entities
1:21:00
has really borne fruit in giving us a new strategies for cancer
1:21:04
prevention, for early detection, which we know is critical for
1:21:08
improved outcome, as well as new treatments and in some cases
1:21:12
cure for the 200 diseases that we call cancer.
1:21:15
So we have better screening. Now. There's fewer smokers out
1:21:18
there as well. But I do want to highlight that specific 65% Drop
1:21:22
in cervical cancer rates that's for women in their early 20s. We
1:21:25
know that cancer kills some 4000 women every year, how much of
1:21:30
that decline do you attribute just to that vaccine?
1:21:32
We see a significant relationship between vaccination
1:21:35
for HPV and that decline because it's specific to that group of
1:21:39
women that precipitous decline in cervical cancer incidents.
1:21:44
Adopted there because it became a promotion. Yes. For the HPV
1:21:49
vaccine for the next 10 minutes. That's all they talked about.
1:21:53
Well, yeah, yes. Did they also talk about boys getting the HPV
1:21:58
shot?
1:21:58
No, they actually they. That's odd. I found it odd to they just
1:22:03
really were pounding home, the
1:22:07
HPV, and we were we were all 4000
1:22:10
Out of what 300 million people? Yeah, I mean, it's not as
1:22:15
consequential but there's more people on the various database
1:22:19
after getting the mRNA vaccine than 4000 that died.
1:22:24
So we were all over this Gardasil de Word as they were
1:22:31
promoting this in dorm rooms hanging little sad, little,
1:22:35
little, little goodie bags on the doors of college dorm dorm
1:22:39
rooms, and if I recall, of the, I'm just I'm just, I'm just
1:22:44
throwing out numbers, I think it was of the 12 different
1:22:47
different types of HPV. This only really stopped three. It
1:22:55
was very painful. You needed to, I don't think was covered by
1:22:59
insurance at the time was very expensive. $300 either total,
1:23:03
or, or one. And, and if you also remember, there were a lot of
1:23:12
adverse reactions. tell you there were girls who were
1:23:16
walking back walking backwards? Yeah. The walking backwards was
1:23:20
the best. They had the tics and all kinds of and parents. I
1:23:25
mean, it just comes and goes. They report on it. Move on.
1:23:30
Nothing to see here.
1:23:33
But the fact that this was triggered by the number 33
1:23:37
twice, Oh, yeah. Yeah, no, I hear that in the report. I'm
1:23:39
thinking well, there's something amiss. You're kind
1:23:41
of kind of done there. Yeah, I agree. Okay, are we done with
1:23:47
the let me see, are we done with Big Pharma for today? Oh, wait,
1:23:52
wait, no Big Pharma has one other things. Now, it's not
1:23:56
worth it. To play that. board with pharma. What else can we
1:24:01
yell about?
1:24:02
Why do we have China in the COVID? In China update? We
1:24:05
should mostly get data. Oh, yeah,
1:24:06
of course, if you have that. He would go.
1:24:09
A top epidemiologist in China is warning that rampid COVID 19
1:24:13
infections may not subside for two to three months. Instead he
1:24:17
says the virus will spread from cities into the countryside as
1:24:20
millions of people travel home for Lunar New Year celebrations.
1:24:24
That raises new fears. Many of China's rural communities cannot
1:24:29
cope with major medical emergencies.
1:24:31
Isn't this exactly the same? Dare I say it playbook as 2019?
1:24:36
Yeah, but they in 2018 They cut the travel off. Right but
1:24:41
right okay. But they stuck they ended up I think they first
1:24:44
they'd let them go for the Chinese Lunar New Year. No, no,
1:24:46
no, they cut them off. I thought they'd let him go. No, no would
1:24:51
have been a mess. The and this is like now they either get the
1:24:55
other analysis I've heard is that this is this is all Omicron
1:24:58
is not going to be you know There's going to be something
1:25:01
like 80% of the whole population has got tests positive it's just
1:25:05
like it's out of control. But it's just it's not killing that
1:25:10
that man. I mean, they're killing booty a billion point
1:25:12
for 1.4 billion people. There's a lot of people we're going to
1:25:14
be dead. details details. They have to they've put a stop to
1:25:20
the lock downs and that's what matters. Yeah. Hmm.
1:25:27
Well, Oh, this one last thing. You I saw that you signed up for
1:25:32
the super secret Mastodon instance.
1:25:35
Yeah, I did. Pretty cool, right. Well, what it does it is a super
1:25:40
secret Mastodon instance. And exactly what so in other words,
1:25:44
so it's unknown. And so it's not blocked.
1:25:48
Wow, this is one or one or two found it's blocked. It's curry
1:25:51
blocking.
1:25:53
Why did they How did they figure that out?
1:25:55
I don't know. It's fashion adjacent man. I don't know. They
1:26:00
figured it out.
1:26:02
Well, that stinks. You got to create a whole new it's no,
1:26:05
no, no, it's just it's believe me. It's an unknown instance.
1:26:08
You're good. And you went to the federated timeline, because I've
1:26:11
carefully curated all of these former Twitter people I would
1:26:17
say mainly,
1:26:19
yeah, a bunch of journalists and other AI holes like Robert Reich
1:26:23
over there at Cal
1:26:24
Yeah, he's Yeah, he's on there a lot.
1:26:28
And they're all and melodica Macedon dot social which I
1:26:32
thought was interesting. Which and that whole group on Macedon
1:26:38
dot social which have blocked no agenda. They're a bunch of
1:26:42
Nazis, but they're in the guise of communists. It's
1:26:47
unbelievable. They are shameful all of them as great. Well, it's
1:26:53
kind of frightening. Kept me up a little too late. Thanks for
1:26:58
that. Shrek that both of us pull on each other rarely, I don't do
1:27:03
it much. But he did it. He says to me this link at about 11 at
1:27:08
night. I'm gonna go to bed in an hour. And it's this crazy
1:27:12
instance where I go in there just to check it out. And oh my
1:27:16
god. It's like a goldmine of creeps. And so all journalists
1:27:21
going well, you know, Trump sucks. They're still on Trump.
1:27:24
Is there a problem? Did
1:27:25
you see Jeff Jarvis because he he's he's the he's the master.
1:27:30
He boosts everybody. So if you're looking for someone to
1:27:32
follow Oh, yeah, no,
1:27:33
you follow Jeff Jarvis, you get all you get connected to all the
1:27:37
douchebags. So I don't know if boosts everything. I don't know
1:27:41
if you saw Lena when
1:27:44
I did not catch Lena. Wait, no, no, she's not not a Muslim. But
1:27:46
she wrote an op ed in the Washington Post, and bring this
1:27:51
up here. And I found that I had had not heard of this article.
1:27:55
Luckily, Jeff Jarvis had tweeted it. And it's we are over
1:27:59
counting COVID deaths and hospitals, the hospitals,
1:28:02
hospitalization, that's a problem.
1:28:04
Yeah. Now this is I read this already, that this piece, which
1:28:09
is like contrary to everything that's been going on for two
1:28:12
years, claims that they're over, claims what we claimed over a
1:28:16
year ago, and when the Canadian guy who is investigating the
1:28:19
Canadian COVID debts, if you remember that clip, of some guys
1:28:23
going around looking at each and every COVID death and found that
1:28:27
about 20% of them were actually from COVID and 80%. Were from
1:28:31
car accidents. So they just happen to have something else
1:28:34
going on. They're in a hospital, they died. But they tested
1:28:37
positive and some people were being actually tested after they
1:28:40
died, even though they weren't in the hospital for COVID. And
1:28:44
so that was a we've always assumed they were over
1:28:46
reporting. But all during that period, and Lena Wen was one of
1:28:50
these people all during that period. They kept saying the
1:28:53
same words over and over. We probably could document this
1:28:56
with clips, which was wow, we think they're probably being
1:28:59
under reported. The numbers probably low Fauci used to say
1:29:03
that all the time, they now
1:29:06
know much worse, it's much worse.
1:29:09
It's much worse than that reporting.
1:29:13
So what was nice about this is that Jeff Jarvis had something
1:29:17
to say. And Jeff Jarvis by the way, the bigoted racist, he's a
1:29:22
bigoted racist. Jeff Jarvis has said this. I don't and I'd have
1:29:30
to do a Jeff Jarvis voice of thaw. I don't understand. Well,
1:29:35
he's, you're way off here. Can you pitch guy would it be
1:29:39
better?
1:29:40
I don't understand what happened to when she's been blank. Let's
1:29:45
not do it. That's better. I'll do
1:29:48
a little if you could try to hold that. Well, I don't think
1:29:50
you can do it.
1:29:51
I'm not gonna do it. It triggers Tina is she doesn't like that
1:29:55
voice. I don't understand
1:29:57
why that's that robot. That voice is to do about the
1:30:02
firewall, the firewall is
1:30:05
very triggering. I don't understand what happened to when
1:30:09
she has been playing into the far rights anti science
1:30:12
campaigns with this pandemic and the post is helping her. Now
1:30:17
let's read a couple of follow ups. Matt chambers I don't know
1:30:21
who that is. She's terrible. Ignore her. Sam Adams federated
1:30:30
dot press, people who believe this don't know how to read a
1:30:33
death certificate. I've covered this extensively. The right
1:30:39
claims COVID is not a factor in death of people who are already
1:30:42
sick when it absolutely is. Many could have lived years longer if
1:30:46
it were not for COVID. They're trying to say if a person dies
1:30:50
in a car crash and as COVID authorities claimed COVID killed
1:30:53
them, which is absolutely false. I can't figure out what
1:30:56
Republicans think they gain from this disinformation so now Lena
1:31:00
win is just like a drink Glenn Greenwald and Matt Taibbi are
1:31:05
now right wing there and far right
1:31:07
she's about it. She's a lefty oh, these people turn on
1:31:11
themselves so quickly. This is the big gripe that bowtie EB and
1:31:15
Greenwald have with the left because they're extremely left
1:31:19
wing Greenwald in particular is is a socialist let's try and and
1:31:24
they would try it you know, they got kicked off all the platforms
1:31:27
because they they questioned this Russia gate thing and there
1:31:31
was no verboten.
1:31:33
So a doctor who was heralded for her pin out, we think she's a
1:31:39
shill but heralded for her heroics during the Boston
1:31:43
Marathon bombing. Who was the who was running the I think the
1:31:48
Massachusetts US health system you know, she she was heralded
1:31:54
as fantastic. And you're right on a dime and Roper Mm hmm. What
1:32:02
do hashtag Republicans gained from hashtag COVID lies poor
1:32:06
people die so they won't vote for hashtag Democrats which gave
1:32:09
a hashtag Maga hashtag GOP boost in the next elections. Ditto for
1:32:13
the older voters who remember hashtag social democracy ethos
1:32:17
have ye old hashtag USA and hashtag reps wants to Nick
1:32:22
Social Security welfare payments Medicare iterations hashtag
1:32:25
gerrymander replace of dead and threatened voters money diverted
1:32:29
to hashtag Republicans including private health care rather than
1:32:32
publicly funded hashtag COVID vaccines and care now and then
1:32:37
Jeff Jarvis
1:32:38
eggs hashtag city now Jeff Jarvis
1:32:41
answers her. They are institutional insurrectionists
1:32:47
burning down every institution of society voting democracy
1:32:52
science education so as not to share them with those who follow
1:32:59
die denounced Jeff Jarvis says a human being Wow What an idiot.
1:33:04
Wait, the trouble with me Jeff job at Jeff Jarvis. I've got to
1:33:08
admit I'm quite shocked by this. What's happening to your papers
1:33:12
of record over there? Hi, notice the times is higher David French
1:33:15
recently seemingly Barry Weiss wasn't right wing enough. This
1:33:22
is this is crazy
1:33:24
is the media and then this the entire media Jeff Jarvis is a
1:33:28
professor of Media. He was just he's promoting it.
1:33:33
He's He's they now have a a scholarship for Macedon at his
1:33:40
university or college or community college wherever he
1:33:43
works.
1:33:44
I think he's at NYU back. So
1:33:47
wait, let me read the last one. So then there's,
1:33:49
by the way, the reason I chose interferon I think this is
1:33:53
replacing my much missed reading from Facebook. Yeah. But you
1:34:00
bailed on?
1:34:02
I have an actual reading. Well, I don't have Facebook. We bailed
1:34:07
on Facebook. Six years ago, almost. At Jeff Jarvis, I can't
1:34:13
read this article due to pay wall. But hasn't this been her
1:34:16
mo for a long time now the hero of the Boston Marathon bombing
1:34:23
which was very big for him over a long time.
1:34:26
So he answers yes. And I don't want to waste a gift link on her
1:34:32
as I'm sure you'd appreciate. So he won't give away one of his
1:34:37
gift links so that this person can read this horrible
1:34:41
Republican leader when you know when the Republican well, and
1:34:48
walk out was giving her a platform. So now watch. Now WaPo
1:34:53
is under fire. Isn't that interesting? So even their paper
1:35:00
Record, The Washington Post. I've kind of a Facebook thing
1:35:06
for you. I got this email. Now, did we? We covered the Biden in
1:35:12
Mexico. On the last show.
1:35:15
Did we know a little bit? Yeah. Well, we'll
1:35:17
do we not covered the agreement they made? Yeah, you did. Did I
1:35:21
not read them verbatim?
1:35:22
I don't remember. Yeah. Read the DNA. Read it again. I will
1:35:26
remember.
1:35:26
No, it was all about irregular immigration. And then we and you
1:35:31
had to refer back to the law. So there's a green element. And
1:35:33
then we had always all of it and we had to go back to the Los
1:35:36
Angeles Dec Declaration, which is all those countries that said
1:35:39
yes, yes, we've got to streamline irregular
1:35:42
immigration, which is the wishes, Newspeak for illegal
1:35:47
entry into the country.
1:35:49
Which, right, we did discuss that. So here's
1:35:53
the email I get. Subject, your coverage or lack of the ongoing
1:36:02
invasion of the southern border. Sir, your shows failure to
1:36:08
address the border crisis. And the US media slant towards
1:36:11
opening borders is puzzling. Mass immigration is the only
1:36:19
issue that matters, not bugs as food, not COVID or Vax fears or
1:36:23
whatever topic, you and your co host obsess over. The
1:36:29
demographic replacement occurring on an unprecedented
1:36:32
scale will make many other issues irrelevant. I understand
1:36:37
you are no agenda, but to bury other any word or comment about
1:36:41
Biden's trip to El Paso and the white washing that occurred
1:36:45
there prior to his visit. And the media silence on that issue
1:36:48
is interesting. If you are pro mass immigration, just come out
1:36:54
and say it. Mike Wilkins,
1:36:58
you might want to trade a little more comic book guy into that
1:37:02
voice. And you'd nail it. The problem
1:37:05
is, so this comes in and and Tina says What are you doing?
1:37:10
And I'm like, I'm typing. I'm typing email to this guy. I hate
1:37:14
him. She's laughing So yeah, you got to Calm down son. Because
1:37:20
this guy he doesn't this is I think this is probably just
1:37:23
someone who doesn't listen or doesn't hear. We literally
1:37:27
discussed the irregular immigration. That's the that's
1:37:30
the only thing we discussed almost on that topic. Yeah, but
1:37:33
he wants the outrage. You see, people want to hear that.
1:37:37
We don't deliver we don't deliver outrage. And I believe
1:37:40
that that's probably I mean, I don't we're not here to deliver
1:37:45
outrageous plenty of people doing that. Yeah. And you all we
1:37:49
did? Go people should go read the mission statement at no
1:37:54
agenda show.net. And understand what we do. We don't we're not
1:37:59
here to be outraged over any of this. We're here to laugh at
1:38:02
most of it. It's kind of funny, and pretty much to be to be
1:38:08
outraged is ludicrous, at least to us. I mean, I get irked about
1:38:13
media coverage, and sometimes I'll have a little annoyance in
1:38:17
my voice, but outrageous, not healthy.
1:38:21
No, and people get stuck in that and then they're outraged over
1:38:26
the over really very minor things on a grand scale. grand
1:38:30
scale of things outrageous. And just things that okay, whatever.
1:38:35
Yeah. Are you surprised? Are you surprised that your Government
1:38:38
wants you dead? Am you surprised what is the surprise here? Let's
1:38:41
have a good laugh and keep our keep our heads clear. So we can
1:38:46
you know be aware of what's going on
1:38:48
to make decisions that are appropriate
1:38:50
but I guess this is my problem with most podcasts that that do
1:38:56
anything kind of like we do and that includes bond Gino and
1:39:00
everybody all these people. Okay, I got it. It's an outrage.
1:39:05
But let's go and let's look at some documents and see if we can
1:39:07
figure out what's going on. Let's laugh at the at the poor
1:39:11
propaganda I mean, advertising that is being shoveled in front
1:39:15
of you. This this is this is interesting. This is how you wet
1:39:18
your weaponize yourself. You defend yourself against what's
1:39:22
next. Not this. You didn't mention the media cleaned up the
1:39:27
illegal immigrants in the airport. Come on, man. We talked
1:39:30
about that weeks ago when it was actually happening and we
1:39:33
weren't outraged. We were like wow, that's pretty crazy. real
1:39:36
problem. But making a whole show anybody
1:39:40
be surprised by that? Exactly. I mean, this is like the Hey, the
1:39:44
bosses come and clean up the shop. Well, you're running a
1:39:47
pretty clean shop here boys. Well, thanks, boss. Yeah, thanks
1:39:51
again next year. This is new good work
1:39:55
brown idea. Remember that good Word Brown
1:39:57
new idea to people that people would do this. They can I'd like
1:40:00
to clean up the house a little bit because you got some guests
1:40:03
coming over. I'm outraged to play should be a mess.
1:40:07
Yeah, we even we even covered to the El Paso regional airport
1:40:12
that more people were coming in or leaving, and we had this
1:40:15
long, doesn't matter. Doesn't matter
1:40:19
ticked you off. So I
1:40:21
replied this guy and he never came back, which is too bad
1:40:24
because I know most of them will come back. Most of them do come
1:40:28
back and then try. So
1:40:29
one guy went back and forth, he comes back and nothing happened.
1:40:33
I thought that was kind of,
1:40:34
well, what I'd say seven times out of 10 Someone's outraged
1:40:38
like that and I'll go back and forth and then events he's like,
1:40:42
Nah, man, I'm sorry. My girlfriend left me I stepped on
1:40:45
my door. I was drinking is my favorite. I was drinking Well,
1:40:49
okay. Don't drink and email your favorite podcaster or podcasters
1:40:55
because man is good. There's two of us. And with that, I want to
1:40:59
thank you for your courage say in the morning to the man who
1:41:01
put the sea in the health scare ladies and gentlemen, please say
1:41:04
hello to my friend on the other end Mr. Jobs
1:41:13
chips ships as you listen to ground feet, here are all the
1:41:16
names and
1:41:18
trolls and the troll room. Lots of trolls here I think 20 2206
1:41:29
to 2206. That's pretty good. Pretty normal. As predicted. I'm
1:41:33
looking up. I'm
1:41:34
pretty happy about that. During that donations who are off by Oh
1:41:37
yeah, we're
1:41:38
gonna do the same thing we did last show. We're going to do all
1:41:42
the donations in one go. Because it's so short doesn't even make
1:41:44
sense to stop twice. So we're going to do it all in one go.
1:41:47
Which means there'll be plenty of show after the donation
1:41:50
segment. For those of you who bail out thinking nothing's left
1:41:53
just silly fools. I see you. You can join the trolls at troll
1:41:58
room.io You go that way. What was that? That's new.
1:42:03
Sorry. Let's say it should have been. No, no.
1:42:07
No, I want the other one. Do I do that one.
1:42:13
I like that a whale. Hello buddies.
1:42:16
I like that one. You can go to troll room.io. And there you
1:42:21
will be presented with the stream. You can watch that live
1:42:23
right away. And you can log into the IRC chat. Now you can also
1:42:27
and there's going to be more and more apps doing this at new
1:42:30
podcast apps.com currently pod versus the one you want. Because
1:42:35
you can set an alert and then when we go live, the bat signal
1:42:38
actually pops up on your podcast app where you listen to your
1:42:41
podcast anyway. And you can log right into the troll room there
1:42:44
and listen to the live stream. It's a crazy concept. We put
1:42:47
live streaming podcast into the podcast app based genius. Now, a
1:42:53
little something about no agenda social.com which is the not
1:42:56
super secret and very much blocked instance which we
1:42:59
started in 2017. Now going in our sixth year, so we were there
1:43:04
way, way before this hype. Now we were not new to the fediverse
1:43:08
at all that have been going on for many years before that. But
1:43:12
it was really cool. It was it we started as a community we
1:43:15
limited it to 10,000 accounts and then after we purge once a
1:43:19
year, if you haven't logged in for a year, you're gone. And the
1:43:22
reason why is this is a very nice and we've always promoted
1:43:25
it that way a very nice social network that does not have algos
1:43:31
and that we can have conversations and do whatever we
1:43:33
want with each other and we're pretty open you breeze speak
1:43:37
true or free speech free speech zone. Now I get reports you
1:43:44
know, the you can report accounts on our server from
1:43:46
anywhere you want. And sometimes it's like you know, some some
1:43:51
want to guy off here that's what I'm gonna talk about. There's
1:43:54
you know that we get a lot of bogus reports like C dot i m
1:43:58
which is a very small instance and they report everybody for
1:44:01
saying things about vaccines and that too, okay, so I actually
1:44:04
blocked them go away and and I kind of was I think it's because
1:44:09
I'm getting older and I'm taking your advice because you seem to
1:44:13
be living a healthy life and you seem okay. And I want to be like
1:44:16
you when I grow up and so I get a report about this one guy. And
1:44:26
all he's doing is having arguments with people on other
1:44:31
servers. He's not involved in anything whatsoever on no agenda
1:44:36
social.
1:44:37
Oh, he's just a shit poster off off site and bit giving us a bad
1:44:42
name. And so
1:44:44
I looked at this and I know there's a lot of people
1:44:46
reporting because he was very inflammatory. And I don't
1:44:50
appreciate cake Jew nigger. I mean, no, it's this is just
1:44:54
that's not You're not minimum. We don't do that in our
1:44:56
community. I'm not going to make a problem. If someone throws in
1:44:59
what am I I'm not going to police anybody on your speech.
1:45:02
But if you're on our server to only shitpost other people,
1:45:07
you're gone, go get an account somewhere else. And this and I
1:45:12
posted this, I said, I'm sick and tired of people using their
1:45:15
account to only shitpost. Other instances, I have no patience
1:45:20
for that you're gone. Interesting response most people
1:45:24
cannot read apparently, I got responses, like, I demand to
1:45:29
know the rules or shitpost. Like you're missing the point, it's
1:45:35
not about the content. It's about the fact that you're not
1:45:38
involved in our community. This is for our community, and anyone
1:45:41
from the outside who wants to can contribute. And of course,
1:45:44
you can answer anybody you want from anywhere else, but and I
1:45:47
looked at his whole timeline, the only thing he was doing is
1:45:51
shitposting other people. That's not what our servers for the
1:45:56
yes, it's a privilege to be on no agenda social.com. And so
1:46:00
there's no I
1:46:00
had I had a problem with this. You suppose say pray tell what.
1:46:07
Pray tell what. So I
1:46:09
look at this thing that you posted about kicking this guy
1:46:12
off. I have no idea and you never mentioned who it was, I'd
1:46:15
like to know.
1:46:18
I've noticed someone I'd never heard of.
1:46:22
I mean, I could go in and look but I'd have to go ask Who
1:46:24
cares? Now it's not that important. Just go you're like
1:46:28
blasting some guy with five barrels of a two barrel shotgun
1:46:32
in your blind leg. I'd lie they got you suck your body by your
1:46:35
out, gone. And I'm thinking who is he talking about? Oh, and
1:46:39
the guy was gone. There was nothing to see. It was just a
1:46:42
guy. All he did was just tell other people how foolish shit
1:46:46
they were. And you know, calling him names and alien like and it
1:46:50
had nothing to eat. Had nothing to do with no agenda. Nothing.
1:46:54
So I'm like, Okay, if you're here, just as a bad reputation,
1:46:57
guys, like I don't even care about that. We have this. Okay,
1:47:00
we have a place for our community. And you don't have to
1:47:03
always be talking but it's amongst it's like a meet up. If
1:47:07
some guy came into a meet up and was just yelling at the at the
1:47:10
restaurant staff. You know, we kick them out to shut up. So
1:47:15
there's not going to be any rules. There's no, it's not
1:47:18
about shitposting I don't I really don't care in general
1:47:21
what you say I really don't and I know no reasoned. I mean,
1:47:26
people report us. I mean, it's all our own people report us
1:47:30
like I have nothing better to do you dicks. It's unbelievable. So
1:47:34
I think you'd be labored. I have it. Indeed. No agenda social.com
1:47:39
It's a great place. Now, let us thank the artist for episode
1:47:46
1520 of the best podcast in the university. appropriately titled
1:47:51
Hambone I learned a new word. And our art was created by
1:47:58
networks. And this was a i a lot of people liked this art. And
1:48:04
just everybody knows if you're new to the show, we change the
1:48:07
art on every single one of our podcasts, the album art and good
1:48:13
podcast apps, new podcasts, I was gone. They will show this I
1:48:17
think Apple finally figured out that they should show this. This
1:48:20
was a really dynamite piece which in at first I didn't even
1:48:26
recognize what was going on until I saw this. I mean what do
1:48:30
you call this like a DJ on fire DJ and he was his hair on fire.
1:48:34
His hair was on fire and his turntables were a gas stove. I
1:48:39
didn't even see that in the first instance. And we liked it.
1:48:43
It was good.
1:48:46
It was nutty and I liked it bring the heat. It just had an
1:48:51
it was the best piece of usable piece now rowdy came in with a
1:48:55
three versions of one piece after the fact I don't know why
1:48:59
these things are placed where they are because I don't
1:49:01
remember seeing
1:49:02
used on that you use this in the newsletter I did I use one of
1:49:05
them proving you that proving to you that I do read the
1:49:08
newsletter
1:49:13
Well, one time that I get a one mark one
1:49:18
from backgrounds you and I can see the blue and the purple
1:49:20
difference. I see that one and the green it was just three
1:49:23
different backgrounds wasn't it? It was
1:49:25
also a cupcake cupcake showing.
1:49:29
It was kind of grotesque now I look at it. Yeah, it
1:49:31
was kind of grotesque and they probably wouldn't have been a
1:49:33
good piece of it may have not even been a good piece for the
1:49:35
newsletter because the newsletter was unrest didn't
1:49:37
work. Oh, I'm blamed the art.
1:49:39
Okay. Thanks. roundy
1:49:42
takes around these browsers something attractive. Oh, so
1:49:47
this Ukraine wins again. original art John by Josh. I
1:49:53
don't remember seeing that. It wasn't going to be picked. I
1:49:56
don't remember seeing that one.
1:49:58
Which one the Taunton. You No by Josh
1:50:02
corn carnold Connor girl where is that above it is down is from
1:50:08
the front of the fat baby and the top there one fat baby go
1:50:12
down 12345 his gut is a blank colors and a woman with with
1:50:17
wings and feet.
1:50:22
I don't know what I don't have, either.
1:50:25
I don't remember seeing these things aren't coming in in
1:50:28
order.
1:50:29
If you are listening to us live, you can go to no agenda, art
1:50:33
generator.com And you can look at it live. You'll also see
1:50:36
what's already being created as we speak by our artists. And if
1:50:39
you're listening to this as a podcast, that new podcast app
1:50:42
will show it to you as Dr. Scott uses it for our chapters. We had
1:50:46
make Brazil great again. No. We had the megaphone was it's an OP
1:50:53
or op. You'll actually mentioned that one as a possibility.
1:50:56
Yeah, I kind of thought it was cute. And now I you hate you or
1:51:00
you hate the megaphone? No, I don't hate it's just like, well,
1:51:04
you called me up by saying oh, you liked a megaphone every time
1:51:06
one shows up with.
1:51:09
It's true. It's true. It's true. I think we both thought the the
1:51:16
was it? Was it in this one that the major league bullshit MLB
1:51:22
comics or Blogger made an MLB version, which I think I did
1:51:25
mention and there was also a 100% copyright infringing MLB
1:51:31
version.
1:51:32
Where do I see the one that has actual MLB? MLB logo? Yeah,
1:51:36
there's gonna be a problem. Lots of eggs stuff. Yeah, what else
1:51:42
was there? Fat Lives Matter and all the stuff and we're not
1:51:45
gonna We're not trying to insult people. All the time. Okay,
1:51:52
anything else? Anything else on this art?
1:51:54
That's I think that covers it.
1:51:56
We appreciate all of our artists. There's no wrong if you
1:52:00
if you're if you're able to get it up on that on that knowledge
1:52:04
and art generator.com There's no wrong it's we'd love it. We now
1:52:07
have goodness. Let me count them how many we have? We have 28,565
1:52:13
unique pieces.
1:52:15
I'm surprised there hasn't been some sort of a armed rebellion
1:52:18
in the no agenda social or this protest over not picking
1:52:23
something?
1:52:24
approach? What are you? Are you trying to stir the pot? Are you
1:52:28
saying don't stir the pot Jhansi Dvorak that's not good. It's not
1:52:32
nice. Thank you artists we love you. We mean that sincerely. It
1:52:36
is one of the highest forms of talent and time you can you can
1:52:40
dedicate specially because you're doing it on the fly
1:52:43
probably while you're at work listening to this pretending to
1:52:45
pay attention to your boss or do whatever you should be doing is
1:52:48
very much appreciated. No agenda, art generator.com. Now
1:52:52
we'd like to thank our executive and Associate Executive
1:52:54
producers for episode 1521. These are the people who came in
1:53:00
$200 or above. And these are real credits forever credits.
1:53:03
This is not not a joke. This is just like when you see the
1:53:06
credits, when you see it rolling on a Hollywood production,
1:53:09
television, movie, etcetera. These are the people who get
1:53:12
listed because they they helped finance it. That's how it works.
1:53:15
Now, you're financing it because you got something out of it. You
1:53:19
got some value. This is why we call it the value for value
1:53:21
model. You felt something it did something for you. Or perhaps
1:53:27
you had a stock tip or relationship tip or maybe you're
1:53:30
not dead because of us. It's all possible. Whatever it is, turn
1:53:34
that into a number. Send it back to us. We appreciate Justin
1:53:37
Varner from Richmond, Virginia who kicks in and this is
1:53:42
interesting. I've never seen a pink field on the spreadsheet.
1:53:47
You know things are changing in the back office when new colors
1:53:50
start to show up. Have you noticed this pink? It's very
1:53:54
readable. Yeah, I by just I don't know what it means the
1:53:57
pink. I know blue is night. Yellow is birthday. Gray is note
1:54:03
pink in the morning, gentlemen.
1:54:05
Purple was also a douchebag call. Oh, I
1:54:07
know what this is. Oh, this is a show number donation. 1521. Yes,
1:54:16
teller? Yes. Yes. Yes. We love that new color. Good work. In
1:54:20
the morning, gentlemen, please accept this value proposition
1:54:22
demonstration in the amount of 1521 monopoly bills to
1:54:26
commemorate the show number of the same non false equivalency I
1:54:31
need you once again to call out bill for being a huge douchebag
1:54:35
sorry, I don't know why that happens. Douchebag got to fix
1:54:42
that. Not donating since the last call out in 1424. And now
1:54:48
going on 11 years as a listener. He is obsessed with the show and
1:54:53
doesn't know how to consume information outside of that
1:54:55
format. And who can blame him for our shitty education system?
1:55:00
As such, he is hereby ordered to donate immediately or the
1:55:03
douching will continue every episode for perpetuity in the
1:55:07
form of a recurring donation of $50 with a note bill is a
1:55:11
freeloading, sleazy son of a bitch. Okay, thank you as always
1:55:18
for really digging into the shit. There's no one else Bill
1:55:21
Bill is contributing more that way by not donating
1:55:24
this correct. Yeah, keep it up, Bill. Good work, Bill. Gotcha.
1:55:31
There's no one else who can do what you both do, nor would they
1:55:34
want to true. It is such a vow of poverty is an incredible,
1:55:38
important service to our country. It's an incredibly
1:55:41
important service to our country and our hope that this year you
1:55:44
are awarded with the Presidential Medal of Freedom.
1:55:48
By blow Jaiden Please, man, please play as much Al Sharpton
1:55:54
as possible. I would even vote for a show dedicated to Sharpton
1:55:57
super cuts, and I bet others would too. If only if only there
1:56:01
was enough to do a full show. Believe me. Now. There's not
1:56:05
enough. Justin Varner dude named Justin Richmond, Virginia former
1:56:09
resident of Gitmo, Central Texas slave lands
1:56:11
night is the measure of whether the country begins in the state
1:56:17
of Wisconsin, a national drive to push back or whether we have
1:56:24
more to go to build a movement of resistance. But resist we
1:56:29
must. We must, and we will much about that. Be committed just a
1:56:37
classic. Joining me now.
1:56:38
classic, classic Sharpton.
1:56:40
I believe that's the original.
1:56:42
That is the OG that's what got us into the obsession with Al
1:56:46
Sharpton. Yeah.
1:56:49
Who knew? That he's I think they do a lot of cutters. I listen to
1:56:53
the show infrequently. Maybe once or twice a month, trying to
1:56:57
catch something I can catch something a little this all
1:56:59
minor. Now like the good old days, with respect our ESP ICT,
1:57:05
that sort of thing?
1:57:06
Well, we should play the short version then since it's respect,
1:57:11
by the way, respect.
1:57:14
Do Richard Gabriel is on the list. from Tucson, Arizona, he
1:57:18
came at 350 $6. Now he, he I'm going to read what I have from
1:57:23
him. It may have a note about a note. And he came to subject
1:57:28
instead of saying donation has helped, I got perturbed and
1:57:30
confused. I made a hefty executive order called executive
1:57:36
producer qualifying first time donation, which is this one. So
1:57:39
let's give a D douching. Right off the bat. You've been deed
1:57:44
deuced. That I that then I sent a note that I'd like read to
1:57:51
this address, which is my address john@divorce.org, which
1:57:54
is where you should be sending to notes at no agenda show.net.
1:57:59
It's all going to be on the new donation page q1.
1:58:01
Oh, yeah, it'll be on there right to top. I'd like to read
1:58:04
for the Sunday show. And it doesn't attach it. So he just
1:58:06
continues with this complaining. January 15. For this email
1:58:10
address. All of I did all of this on Wednesday, January 11. I
1:58:13
checked my email and learned my message was blocked. Or
1:58:17
disallowed content. Yes. This happens on my service when I'm
1:58:23
recommend sending, especially if you're if there's one swear word
1:58:26
in there, like anything, it will get blocked unless you're on the
1:58:30
whitelist. And I don't have any reason to put them on the
1:58:32
whitelist and never get a note. Even if you say
1:58:34
shit, I think he got blocked from your server. Oh, yeah, you
1:58:36
definitely will. Yeah, please inform me exactly where to mail
1:58:40
these notes. And I sent him a note back to be read on the
1:58:43
show. And I even put the word donation in the subject. I
1:58:46
scoured the no agenda webpage to understand exactly how to do
1:58:50
this stuff. But it's not very clear. We make it clear on the
1:58:54
show, but obviously this
1:58:55
and the reason why if I can, if I could just interject, if I can
1:58:59
just interject. The It was It has always been the intention
1:59:04
that you can leave and this is how it started. Leave a small
1:59:08
short note of thanks. On the PayPal in the PayPal area where
1:59:14
that is intended. And since people can't figure out PayPal,
1:59:20
they start emailing notes and now it's become a thing where I
1:59:24
need to email my note how come it's not clear. So that's why
1:59:27
you know, our incredible staff which as you know is is we have
1:59:31
so much production help is going to revamp the donation page to
1:59:36
get this in under crucial order if q1 So we're very sorry. We
1:59:41
really are we're just two dudes.
1:59:44
Oh, I understand is to email this account which is my account
1:59:48
and put the donation in Okay, so we don't have whatever the
1:59:52
original note was that was cussing or something. I don't
1:59:55
know what it was in there. Because I could have attached
1:59:58
that note to this you could Attach it to the as it as an
2:00:03
attachment and probably would have gotten through because I
2:00:05
don't think those are so
2:00:06
you made your point let's go when so that's what he said
2:00:09
yeah that's the end of his notes so we give them let's give him a
2:00:12
Karma
2:00:13
we give them a double up karma without a note you get a double
2:00:15
up karma you've got karma I have this one this is a note from
2:00:26
second this is from Sir Alexander yes Sir Alexander and
2:00:31
I have his note which is nicely scanned by our crack staff in
2:00:36
the morning gentlemen, ITM gentleman proud virtue signaler
2:00:39
with an overdue donation, may I request an R two d two health
2:00:43
karma for all with this donation I moved to whatever the next
2:00:47
level of knighthood is accounting below. So he will he
2:00:50
will have a title change today. My piping hot wife and I have
2:00:53
fled middle Cascadia for the beautiful hills of Middle
2:00:57
Tennessee. Would it be possible to request a name change from
2:01:00
Sir Alexander Black Knight of middle Kent, a Cascadia to Sir
2:01:03
Alexander Black Knight of Middle Tennessee. May You of course
2:01:07
we're going to do that. May you keep this wonderful racket going
2:01:10
for another 1500 episodes. Thank you very much. RTG two for you
2:01:15
sir. You've got
2:01:19
karma. It should be noted that his donation was 330 806 and it
2:01:26
should also be noted that he used the word piping trigger me.
2:01:31
Oh, okay. What is the oh six about then. 3638 coccyx Oh, it
2:01:37
could be and what are the wiping rice piping?
2:01:40
Why went on a rant about two three years ago because Martha
2:01:46
Stewart kept saying piping hot piping hot. And I've yet to hear
2:01:51
any explanation for what piping me What is piping hot.
2:01:54
I know what is when the stove pipe the on an old stove is very
2:02:00
very hot. So
2:02:00
what's what's that got to do with my cup of coffee?
2:02:04
It's just a temperature warning John.
2:02:09
Mark Stokes Berean center in Centennial Colorado. Three
2:02:14
Three. And he writes good morning cracking buzz says
2:02:18
discovering the no agenda show via the Tom Woods show. Tom
2:02:23
Woods donation. I've been in Washington and I am well on my
2:02:27
way to knighthood I do want I do wanna I do want to wish my
2:02:34
sister in law Sarah Stokes Berry, a happy 44th birthday on
2:02:39
Monday the 16th. And shamelessly do I think is she's on the list
2:02:43
on Shameless. He directs all of Gitmo nation to my sub stack at
2:02:47
Mark Stokes burried.substack.com. And as
2:02:51
Mark Stokes burries what it sounds like it showcases my art,
2:02:55
much of which I think even John would appreciate. I looked at it
2:03:00
he's got he's got a nice style very professional. No jingles
2:03:04
but I'd love to some marriage karma as I tie the knot later
2:03:08
this year best Mark Stokes Berean Centennial Colorado Thank
2:03:13
you very much Mark our final executive producer for episode
2:03:16
1521 You've got karma onto our associate execs Ilan Homburg in
2:03:25
Bellingham Washington my son Ari and I share a birthday my
2:03:28
birthday is 116 81 which is $160.81 plus his birthday 116 19
2:03:36
equals to 33 Pence the donation amount and thank you for your
2:03:40
courage please add us both to the birthday list it Consider it
2:03:43
done
2:03:46
onward with the Eric Eric I'm sorry Erica Callahan in to
2:03:52
actually sue it so excellent
2:03:55
weekly sewak civically Subic so
2:03:57
quickly so quickly Pennsylvania $20 My dog is giving me the sad
2:04:04
puppy face must be time to donate thanks for all you do.
2:04:10
Yes we don't getting a lot of donations from her
2:04:13
and you're spot on because this is the last one for the
2:04:16
Executive Associate exec sir ready kilowatt from battlement
2:04:20
Mesa Colorado 200 Hello sir ready kilowatt from the troll
2:04:24
room annual donation earlier than usual this year since the
2:04:27
last show was so light Thank you. Can I get a little
2:04:30
entrepreneur karma from my now full time drone business? No
2:04:34
jingles no karma? You literally asked for karma and then you
2:04:37
said no jingles no karma. But you know what we'll give it to
2:04:40
you. Anyway. Thank you. Carla. Thank you to these execs and
2:04:46
Associate Executive producers for ever credits they do not
2:04:50
expire. They will not expire. You can put them anywhere you
2:04:54
want will vouch for you if anyone questions and put them on
2:04:57
IMDb that is the be forever credit. place and just have a
2:05:01
search and see what kind of actual heavyweights including
2:05:04
Hollywood heavyweights have one of these coveted forever titles
2:05:07
and thank you for supporting the best podcast in the universe.
2:05:12
Shall we continue right on with the yes with
2:05:15
short wins in Langley Washington 125 Dakota Walker from Boise,
2:05:21
Idaho One, one 3.85 of the birthday donation on January 13.
2:05:26
Dylan Edmonds in Santa Maria, California in some jobs karma at
2:05:30
the end $100 from him. Lucas Williams. Roswell, New Mexico.
2:05:36
Me, sir slam Bob rolling in San Jose at 33. Sir Kevin
2:05:45
McLaughlin. He hasn't missed a beat. Lucas, North Carolina 808.
2:05:52
Boobs. Peter arreglar registered brother reg.
2:05:58
Do I have to open it up and take a look?
2:06:01
Reg? Reg? Reg, it's just shink NYG. But yeah,
2:06:05
wow. Hold on a second. Let me I want to see this name now.
2:06:09
Peter. Reg nig he's a reg. Reg. Reg. Reg. ixnay. ragged snag.
2:06:19
Westminister Colorado. 6923 Adam moves Monza anger in Brookfield,
2:06:25
Wisconsin 6869. Sir Don and Chan Chandler, Arizona. 606 small
2:06:32
boobs. Christopher Dexter ft. 678 Angela Pickering 55 Ken and
2:06:42
in a loca o n o n a local 512.
2:06:49
Live living NL loca
2:06:52
in a loci in Austin, Texas. 5120. Poor showing there at the
2:06:57
local Paul DuBois is from MacKerricher I'm sorry,
2:07:03
I'm sorry, don't do that. Most meetups don't say that poor
2:07:07
showing people gave what they could. That's not nice call.
2:07:13
Yeah, okay. Paul, they know better. Paul DuBois and Kerr
2:07:18
Hudson, New York 50 bucks and the rest of these all be $50
2:07:22
donors. Brandon Sivan port orchard. John Bremen our in
2:07:31
Lemont furnace is that the name of a town in Pennsylvania,
2:07:35
it's again Pennsylvania is to be avoided.
2:07:39
Christian Freeman San Marcos, but not San Marcos, California,
2:07:43
San Marcos, Texas. Kevin deals in Huntersville North Carolina
2:07:47
Patricia Dane Patricia Worthington in Miami. Real deals
2:07:52
now. In San Antonio real
2:07:56
deals now San Antonio.
2:07:59
Phillip blue in Louisville, Kentucky. Kelly make a deal in
2:08:03
Mission Hills, Kansas. Chris Lewinsky in Sherwood Park,
2:08:08
California easy landscapes in North Stonington Connecticut. If
2:08:14
you're in North Stonington go to easy landscapes sir Eric and
2:08:17
Richardson, Texas. Sarah Gordon and Tucson Daniel Galloway in
2:08:24
Marietta, Georgia, Gerald wing and Roth in Saugus and last on
2:08:30
the list is Leanne Shipley and Covington Washington. I want to
2:08:33
thank all these people including the local they're in in Austin,
2:08:39
for helping us do this show and contributing thanks.
2:08:42
And as a reminder, we have a great donation page. See it now
2:08:46
before it's vintage vorak.org/and Thank you all for
2:08:51
your time, talent and treasure for episode 1521 Our formula is
2:08:56
this we go out we hit people in the mouth
2:09:10
shut us by regressed jobs, jobs, jobs and jobs for jobs.
2:09:29
Interestingly, we do have a longer birthday list than
2:09:31
typical Dakota Walker celebrates on the celebrated on the 13th
2:09:35
mark Stokes Murray wishing his sister in law Sarah Stokes Bria
2:09:38
Happy Birthday turns 44 on the 16th ilan Hamburg January 16.
2:09:44
And Elon also wishes his son ARIA Happy birthday on January
2:09:48
16. Ciao Jow Best Wishes their daughter Elena a happy birthday.
2:09:52
She turns five on January 17. Happy birthday from everybody.
2:09:56
He had the best podcast in the universe. You
2:10:07
don't want to be and you just heard it only one title change
2:10:11
for today's episode Sir Alexander Fleming Black Knight
2:10:14
of the middle Cascadia, now known and honored as Sir
2:10:17
Alexander Burnett of Middle Tennessee and we of course
2:10:20
support his additional or appreciate as a traditional
2:10:23
support of the best podcast in the universe No knights no
2:10:26
dame's today should we go straight to the meetup?
2:10:35
And the party's coming up in Indiana.
2:10:38
You don't produce this if you're in Central Indiana then come
2:10:40
attend our New Years no agenda meetup on 15th January we'll be
2:10:44
going to the bladder brewery on Binford Boulevard in
2:10:47
Indianapolis good food good drink good conversation and the
2:10:52
donation rebel find us and no agenda minutes of comfortable
2:10:56
information and to RSVP
2:10:59
in the morning get more nation in John and Adam This is Sir
2:11:02
camera Chris with BJJ mats I'm reporting to you live to tape
2:11:05
from the newsroom called next door to the safe house since we
2:11:08
got kicked out of there
2:11:09
in the morning John and Adam. Master overhand no agenda social
2:11:13
it's a big scam.
2:11:14
This is Sir spooky of the Elm streets a bat out of hell known
2:11:18
as Chicago in the morning Adam from Milwaukee in the morning,
2:11:22
sir a mountain mon saw
2:11:24
in the morning sir Matt Nick later night of Edgewater
2:11:27
drew from Wisconsin from Lake Geneva in the morning. This is a
2:11:30
great night to meet other like minded people. I am so deeply
2:11:35
grateful for the community. Thank you John and Adam
2:11:39
ITM. This is James smokin hot stew coming to you live from the
2:11:43
newsroom pub. It was a great meet up
2:11:46
sir BMA and then K ye in the morning.
2:11:49
I misspoke. This is Brian from Union Grove in the morning. This
2:11:52
is John thank you for your courage. Ito gents are having a
2:11:55
great time. You're gonna have a good run. John from West Dallas,
2:11:59
I can't believe you read my email address on
2:12:01
the air. Hi, John and Adam. My name is Chris in the morning,
2:12:06
John and Adam at the hairballs show. I wish you were here.
2:12:10
Adam. You should have never cut your hair. And I'm not wearing
2:12:13
pants.
2:12:14
Hi, John and Adam. I'm Missy from once Ben.
2:12:18
And with that we're off to see Chris box and hairball.
2:12:23
Yeah. But don't try to do stick Okay. Doesn't help. Now over to
2:12:27
Columbus. Oh, yeah. Also, don't try to be cute with your
2:12:32
production. Just don't put music just just get to the I'll do
2:12:37
that if it needs it. Okay. This is a Wild Bill
2:12:40
with a central Ohio meetup. Thank you, Adam and John, for
2:12:43
your courage and I'm going to hand it off to the next person
2:12:45
in line. This is Anthony.
2:12:47
John am thank you for all you do. This is Mark, thank
2:12:50
you for your courage in the morning in the morning. This is
2:12:53
PBR street gang. Still looking for another mission.
2:12:57
Next CC from C bus in the morning. This is Josh in the
2:13:02
morning. This is Eric, I do want to thank you for
2:13:05
your courage.
2:13:06
This is Sir Leary at Dempsey's pub. It's been a great time and
2:13:12
started meeting people.
2:13:13
Three pronunciation guidance ag you lar from Bell fountain?
2:13:17
This is Dame Trinity having a great time in Columbus in the
2:13:21
morning in the morning thank you gentlemen
2:13:27
and why why the Genesis cover is beyond me it is complete
2:13:32
copyright violation don't do that. But I did I like to echo
2:13:36
on the on the that would that would that kind of work for me.
2:13:39
That today there is a meet up. And yeah, I guess you can just
2:13:44
make it why you're even thinking of doing that not just sitting
2:13:47
at home listen to the show at the Oxford Saloon in Snohomish,
2:13:50
Washington two o'clock. The New Year Crossroads America Indy
2:13:55
tribal resolution meetup. You just heard that there'll be
2:13:57
three that's underway now today. Again, I'm doing this on
2:14:00
Sundays. It's very disturbing blind. Oh, our brewery. We have
2:14:05
the TMI evac zone 333 These are all underway. Evergreen brewing
2:14:09
in Camp Hill, PA. I do believe this will be a good meet up six
2:14:13
o'clock at skippers pier coastal Cajun kitchen in Gladewater.
2:14:17
Texas. You can obviously make that one. On Wednesday, the Fort
2:14:19
Wayne Indiana red pillars club 33 meeting at 633 at Xenos
2:14:24
Italian eatery. That's DuPont Road in Fort Wayne, Indiana and
2:14:27
they got a lot going on in Indiana. And then on show day,
2:14:31
the New Year omega A new amygdala cleanse 633 at MC
2:14:35
thirsties pub in Peterborough, Ontario. That's Canada.
2:14:38
Charlotte's Thursday. I'm getting my teeth adjusted on
2:14:42
Tuesday, Charlotte's thirsty third third. This is this is
2:14:45
mean. My temporary teeth of just slipping all over the place with
2:14:50
this one. Charlotte's thirsty Third Thursday monthly meetups.
2:14:55
Keep using that one people oh no
2:14:57
Tuesday we're adjusting it. It's tough. Going in Charlotte, North
2:15:01
Carolina, and the Shot Show shitshow 730 at Gilley's in
2:15:05
Treasure Island, Las Vegas, Nevada. So Ramsey Kane who does
2:15:08
not know and will be hosting that fantastic these are the no
2:15:11
agenda meetups there's many more on the calendar through February
2:15:14
to the end of February and beyond if you'd like to see it
2:15:17
go to no agenda meetups.com If you can't find one near you
2:15:20
start one yourself always a punch a
2:15:23
sometimes you want to go out with a nice day you'd be
2:15:32
triggered you wouldn't be used say is like
2:15:44
I have I have couple of ISOs if any of them are going to beat
2:15:49
anything you might have.
2:15:50
What do you have anything good, so you probably can do it. Okay.
2:15:54
This one was sent by I think Nola check meats
2:16:04
is cute for the show but I don't know if it's
2:16:07
not necessarily end of show and yeah this one
2:16:12
did thank god that's actually not bad. Yeah,
2:16:17
it's not but and then this one not hearing anything. That's all
2:16:21
I got. Really?
2:16:22
I can't even hear that.
2:16:23
Let me listen to you. You have this one. Yeah, this one okay,
2:16:25
here we go. How does he do that? I think thank God let me see if
2:16:31
I queued up a little tighter How long is it hold on thank God if
2:16:36
I can
2:16:37
beat has to be taken out has to be taken out of the between
2:16:42
thanking God it doesn't need to have that long.
2:16:45
Oh, hold on. Let me see if I can do that. Probably because I am I
2:16:51
am the master see how this works. Ready? Thank god
2:16:56
that's that I like it.
2:16:58
All right. That will require extra work at the end
2:17:03
so just as as we wrote some what somebody I got an email as we're
2:17:08
doing the show about that clip I played from the BBC. Within
2:17:13
minutes I guess of that clip going over the air on the BBC.
2:17:17
The Guardian comes out with a with a headline BBC criticized
2:17:23
for letting cardiologists hijack interview with false COVID Jab
2:17:28
claim. Wow, love has seen Mel Horton, male heart, murmur
2:17:34
Hathras Malhotra has misguided in quotes, views Lincoln some
2:17:40
COVID vaccines to excess heart disease deaths should not have
2:17:44
aired, say experts. And then the whole story done by this woman.
2:17:53
Our our wha Modra doll and she finishes it with her little she
2:18:01
does her little bits at the end where she has stuff like this.
2:18:06
In other news, Peter Davidson is now dating Martha Stewart Donald
2:18:10
Trump is still threatening to run for president threatening
2:18:14
and British tabloids are still churning out 100 articles a day
2:18:17
about whether murder Megan Markel eating lunches and
2:18:21
outrageous snub to the royal family. It goes on so she's
2:18:27
right to
2:18:28
talk about the Guardian is under a current I think still
2:18:32
ransomware attack and all journalists have been ordered to
2:18:35
work from home on their own computers until I think the 26th
2:18:38
of January. No, I did not know this. Yeah, that all their
2:18:42
systems are ransomware I'd say that's a good start. Ransomware
2:18:45
all of them Fox, CNN NBC, MSNBC CNN. CNBC is funny leave those
2:18:51
guys on ransomware I'm all that I don't understand why people
2:18:55
don't do this. I think you can make so much money particularly
2:18:59
around election time. Or when you know Pfizer launch launches
2:19:02
a new super jab super shot
2:19:05
I don't think is I think it's not I don't think it's a trivial
2:19:08
exploit.
2:19:10
What are you talking about it wouldn't you get the news about
2:19:13
the newsroom? When you get to newsroom that's a problem yeah,
2:19:18
probably and then and then they don't
2:19:20
work out people you don't like you know backup backup every
2:19:23
week at least once a week a full backup a ghost you want to go
2:19:30
back if you don't want just you know a bunch of files backed up.
2:19:33
You need a whole something you know, as safe The trouble is
2:19:37
Chris the rants are smart. They would plant like a month in
2:19:40
advance. Oh, exactly. I just don't there's no reason to
2:19:44
because nobody backs up.
2:19:46
I'm just gonna set up the I'm just going back for a second I
2:19:51
realized I have a clip of about the debt limit being raised. And
2:19:55
then I have an interesting associated clip which came up on
2:19:59
the same day that we're denounce from Black Rocks? Larry Fink so
2:20:03
here's Yeah, we're gonna
2:20:04
turn now to a critical time in Washington Congress is on the
2:20:07
verge of a political showdown after the Treasury Secretary
2:20:10
warned lawmakers that the US is projected to reach its debt
2:20:14
limit on Thursday ABCs. And win has the latest now from
2:20:18
Washington. And good morning to you.
2:20:20
Good morning, Gao, Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen is urging
2:20:23
Congress to quickly pass legislation to either raise the
2:20:27
federal debt limit or temporarily suspended and that
2:20:29
deadline is January 19. That's Thursday. And Yellen says before
2:20:33
the government will have to resort to quote, extraordinary
2:20:36
measures to avoid defaulting on the nation's more than $30
2:20:39
trillion borrowing capacity. Failure to address the debt
2:20:42
ceiling, she says would cause irreparable harm to the US
2:20:45
economy. Some analysts suggesting a default could crash
2:20:48
financial markets and potentially lead to a credit
2:20:50
downgrade. And if the issue drags on, it could lead to a
2:20:54
partial government shutdown. Raising the limit does not need
2:20:57
more spending, but rather just allows the government finds
2:20:59
existing obligations, including tax refunds Social Security and
2:21:03
Medicare payments. debate over the issue will almost certainly
2:21:06
trigger a major political showdown in the house between
2:21:09
Republicans who now have control and Democratic lawmakers, House
2:21:13
Republicans have pushed back expressing interest and using
2:21:16
these negotiations to cut spending. And the debt ceiling
2:21:19
was raised three times under the Trump administration without
2:21:22
issue when Democrats held the majority. And now Democratic
2:21:25
leaders say there's no reason Republicans can't do the same.
2:21:30
Everything we said was true. Now, I'm going to connect that
2:21:33
clip without evidence to the CNBC clip of Larry Fink. So
2:21:38
let's just say because you know, I know that you say it'll never
2:21:41
happen. I'm always looking at what is the CBD? Is the central
2:21:45
bank digital currency? When is it? How are they going to
2:21:47
shepherd it in? I don't think it'll be a bank holiday, and
2:21:51
then we wake up and it's happened now, I'm thinking
2:21:54
something like this would be a really good opportunity to kind
2:21:58
of shuttle something in like where everyone's arguing and
2:22:01
we're all gonna die. We can't fund anything we can't eat, we
2:22:04
have no money, we could just created a different way. And
2:22:08
well, here's here's some understanding from Larry Fink,
2:22:11
how many digital coins
2:22:12
you think will exist, and in a year from now? Well, that's
2:22:16
where I don't think we need that many we need we need a digital
2:22:21
digitized dollar, let's start there, or a some form of stable
2:22:25
coin. And then we need some form of a crypto asset, whether it's
2:22:30
a Bitcoin or a new Bitcoin, Bitcoin, where we were, where if
2:22:36
people want to invest in things that are uncorrelated to, to any
2:22:41
one currency, uncorrelated to one market, and that's what gold
2:22:46
used to be. And can we create this uncorrelated asset class
2:22:51
that that can play that role beyond that, in most cases, what
2:22:56
digitization of crypto is it's just digitizing $1 Having the
2:23:01
ability to transact business on the internet. And so, to me,
2:23:05
there's a lot more hype than what what what it really
2:23:08
basically is we're doing a great deal of studying on it we
2:23:11
invested in one company that's doing very very well and in the
2:23:17
stable coin arena. And so we're doing a great deal of studying
2:23:21
I'm meeting many people can you say which one publicly invested
2:23:26
in circle and circle is one of the you know, every invest
2:23:32
investors money goes into a government security. It's and so
2:23:37
there are companies that are doing the right thing
2:23:40
continuously?
2:23:41
Hmm. A lot they're new, a new Bitcoin and circle they make the
2:23:47
stable coin USDC I don't know. I've always felt stable coins
2:23:51
were inflationary by their very nature. They sit on top of
2:23:55
apparent assets, which would be government assets. So he
2:24:00
literally said they wanted it the way I understand it. They
2:24:02
want to have a stable coin that tokenized his government bonds
2:24:06
so I think that means you're you're trading on top of stuff
2:24:09
that is a bond that is already a debt from the country.
2:24:13
I don't understand right? Yeah, I
2:24:15
don't understand it but But Larry Fink man when he comes out
2:24:18
you know something's gonna happen. That's and and all hell
2:24:21
is gonna break loose and you're gonna need a Bitcoin, a new one
2:24:24
new big new Bitcoin
2:24:27
to have a series of clips about the Marines. Okay. I didn't know
2:24:33
any of this was going on, but the Marines are being thanks to
2:24:39
Lloyd Austin and I think even the marine commandant. We have a
2:24:43
lot of Marines who listen to the show. Yes, we do. And they're
2:24:47
trying to ruin the service completely. It sounds like if
2:24:51
you listen to one of the old timers who had to they have on
2:24:54
one of these, this anti D clip and I thought it would be worth
2:24:59
rolling out this information because I don't know anything
2:25:01
about this until I heard this. And it's just seems pretty.
2:25:07
Pretty screwy. This is the US Marines. One repurpose,
2:25:10
and the Marines will repurpose their presence in Japan into
2:25:13
what they call a portal regiment. It's designed to be
2:25:16
more money.
2:25:18
Stop, stop. Sorry. This is from PBS, which makes it even more
2:25:23
interesting that MPs would cover this, because they go into a
2:25:27
pretty good job of taking this repurposing the Marines apart,
2:25:32
Eric and the
2:25:32
Marines will repurpose their presence in Japan into what they
2:25:35
call a torille regiment is designed to be more mobile
2:25:38
better conduct reconnaissance and fight from remote islands.
2:25:42
They'll be equipped with not yet acquired anti ship and anti
2:25:46
aircraft missiles. The Marines portray themselves as the best
2:25:49
of the best capable of responding quickly anywhere on
2:25:52
the planet, including for the last 20 years fighting land
2:25:55
based counterinsurgency. We will focus now on China and maritime
2:26:01
campaigns from the current commander called and the
2:26:04
revolution
2:26:05
from the hill fights of Vietnam to the global war on terrorism.
2:26:09
Third, marines has adapted its mission, its structure, its
2:26:12
training with drittes evolving in the Pacific,
2:26:15
it's time to adapt again. The Marines goal operate within
2:26:19
what's known as the first island chain inside the area vulnerable
2:26:22
to Chinese missiles. As some other US military weapons such
2:26:26
as ships and aircraft stay at a distance standing in Marine
2:26:30
Corps Commandant David Berger,
2:26:32
you're there side by side shoulder by shoulder with Pat
2:26:35
with a partners with the allies that the US has. You're not
2:26:39
You're not leaving them, you're not going back to the rear.
2:26:43
This week, Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin provided his most
2:26:45
public support for the Marines shifts.
2:26:48
These actions will bolster
2:26:50
deterrence in the region and allow us to defend Japan and its
2:26:54
people more effectively. Oh yeah. This is great.
2:26:59
Didn't you put this in the newsletter as well?
2:27:01
Why would I put it in the newsletter was the fact that
2:27:04
they're trying to rearm the Japanese was not what allied
2:27:07
Austin just said there? Yeah, kind of but now they want to put
2:27:10
these marine marine battalions here in their craw long all
2:27:14
these.
2:27:15
Let me say, put them at our border. Okay. I've covered all
2:27:18
the bases. John.
2:27:20
Good work. All right. Onward.
2:27:24
A senior Administration official told me the Marines his moves
2:27:27
represents a significant posture change, and Japan's agreed to
2:27:30
the change reflects a major development in the Alliance. For
2:27:34
more on the Marine Corps plan to take on China and redesign their
2:27:38
force structure. We turn to retired Lieutenant General Paul
2:27:41
Van Riper. General, thank you very much. Welcome to the
2:27:44
program. We've spoken to a half dozen, three and four star
2:27:47
retired Marine generals like yourself who voiced concerns
2:27:51
about the Marines, his plans, you've been particularly public,
2:27:54
in your criticism, what are your worries about the vulnerability,
2:27:58
the sustainability and the access for these Marines being
2:28:01
deployed in the Pacific?
2:28:02
The Marines have always been an offensive organization. The few
2:28:06
times we've been in the defense, it hasn't gone well. In fact,
2:28:10
there's an analogy. In the Second World War, the Marines
2:28:14
had a defense Battalion on Wake Island. They weren't able to
2:28:17
resupply, to provide any support. And of course, the
2:28:22
island fell with tremendous casualties in pressors. What
2:28:26
we're talking about now is putting Marines on islands in
2:28:29
the first island chain on the western Pacific. There is no
2:28:33
ability logistically and even the Marine Corps was in business
2:28:37
now to support them, or you won't be able to get casualties
2:28:41
up.
2:28:41
I spoke to the current marine commanders on Okinawa, and they
2:28:45
acknowledged some of your concerns about logistics, but
2:28:48
they point out that they do not have to do everything themselves
2:28:52
that they'll be supported by the Navy and the Air Force. Will
2:28:55
that be possible?
2:28:56
No. Oh, okay. This is this is old trauma. Old South Pacific
2:29:02
trauma.
2:29:05
Well, I guess, but this guy, this guy is great. He just
2:29:10
thinks no, no. To get we do that now can't be done. And I think
2:29:15
he's right. Because it seems to me because I don't think much of
2:29:19
Lloyd Austin. No, I think he's a blowhard. And he's got a great
2:29:24
voice though. I mean, he's got the voice for the job, but
2:29:26
that's about it. And he's just seems like a stooge, a
2:29:29
government stooge, a
2:29:31
memory with a mask and the face shield and
2:29:35
a mask and a face shield? He's sure.
2:29:38
He's not shows us like we're weak. We're pussies. That was
2:29:40
horrible. Horrible. I
2:29:42
forgot to face in the mouth. I didn't rest I didn't forget this
2:29:45
guy's horrible. So he's a horrible person that ran the
2:29:49
marine commandant and the rest of them and like Mark Miley,
2:29:53
they're just Yes, men. So I mean, the Marine commandant, I
2:29:56
think is just so yeah, yeah, whatever boss whatever,
2:29:59
whatever. Like Get the stars. I also
2:30:01
believe there is a contingent, upper level contingent of the
2:30:04
Marines who may be running a lot of the military industrial
2:30:08
complex and all kinds of crap stuff that that removed that
2:30:12
does not represent the Marines that I know. There's something
2:30:17
going on something going on, I think
2:30:18
something is going on to try to eliminate this as part of the
2:30:22
service, you watch
2:30:24
the Navy and the Air Force, will that be possible?
2:30:27
No, there have been articles written where the actual numbers
2:30:32
have been done. And it's over 900 metric tons a day. Even with
2:30:37
the Marines and the joint force, they can't keep them supplied.
2:30:41
Let's talk about the overall strategy when it comes to China
2:30:44
in defense officials I speak to in this Pacific say they support
2:30:48
these changes, because they need the Marines and the Army to
2:30:52
operate within the first island chain and make Chinese targeting
2:30:56
much more complicated since the Chinese are trying to keep the
2:30:59
Navy and the Air Force out. Doesn't that make sense?
2:31:03
No.
2:31:06
It could have been an Ask alum. What's he going to say?
2:31:10
So I gotta get guy this guy. No. But he was just adamant about
2:31:14
it. I think the guy
2:31:16
did all fairness. He's like, command, why do I have to do the
2:31:19
NTD interview? No one watches that maybe some podcaster.
2:31:23
That's about it. So he was annoyed that he had to do this
2:31:26
interview.
2:31:27
He's on PBS is
2:31:29
just as bad. What are you talking about? That's actually
2:31:34
interesting. on PBS, he would just give those short answers.
2:31:37
No, he was flat.
2:31:38
He does elucidate. So here we go with this news clip for
2:31:42
doesn't that make sense? No.
2:31:44
The Marine Corps in their initial documents. So this would
2:31:47
be a low observable unit. I've looked at all the equipment,
2:31:52
there's not one item of equipment that has any stealth
2:31:56
or low observable capabilities. Now the Marine Corps is saying
2:32:01
what we will do, we will tell people where those units are as
2:32:05
a deterrent to the Chinese, which is going to be there's
2:32:09
going to be little observable, but there's no indication, none
2:32:11
of the equipment in that unit has still played capabilities.
2:32:16
The Chinese are going to target these right at the outset, and
2:32:19
take them up.
2:32:20
Marine leaders say they do acknowledge some of the concerns
2:32:24
that you're raising, but that if the Marines are gonna play a
2:32:27
major part in what the Defense Department calls the pacing
2:32:30
challenge, China, they'll have to make bold changes, and that
2:32:33
they're working to solve some of the vulnerabilities. What's your
2:32:37
response to that?
2:32:38
The mistake is divesting yourself of current
2:32:42
capabilities. And as you know, the Marines have gotten rid of
2:32:45
all their tanks in the process of getting rid of cannon
2:32:48
artillery, cutting squadrons. Why would you cut these things
2:32:53
before you have the capability they claim that we'll have in
2:32:56
the future? So we're going to have a vulnerability gap here of
2:33:00
anywhere from eight to 10 years for an unproven capability. Wow.
2:33:10
Okay, then you have a fifth one a long one.
2:33:14
Yeah, the last last one, he kind of wraps things up but what he's
2:33:17
saying is that they want to be essentially disarmed the Marines
2:33:23
and then rearm them with all this fancy missiles and make
2:33:27
them a missile operation cool shit, but they don't have any,
2:33:31
but they do. But there's nothing in between. It's gonna take 10
2:33:34
years to do that, and they're gonna they're gonna be
2:33:35
weaponless. In the meantime, for all practical purposes, it This
2:33:40
is ludicrous.
2:33:41
Oh, certainly, since everything is being sent to Ukraine.
2:33:45
That does well, he mentioned that this last clip,
2:33:47
a senior defense official told me that the the items that
2:33:52
you're talking about that why doesn't he
2:33:53
just say who it was a senior defense official. And when
2:33:56
you're talking to this guy, PBS, why don't they just say it? Is
2:34:01
that? Is that crap journalism? Am I just too critical?
2:34:05
I think it's as good. I think this is a legitimate complaint.
2:34:11
A senior defense official told me that the the items that
2:34:15
you're talking about that have been cut are more relevant to
2:34:18
invading Afghanistan, rather than taking on China, which
2:34:22
again, the Defense Department identifies as the future threat.
2:34:25
All I can say is look at Ukraine. What do we need in
2:34:29
Ukraine, they're crying for artillery, they're looking for
2:34:32
armored tanks. They want six wing close support aircraft,
2:34:37
though they want helicopters. Those are the kinds of things
2:34:41
the Marine Corps as cut or as well on the way to cutting the
2:34:45
Marine Corps in the western Pacific will be a missile force.
2:34:49
It'll have no infantry maneuver units on the ground. What people
2:34:54
think of the Marine Corps will not exist. They're rapidly
2:34:57
cutting it. So instead of being a forces able to deploy
2:35:02
worldwide for contingencies is going to be sitting on islands
2:35:07
in the defense is an untested concept. But we're making we're
2:35:11
actually making the structure cuts and cutting the weapons
2:35:15
before we have this capability that I don't think we even even
2:35:19
exist,
2:35:19
was there a way for the Marines to become more relevant to the
2:35:22
fight in the Pacific without losing that global response
2:35:25
capacity.
2:35:26
What the Marine Corps always done is been a it's been a
2:35:29
global response force, it's been able to move on globally,
2:35:33
because of that was born amphibious ships, it had air
2:35:37
alert forces, it was on scene, all of those capabilities are
2:35:41
being cut for a promise in the future, that those of us who are
2:35:45
resisting this and arguing against it, don't think will
2:35:48
ever come to fruition.
2:35:50
So first of all, I can get you an appointment with Dr. Zack for
2:35:54
that Shiva lunch. We should work on that sector. I think he's. So
2:35:59
if I now put this all together, what what they're doing here is
2:36:05
moving these guys out of the way. But his complaint is we
2:36:07
know one, I think it's not just the Marines, no one has any new
2:36:10
gear. Yeah, we know, it's all going in there. And the and the
2:36:13
deals have been you know, they're all the money is going
2:36:16
into the manufacturers, but we really don't have anything yet.
2:36:19
And this is good, because this brings me right to a couple of
2:36:21
Russia things that I have. And a junior defense official told me
2:36:27
that there's a lot of reports of tuberculosis in Ukraine amongst
2:36:32
the Ukrainian soldiers, which was very predictable. And if
2:36:38
they get a full on TB outbreak, not very good. Second, from the
2:36:44
same Junior defense official. I am informed that President
2:36:50
Zelensky of Ukraine is offering anyone who wants to fight and I
2:36:56
know that there's a lot of mercs in Ukraine, mercenaries, US
2:37:00
mercenaries, hired soldiers not should not be surprised anybody.
2:37:05
A lot of them go just they'll fight anywhere for money. That
2:37:11
anyone who fights for the Ukrainian cause is offered a
2:37:16
Ukrainian passport. And you can put any name on it you want. So
2:37:21
there are terrorists, there are criminals. Apparently even some
2:37:26
Antifa like real hardcore Antifa are all getting these Ukrainian
2:37:30
passports and they are flooding into Europe. So that's what the
2:37:34
officials say. Now let's turn to Germany, Germany is under the
2:37:38
loop and there's something going on Germany has a problem. And
2:37:42
heads are rolling. As we are now all asked to send our our tanks,
2:37:49
our Bradley Fighting Vehicles anything we got send it to
2:37:52
Ukraine,
2:37:53
the United Kingdom has now confirmed it will send a
2:37:55
challenger to tanks to Ukraine. These will be the first advanced
2:37:59
tanks given to Ukraine by its allies since the war began.
2:38:03
Keith has been pleading for more modern weaponry for months and
2:38:08
hopes the British decision will put greater pressure on Germany
2:38:11
to allow the delivery of its own
2:38:14
leopard tax. So the leopard tanks. This is also very soon
2:38:18
we'll talk about both the Bradley Fighting Vehicles and
2:38:20
the leopard tanks in a moment. This is a point of contention
2:38:25
amongst the Germans in their parliament.
2:38:28
Now we've got an ongoing debate whether or not Western allies
2:38:32
should supply Ukraine with Western built battle tanks such
2:38:36
as the leopard. What's your stance?
2:38:39
Well, I think we have a debate that is only focused on new
2:38:43
weapons, which is I think, a wrong idea. We just decided to
2:38:50
send vehicles to the Ukraine and in the moment that was decided
2:38:57
the next questions were raised whether we shouldn't send
2:39:04
Western tanks and what's the next Western airplanes and
2:39:08
Sunday we're talking about Western troops? I don't know. So
2:39:12
I don't think that this is the right thing to do. Oh,
2:39:14
please don't try to be sensical you moron. You can't have that.
2:39:18
The problem is all of Germany's metrio is crap. It hasn't been
2:39:24
maintained. That half of it is just broken. And this week if it
2:39:29
hasn't been announced already, the German defense minister will
2:39:32
resign her position
2:39:34
here in Germany media reports suggest the defense minister is
2:39:37
planning to resign because in a lumbar left has come under
2:39:41
scrutiny for a number of blunders most recently
2:39:44
asked John what kind of what kind of mistakes you think she
2:39:48
made that would make force her to resign?
2:39:53
Well, I don't know what kind of mistake could she make
2:39:55
official unofficial New Year's message that critics found
2:39:58
distasteful but She also allowed her son to fly with her on
2:40:02
official business in a government helicopter. So what
2:40:05
has she been? Like?
2:40:07
Tweet?
2:40:08
Wait, wait, wait, listen to the reporter who's coming to tell
2:40:11
you what's what the problem really is
2:40:13
government helicopter. So what has she been like, as a defense
2:40:16
minister? What are some of these blunders that have taken place?
2:40:20
On a smaller scale, these blunders have been you know,
2:40:23
she, she showed up at a at a military training site, and she
2:40:25
was wearing high heels. So just she just looked out of step out
2:40:28
of touch with her surroundings. She you, you know, then it also
2:40:34
turned out that she had an A nail appointment, during
2:40:37
official working
2:40:38
hours, this was an outrage, she has to resign.
2:40:41
It's like small things where you think you're not taking your job
2:40:44
seriously. And the problem of that is obviously the context,
2:40:48
right? We're dealing with the war in Ukraine, the German
2:40:52
reputation already appears to be very hesitant when it comes to
2:40:55
arms deliveries. When you look at the state of the German army,
2:40:58
it doesn't look very good, you know, recently had a training
2:41:02
exercise with Pumas that were meant to be sent to the NATO,
2:41:06
eastern flank. They all failed. So you know, we're already in
2:41:10
the middle of, you know, a difficult time for the German
2:41:14
government where it is under pressure for its behavior for
2:41:16
its attitude and for its behavior in this whole conflict.
2:41:20
And then you have a defense minister who appears not fit for
2:41:23
the job.
2:41:24
No kidding. None of these people are fit for the job. There was
2:41:28
never supposed to be even a European army or German army. So
2:41:34
yeah, they put some woke person in there just like Lloyd Austin,
2:41:38
and now their stuff doesn't work. Now, the suggestion here
2:41:43
in the United States is we need to send Bradley Fighting
2:41:46
Vehicles, B, F V's the BFBS Bradley Fighting Vehicles are
2:41:53
the so called tank busters. And they have these tank missiles on
2:41:57
top, which is actually turned out to be not so great, because
2:42:02
if you target one of these vehicles, and you hit it right
2:42:05
on top, then pretty much everyone inside melts. And I
2:42:11
have sorry,
2:42:12
I believe that there was I remember when this thing was
2:42:15
first being developed. And it was controversial at the time. I
2:42:19
remember this is like a was some sort of massive waste of
2:42:23
development money. I have Am I wrong? And then after that, I
2:42:27
have a
2:42:27
bootstrapped. Yeah. No. What would happen is it would blow
2:42:31
these things up. If I hit it on top where these tank busters
2:42:34
are, and the way it's built, it would actually weld the top
2:42:38
shut, and fry everybody inside. I think that was a design flaw.
2:42:43
We have boots on the ground from an armor officer, who of course
2:42:47
will shall go unnamed known to me, and I've served as a
2:42:49
battalion commander, Lieutenant Colonel, I've operated in and
2:42:52
lead soldiers in Bradley Fighting Vehicles and Abrams
2:42:55
tanks. I've been to combat more than once and I've seen these
2:42:59
systems in battle. All information I'm sharing is open
2:43:01
source. My opinions are my own. I maintain my position that a
2:43:05
secondary objective of US involvement in the Russia
2:43:07
Ukraine war is to study the effectiveness of our legacy
2:43:11
equipment against the current threat systems. There are
2:43:14
parallels to this war and the Yom Kippur War, where we studied
2:43:18
the outcomes of the battles between the Israelis who
2:43:21
supplied were supplied with us equipment and the Arabs supplied
2:43:24
with Soviet equipment. This is good. This is good analysis
2:43:27
here. The conclusions of the study of outcomes of the Yom
2:43:31
Kippur War and the battle damage of the equipment led to the
2:43:34
development and fielding of the US Army's Big Five whatever that
2:43:40
is, the BF the Bradley fighting vehicle is good, but not all
2:43:46
that. There's been a push in the army to equip equip the Bradley
2:43:50
fighting vehicle and other systems with 30 millimeter
2:43:52
cannon versus a 25 millimeter cannon because the Russians
2:43:57
outgunned us. The fight the Bradley fighting vehicle
2:44:00
requires crews that are highly trained and that work well
2:44:04
together to be effective. They have a role on the battlefield
2:44:08
as a scout platform or infantry transport fighting vehicle. Yes,
2:44:12
they can kill tanks, but do not protect crews very well, to just
2:44:16
said the variant of the Bradley fighting vehicle that will be
2:44:19
given to Ukraine has not been specified yet. That may make a
2:44:23
difference. The most modern bFV variant is the m A m two a
2:44:27
three. It was the new hotness when I was Lieutenant 21 years
2:44:32
ago. The OS for the computers is Windows 95. My process of
2:44:40
spiking likely will get shipped to Europe is the m two a two
2:44:46
from Operation Desert Storm, which is not as advanced. It is
2:44:51
a viable fighting platform with a train but only with a trained
2:44:54
crew. Training the crew to be proficient proficient on this
2:44:57
platform takes months if These crews were trained to standard
2:45:01
it will take about six months from when the Ukrainian start
2:45:04
training up when we should see them in combat. Given an
2:45:07
accelerated timeline, the US has given the bFV to other partners
2:45:11
with limited success. I don't believe the hype around the bFV
2:45:15
going back to war against an old threat. It's counterintuitive to
2:45:19
the military industrial complex argument that Russia outguns us.
2:45:22
Therefore we need better stuff. future battles may tell but
2:45:25
perhaps the Pentagon is shorting the bFV. I believe that with
2:45:30
well trained cruise train crews, and robust robust logistic
2:45:33
support, the bFV would likely provide viable so this none of
2:45:38
this is going to happen. Of course, there's not going to be
2:45:41
enough training. It's not gonna enough time to train at all. So
2:45:47
this is a farce, but the farce is taken very seriously by the
2:45:53
Ukrainians. This is the Ukrainian defense minister on
2:45:56
BBC,
2:45:57
Ukraine's defense minister says his country has become a de
2:46:00
facto member of the NATO military alliance, as Western
2:46:04
nations continue to supply weapons for the war against
2:46:06
Russia. Speaking to the BBC, Alexei Resnikoff, said there had
2:46:10
been a change among some allies, once concerned that the military
2:46:14
assistance could be seen as an escalation by Russia. Well, our
2:46:17
correspondent Hugo chega, sat down with him.
2:46:19
We have a lot of modern NATO standard weaponry, it means that
2:46:25
Ukraine, as a country, and the armed forces of Ukraine or our
2:46:31
sector of security and defense, became the member of NATO de
2:46:37
facto not the euro, but the fact that because we have weaponry,
2:46:41
we have the understanding how to use it. We have this
2:46:44
interoperability level of the communication while they're with
2:46:48
our partners. And I'm sure that in next future we will became
2:46:54
the member of NATO, the EU. So that's a controversial
2:46:58
statement. You're saying that Ukraine is a de facto NATO
2:47:02
member? Why controversial? It's true. It's a fact I'm a lawyer,
2:47:07
you know, I I I'm operated with the facts. The perception has
2:47:13
been that any kind of let's say tanks being sent to Ukraine
2:47:16
would be seen as an escalation by Russia. You're not concerned
2:47:19
about how Russia could respond. I have a war in my country
2:47:27
them's fightin words. I say de facto NATO. This is so stupid.
2:47:34
The Russians must be in the game somehow.
2:47:37
There's something fishy about the whole
2:47:41
I don't like any of this. The mind control was fantastic
2:47:44
though. Because man there it's a money bonanza. Check this out in
2:47:48
Sweden,
2:47:49
Europe has a new gateway to space. Today, the EU inaugurated
2:47:53
its first orbital launch pad on the European mainland. It's the
2:47:57
latest sign that the space race is heating up here in Europe as
2:48:01
well. The new EU facility in Arctic Sweden will complement
2:48:05
Europe's other Spaceport in tropical French Guiana. It's
2:48:09
designed to launch small satellites, which can be used,
2:48:12
for example, to track natural disasters in real time or to
2:48:15
monitor active conflicts like the war in Ukraine. European
2:48:19
Commission president was enough on deadline joins Swedish and EU
2:48:22
dignitaries at the ribbon cutting ceremony today.
2:48:25
It's a big moment. It's a big moment for Europe. It's a big
2:48:29
moment for Europe space industry. This space port offers
2:48:34
an independent European gateway to space.
2:48:39
The current geopolitical situation, not least, of course,
2:48:43
the Russian invasion of Ukraine has demonstrated how important
2:48:48
it is that the European Union has access to
2:48:51
space. Who Are they kidding? Do they have engines or do they do
2:48:57
they also get them from Russia?
2:49:00
This is very me all the engines. The good engines all come from
2:49:03
Russia, but they know that oh, what are you gonna do?
2:49:08
I have to climate change clips, short ones. I think
2:49:11
because I got to drought Eclipse,
2:49:14
you want to hit us with the drought hit us with the drought.
2:49:16
We have our drought here in California. Here's a drought
2:49:20
quickie.
2:49:20
And despite the amount of rainfall the drought that has
2:49:24
gripped the western US is far from over.
2:49:26
Yeah, of course. We could have rain for Here to Eternity and
2:49:31
there's gonna be a drop because it keeps the prices high. But
2:49:34
But then what's causing all this? Well, it's climate change
2:49:38
the other Cliff course.
2:49:39
So one of the issues that has come up about climate change is
2:49:42
no longer an existential future threat in California, it's here.
2:49:46
And what we're seeing is drier dry years and wetter wet years.
2:49:50
So this way, you can't attribute this what's happening right now
2:49:54
to climate change, but it is consistent with what we're
2:49:57
seeing and that is these atmospheric rivers getting
2:50:00
juiced up by the warm air out in the Pacific because they're just
2:50:03
holding more water as they come in. And so this is what all our
2:50:06
predictions are like this is what the future probably looks
2:50:08
like and in fact, I would argue the future is here it's here now
2:50:12
did you listen to the what he said first is climate change and
2:50:15
then he says you can't attribute it to climate change.
2:50:18
No, you can't attribute the you can't attribute the this wet
2:50:21
weather to climate change that's just an anomaly which actually
2:50:24
comes from global warming. We all know this. You're going to
2:50:27
you're going to you're going to have no water because of the
2:50:30
water that from global warming. We were talking earlier about
2:50:38
you know how how news models are often given the you know that
2:50:42
the control room che Okay, yeah, you gotta say this or ask this
2:50:46
question. And we had one of those crop up. This week. This
2:50:52
was CNN discussing the very dangerous gas stoves because
2:50:58
they are noxious fumes are killing our children and even
2:51:02
older people noxious fumes from gas stoves. That's why we need
2:51:06
to get rid of them. gas stoves
2:51:09
could soon get 86 to from kitchens across the country
2:51:12
going forward. The US Consumer Product Safety Commissioner is
2:51:15
considering a ban on the appliances for new builds. It
2:51:20
says those appliances can be a source of indoor pollution,
2:51:24
sometimes linked to childhood asthma,
2:51:26
but also the gas no gas
2:51:28
lines in new construction. Is that about fossil fuels, or is
2:51:31
it about sorry, I'm getting in trouble. No, no, that's That's
2:51:35
the short answer. It's about climate change.
2:51:37
I will now do the part of the control room
2:51:41
and gas lines in new construction. Is that about
2:51:43
fossil fuels? Or is it about Shut up? jasha Deville trouble
2:51:47
no no, that's That's the short answer. It's about climate
2:51:50
change because methane is more powerful than co2 when it comes
2:51:53
to heating up the planet. So big time but in small spaces it's
2:51:57
personal health Excellent.
2:51:58
Well we'll save built good work
2:52:04
now know what your control room I'm going to change you don't
2:52:07
like? Like my control room? I like the older control room.
2:52:11
Okay. Yeah, that's more believable. Okay.
2:52:15
I'm sorry. Yes, Michelle, move on with the show. We have a
2:52:24
shill or not no agenda show listeners know exactly what's up
2:52:27
when you hear about the new what is his title? Chief note new
2:52:36
leader of the cop 28 climate talks. So this we just had top
2:52:41
20 Cop 27 With the new Greta and all out soft now cop 28. We're
2:52:46
going to discuss again how we're going to pay for it who's going
2:52:49
to who how America is going to just get it so who's gonna get
2:52:52
soaked. But now Whoa. Climate
2:52:55
change. Campaigners have expressed outrage and the
2:52:57
appointment of the head of one of the world's biggest oil
2:52:59
companies as president of this year's UN Climate Summit in the
2:53:03
United Arab Emirates saw Tom Athonite algebra who had Abu
2:53:07
Dhabi's national oil company is the nation's climate and boy,
2:53:11
his office said he would play a central role in building
2:53:14
consensus, the cop 28 conference, The move comes amid
2:53:18
controversy over the prominence of fossil fuel interests at
2:53:21
climate talks. The recent cop 27 gathering in Egypt was described
2:53:25
by some attendees as a glorified fossil fuel trade show.
2:53:30
I haven't ever, ever thought why why this guy is going to be the
2:53:33
lead.
2:53:35
Well, first of all, before you have your thought, I never heard
2:53:38
that it was a glorified trade show for the fossil fuel
2:53:42
industry. Amy was there she never mentioned that it's
2:53:44
only this guy did now that this guy is going to be the new guy
2:53:48
for 24. The 2828 doesn't I don't know. Is it been 28 years?
2:53:55
Isn't it every other year? It's not every year, it's been
2:53:57
60 years. I think this guy is is the guy because it's going to be
2:54:05
green hydrogen.
2:54:07
Maybe that could be you might be right that I think
2:54:10
that. And this is the switcheroo. I mean, someone
2:54:14
pointed out to me although I think we we knew it. That the
2:54:19
inflation Reduction Act includes money for green hydrogen, clean
2:54:24
hydrogen. And we need to invest now so that in 10 years we'll
2:54:28
have green hydrogen from steamer Monza, European Union, Green
2:54:32
Deal Guy, clean hydrogen. Now of course, to get to green, clean
2:54:37
hydrogen, you have to go through brown and blue and purple
2:54:41
hydrogen, which is not made with wind power, or whatever else. I
2:54:47
think they're gonna make it with. I think the whole the
2:54:50
whole thing is coming full circle. They're scamming this
2:54:53
now that the scamming everybody's taking away from
2:54:55
batteries and I think there's we're gonna see more here More
2:55:00
of these reports
2:55:01
we have an important consumer alert tonight for people who own
2:55:03
Bissell cordless vacuums. More than 60,000 multiservice wet dry
2:55:08
vacuums have been recalled. A government watchdog group says
2:55:11
some models can overheat and even catch fire. At least one
2:55:15
person was burned. Contact this oh for a free replacement
2:55:18
battery pack.
2:55:20
Now do you think that they bought that airtime? Nor was
2:55:23
that truly a consumer
2:55:25
wouldn't be bad bissa wouldn't be buying it. That that's not
2:55:28
the kind of thing you can buy airtime for different things,
2:55:31
but you're not going to do it for some negative story. It
2:55:34
seems to me but that negative story is interesting in and of
2:55:37
itself because they are starting to target
2:55:41
batteries batteries, yeah. And why those targeting
2:55:43
and in Tesla's being targeted to there's no doubt about it. I
2:55:46
mean, they were given a free free pass for a long time now
2:55:49
they're being targeted. I know locally, we've had a number of
2:55:51
stories about there's a crash in the in the tunnel that goes to
2:55:56
go across the bay, the Yerba Buena tunnel and there are some
2:56:00
and they have pictures of it. They showing movies. I've never
2:56:03
seen this before, because they might be able to do this
2:56:05
everywhere. But they have a camera shot of a Tesla in the
2:56:09
fast lane, going across the bridge, hitting the tunnel and
2:56:12
then stopping dead and then just stopping dead and then bang,
2:56:16
bang, bang, bang bang that's six cars, including one that got
2:56:19
jammed up into the side became kind of get flying almost
2:56:23
flipped over. And then there's updated a whole feature on what
2:56:26
happened.
2:56:27
Wow. Dynamite. Yeah. Well, Elon, Elon, is I think Elon may have
2:56:35
taken just bitten off too much. He couldn't chew it. You know?
2:56:39
He I think he may have been more alone in this in his insanity
2:56:44
and incessant desire to build x.com Because Pay Pal isn't what
2:56:49
I wanted it to be. Has to be x.com I would talk about the
2:56:53
Twitter coin you're gonna pay with a Twitter coin and Twitter.
2:56:56
Maybe I was wrong. Maybe he's really just freewheeling this.
2:57:01
Because it's not I mean, Twitter is I always predicted it will
2:57:05
destroy Twitter. I think that is really happening. I mean, Jeff
2:57:09
Jarvis is on Mastodon lexicon that's got to be the canary in
2:57:13
the coal mine.
2:57:16
Or not?
2:57:18
I can I can I have only one last clip just to remind everybody,
2:57:24
the way I started out, they want to kill us. They want to kill us
2:57:27
all. They want to kill us with their climate change. They want
2:57:30
to kill us with a with a crap food that isn't food. Where the?
2:57:36
What was it? What was what what cereal was better than beef, I
2:57:40
forgot what it was. It wasn't Cheerios, it was Froot Loops, I
2:57:46
think Froot Loops.
2:57:47
Froot Loops is a classic. It's on the it's on the recommended
2:57:50
list,
2:57:51
I think from the
2:57:54
recommended number of artificial dyes.
2:57:58
So we have one more classic from Paul Ehrlich, the guy who was
2:58:02
still an advisor to the White House today on climate change.
2:58:07
But this one is where he shows his true colors,
2:58:10
a population growth expert, but now he's a climate change expert
2:58:14
too. Is that what you're telling me?
2:58:16
I'd like to return to his true self, when he was a population
2:58:20
expert in the 1970s. And I'd like you to hear his
2:58:23
recommendations for curtailing the population. And then just
2:58:28
think about these people walking around right now. And how they
2:58:31
want most of us dead,
2:58:34
given the population explosion, let alone in this country. What
2:58:39
can the government what ought the government to do about this?
2:58:41
Well, what it ought to do is, that's the first thing you want,
2:58:44
you don't want to put I'm against government interference
2:58:47
in our lives, you want to minimize that. So the very first
2:58:49
thing the government should do is try and take the pressure off
2:58:52
to reproduce. There's a lot of pressure in our society now to
2:58:54
reproduce. If you're single, people try and push you into
2:58:56
getting married, you know, your wife, you have a bachelor over
2:59:01
and your wife says you shouldn't I have a nice girl over the
2:59:03
ideas. You know, nobody should escape. So there's pressure to
2:59:05
get married. Young couples have they don't have children. People
2:59:08
say gee, they must be sterile. They never say, gee, maybe they
2:59:11
like good wine and go into the theater and so on. They prefer
2:59:13
that the scraping diapers so there's pressure to have
2:59:16
children. So the first thing that should happen is that the
2:59:18
President wants to say from now here on out no intelligent,
2:59:22
patriotic American family, or to have more than two children,
2:59:26
preferably one if you're starting a family now, and I'm
2:59:28
not any law, but just say this is what responsible people do.
2:59:32
You ought to make the FCC See to it that large families are
2:59:35
always treated in a negative light on television, wherever
2:59:37
they appear. There ought to be a tremendous amount of television
2:59:39
time devoted to spot commercials this where we've had against
2:59:42
smoking. But the ones in the middle of say in the middle of
2:59:45
Beverly Hillbillies, you get a scene which shows Los Angeles
2:59:47
and the smog and it just as a city as a fatal disease. It's
2:59:49
called overpopulation and so long. Now that sort of campaign
2:59:54
you can you can have a census, a sample census, which we'll see
2:59:57
whether that was having a desired effect. If that didn't
3:00:00
you'd move to giving women bonuses for not having babies,
3:00:02
that almost certainly would do the job. If that didn't have the
3:00:05
effect, then you could move to changing the tax structure. So
3:00:08
that people who had the money and had the children paid for
3:00:11
the children. In other words, you would increase taxes on
3:00:13
people with children, rather than decrease them, since they
3:00:15
when they have the children, they require more services. If
3:00:18
that doesn't work, then you will have the government legislating
3:00:20
the size of the family and people say, Oh, that's
3:00:22
impossible. Government can never intrude and tell you how many
3:00:25
children to have. Well, I got news, you know what intruded a
3:00:27
long time ago and told you how many wives you can have. And
3:00:29
there's not the slightest question that if we don't get
3:00:31
the population under control with voluntary means that in the
3:00:33
not too distant future, the governor will simply tell you
3:00:35
how many children you can have and throw you in jail if you
3:00:37
have too many.
3:00:37
This is the thinking. And it's the same thing behind climate
3:00:41
change behind the Froot Loops. They want you dead. They don't
3:00:45
want you to reproduce. They need less of you. And of course, they
3:00:49
hit upon the genius idea of convincing everybody they needed
3:00:53
to be the opposite sex to sterilize themselves. It is so
3:00:57
good. Paul Ehrlich should go home.
3:01:01
That's a yeah, do others to self serve sterilization, deciding
3:01:05
and changing his sex and sterilizing yourself in the
3:01:08
process is definitely part of some sort of screwball movement.
3:01:12
Don't like it?
3:01:13
No, of course not. But that's why we break it down and
3:01:16
deconstruct as best we can. Early go home. Okay, we have end
3:01:26
of show mixes from Tom Starkweather. We got Rolando
3:01:30
Gonzalez, we got Maddie J and one more. Sir Michael Anthony.
3:01:37
Erica. Coming up next on no agenda stream.com If you're in
3:01:42
the troll room, you can stick right where you are. It's bowl
3:01:44
after bowl, Episode 217. Coming to you from the heart of the
3:01:51
Texas hill country here in FEMA Region number six in the
3:01:53
morning, everybody. I'm Adam curry
3:01:55
in from Northern California where it started raining just
3:01:59
now. Climate change, I'm John C. Dvorak.
3:02:04
We return on Thursday with another episode of your
3:02:07
deconstruction right here on no agenda. Get pod verse app to be
3:02:12
alerted when we go live. And make sure you go to no agenda
3:02:15
show.net And subscribe to the newsletter. Remember us at the
3:02:19
boruch.org/na Until next time, everybody. Adios and
3:02:36
we take this very seriously. The president takes this very
3:02:39
seriously. He was not aware that the records were there.
3:02:42
Ukraine has refuted Russian claims it's captured the eastern
3:02:46
town of solidar.
3:02:47
Pfizer board member Scott Gottlieb use the same Twitter
3:02:50
lobbyists the White House uses to encourage Twitter to hide
3:02:54
post challenging his company's massively profitable COVID Jab,
3:02:58
Lucky lottery player just one big and I'm talking huge, but
3:03:02
unless you were in Maine recently, it was
3:03:05
Treasury Secretary Jenny Yellen is urging Congress to quickly
3:03:08
pass legislation to either raise the federal debt limit or
3:03:11
temporarily suspend it
3:03:13
with more rain on the way the flooding may not be over just as
3:03:16
many people are cleaning up from the last door
3:03:19
CDC says it has found a safety concern linking Pfizer's updated
3:03:24
by baileigh vaccine to possible stroke health
3:03:26
officials are reassuring older Americans that the latest
3:03:29
COVID-19 Booster is safe
3:03:46
nothing would be happy for me
3:04:03
you must be your advice is the only highlight of the month.
3:04:43
Is yours
3:05:04
If the freedom to dream or a spear, I proudly present a human
3:05:09
being who tonight represents that Spears most honed kit
3:05:12
that is in judgment. Wow. Wow. You know, for us Ukraine losing
3:05:17
this was simply not an option because it's also about our way
3:05:20
of life and our freedoms, that is in job
3:05:23
training of about 100. Ukrainian soldiers will begin as early as
3:05:26
next week at Fort Sill, Oklahoma. My difference is not
3:05:32
that I'm pleased to yield to the distinguished President of
3:05:35
Ukraine, the courageous, determined unified President of
3:05:39
Ukraine, President Solinsky, ladies and gentlemen,
3:05:42
supporting Ukraine fully and completely is in the best
3:05:45
interest of the United States. I'm trying
3:05:48
to make a statistical point. Okay, that is in JAMA,
3:05:51
we are willing to stick to Ukraine and that we are willing
3:05:54
to do whatever it takes, and as long as it takes,
3:05:57
but the Ukrainian see more than that.
3:05:59
That is in judgment.
3:06:00
I think really giving Ukraine these capabilities, I think can
3:06:04
be a deterrent. For example,
3:06:05
long range fires, that calculus has clearly changed that is in
3:06:09
JAMA giving in to Putin's aggression is absolutely the
3:06:15
wrong answer to this challenge, not a joke. That isn't jonkman
3:06:19
eggs.
3:06:21
Nothing embarrassing about it. And you'd better lay one out if
3:06:25
you're hired, given the old needle once in a while. egg
3:06:30
prices are continuing to soar the cost of
3:06:34
eggs has been soaring across the country by
3:06:37
cost of eggs. So what's behind egg inflation,
3:06:40
pathogenic avian influenza, more commonly known as bird flu,
3:06:44
the worst bird flu outbreak in years, swept through the
3:06:48
country. 10s of millions of birds have died or been
3:06:51
slaughtered first, we
3:06:52
have reduced the egg laying hen population by more than 40
3:06:55
million 40 million that's astounding to think about that
3:06:58
looks like eggs are the new toilet paper. extremely bad news
3:07:03
you
3:07:03
might want to consider alternatives. This is
3:07:06
an egg replacement item.
3:07:07
These chickens that were laying eggs those are mature hens right
3:07:11
so we don't get a mature hen overnight. It takes some time
3:07:15
for a chicken patches out of an egg to be ready to lasting us
3:07:18
into the summer
3:07:20
for you and nice egg in this prime. Got an egg?
3:07:35
borak.org/in A thank God
0:00 0:00