September 25th • 3h 33m
Transcript
The transcripts of No Agenda are automatically generated and therefore, not fully accurate. Discretion is advised.
Click the text to start playing from that position in the show. Click the timestamp to copy a direct link to that position to your clipboard in order to propagate the formula.
We're going to the moon.
Adam Curry, John C.
Dvorak.
It's Thursday, September 25th, 2025.
This is your award-winning Gilmore Nation Media
Assassination Episode 1802.
This is no agenda.
With free speech on sale and broadcasting live
from the heart of the Texas Hill Country
here in FEMA Region No.
6 in the morning, everybody.
I'm Adam Curry.
And from northern Silicon Valley, where we're noticing
that they're shooting up to place in Texas.
Get out while you can.
I'm John C.
Dvorak.
You know, I'm getting a little annoyed by
bullet etchings.
It all began with that one guy.
Well, it started with Luigi.
But did Luigi have bullet etchings?
Yeah, he had no deny, defend.
Okay, well, one guy said it.
Once one guy did it, all these other
guys have to do it now.
It's like, is this the modern-day version
of Manifesto?
I just want a good old-fashioned Manifesto.
I don't want it.
Listen, here's the story.
You can hear the gunshots.
Denise Robledo was waiting for her mother at
the Dallas ice field office and started filming.
I was with my sister praying, she said.
At least three people shot.
Multiple people shot.
Police say the gunman perched on a rooftop,
killed one detainee and wounded two others before
taking his own life.
No ICE officers were injured.
DHS calling it an attack on ICE law
enforcement.
The FBI releasing this image of shell casings
found near the shooter engraved with the words
anti-ICE.
Tom speaking with the acting ICE director.
There were some brave men and women on
the ground that went into those vans, were
pulling those detainees out while they're under fire.
And they were all shot while they were
in the vehicle?
They were shot while they were in the
vehicle, right?
So the shooter obviously didn't know who was
in the vehicle.
He was just randomly shooting at windows into
vehicles that he already seen down there.
The agency releasing images of bullet holes in
a window and American flag inside the facility.
Authorities say the gunman fired multiple rounds from
the top of that building into this ICE
facility a few hundred yards away.
Tonight, NBC News has learned the shooter is
29-year-old Joshua John.
According to multiple senior law enforcement officials, John's
brother described him to NBC News as unique
without elaborating, saying he didn't have strong feelings
about ICE as far as I knew and
that he was not a marksman.
That's for sure.
Now, this is all very troubling.
First of all, the etched shell casings.
I want to hear from our ammo experts
and we have them out there.
I'm surprised no one has said, has come
forward, step forward.
Our producers are out there.
What, how do you etch on casings?
Do you put it in a vice?
And do you use, what do you use?
Is it safe to do this?
Is it easy to do?
I haven't etched any shell casings myself.
And how do we know that this was
an attack on ICE?
Maybe there was someone who needed to be
taken out in the van.
We don't know anything.
It's just assumed.
And unique individual, is that code for trans
now?
I mean, I'm just asking questions.
Well, those are all good questions.
As a matter of fact, and you have
to go by the, you know, the classics
movie script where this is a, you know,
bull crap and there was somebody in the
van that had to be killed.
We never are, nobody's told us who the
dead guy is.
Well, they just, oh, the dead guy.
No, could be a gang member.
Could be someone.
We don't know if it's a woman or
a man as a man or a young
person or an old guy.
We have no idea who it is.
They've just completely glossed that over.
Zero, zero information.
Then there's three others injured, I suppose.
And we don't know anything about them either.
So that, and it's peculiar that, you know,
that he killed a detainee instead of, you
know, he's shooting in the windows, he's doing
all this other stuff, but then that detainee
gets, that's a good point.
I like it.
No, but these are all very- It's
perfect, no agenda material.
It's very irritating things to me.
Why is this guy dead?
Another one is like, we have so many,
we have hundreds of thousands of producers.
And I know that when I make the
call, they'll show up.
But I want people to get back into
the habit of, wait a minute, they're talking
about something that happens to be my field
of expertise.
Maybe I should weigh in.
By the way, if you're tuning into this,
to the No Agenda show to talk about,
to hear some talk about who or how
Charlie Kirk was killed, about entry and exit
wounds, strange characters at the scene, people sending
baseball-like signals or ballistics, this is the
wrong podcast for you.
Bushes with guns.
Yes, this is the wrong podcast for you.
That's, go listen to Megyn Kelly and Candace.
We're not doing that here.
We have other things to do that are,
may actually make a difference to your life.
What a conspiracy hole everyone's been pulled into.
It's like...
Yeah, well, I think it's...
I know people like answers.
I know people like answers.
But people, they like puzzles, it seems to
me.
We like puzzles, yes.
People love puzzles.
Well, so where are our producers who are
experts in escalators?
I would have expected at least three emails
on this topic.
We have people who are experts on everything,
including elevators.
But is there some magic kill switch on
escalators that I'm unaware of?
No, there is a kill switch at the
top.
At the top.
And I think at the bottom too.
But that's a, that's a...
Yeah, somebody up the top could have just
stomped on a switch.
They claim somebody is walking up backwards, taking
pictures or some, you know, a staffer.
And they're blaming it on Trump now.
Oh yeah, no, of course it's Trump's fault.
And he walked up backwards and accidentally stepped,
which is, by the way, I don't know
how easy it is to accidentally step on
that big red button that's at the top
of the stairs.
He stepped on the, they were on two
rungs and the thing stopped.
Anyway, here's everyone's favorite.
We haven't heard from her in a long
time, although I saw her in a promo.
No, it wasn't a promo.
She was doing a hit on the primetime
hours on MSNBC.
And she looks like an old dude now.
I'm talking about Jen Psaki.
So Trump passed through the security barricades.
He then walked up to the escalator and
stepped onto it with the first lady, at
which point, and you'll see in a second,
okay, there it is.
The escalator abruptly stopped, leaving Trump flummoxed for
a few seconds.
Flummoxed, I tell you.
You can see the first lady just walking
up the stairs as one normal person does.
He ultimately decided to just walk up the
immobile staircase himself.
Now, basically everyone who has ever used an
escalator ever has had some version of this
exact same experience.
No.
I've never had that happen to me.
I've never had it.
I've had to walk up escalators that weren't
working.
Everyone's had to walk up escalators, which I
think is what she's trying to say.
No, no, she's not trying to say that.
She's being very clear.
Trump is stupid.
That's what she, he was flummoxed.
He didn't know what to do.
Oh my God, my escalator doesn't work.
Now, basically everyone who has ever used an
escalator ever has had some version of this
exact same experience.
Sometimes escalators malfunction, and you are left to
just treat them like a regular staircase.
Not a big deal.
It happens.
But for Donald Trump, the brief inconvenience of
having to walk up a non-working escalator
while on camera was enough to provoke outrage
on the world stage.
All I got from the United Nations was
an escalator that on the way up stopped
right in the middle, and then a teleprompter
that didn't work.
This is, these are the two things I
got from the United Nations, a bad escalator
and a bad teleprompter.
Okay, so that's real.
That was the president of the United States
lashing out and misguiding the world leaders.
Lashing, lashing out.
He's not lashing out.
Is she an insane person?
You have an insane person that looks like
an old dude, yes.
So that's real.
Was this, did you get, I didn't get
this clip, but did you get this clip
on, right off MSNBC?
This is right off MSNBC, yeah.
Well, they must have new makeup people or
something because they used to at least make
her look presentable.
No, no, when I saw her in the,
it was non-presentable, was she was a
guest and she was, I think she was
actually dialing in from Zoom.
So that didn't help.
Although Zoom has all kinds of filters.
Oh, she was calling in so she didn't
have her, she didn't have a, you know,
the thick coat of baseline makeup.
That's correct.
There was plaster on her face.
That's correct, that's it.
So she looks like hell, is that what
you're saying?
That's the one.
So that's real.
That was the president of the United States
lashing out and an assembled gathering of world
leaders because the escalator.
See Mike, troll see Mike says, gingers go
bad fast after their expiration date.
How rude, see Mike.
Apparently didn't show him enough respect.
It was to say the least, a ridiculous
thing to bring up over and over again.
We showed you a couple of examples of
that in a speech to the United Nations.
But the escalator crisis, believe it or not,
it did not end there.
Just a few hours after that speech, White
House press secretary Caroline Leavitt posted on X
quote, if someone at the UN intentionally stopped
the escalator as the president and first lady
were stepping on, they need to be fired
and investigated immediately.
Oh yes, yeah, absolutely.
So that of course is the headline, which
is probably the whole point of it.
I see you on, you teased in the
newsletter clips of his UN speech.
And I, as we know, I don't listen
to any of your clips, but I saw
only one labeled UN.
So I figured I'd pull a couple of
short ones, but what is your BBC clip?
I decided that there was so many clips
that the people played of Trump berating the
members that everyone has seen these by now.
There's no reason to really be redundant about
it.
It wasn't that remarkable.
He was telling them that global warming is
bull crap and that they better get their
act together.
And it wasn't that remarkable for me to
clip it.
So I clipped nothing from the speech.
I promised and didn't deliver.
Yeah, so I have done many a time
by the way.
Continuously.
It's yours.
Yeah, continuously.
It's your brand.
I talk about it, but then I don't
have to do it.
It's your brand.
I clipped a couple things.
Well, good.
Well, I'm glad you did.
But again, I found the speech to be
relaxed.
I didn't see that he was lashing out.
She's nuts, this woman.
And he was pretty funny, kind of laid
back.
And the prompter went down, which is a
bad idea with him because he could do
two hours without the prompter.
The prompter keeps him in line.
So that was a mistake.
He went over an hour and he's yacking
away without a prompter.
He doesn't need a prompter.
So he doesn't.
No, he doesn't.
He doesn't.
The prompter is to keep him from going,
getting carried away with his long, long diatribes.
And so they killed the prompter.
You're going to get Trump.
All right.
I have a couple of clips and I
feel that all I saw was teleprompter escalator
clips.
So I'll just play the ones that was
really his entire message centered around those two
points, as you said.
And here they are.
Not only is the UN not solving the
problems it should too often, it's actually creating
new problems for us to solve.
The best example is the number one political
issue of our time, the crisis of uncontrolled
migration.
It's uncontrolled.
Your countries are being ruined.
The United Nations is funding an assault on
Western countries and their borders.
In 2024, the UN budgeted $372 million in
cash assistance to support an estimated 624,000
migrants journeying into the United States.
Think of that.
The UN is supporting people that are illegally
coming into the United States and then we
have to get them out.
Your No Agenda show, of course, has been
on this continually showing the UN International Migration
Office doing exactly what the president is saying
here, which no one ever says.
The UN also provided food, shelter, transportation and
debit cards to illegal aliens.
Can you believe that?
And phones.
On the way to infiltrate our southern border.
Millions of people came through that southern border
just a year ago.
Millions and millions of people are pouring in
25 million altogether over the four years of
the incompetent Biden administration.
And now we have it stopped, totally stopped.
In fact, they're not even coming anymore because
they know they can't get through.
But what took place is totally unacceptable.
The UN is supposed to stop invasions, not
create them and not finance them.
In the United States, we reject the idea
that mass numbers of people from foreign lands
can be permitted to travel halfway around the
world, trample our borders, violate our sovereignty, cause
unmitigated crime and deplete our social safety net.
And believe me that this message was heard
around the world.
And there are citizens in Europe and in
the UK going, yeah, how come we don't
have that message?
And this one, for that matter.
Global warming.
Not happening.
You know, it used to be global cooling.
If you look back years ago in the
1920s and the 1930s, they said global cooling.
How about 1970s, Mr. President?
Leonard Nimoy, 1978, they were saying.
It went right up to 1980.
Someone needs to adjust his script on this.
That annoyed me that he said, oh, how
about all back then?
No, sir, up to the 1980s.
Kill the world.
We have to do something.
Then they said global warming will kill the
world.
But then it started getting cooler.
So now they could just call it climate
change because that way they can't miss.
It's climate change because it goes.
When I hear this, I'm like we could
be president.
We could easily we could do this.
We don't need a prompter.
We can walk up with the broken escalator.
We can do this is our material.
Higher or lower, whatever the hell happens.
There's climate change.
It's the greatest con job ever perpetrated on
the world, in my opinion.
Climate change, no matter what happens, you're involved
in that.
No more global warming, no more global cooling.
All of these predictions made by the United
Nations and many others, often for bad reasons,
were wrong.
They were made by stupid people.
He needs to add the snow globes, man.
That have cost their country's fortunes and given
those same countries no chance for success.
If you don't get away from this green
scam, your country is going to fail.
And then he said something remarkable, which and
it's not the first time he said it,
but it's the first time we've clipped it
about Germany.
And it's patently not true, which is just
interesting.
Europe, on the other hand, is a long
way to go with many countries being on
the brink of destruction because of the green
energy agenda.
And I give a lot of credit to
Germany.
Germany was being led down a very sick
path, both on immigration, by the way, and
on energy.
They were going green and they were going
bankrupt.
And the new leadership, new leadership came in
and they went back to where they were
with fossil fuel and with nuclear, which is
good.
It's now safe and you can do it
properly.
But they went back to where they were
and they opened up a lot of different
plants, energy plants, energy producing plants.
And they're doing well.
I give Germany a lot of credit for
that.
They've said this is a disaster.
What's happening?
They were going all green.
All green is all bankrupt.
That's what it represents.
And it's not politically correct.
I'll be very badly criticized for saying it,
but I'm here to tell the truth.
I don't care.
Now, this is just not true.
Germany has definitely been talking about reopening their
nuclear plants and that they could reopen coal
plants, but it hasn't happened.
I, I would, I'm as baffled as you
are about this.
I think it, I think he's trying to
signal to the non-monarch member state of
the European Union, Hey, don't let those, uh,
those bloodlines kill you.
Cause they don't, they don't, they don't have
a royal family.
I can't think of anything.
I mean, first of all, the whole, the
whole immigration and, uh, and clean energy green
new deal is a shot across the bow
at the elites of Europe.
Cause that's what they, that's what they've been
talking about for decades.
For as long as we've been doing this
show.
They've wanted to kill people.
They want to kill people.
Yeah.
Well, they want a smaller population so they
can, uh, and, and, and a population that
they have under total control, i.e. immigrants
who will have to do what they say,
or they get thrown out.
So, but he's, it's not true.
There's a lot of talk about it.
Yeah.
Well, there's gotta be some rationale for this.
It should be, uh, I think we demand
an explanation, an explanation.
Germany isn't doing well at all in that
regard.
We want an explanation from the president.
This is not true.
Why are you saying it?
Why is no one, I mean, what a
perfect opportunity for the green zealots to say
he's lying.
That I don't hear that either.
So something's up with that.
What's your, uh, BBC, uh, UN clip.
Let's play it.
President Trump has demanded an investigation into what
he called a triple sabotage after an escalator,
teleprompter, and sound system all malfunctioned.
A teleprompter?
Is it like a teletubby?
He addressed the United Nations General Assembly on
Tuesday.
In a lengthy social media post, Mr. Trump
described the three incidents as very sinister and
called for anyone responsible to be arrested.
The UN has said the events were accidental
and suggested White House staff might have been
responsible for the problems with the teleprompter and
the sound system.
The teleprompter, teleprompter.
Oh, the teleprompter.
The, uh, analysts that came on different shows
that were security oriented said this was a
disaster because they set Trump up for being,
for an assassination and Secret Service did nothing.
I didn't even see Secret Service anywhere near
him when that happened.
I didn't even see them near him when,
when they came in.
Which, yeah, there was just a group of,
yeah, I agree.
But there was areas along the sides there
that they could have been because there were
stair steps that were next to the escalators.
And, uh, well, yeah, it was, there was
a Secret Service failure.
Well, then, then we need to take a
slight diversion and go to the, what was
the Secret Service doing?
Well, we know what they were doing.
Popping this up on your screen.
It is a live look over New York
City as we are following some breaking news
at this hour.
The US Secret Service saying it dismantled a
network of electronic devices located throughout the New
York tri-state area that were used to
conduct multiple telecommunications related threats directed towards senior
US government officials, which represented an imminent threat
to the agency's protective operations.
This protective intelligence investigation led to the discovery
of more than 300 co-located SIM servers
and 100,000 SIM cards across multiple sites.
In addition to carrying out anonymous telephonic threats,
these devices could be used to conduct a
wide range of telecommunication attacks.
And this could include disabling cell phone towers,
enabling denial of services attacks and facilitating anonymous
encrypted communication between potential threat actors and criminal
enterprises.
Again, all of this information here just coming
in from the Secret Service moments ago.
And they did post this image here showing
some of that equipment.
They said the Secret Service dismantled a network
of more than 300 SIM servers and 100
,000 SIM cards in the New York area
that were capable of crippling telecom systems and
carrying out anonymous telephonic attacks, disrupting the threat
before world leaders arrived for the UN General
Assembly.
Now, this this story immediately, here's where the
dudes named Ben came in.
They're like, what is this nonsense story?
This is yes, you could use this not
temporary.
Clearly, someone went through a lot of it
just looking at the picture.
Someone went through a lot of work to
make this a permanent thing.
This is typically used for those text messages
that you get that are scams.
You know, the girlfriend you have in in
China who wants you to invest in Bitcoin.
My favorite.
Can you can you use it to have
encrypted communications?
Yes, I guess.
You know, the answer is yes.
Can you flood a cell site?
Yeah, you don't need hundreds of of you
don't need a SIM farm to do that.
This whole thing was weird.
I'm going to use the W word.
The thing was weird.
It's like, why is the Secret Service all
of a sudden doing this?
Isn't this typically the FBI?
This is an FBI thing.
Oh, no, now it's Secret Service.
And it endangered everybody within the all the
world leaders.
Yeah, they had a 36 mile radius.
Sure, that's all of Manhattan.
So and then they and right away, we've
got Sam Spook.
Did you see this guy?
No, Sam Spook from the Secret Service shows
up.
He's got glasses on that.
Just just yell.
I'm a spook.
And he has an important announcement.
They already have the PR press release.
Good to go.
While the president's teleprompter and escalator are failing
is Matt McCool.
And I'm the special agent in charge of
the Secret Service, New York field office.
We are making this announcement as a matter
of public interest, given timing, amount and concentration
of material recovered during a recent Secret Service
protective intelligence investigation.
Following multiple telecommunications related imminent threats directed towards
senior U.S. government officials this spring, the
U.S. Secret Service began a protective intelligence
investigation this spring.
So they've been on this for a while.
But now today is the day that they
have to do this.
And and they didn't hand that to the
FBI.
Now they take care of it themselves.
I didn't know they did this kind of
stuff.
Threats directed towards senior U.S. government officials.
This spring, the U.S. Secret Service began
a protective intelligence investigation to determine the extent
and impact these threats could have on protective
operations.
This was a difficult and complex effort to
identify the source of these fraudulent calls and
the impact on the Secret Service protective mission.
Oh, so difficult.
Just triangulated, man.
During this period, we leveraged technical assistance and
support of federal partners including Homeland Security Investigations,
the Department of Justice and the Office of
the Director of National Intelligence.
We also received phenomenal support from our state
and local law enforcement partners, to include the
NYPD.
The investigation led us to the New York
tri-state area where investigators discovered tens of
thousands of co-located and networked cellular devices
capable of carrying out nefarious telecommunications attacks.
These devices allowed anonymous encrypted communications between potential
threat actors and criminal enterprises, enabling criminal organizations
to operate undetected.
This network had the potential to disable cell
phone towers and essentially shut down the cellular
network in New York City.
Potential.
These devices were concentrated within 35 miles of
the global meeting of the United Nations General
Assembly now underway in New York City.
Given the timing, location and proximity and potential
for significant disruptions to the New York telecom
system, we move quickly to disrupt this network.
Yes, citizen, you may return to your harpsichord.
I mean, come on.
Well, I have a question about this.
Yeah, sure.
Who got arrested?
Nobody.
Wait, there's just a bunch.
They found these banks.
I mean, the pictures I saw, there were
like these ridiculous banks of phones.
You can buy that setup for, you know,
like a thousand dollars.
It reminds me of the old BBS station
we talked about before.
A bank of modems.
Yes, exactly.
Bank of modems.
So you had these, you know, thousands of
phones all hooked up in a very nice
rig.
Let's put it that way.
And they don't know who owns it.
There's property involved.
Well, of course, everyone immediately says, oh, that's
Israel Mossad.
No, dude.
This is your Chinese girlfriend.
These things are all over the country.
This is what they use to do scam
text messages.
That's what this is used for.
The telecom industry knows this.
So it's like.
So they cracked down on this thing and
then nobody got arrested.
And so this is a.
No, this is.
In other words, they have no clue about
anything.
And meanwhile, the president appears to be completely
unprotected on the escalator.
Yeah, I stopped escalator in the middle and
stopped escalator with no one.
People just go.
No one's like, OK, this is this is
an issue.
This thing stops.
Might be a reason.
Let's go.
Move, move, move.
No, none of that.
Very bizarre.
And this is NSA.
This is FBI.
Why the Secret Service?
Yeah, the NSA should know exactly who's behind
the whole thing, but nothing.
And this spook comes out, Sam.
The spook comes out right away with this,
you know, with this announcement.
Yeah, this is bull crap that they had
breaking news.
And and then they went straight to this.
They already had it.
It was given to the breaking news here.
Play this.
Anyway, I have a version of the BBC
UN report that just I was like, what?
Wow, I can't believe that they did this.
No, actually, I can because, you know, it's
the Brits.
He pitched as an alternative, a new world
order.
No, he didn't.
They're saying that Trump pitched the new world
order.
Yes, listen.
He pitched as an alternative, a new world
order centered around his United States.
I've come here today to offer the hand
of American leadership and friendship to any nation
in this assembly that is willing to join
us in forging a safer, more prosperous world.
And his own.
Where's the new world order in that part?
That's that's just bizarre.
Offering a helping hand in nowadays indicates that
you are you're trying to implement a new
world order.
Yes.
Meanwhile, while this was taking place, Queen Ursula
was in the starship, the mothership of the
European Union, giving the state of the union.
And listen to what she said.
Europe is in a fight, a fight for
a continent that is whole and at peace
for free and independent Europe, a fight for
values and our democracies, a fight for liberty
and our ability to determine our destiny for
ourselves.
Make no mistake, this is a fight for
our future.
And I thought long and hard about whether
to start the state of the union address
with such a stark appraisal.
After all, as Europeans are not used to
or comfortable with talking in such terms, because
our union is fundamentally a peace project.
But the truth is that the world of
today is unforgiving and we cannot varnish over
the difficulties that Europeans feel every day.
They can feel the ground shift beneath them.
They can feel things getting harder just as
they are working harder.
They can feel the impact of the global
crisis, of the higher cost of living.
Here we go.
They feel the speed of change affecting their
lives and their careers.
And they worry about the endless spiral of
events they see on the news from the
devastating scenes in Gaza to the relentless Russian
barrage on Ukraine.
We simply cannot wait for this storm to
pass.
This summer showed us that there is simply
no room or no time for nostalgia.
Battle lines for a new world order based
on power are being drawn right now.
Hold on a second.
She's the one talking about a new world
order.
Battle lines are being drawn for a new
world order.
Do tell me more, Queen Ursula.
No time for nostalgia.
Battle lines for a new world order based
on power are being drawn right now.
So yes, Europe must fight.
Now, I take this to be, I'm just
going to say it, this is the North
Sea Nexus.
We've got the BBC saying that Trump was
out there talking about a new world order.
And then we have Ursula saying, she doesn't
say Trump, but she's saying Trump's making a
new world order.
This is collusion.
Pure collusion set up.
Battle lines for a new world order based
on power are being drawn right now.
Yeah, we're power.
So yes, Europe must fight for its place
in the world in which many major powers
are either ambivalent or openly hostile to Europe.
A world of imperial ambitions and imperial wars.
Imperial ambitions and imperial wars.
Who could that be?
A world in which dependencies are ruthlessly weaponized.
And it is for all these reasons that
a new Europe must emerge.
Yes, a new Europe must emerge.
They're afraid.
They do not like what Trump is doing.
And it has to be it.
I would say that little snippet was unhinged.
And if you want to hear what her
solution is, I mean, I can tell you
it's basically two trillion euros of borrowing to
invest in.
I'll just tell you it's boring to listen
to her.
Two trillion euros of borrowing to invest in
quantum.
There you go.
Quantum and clean energy.
Quantum and clean energy.
It makes nothing but sense.
Two dead ends.
Yes.
So now I think the president is really
trolling them to an unbelievable degree.
And he wants to kill the European Union.
And I think it's evidenced by this truth,
this truth, also known as a tweet.
This, you know, I'm going to have to
go.
I get an account on that thing because
everybody is like it's worse than it was
back in the day when news media kept,
you know, the set of doing any reporting
or any phone calls or sitting at the
desk and trying to do some work.
They just look at Twitter and then they
quote and they run it on the six
o'clock news.
And this somebody tweeted this and he tweeted
that kind of work is this work?
Well, here's the truth that he posted.
This is from the Global News.
We're now on our top story and what
appears to be a significant shift in U
.S. President Donald Trump's approach to Russia's war
on Ukraine.
A short time ago, Trump posted a statement
online, which reads in part, after getting to
know and fully understand the Ukraine, Russia military
and economic situation, and after seeing the economic
trouble it is causing Russia, I think Ukraine,
with the support of the European Union, is
in a position to fight and win all
of Ukraine back in its original form.
With time, patience and the financial support of
Europe and in particular NATO, the original borders
from where this war started is very much
an option.
So this is a troll and everybody took
it as he's turning around.
He's coming to our side.
Yeah, you're you're you're I and I hate
saying this.
You're totally correct.
This is a complete bull because the angle
is right there, right in front of you.
Europe does this.
If Europe does that, if Europe gives us
money to sell them stuff that they then
give to Ukraine.
Or even worse, even worse than that.
Here's here's my boy, Andrew Soulus.
Now he breaks it down.
He doesn't understand.
It's just one clip by him.
He doesn't explain the the the nature of
the troll, but he does explain exactly what
this is and what it what it isn't.
What do you make of the new post
by Donald Trump?
What do you make of it?
Untrue social sounding.
The only logic one can infer is that
it's economics because militarily the Ukrainian forces are
in no position to defeat the Russian forces
and push them back to the 91 borders.
The last time the Ukrainians tried this in
earnest was the summer, August 2023, when they
launched a fully equipped offensive with NATO weapons
and NATO tactics, and they managed to breach
eight kilometers into the Russian line where they
needed to breach 60 kilometers to reach the
Sea of Azov.
Now, the Russians, the Ukrainians also did a
surprise attack in Kursk in Russia last year,
which was an undefended area or lightly defended.
And since that time, the Russians have pushed
the Ukrainians back to their own borders.
So militarily, it's inconceivable that the Ukrainian military
could defeat the Russian militarily unless you actually
destroy the Russian economy.
And I think this is now what's turned
Trump's mind to this statement today, in the
sense the argument being that if everybody pulls
together and sanctions the Russians more than they've
been sanctioned in the last three years, and
they're the most sanctioned country in the world,
that somehow the Russian economy will collapse.
The Russians will give up their gains and
put up their hands and basically walk back
to the Russian borders, a highly improbable outcome,
because China still supports Russia.
So even if everybody in NATO, you're talking
now Hungary and Slovakia would have to come
around as well.
They're not there yet.
And Turkey, too.
So this is all astounding and highly improbable.
So, of course, it's astounding and highly improbable,
because what the president is saying is, you
know, what you need to do is you
need to stop buying Russian oil and gas
products, which would be hilarious, because then the
EU will die.
And so they're never going to do it.
He knows.
He's just saying it's your fault, your fault.
I think he even said somewhere in his
UN speech, he said, you know, until I
found out that they were still just buying
Russian oil.
So you should stop buying Russian oil.
They can't.
They can't be with the green scam.
The whole thing is a troll.
And the world news media is going, oh,
yes.
Zelensky convinced him.
Oh, yes.
It's so it was fantastic.
I think even Fox has suckered into this.
Oh, it's so dumb.
Like, don't you don't you see it here?
I think I have Fox is all in
on this.
Oh, well, he's changed.
And they're doing it in such a way
as well as a smart move.
Or I mean, it's like it's just they're
completely missing the point.
Yes, of course, it's missing.
They're dumb.
They're so dumb.
And then here's my favorite.
I got a lot of reports about this.
There's no evidence of this being Russia.
And I'm going to play this 55 second
clip so that I can tell you what
I saw in the 55 second clip.
Drone incursions caused temporary closures at Copenhagen and
Oslo airports Monday evening.
It came just days after a hacking operation
led to problems at three European airports, including
London Heathrow.
For officials, whoever is behind the latest attacks
has one goal in mind.
To disturb, create unrest, cause concern, see how
far you can go, test the limits.
They see the line, make it go.
Speaking on the sidelines of the U.N.
General Assembly in New York, Ukraine's president suggested
there was little doubt of Russia's involvement.
The comments from Vladimir Zelensky come as the
war at home grinds on a conflict where
drone technology has been pushed to the limits.
So he uses different types of long distance
drones to understand how Europe is ready.
OK, so he, Putin, uses different kinds of
long range drones to see if Europe is
ready.
So I'm looking at this video, all the
video from the Danish broadcasters from Euronews.
These drones have big red flashing lights.
What kind of reconnaissance drone is that?
Hi, I'm a drone.
Big red flashing light.
I'm a drone.
I'm a drone.
Come on.
This is either some Dane who's sitting on
the ground laughing his ass off.
Like I made the news.
World news, baby.
This is stupid.
Long range drone.
It was a quadcopter with a red flashing
light.
Stop.
Oh, the incursion, an incursion.
I have the aviation clip from Denmark.
OK, let me see.
This is a BBC report.
I got it.
Reports from Denmark say drone activity has been
detected over four airports in the Jutland region.
The airport at Aalborg was temporarily shut down
after drones were identified, but it's now reopened.
The incidents come two days after Denmark's main
airport at Copenhagen was shut down over drone
sightings that rattled European aviation.
That's all they had.
That's all they had.
Hold on a second.
They want me to reconnect the stream.
That's odd.
OK, I'll reconnect stream.
See if that helps.
There we go.
Yeah.
Now it's always big news in Europe.
Oh, the Russians are flying drones everywhere.
They're going to they're coming to get us,
the Russians.
And meanwhile, what wasn't discussed at all, there
was a kind of on the sidelines of
the United Nations.
Putin made a little announcement.
Russia says it will adhere to nuclear arms
limits for one more year after the last
remaining deal with the United States expires in
February.
Russia's President Vladimir Putin told members of his
Security Council that Moscow would expect the U
.S. to follow Russia's example and stick to
the treaty's limits.
The New START deal, first signed in 2010
by then presidents Barack Obama and Dmitry Medvedev,
limits each country to no more than 1
,550 deployed nuclear warheads and 700 deployed missiles
and bombers.
On-site inspections under the deal have been
dormant since 2020.
In February 2023, Putin suspended Moscow's participation in
the treaty but stopped short of withdrawing from
the pact altogether.
Together, the U.S. and Russia hold 90
percent of the world's nuclear arsenal.
The future of the New START treaty has
taken on increased importance at a time when
Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine has pushed
the two countries closer to direct confrontation.
No, no one really reported on that.
Which is, I guess, kind of a good
thing.
Yeah, should be.
Yeah, we're not going to increase any more
nuclear weapons.
That's good.
That's it.
They're just going to modernize.
They're going to do that.
They're going to be better.
But, you know, the other thing that they
don't deal with is this constant drumbeat, and
I hear it on every of the networks
from the right to the left, is the
Russian economy's in a shambles.
There is absolutely no evidence of this.
And if you watch YouTube videos, because there's
plenty of them in Russia, and they get
posted, everybody looks happy as a clamp, roaming
around, they're night clubbing, and the stores are
stocked.
It's not like during the days of communism
when everything was, the stores were, shelves were
empty bare.
It's ridiculous.
So yeah, this is, I think your analysis
about this is with the fake EU thing
and the head fake by Trump is all
on the money.
Yeah, and he's going to, but my takeaway
from Queen Ursula is she sees it.
And she is actually, she's not middle management
like the Clintons.
She comes from bloodlines.
Well, you can tell by the way she
handles herself.
Yes, and the reason she's there at all
unelected, I think that says it all.
She comes from bloodlines, and she's part of
the North Sea Nexus elite, and they know
what Trump is doing.
And that's why she's saying, well, when she
says imperial powers, well, no, imperial powers are
being crushed.
That's what's happening.
That's you.
We're not an imperial power.
That's ridiculous.
And then to have the same verbiage as
the BBC saying a new world order, and
then she says they're trying to create a
new world order.
That that's too much coincidence for me.
When there was no, no one said that
the term new world order, certainly the president,
the last guy, the American president who said
that was George Bush.
Yeah.
George HW.
No way.
Clinton said it too.
I don't remember that, but I do remember
George HW saying, and he made a big
point of it.
But he was, you know, kind of an
elite.
Let me see.
I thought I had, I thought I had
Clinton saying new world order.
Maybe not.
Yeah.
Well, George HW for sure.
So we have climate China bullcrap.
Now I want to play a couple, I
got three clips here.
There should be four, but clip two, I
didn't post properly.
And I just explained what he said or
what this woman said on clip two, but
this, but start with a background or this
is climate X, China, L O L.
The world's largest carbon polluter, China says it
will cut carbon emissions by seven to 10
% by 2035.
The announcement came as more than 100 world
leaders gathered to talk about increased urgency and
the need for stronger efforts to curb heat
trapping gases.
International climate negotiations are set to begin in
Brazil in six and a half weeks.
Now, if I'm not mistaken, and it is
in the era of the show, and it
was about four years ago, I believe when
it was a big deal during one of
the climate meetups where China said, oh, well,
okay, we're going to implement the whole program
in 20 by 20 and 2030, we're going
to begin.
Do you remember this?
Yeah, sure.
And it was 20, 30, 20, 30, 20,
30.
We're not going to do anything until 2030.
And then we're going to be on board
and everyone's all jacked up.
Oh, China's getting on board with the climate
agenda and they're going to be on board
in 2030.
And now they're going to now the latest
is they're going to cut 10% seven
to 10% by 2035.
And not one of these reporters has mentioned
this other promise about 2030.
There's just, oh, this is great.
China is just China is just running circles
around these idiots.
Let's listen to this is the BBC report.
This climate change BS BBC.
Yes, the first time China has made a
commitment to cut its carbon emissions.
No, it's not the first.
Hold on.
That's not the first time we just discussed
this.
They said by 2030 in one of the
climate meetups.
But now all of a sudden is the
first video address, the United Nations in New
York.
President Xi Jinping said that greenhouse gases would
be reduced by between seven and 10%
from a peak in the next decade.
He said that all parts of the economy
would shift away from fossil fuels.
China is the world's biggest source of planet
warming gases.
So that is some hope that this is
a major step forward in the fight against
climate change.
Well, just a few minutes ago, I spoke
to our China correspondent, Laura Bicker, and I
asked her why it's so significant then to
get a pledge on climate from China.
If the world is to try to commit
to reducing carbon emissions, if the world is
to try to limit global warming to 1
.5 Celsius, then it needs China.
China is one of the world's biggest emitters.
Around a third to a quarter of all
greenhouse gas emissions come from China.
Now, if China commits to this seven to
10%, it's the first time that it has
actually said, actually committed to a number.
That's the tricky part with the number number.
Yes.
I'm looking at what that was part of
the Paris agreement.
That's when you're right.
Right.
That's when they said, yeah, I'm trying to
see if I can find a clip from
it.
So far, no luck.
But I remember it distinctly.
And so, OK, well, that is the first
time.
So they're twisting it a little bit.
And now I've clipped to which I don't
have.
And I'm sorry that I screwed this up.
But I'll tell you what she said.
This woman, she said, the good news is
that China always over delivers.
Whatever they promise, they over deliver.
And I'm thinking, when was when does this
ever happen?
Tell that to the WTO.
Exactly.
Well, they've promised this and they promised that
and they don't they don't over deliver.
They don't deliver anything.
No, it's not what they do.
No, it's not what they do.
So here we go.
The final clip, which we clip three.
She kind of it's wrapped.
It went through mass urbanization.
You know, they have huge towering concrete skyscrapers
in many of their cities.
That is something they're going to try and
reduce.
And they're going to make new energy vehicles,
the mainstream and new vehicle sales.
Oh, yeah.
More more battery cars.
That's OK.
I didn't get the whole other part of
that other clip was what China is going
to do is they're going to build more
electric cars, which, of course, require electricity, which
is inefficient in itself compared to you have
to send electricity down the transmission line, which
loses energy and it gets to the car.
It fills the car as opposed to fossil
fuel gasoline, which is the most efficient way
to power a vehicle.
But we will get into that.
But the other thing is China is going
to do is going to be a big
deal.
They're going to plant trees.
Well, I thought they already agreed to that.
Well, they're going to agree again.
And do you have a clip on the
more trees?
You have a clip of the tree plant?
No, that was part in the part two.
Well, so the the U.N. climate change
gambit, by the way, you know who was
in the in the U.N. when all
this started?
That was Murray Strong.
Remember Murray Strong, Al Gore's buddy.
They were the ones that he's dead now.
They were the ones who were setting up
the carbon exchange.
All right.
The carbon trading bureau.
Oh, yeah, it was going to be.
Yeah, it was going to be like the
the Chicago board of this CBOE with trades
of commodities.
Yes.
Now, now that of the carbon trade is
happening and there are trading deaths.
But that was always the Al Gore idea
with Murray Strong, his partner, and then strong
and all kinds of trouble.
I can't remember exactly what it was, but
eventually he died.
So but he's he was the guy in
the U.N. who was pushing this early
on.
And it always came down to, well, you
know, if only we had less people, that
would be better, which led to the U
.S. population bomb.
Now, you remember that more distinctly than I
do.
Was that was it a report?
Was it a book?
It was Ehrlich's book.
Ken Ehrlich?
No, not Ken.
It was that's the director of the of
the Oscars.
No, somebody else.
No, it's either Ehrlich or Ehrlichman.
The guy is a Stanford professor.
He's still there.
You can look him up.
Somebody in the chat room can get it
straight and get his first name.
But Ehrlich did the population bomb.
And then he in 1970.
And that's when that all began.
And we're all going to die by the
year 2000.
And we should have stopped having babies.
And that Paul Ehrlich, Paul Ehrlich, Paul Ehrlich.
And then Paul Ehrlich, because of that book,
I believe a number of people I know,
men had vasectomies.
Yes, as at a young age.
So they would not have to do so.
They would not contribute to this disastrous population
explosion.
It was going to kill everybody by the
year 2000.
By the way, we ran out of material,
everything, no food.
We're all going to die.
And Ehrlich also did a book, which is
harder to find because it's been kind of
suppressed about the race.
I think I can't remember the exact name
of it.
Again, somebody might look this up.
I think it was called The Race Bomb.
And it was about how bad it was
to have too many blacks in the country.
Yes, he had a racist book.
But that got put aside real fast.
The Race Bomb, 1978.
The Race Bomb.
The Race Bomb.
OK, so he is trying to capitalize on
the population bomb and the race bomb.
Nice try.
And they buried that baby like there's no
tomorrow and kept this guy propped up.
He's still around.
Yeah.
Well, he was in Obama's administration.
Remember, he was the climate czar, wasn't he?
For a little bit there?
May have been, yeah.
Let me see.
Amazon.
It's almost a comedy to watch this, by
the way, at this point.
The Race Bomb.
Let's see.
Do we have a little blurb on this
race bomb?
The population, by the author of Street Crime,
Failing Schools, Decaying Cities, High Unemployment, Soaring Welfare
Costs, The Fuse Is Lit, The Race Bomb,
Skin Color, Prejudice, and Intelligence.
Wow.
Yeah, yeah.
Get a hold of that book, people.
They don't even have a wiki page for
like, shh, shh, shh, we can't.
They keep that.
This is what I would call a major
suppressed work.
Wow.
I got to order a copy.
It's available on Amazon, people.
Oh, that's interesting.
Anyway, it all comes down to that.
And so now, and I understand, now I
understand this report because I've been reading about
the EU and other countries starting to tax
shipping.
So ships, get a carbon tax for ships
because, you know, the ships are polluting the
oceans.
And I think we're going to, this will
be the new tactic, the new attack surface,
if you will, for the climate zealots.
It's the greatest con job ever perpetrated on
the world.
Less than a day after US President Donald
Trump delivered this opinion on climate change.
Opinion.
Yeah.
It's an opinion.
An opinion held by many podcasters, including the
No Agenda show.
Predicted on the world.
Less than a day after US President Donald
Trump delivered this opinion on climate change.
Then they said global warming will kill the
world.
All of these predictions were wrong.
They were made by stupid people.
Some of those informed and experienced scientists.
Informed and experienced scientists.
We're also at the UN, warning against imbalances
on our planet.
Now getting more dangerous.
Johan Rockström is the director of the Potsdam
Institute.
We fail unless we safeguard the world's most
powerful carbon sink and planetary cooling system, a
healthy planet.
The latest health stressor in that Potsdam report,
how acidic our oceans have become.
Because they've been absorbing the carbon, humans have
been burning.
Just like when we add carbon dioxide to
coke, that makes the soft drink more acidic.
Chris Harley teaches ocean— Hold on a second.
Is that true?
If you add— Listen to what he said.
Just like when we add carbon dioxide to
coke, that makes the soft drink more acidic.
Chris— Does it?
Makes it more acidic?
Yeah.
Well, it's carbon dioxide creates carbonic acid, which
is acidic.
Okay.
And then they double up on it with
coke to make it more acidic than that.
They add phosphoric acid to that to double
it.
So it's very— it's an acidic drink.
So that's killing us, basically.
No, it's not.
It's delicious.
Chris Harley teaches ocean science and climate change
at the University of British Columbia.
He says the latest report shows the soaking
up of that carbon.
It's changing the chemistry of the ocean— Oh,
no!
—leaving fewer building blocks for corals, oysters, mussels,
and crabs.
It makes it harder to build a shell.
And you need to add shell if you
want to grow bigger.
Sort of like building a house and all
of a sudden the building materials become more
costly.
You're either going to build smaller homes or
not as many.
Explain that analogy to me.
I don't know what the calcium cycle looks
like because it's calcium that makes the shells.
And I don't know if the acidity retards
that process or not.
So I can't explain it.
But a better analogy would have been, you
know, your concrete is no longer strong or
your rebar is weak.
No, instead he says your building materials became
more expensive.
So then we build less houses.
In his mind, it's something about money.
By expensive, I think he meant scarce.
And when you bring in boatloads of seafood,
size matters.
Consider BC's dungeness crab industry, estimated to be
worth $250 million annually.
Cosima Porteus at the University of Toronto has
studied those crabs.
These kinds of levels of ocean acidification were
affecting their sense of smell, reducing their ability
to find food.
So we potentially could see smaller animals that
could produce fewer eggs and offspring.
Not only affecting the food we eat, but
the food our food eats.
And keep in mind, the oceans protect us
by absorbing all that CO2, but too much
and that ability to absorb weakens.
Ocean acidification is a global problem with local
impacts.
Iria Jimenez studies acidification's impact with the Hakai
Institute in British Columbia.
With oceans covering 70% of our planet,
there's only one solution.
We're predicting that the conditions in the ocean
are still going to deteriorate for at least
50 years, if not more.
So absolutely it's urgent that we drastically reduce
our emissions.
The carbon footprint is a hoax.
But as the ocean grows more acidic, it
seems the toxicity in climate discourse might stand
in the way of the progress needed to
save it.
Progress.
It's amazing.
Whatever President Trump says, just do the opposite.
It's not true.
Stop.
You're crazy.
You know, don't listen to him.
My favorite thing of late is the fact
that all these TikTokers.
I don't have any TikTokers.
I actually have one.
Of the women?
Yeah, taking Tylenol.
Tylenol is going to give me my baby
autism.
Bullcrap.
I'm going to eat all the Tylenol I
can.
Yeah.
The lot of that.
What idiot.
I mean, whether, you know, whether it can
be proven or not.
Why would you do that?
What kind of a lunatic are you?
Well, these are all outstanding questions.
So instead of pulling a clip of one
of those lunatics who was there with a
big pregnant belly saying, watch me pound this
Tylenol.
Like, wow.
I took this one.
I watched Donald Trump's entire autism press conference
and took four pages of notes.
Big takeaway.
He says Tylenol causes autism and that you
shouldn't take Tylenol if you're pregnant and you
shouldn't give Tylenol to your child.
Trump says that we need to wait until
12 to give our children the hepatitis B
vaccine because it's a sexually transmitted disease.
So there's no reason to give it to
an infant.
Other parts of the world don't have Tylenol
who also don't have autism.
First time in the press conference, he says,
don't take Tylenol.
There's no downside to not taking it when
you're pregnant.
He's going to issue a physician's notice and
a safety label change to Tylenol.
What I like about this lady is she
believes that Trump is doing all this.
It's all Trump.
She doesn't, he barely even, I don't think
she even brings in RFK Jr. It's all
Trump.
Trump is an idiot.
Why are you listening to Trump?
He says you shouldn't give a baby hepatitis
B shot because it's sexually transmitted disease.
She's saying it as if she's like, thinks
this is crazy.
What are you saying?
It's, it's really, it's sad.
It's very strange.
It's sad.
Get a propaganda campaign.
That's basically a series of infomercials telling parents
not to take the drug.
Other fever reducer alternatives.
And you should only use Tylenol when the
treatment is required.
He says that in children, you could actually
prolong viral illnesses if you give them Tylenol.
He said it could also be a folate
deficiency.
Let's not forget this is all Trump, not
a doctor.
RFK claims that the model that they're currently
using for medical research is going to yield
results in the future for all other chronic
illnesses.
The NIH will use machine learning to help
find the cure for autism.
Machine learning, AKA AI.
No, no.
AI rebranded machine learning, but it's not your
chat GPT.
That's what she's saying.
Machine learning is a real thing that does
actually work.
It's just not sexy and no one wants
to pump $2 trillion into it.
To help find a cure for autism.
We will not delay as scientists often do
in this medical research.
There's historic shift in medical culture that we
are about to see in the United States.
They're going to be sending letters to doctors
to warn them of the dangers of recommending
Tylenol to their pregnant patients.
That an overwhelming body of evidence pointing to
an association between Tylenol and autism exists.
The mindless practice of treating a fever is
pointless and that the body's natural way of
ridding a virus is healthy for a pregnant
mother and for a young child.
We should just let them have a fever
instead of giving them Tylenol.
That is an unnecessary drug.
So I grew up in the Netherlands and
I remember moving there when I was just
seven years old and I had a fever.
I had, you know, flu, whatever it was.
And my parents were, you know, they were
like, OK, something's wrong.
I was not, I was sick.
And so they find a doctor and the
doctor, yes, I speak some English.
I will come and take a look at
your child.
And he comes in and my mom's like,
give him an antibiotic.
And the doctor says, no, we don't do
that here.
It's good for him.
He needs to sick it out.
Sick it out.
Autschicken, sick it out.
And my parents were like, he's suffering, he's
suffering.
I said, no, we don't do that here.
He'll be fine in a few days.
And of course, I sicked it out and
I was fine in a few days.
And that was for most things in the
Netherlands.
My entire youth growing up there, really, I
mean, antibiotics?
No, they would not prescribe that.
And I think that has changed throughout the
years.
I think that the Dutch were much healthier
back then.
They had healthy bodies.
And by the way, if you look at
the Dutch from World War II to probably
the 90s, mid 80s, 90s, man, these were
like big, strong, healthy people biking.
And it's because they really were biking.
Once they got their bikes back, they were
biking again for decades.
And they really, they were healthy until it
kind of crept in and, you know, World
Health Organization, just the globalization of medicine.
And I guess they finally gave into it.
But that is true.
The thing that just saddens me is that
what do these women think?
That the president is purposely doing this as
a joke?
Or like, you know, he wants to hurt
you?
Wouldn't you at least think about it or
investigate it?
And of course, their diet, their media diet,
as you've been pointing out for the past
few episodes, is so restrictive, so restrictive to
certain news programs and news and papers and
news outlets.
As well as the, in general, pharmaceutical funded
media because of their advertising.
By the way, I got a note from
someone saying, you sound like anti-vaxxers, you're
anti-pharma.
I work in bed.
No, we're not.
We've had a bunch of people like that
that write it, bitch.
But we're not.
We've said, again, we could be president because
we've been, you in particular have been talking
about the hepatitis B vaccine for as long
as I can remember.
Like it makes no sense.
When that first came out, which was some
years back, I had a doctor at the
time who retired long since, but he was
the one who gave me two clues.
One, I said, I went in and I
asked for, he said, is this new vaccine?
Should I get it?
This is like 30 years ago.
And he says, what would you want that
for?
Are you going to start working with blood?
What's, are you going to become a drug
addict?
What do you want this vaccine for?
What are you planning, Devorah?
What are you planning?
And he scolded me for even considering it.
And this is as an adult, not as
a four month old baby.
And he, some years later mentioned it just
out of the blue.
He says, you know, I think people are,
it was during some flu thing when he,
he's the one that gave me the D3
tip that the insider, doctor insiders use, which
is the mega doses of D3 if you're
feeling sick.
He says, I think people are over-vaccinated.
It's just a problem.
Yes.
Well, of course it is.
And we're not anti-vax.
We're not anti-Big Pharma.
I mean, I got a, in fact, I
did get a vaccine during this, during the
era of the show.
I got a shot for, I got Prevnar
13.
You've never been quite the same, to be
honest about it.
So this is just an example of how,
how the Big Pharma fund.
And this is, if we have any qualms
about this is, we don't like the fact
that there's no honest reporting or conversation in
news media because of their...
It's dishonest.
Exactly.
That's the problem.
And the Pharma guy who wrote to you
should realize that, you know, yes, we're not
going to be part of some such, some,
some scheme to just keep promoting their products.
Which is happening.
And they shouldn't be advertising either.
Which is happening.
You know, they're moving to podcasts now.
There's a lot of Pharma advertising happening now
on podcasts.
So this is ABC.
We are joined now by ABC News medical
correspondent, Dr. Darian Sutton, with more facts and
myths about Tylenol use in pregnant women.
Dr. Sutton, thank you so much for being
here.
Let's just get right to it.
Can Tylenol use in pregnant women cause autism?
The leading evidence and the strongest evidence shows
us that there is no association between the
use of Tylenol in pregnancy and the outcome
of autism.
Okay.
So this is a great response.
This is right from Helen Nolten.
This is, you know, your crisis management, the
leading evidence and the strongest evidence.
Isn't that just evidence?
There's evidence or there's no evidence, but it's
the leading and strongest.
Well, that's all very subjective.
That's very good.
Yeah.
Very, very subjective information.
Tylenol use in pregnant women cause autism.
The leading evidence and the strongest evidence shows
us that there is no association between the
use of Tylenol in pregnancy and the outcome
of autism.
Just to backtrack in terms of where this
all came from, there was a recent study
done by Harvard in collaboration with Mount Sinai,
and it found that there was an association
in the rate of Tylenol use or acetaminophen
use during pregnancy and the outcome of autism.
Important to note here, the authors of that
study went on to state that that does
not state that there is a cause and
effect relationship.
Reasons why are because for one, there are
many reasons why a pregnant mom might take
Tylenol for a fever, an infection, for pain,
all of which we know are directly associated
with poor outcomes in terms of neurodevelopmental disorders.
So it's important to understand that association does
not mean cause and effect.
So what he's saying is it's not the
Tylenol.
It's the infection you got.
It's the fever you had.
It wasn't the Tylenol.
It was whatever you got that made you
take Tylenol, which is just an amazing conclusion.
Having said all that, the diagnoses for autism
have increased in recent years.
To what do you attribute that?
I know it's tremendously complex.
Yeah.
But get into it.
You're absolutely right.
Neurodevelopmental disorders are tremendously complex, and we understand
through research and data that up to 80
% of cases of autism are related to
genetic changes.
Important to understand there.
Genetic changes.
What does that mean?
They're related to genetic changes.
What genetic?
Does the human genome as a whole change
to somehow from something or other?
What could that be?
Are tremendously complex, and we understand through research
and data that up to 80% of
cases of autism are related to genetic changes.
Important to understand there.
In terms of the increase, there are many
reasons why we can look to number one,
the increase in awareness of more people understand
what autism looks like, the reduction in stigma,
the increase in screening for parents, and then
also the broadening of the diagnosis.
We are a long way from 1910 when
the earliest descriptions of autism were diagnosed or
determined, and now we are here today.
It looks very different than when it did,
and also more adults are diagnosing themselves with
autism.
All of these are reasons why we're seeing
the rise in the rates.
Also, with that being said, with that rise
in the rate, there's a reduction in vaccine
participation.
There's also a reduction in Tylenol use in
pregnancy, and those two things do not go
in consistent with the president's statements.
There's a reduction in vaccine, therefore more autism,
is what I just heard him say.
But he threw out the, and I've fallen
for this as well, the, well, there's more
diagnosis, there's more understanding, so of course the
number goes up and the spectrum is so
incredibly wide.
And this came up with the Cuomo kid
on whatever that network he's on.
What's he on?
Newsmax, Newsmax.
No, not Newsmax, Newsnation.
Newsnation, I forget what so many of them.
There's too many of them.
He's on, is General Flynn funding that one?
Okay, Newsnation, and he had...
No, that's, the Newsnation is the Chicago Tribune.
Oh, okay.
Well, so- Used to be WGN.
Oh, really?
Oh, dear.
Okay, so- The world's greatest newspaper is
what that's called, sign is.
WGN, world's greatest newspaper.
I didn't know that.
WGN, world's greatest newspaper, good to know.
So Cuomo kid has RFK Jr. on and
uses this exact phrase and RFK Jr. slaps
him down.
One answer is, well, Bobby, the reason we
get a lot more now is because everything
gets a diagnosis these days.
Every kid has at least two diagnoses for
what we used to just call behavior.
So now they're putting all these kids on
the autism spectrum because that is kind of
like the fashion of the moment.
That's the answer to why we're seeing more.
Do you accept that?
No, that is nonsense.
It is an absurd, industry-driven canard.
There's been study after study after study in
high gravitas journals by the best research organizations
and institutions and universities around this country that
shows that the autism epidemic is real.
And Chris, it's also just common sense.
If it was just a matter of better
diagnosis or better recognition, you would see it
in older people.
You know, the epidemic is taking place in
a specific generation and it's kids who were
born after 1989.
That's what you see.
You don't see, you know, it's not you
don't see autism.
One in every 31 people my age.
I have never seen somebody my age, 71
years old, with full-blown autism.
That means profound autism.
That means nonverbal, non-toilet trained, headbanging, the
stimming or the stereotypical features of the disease.
You don't see that.
And these are not people who are locked
in some institution somewhere.
There are no places for people like that.
And so why, if it was anything other
than an epidemic, why would you only see
it as a single generation?
Right.
That's a fair point.
Fair point.
Yes.
And I had to look up stimming.
Stimming.
What is stimming?
Stimming?
Yes, stimming is three behaviors of stimming.
Motor movements like flapping hands, twirling hair, rocking
back and forth, spinning.
Remember spinning?
Yes, spinning.
Kids spinning.
Verbalizations like repeating phrases or sounds and object
manipulation such as repeatedly spinning an object.
So stimming, stimming.
Let's look at what the FDA actually published,
which will give us a little more information
than I have some producer feedback.
FDA says, evidence in recent years has suggested
a correlation between acetaminophen used during pregnancy and
subsequent diagnosis of conditions like autism and ADHD.
Multiple large-scale cohort studies, including the Nurses
Health Study 2 and the Boston Birth Cohort,
find this association.
Some studies have described...
So that may not be the leading data
or the leading research, but that's what they're
quoting.
Some studies have described that risk may be
most pronounced when acetaminophen is taken chronically throughout
pregnancy.
It is important to note that while an
association between acetaminophen and neurological conditions has been
described in many studies, a causal relationship has
not been established, and there are contrary studies
in the scientific literature.
It is also noted that acetaminophen is the
only over-the-counter drug approved for use
to treat fevers during pregnancy, and high fevers
in pregnant women can pose a risk to
their children.
Additionally, aspirin and ibuprofen have well-documented adverse
impacts on the fetus.
So they're a little less firm in their
written documentation as it came across what the
president said, so that's a given.
Rob, the constitutional lawyer, checked in, and he
said, well, it is very interesting that there
has been a multi-district litigation proceeding in
federal court in New York in which the
plaintiffs have long been alleging that Tylenol and
other acetaminophen makers failed to warn pregnant mothers
that the drug may cause autism, ADHD, and
other things.
The Trump administration's announcement this week has thrown
major drama into the case, and he has
a recap for us.
A bunch of folks sued the acetaminophen manufacturers
in a wave of failure to warn, which
is basically what the president was saying, we're
going to warn everybody about this, product liability
cases.
These were not class actions, too many differences
in the individual facts, but they were similar
enough to be grouped together and sent to
a single court to efficiently handle various common
pretrial matters.
So he doesn't really know if that's going
to have, if this announcement's going to have
any bearing on that case.
But then one of our litigator attorneys checked
in and said, here's my take, and I
thought this was good.
From what I've seen, it's Tylenol in conjunction
with vaccinations that is producing brain damage.
The VAXs have statutory immunity, and those cases
get shunted off to the federal court of
claims VAX court division.
The federal vaccination court is basically a board
of adjustment that pays some compensation, but it's
not a real adversarial process, and there's no
discovery.
With this move, he says, Tylenol is going
to get sued in federal court as the
product doesn't have immunity.
The insured plaintiffs need to prove that Tylenol
either alone or in concert with vaccination caused
the autism.
Ken View and Johnson & Johnson's position to
escape liability will have to be it was
the vaccine alone that caused the injury.
So both sides are going to subpoena the
vaccine manufacturers for research and data.
Both sides will put on experts about vaccination
interactions.
At the end of the day, both sides
are going to make it public that the
vaccinations are not always safe and effective.
I think this is the goal to cause
the public outcry as a reason to rescind
vaccination statutory immunity.
Wow.
Isn't that good?
Letter of the day.
Isn't that good?
That could be a workaround.
It's if that's what they're doing.
Kennedy's the kind of guy he's a he's
an attorney.
He's a lawyer.
And I think he's a litigator too.
Yes, he is.
But Kennedy's been in the business forever, and
he knows the tricks.
Yep.
This was a trick.
And I'm like, yeah, that sounds right to
me.
A total trick.
Yep.
That's what I'm talking about.
That's why the No Agenda show is worth
your time and money.
Exactly.
Nobody comes up with this.
It really is.
And all we do is use our producers.
Yes.
Well, you know, we're we have kind of
collective knowledge, but it doesn't get not to
that level that I was.
I mean, it's something I could see.
You could kind of maybe think of it
now.
No, it's better to get it from some
guy who's think actually literally thinking.
Yeah, we don't have the the cred.
We don't have the paper.
Well, it's not it.
No, it's not even the credit is that
we don't have the mindset.
We're not sitting thinking about how to sue
somebody 24 7 because that's our job.
So I haven't shared that yet with with
Rob, our in-house legal staff, but I'm
sure he's listening and he'll help because I
think he has now switched to the litigation
side.
He used to be defense.
I think he's now he's a shark.
He's a shark.
That's what he he has the right.
He's he's he's a good guy going where
the money is.
Yeah, but he sent me I sent me
or told me about, you know, who to
send my list of books to to get
doesn't know.
I actually did.
You know, I've actually done 27 books.
Holy mackerel.
Does that include the vinegar book or is
that no, not including the vinegar book?
No, 27 books.
All right.
So that potential for $3,000 a book,
of course, you know, you're going to retire
if I.
Oh, yeah, I'm going to retire on that.
I don't think so, but it'd be nice.
I get a couple of cases of wine.
Yeah, that would be.
And I've seen the emails go back and
forth until I got dropped, which is appropriate.
You're getting a lot of nice gratis legal
advice there.
I mean, it's value for value, obviously.
Yeah, but it's because it's because the the
crowd, we were crowdsourcing everything and they want
us to succeed because we represent them.
Amen to that.
There you go.
Speaking of the world's greatest newspaper, here's a
quick report from WGN.
Medical experts issued a warning about rising cases
of a nightmare bacteria, a type of infection
that does not respond to most antibiotics.
While the number of cases are still low,
researchers at the Centers for Disease Control found
infection rates rose 70 percent from 2019 to
2023.
Difficult to treat bacteria with the NDM gene
drove the sharp increase.
Doctors say overuse and misuse of a number
of antibiotics could be to blame because bacteria
can develop resistance.
They also say there are likely a number
of unrecognized carriers of the bacteria, which could
lead to community spread.
70 percent.
What is that in numbers?
Who knows?
It went up 70 percent.
How many is that?
Is that seven?
Who knows?
I just like nightmare bacteria.
I like nightmare bacteria.
It's a little long for a show title.
I wrote it down.
I wrote it down.
It's gruesome.
I wrote it down just in case.
It won't get through.
Won't get through the filters.
So there's a little problem that I want
to recognize with the show.
And the problem is this.
And it started because you said on the
last episode, you said, I'm coming over to
your side now.
I don't think we went to the moon.
I'm paraphrasing.
You were very careful about it, but that's
kind of what you said.
Right.
I take it back now.
Don't take it back.
Wait until I'm finished.
Don't you can't this Indian giver can't do
that.
So what happened in Giver?
I know I'm racist.
Where does that even come from?
Indian giver were the Indians, people who gave
and took back.
Were they horrible?
No, no, I think it had.
I think it really is an insult to
the whites, because they gave to the Indians.
And here you can have this land.
Now you don't have it anymore.
Let's ask.
So you're giving to the Indians, but you're
not.
Let's ask the robot error.
Where does the term Indian giver originate from?
It comes from colonial times when Europeans notice
that Native Americans often expected goods given as
gifts, like in trade or treaties to be
returned or reciprocated.
Indian was a catch-all term settlers used,
and the phrase got twisted into meaning someone
who takes back what they give.
Pretty unfair label, honestly.
More about cultural misunderstandings than actual behavior.
I don't know if I like that answer.
So it's just a twisted misinterpretation of the
actual phrase.
Yeah, racist.
OK.
Racist.
So here's what happens.
So it doesn't really even matter.
We have a conversation and people come out
of the woodwork telling me, don't you know
about the Van Allen belts?
Don't you know this?
Don't you know that?
Oh, God, we've talked about the Van Allen
belts for decades.
This is the problem with the show, because
we are now we are responsible for raising
a new generation.
I mean, we're so old.
How old are we?
We're so old.
We are now raising a new generation.
And we have discussed these things ad nauseum
so many times that we don't even bother
talking about them anymore.
No, we assume, we assume.
Oh, yes.
A very dangerous thing to do.
Yeah.
We assume that people have heard our 18
years of material.
So yeah.
And there's only maybe I would say possibly
100 people total have listened to every show
since episode one.
It's a small number.
All the rest are dead.
It's a small number.
Yeah.
So what I would recommend is go to
bingit.io before you jump on us.
You might actually learn things because we have
fleshed out these things so many times.
And bingit.io, built by Deanonomous, you can
get your own for your own podcast.
All this information is when you go to
b-i-n-g-i-t.io, bingit
.io. You can search all 18 years of
transcripts.
When you click on where you want to
be, it plays the audio.
The clips are in there.
Everything is in there.
So check there before you jump down our
throats.
Now, the latest news from NASA is very
interesting.
Because I don't know if you heard, but
we're going to the moon.
We're going back to the moon.
Victor, Christina, Jeremy, we're going to the moon.
They've been together as a crew for two
and a half years, but the excitement is
still there.
Every day that passes puts them closer to
flying an Orion capsule to the moon and
back.
There is danger, but it's outweighed tenfold by
anticipation.
For me, I actually feel completely, 100%
bought in.
When I get an Orion, it's like climbing
into my bed and I'll feel warm and
tucked in.
A metal and plastic bed.
That camaraderie is going to be important on
the mission.
It's short, only nine and a half days,
but it will be in very close quarters,
basically a week and a half in a
space about the size of a minivan.
The Canadian on board, by the way, takes
up more space than the others.
Yeah, Canada did get more than its fair
share of the volume on this mission.
I've heard it acknowledged many times.
So I'm getting a little bit conscious about
my size.
Artemis 2 won't land on the moon.
It's very much a test run for missions
that will.
Everything they'll do from launch to landing is
to make sure it works.
We do all of this training, all this
preparation.
We're buying down all this risk.
Always thinking about what are we handing off
to the next crew is what we're developing
going to help them achieve that objective.
Now, a couple of months ago, the crew
says they locked themselves up to brainstorm a
name for their capsule.
They wanted something hopeful that spoke to their
values.
When NASA gives the OK for the crew
to launch, they'll do so in the spacecraft
integrity.
OK, so once again, we're not going back
to the moon because we're not going to
land on the moon, which to me is
dubious.
And here's a note that I must read
in that voice.
So, Adam, let me get this straight.
You believe that a sandals wearing guy died
on a cross and then came back to
life.
But you can't believe humans walked on the
moon.
The former being documented in an apocryphal bunch
of papyrus leaves.
And the latter...
Apocryphal, apocryphal.
The former being documented in an apocryphal bunch
of papyrus leaves.
And the latter being actually televised.
You also believe that some 100,000 people
who worked on the program just made it
all up.
It would have been easier back in the
60s to just do it than fake it.
We didn't have AI back then.
I almost had to stop pod midstream after
hearing this crap.
Also, I work for NASA.
My reviews do not reflect those of my
employers, but I'm sure they'd also call bullshit
on your hoax hypothesis, says Zach.
Well, isn't it interesting, Zach, that yes, a
bunch of papyrus leaves are still printed in
the millions today as proof.
While NASA could not keep track of 700
cases of tapes and telemetry data, lost all
the blueprints to everything.
Why, yes, isn't it amazing what documentation is
still here?
It's unbelievable.
Well, I think you've got him by the
balls with that argument, because the fact is
that, yes, there is a Bible, which is
what you're referring to for people that don't
understand what you're talking about.
I think they got it.
And that still floats around, and it keeps
being reprinted, and it's been passed along.
It floats around.
And half of the information from the moon
landing is gone.
What happened to it?
Yeah, it's just...
So if you're going to be presenting yourself
as a NASA employee, although you're not representing
NASA, you should be ashamed of yourself.
Exactly.
How do you lose all this good data?
Also, I'd like to point out that it
was not televised.
What we are told is that they beamed
down television signals, and a television camera filmed
the monitor and broadcast that on television.
And then he goes on to say, yes,
amateurs can track missions and the associated Doppler
shift of moon missions.
Yeah, I know they can.
The fact is NASA is calling on them
to do it because they need help from
amateur radio operators.
That's strange.
Particularly when President Nixon called the astronauts from
the White House.
Hey, how you doing?
No delay.
Doing good, Mr. Prez.
No delay.
Okay, good job, everybody.
How about that moon rock we gave to
the Dutch?
That wasn't a moon rock.
I can go on forever.
I just pray that these poor astronauts don't
fry in the Van Allen belts on their
way up there.
And I'm not quite sure what they're going
to do for fuel, but we'll see.
Because they're going to make it all the
way.
And yes, it'll be very easy to fake
it these days.
So I don't know why you're still in
denial, Joe.
I don't think that because at some point
you've got to trust the experts who told
us that it happened.
And I watched it.
I was a little kid.
I watched it, too.
My dad got me up in the middle
of the night.
I saw him landing on the moon.
I saw the jumping off those spacecraft and
saying one small step for man, one large
step for mankind.
Could have said womankind.
Could have said person.
Giant leap.
People kind would have been better.
He could have rewritten that.
I met Neil Armstrong years later.
Yeah.
And did you say, hey, did you really
walk on the moon?
The funny thing about, you know, I think
that the problem I've mentioned this.
Of all, I won't say who called me
the other day, but some famous person called
me and said that they now don't believe
they came, went to the moon.
A person with a big ego that probably
would like to be mentioned, but I'm not
going to say.
And I mentioned that I met Neil Armstrong,
and he gives off an air of not
wanting to discuss it.
No, of course he doesn't.
He doesn't want.
He's sick of that.
He doesn't want to.
Well, all I remember is the press conference
after the moon, after they got back from
the moon.
Yes.
And they were not.
They didn't look like a bunch of happy
campers.
And you'd think after making that trip and
then getting back safely, you'd be very happy.
Yeah.
No, there was none of that.
I remember that.
Well, they were happy when they got those
Corvettes.
They liked that part.
Shut up.
Shut up and have a Corvette.
Corvette.
Here's a Rolex.
Shut up.
Rolex and a Corvette.
All you have to do is shut up.
Can you do that?
Yeah, sure.
We're military.
We know what to do.
Yeah.
You know, you'll have a, you'll be writing
books.
You're going to do Star Trek conventions for
the rest of your life.
It's going to be fine.
It's going to be fine.
Actually, he did respond because I responded very
similar to what I just said.
And he said, okay, doubting Thomas.
Yes.
Oh, doubting Thomas.
That's a biblical reference.
Yes.
Well, Thomas actually then put his finger in
the nail holes in Jesus's hand and in
his side and went, oh, okay, chief.
So another poor follow-up by NASA.
Is this the level of NASA people working
at NASA?
Shush, shush, shush, shush.
That's why Musk is doing so well.
Yeah, no kidding.
And what a scam that is.
I'm going to Mars.
There's more chance we have an exit strategy.
Isn't Musk the one who said that they
need a refueling station?
You need a refueling station on the way
to the moon.
Yeah.
Isn't that what he said?
Yes.
So I don't know.
That doesn't make any sense because his rockets
are bigger than Saturn 5.
I think it's 240,000 miles to the
moon, if I'm not mistaken.
Might be 239.
I don't think we have much evidence of
people being higher than 400 miles.
People.
Yeah, I believe the space, unlike you, I
believe the space station exists.
Oh, no, but the space.
And there are people floating around in it.
Yes, but the space station is not that
high.
No, it's not.
It's not that high.
Error, error.
How high is the space station?
The International Space Station orbits about 240 miles
above Earth.
There you go.
240 miles, a big deal.
So it's 1,000 times closer.
Yes.
So good luck.
Because the moon is 250,000, basically 250
,000 miles away.
That's quite far.
Yeah, well, you can see it, so it
can't be that far.
Well, you don't know how big it is.
We don't know anything.
And it could be hollow.
It could be hollow.
We all know it.
You know, I am a kind of a
believer in the hollow moon.
Yeah, I'm with you.
Remember, they bonked the nuke against it, and
they heard a dong.
Yeah.
Wasn't that recently?
And it's in a perfect, and it's one
of the few, it's one of the only
moons in the entire solar system, I think
it's the only one.
That is in a perfect orbit.
Oh, is that so?
They're all elliptical, and they all got some,
they're off a bit.
You know, they're just kind of lopsided.
No, ours is round perfectly.
I wish I knew about the, I wish
I could find that clip of the hollow
moon.
The donk.
The donk.
Wow, I heard a bell ring.
And then, of course, there's Operation High Jump,
which no one wants to talk about.
Okay, talk about it.
Operation High Jump?
That's when they, well, hold on.
Here we go.
Error.
Give me a synopsis of Operation High Jump.
Operation High Jump was this massive U.S.
Navy expedition back in 1946, right after World
War II.
Thousands of troops, ships, planes, all heading to
Antarctica.
Oh, she's so annoying.
I said synopsis to give me this long
thing.
They basically tried to shoot through the, now,
I can't remember the term now.
I have a t-shirt even.
The firmament.
The firmament above us, which doesn't allow us
to actually go that high.
And they tried to blow it up with
nukes, and it was unsuccessful.
That's the story.
I'm not going to trust Wikipedia on it.
What she got to hear on that, there
was no nukes.
Yeah, but this.
There were big enough to do, there were
rockets to do that.
That doesn't make sense.
I don't think she's correct.
I think you got this wrong, whatever it
was.
No, I don't have this wrong.
Operation High Jump.
Okay, I'll get back on the next show.
I want a report.
You'll have a report.
You'll have a report on Operation High Jump.
This is part of your, the nuttiness of
some of the stuff you come up with.
Call it nutty if you will.
While we're on nutty, I'm apparently as nutty
as one of Putin's top advisors, supposedly.
Who knows?
And I don't even know if this is
a current report, because what would we know?
Because of the number.
But I think the Russians are onto the
stablecoin gambit.
In case you missed it, Anton Kobyakov, a
senior advisor to Russian President Vladimir Putin, made
a bold claim this week at the Eastern
Economic Forum, stating that the United States is
preparing to reset the system, using crypto and
gold to erase its massive debt burden.
America is trying to change the rules in
the gold and cryptocurrency markets.
Remember how much debt they have?
$35 trillion, driving everyone where?
Into the cryptocurrency cloud.
Right now they have a $35 trillion currency
debt.
They move it into crypto, into the cloud,
devalue it, and start from scratch.
Yeah, baby.
That's the gambit.
That's the gambit right there.
That's a pretty good way of putting it.
Yeah.
Hey, whatever works.
Although, see, what's disappointing is the guy talks
about $35 trillion when I think it's $37
trillion.
It might be, but I think it's, no,
I think the new limit is $37.
I think it's still $35.
But I could be wrong.
Okay.
But that wasn't about stablecoin.
I think stablecoin is the kicker here.
Well, no, but he's a Russian.
He doesn't know what he's talking about.
Stablecoin falls under crypto.
They're just calling stablecoin crypto now.
I don't get that.
What do you mean you don't get it?
It runs on blockchain.
So that's why they're calling it crypto.
Oh, blockchain.
Okay.
Well, as long as it runs under blockchain,
I'm good to go.
It's safe and effective.
I'm waiting for the blockchain meets AI.
And then we got action.
Well, how do you see that?
What do you see?
I don't.
I don't get it.
I mean, when somebody sees it and puts
it together and you have blockchain AI, boom,
moneymaker.
All right.
So here's the latest since you bring it
up.
Still trying to figure out how this is
all going to work.
How is this going to make any money,
especially with the most recent report that came
out of, let me see who did this.
This was a big, this is CNBC reporting.
AI generated work slop is here.
It's killing teamwork and causing a multi-million
dollar productivity problem, say researchers.
This came out of Stanford.
Um, that people are just being inundated with
AI generated work content masquerading as good content,
but lack substance to meaningful advance and meaningfully
advance any given task.
They're calling it work slop.
40% of people say they've received work
slop in the last month, which means emails
that are just written by AI where you
basically have to pull it through AI on
the other side, on the receiving side to
understand what they're saying.
People taking more time having to read through
what, what, what is this PowerPoint that you've
created for me?
That is a time waster.
Yeah, of course it is.
And people are just throwing stuff into AI
and throwing it into the workplace.
Well, once it started happening in the legal
world where they had, you know, people would
throw case law and it was all bullcrap.
They're just making stuff up and the judge
had to go through.
This is a huge waste of the judicial
systems time.
So I'll remind everybody of the Bain and
company report, which actually, no, this, uh, no,
what I'll remind you of is that Sam
Altman at one point said it's going to
take $7 trillion.
Remember that he was talking to the, uh,
to, uh, like the Saudis, you know, we
need some of your sovereign wealth fund because
we really, I really need $7 trillion to
scale this thing to work.
Now Bain and company, no slouches in the
money business.
Their report says $2 trillion in new revenue
needed to fund AI scaling trend.
This is from their sixth annual global technology
report headline.
Even with AI related savings, investors are still
$800 billion short in annual revenue required to
profitably fund the data centers of 2030.
Agentic AI innovation is unprecedented, but most companies
remain in experimentation mode before taking their hands
off the wheel.
And finally, here we go.
Quantum computing could unlock as much as $250
billion in market value across industries.
So how are we funding all this?
Well, wouldn't you know it?
Now we have Nvidia putting a hundred billion
dollars into open AI.
This is officially a circle jerk.
Jensen, step back for me.
I mean, a few days, you're all over
the place, literally.
I mean, you're in the UK.
I saw the white bow tie and all
that.
The tux area is very nice, but you're
also doing a lot of investments.
The Intel investment announced last week quite a
bit smaller than this one, but seems significant
also because it's weaving Nvidia technology in the
PCN data center level in a way that
perhaps it wasn't before.
Where do these kinds of investments fit in?
How do you think about the value of
the ecosystem to Nvidia?
The Intel partnership is about recognizing that accelerated
computing and AI's day has arrived.
Remember, general purpose computing was invented practically 60
years ago.
And for the last 60 years, we've been
following that basic blueprint, that basic architecture, you
know, to build the ecosystem, the computing use
of the world.
Stop, stop.
You have to back it up.
He said what was invented 50 years ago?
I think what he's saying is that AI,
the concept, you know, going back to the
guy at MIT, that the whole concept of
how this works was invented 60 years ago.
Well, I was an editor of InfoWorld in
the 80s when this was, when this cropped
up.
Right.
Well, it comes back every decade.
No, it's not decade.
It comes back every 30 or 40 years.
Well, it was, it was, it was, no,
the people use their shirts.
They're all out of business.
It takes forever to rebuild your wealth.
Yes.
Then we get an AI winter.
That's, that's a term.
But.
Okay.
So what do you remember?
Well, I remember a couple of things.
One, the guy out of MIT, who I
think you're talking about, it could be a
couple of different guys.
I have to think of some names.
I'll give you that.
And there's a guy at Stanford called McCarthy
and their guy at MIT was Minsky.
The, well, Minsky and the guy from the
Eliza computer, Weizenbaum.
Oh, that, that predated that by a lot.
Eliza was way before Minsky.
No, Weizenbaum worked with Minsky.
I'm pretty sure.
No, I know, but I'm saying that Eliza
was like in the 70s.
60s, 60s, 60s.
And the AI thing that Minsky and these
guys were all dealing with, it was really
started in the eighties.
That was Lisp.
Well, Lisp was part of that, but it
wasn't the whole thing, which is one at
one element.
But it was built on the Eliza scripts.
I've, I've looked at this history, so I'm
just saying, yeah.
Well, I, okay.
Whatever the case, Minsky and these guys were
off the mark.
And there was a guy out of Stanford
called Levatsky, who was the one who was
pushing the neural network idea, which is what's
finally evolved.
And he's given no credit, mysteriously died in
Australia.
And I hate it when that happens.
Wrote a thesis that had a bunch of
interesting stuff in it.
Like what would they have to kill him
for?
He has the model for who can win
a war as an algorithm.
And which is used by the Pentagon, I'm
told.
And he has a bunch of other screwball
information about psychology and a bunch of things
in this thesis he wrote at Stanford.
But he, and he was a professor there,
and he's the one that was in the
neural networks and neural networks kind of came
and went because they couldn't be, they couldn't
get him to work.
I mean, it would, the idea was good.
Intel had a chip, which I have a
copy of the, one of the first neural
network chips, and they dropped the ball completely
on that.
And then now it re-evolved into what
we have today, which is a neural network,
which is what's talks to the, the large
language model.
And you need that neural network in the
middle to do the work.
And so this whole thing is a mishmash,
but there's issues and they still, it still
doesn't think.
No, it doesn't think at all.
And by the way, can we hook that
chip up?
Well, it's in the archives, so finding the
chip.
Can you put it on the, on a
breadboard and hook it up to the internet?
So you probably could, if you could find
some specs, where the pinouts, what the pinouts
do.
Run a, run some, some GitHub stuff on
it would be amazing.
I don't know.
It's a good question because that chip is
pretty, I don't even know what, what Intel.
See if you can find it.
I, I think I know where it is,
but what difference does it make?
It's unless I can find a specs for
it.
It doesn't just a chip with a bunch
of pins coming out of it.
Well, let's continue with this nonsense.
This hundred billion dollars.
The Intel partnership is about recognizing that accelerated
computing.
This is the term.
This is, see, there's a subtle shift in
the marketing speak here as accelerated computing.
They're taking the intelligence out of AI and
they're calling it accelerated computing, which to be
fair is actually a pretty good name for
it.
Because there is some accelerated computing components to
it.
It allows me to vibe code something, you
know, kind of.
There's no intelligence, no memory capacity, but it's
accelerated.
It's accelerated my capacity to sling some Python
scripts.
Yes.
I like accelerated computing.
It definitely accelerates the art generator.
How do you think about the value of
the ecosystem to NVIDIA?
The Intel partnership is about recognizing that accelerated
computing and AI's day has arrived.
Remember, general purpose computing was invented practically 60
years ago.
And for the last 60 years, we've been
following that basic blueprint, that basic architecture, you
know, to build the ecosystem, the computing use
of the world.
And so all of a sudden, accelerated computing's
time has come.
And we're fusing, if you will, the Intel
architecture with the NVIDIA architecture to bring them
into the world of accelerated computing and AI.
So that's what that partnership's about.
I mean, this is, you know, monumental in
size.
There's never been an engineering project, a technical
project of this complexity and this scale ever.
And it really just says that AI was
in the early adopter phase in the labs.
And finally, it's breaking out into just about
every single industry, every single use case we
can imagine.
It is very soon where every single word,
every single interaction, every single image, video that
we experience through computers will somehow have been
reasoned through or referenced by or generated by
AI.
It's going to be touched by AI somehow.
So all of our computing experiences throughout the
day, everywhere in every industry will be powered
by AI.
This is the first 10 gigawatts.
Surely, it sounds like an enormous undertaking, but
there's no question that AI is transformational for
every industry.
But the important thing is the AI infrastructure
will be everywhere and will power computing experiences
for everyone, every day.
And it's going to be just everywhere.
Yeah.
So accelerated computing, computer experiences.
This is, to me, the never-ending battle
between personal computing and mainframes.
This is just an attempt to get the
desktop computer hooked up to something else so
you don't have any real autonomy.
Excellent.
The autonomy is what we want.
You want desktop AI.
I mean, this is no good.
Everything they're talking about is no good.
Well, this is an NVIDIA term, accelerated computing.
So what is it?
And by the way, NVIDIA is in for
a big surprise when they deal with the
corporate culture at Intel and the arrogance of
that company.
And it's just built in.
It's in their DNA.
It's in their DNA.
It's just they're arrogant and they're assholes in
a way that's unbelievable that they will not
be able to deal with it.
Because NVIDIA guys are just all cool.
Leather jackets and stuff.
Yeah.
Everyone I know that's ever worked there, including
my son who worked there for a while,
they're all just laid back.
It's nothing like Intel.
So what is accelerated computing?
Here's the NVIDIA blog.
Accelerated computing is the use of specialized hardware
to dramatically speed up work using parallel processing
that bundles frequently occurring tasks.
It offloads demanding work that can bog down
CPUs, poor CPU at home, and processors that
typically execute tasks in serial fashion.
Cloud.
Because accelerated computing on NVIDIA GPUs can do
more work in less time.
It's energy efficient.
Oh yeah.
Wow.
Consuming less energy than general purpose servers that
employ CPUs.
We need nuclear power plants for these systems,
but they're so efficient.
That's why accelerated computing is sustainable computing.
Users worldwide are documenting energy efficiency gains with
AI and accelerated computing.
Wow.
This is great.
Who wrote this?
Born in the PC, accelerated computing came of
age in supercomputers.
It lives today in your smartphone and every
cloud service.
There it is.
And now companies of every stripe are adopting
it to transform their business with data.
Accelerated computers blend CPUs.
Blend them.
They blend.
Will it blend?
I could do that with my blend tech
blender.
Will it blend?
They blend CPUs and other kinds of processes
together as equals in an architecture, sometimes called
heterogeneous computing.
Oh, geez.
This is...
I mean, even if they asked us to,
we couldn't write this bullcrap.
We'd be embarrassed.
It's too...
Yes.
We'd be embarrassed.
AI wrote it.
We'd be in...
Oh, HPC.
What is HPC?
High performance computing.
Ah, there you go.
High performance computing plus GPUs equals accelerated science.
That's a good one.
This family of GPUs destined for the data
center, expanded on a regular cadence with a...
This is definitely written by AI.
Expanded on a regular cadence with a succession
of new architectures named after innovators like Tesla,
Fermi, Kepler, Maxwell, Pascal, Volta, Turing, Ampere, Hopper,
and Blackwell.
These guys are smoking crack.
It's unbelievable.
But you can watch it.
It's AI smarts of DoorDash and Domino's.
It's improved our food delivery systems.
Has it now?
Yeah, it has.
So anyway, so now the money is, you
know, no one is...
They need 800 billion more.
Hey, you want your money back?
You got to give us 800 billion more.
Yeah, it's almost like a racket.
Yes, it's a Ponzi scheme.
Like, oh, we need...
Just a little bit more, man.
Just a little bit more.
Just need 800 billion more.
We know Sam Altman said it was going
to be 7 trillion.
I think he's right.
I don't know what you get for your
7 trillion dollars.
How much money do you have to make
to be profitable on 7 trillion dollars?
I don't know.
So I got a couple of funny stories.
Well, I don't know how funny it is.
Well, then we'll see.
Are they funnier than my boots and barbecue
story from the last show?
Oh, the one that went 17 minutes?
Yeah, that one.
Yeah, well, that doesn't take any skill.
Okay, okay.
I have a local news story.
I'm trying to find it on my list.
Fremont murder?
Yeah, the Fremont...
Now, this is a crack...
Okay, the only reason I...
You have to imagine this.
The reason I picked this story up, this
local story from KTVU, it's a murder in
Fremont.
This is a long clip.
The guy, the murderer.
This is a long clip.
How long is it?
2.52?
Oh, well, play it.
I'll cut it off.
But you have to imagine the murderer is
an Indian guy who looks exactly like Cash
Patel.
With those stupid, those eyeballs, you know, Cash
Patel's like, he's not quite cross-eyed, but
what is wrong with his eyes?
Bugging out.
You don't know what the deal is.
So this guy is a murderer, and it
brought me to another clip, which I have
to follow it.
Let's play this first, and we'll see what
I did wrong here.
Disturbing new details in a deadly stabbing in
Fremont.
Tonight, a man is accused of tracking down
and murdering his victim, a registered sex offender.
Police say the suspect was motivated by the
criminal past of his victim.
Court documents also suggesting the 29-year-old
suspect wanted to find someone he considered, quote,
easy to kill.
New at 10, KTVU's Betty Yu dug through
those documents and is live outside of the
Fremont Police Department with more, Betty.
Claudine, the details here are chilling, and they've
really shaken this quiet Fremont community.
We've learned that the victim and the suspect
did not know each other.
In fact, police say that the suspect picked
his murder victim that morning and then killed
him that very afternoon.
29-year-old Varun Suresh is accused of
stabbing and killing 71-year-old David Brimmer
last Thursday.
According to court documents obtained by KTVU, Suresh
told police he had wanted to kill a
sex offender for years because they, quote, hurt
children and deserved to die.
He allegedly said he found Brimmer on the
Megan's Law website and picked him because he
was a, quote, old guy and easy to
kill.
Brimmer had served nine years in prison after
a 1995 conviction for committing lewd acts with
a child.
Police say Suresh posed as an accountant, going
door to door before approaching Brimmer's home on
Solstice Court.
He allegedly attacked Brimmer at the doorstep.
Brimmer ran down the street, eventually forcing his
way into a neighbor's home on Upper Vintner
Circle.
But Suresh caught up, stabbing him in the
neck and ultimately killing him near the lawn.
I'm shocked.
I don't expect something like this happen in
Fremont because I have never experienced something like
this in the last 30 years.
Police say Suresh stayed on scene and court
records show he told police he didn't plan
to escape and even said, I'm hoping that
because the victim is a pedophile, like, everyone
hates pedophiles.
So like, it should be cool.
I know that law was in the budget.
That was the punchline.
I don't know why I didn't get cut
off.
He thought, don't worry about it.
I'm going to kill a guy, but everyone's
going to love me for doing it.
Because I'm cool.
But he doesn't realize that everybody hates murderers
too.
It's a Luigi thing.
Yeah.
It's a Luigi thing.
So, but that brought me to, it was
a really pathetic story, but that brought me
to an old clip that just happened to
show up floating around.
Oh, I love it when that happens.
Yeah, it's funny.
It's just a tap.
This is a Shirley Temple, on the Shirley
Temple Black.
I'm the most abused actress in history.
Well, maybe to some extent, but if you
listen to the story, maybe not.
But this is her talking to Larry King,
probably.
Oh, I remember this clip, sure.
This is a great clip.
When I left Fox, I went to MGM
for one picture.
Thank goodness, only one.
And when I got there with my mother,
we were separated.
She went into the office of Louis B.
Mayer, and I went into the office of
Arthur Freed.
He was going to talk to me about
a movie he wanted to put me in.
I'm 12 years old, you know.
And I thought he was a producer, but
instead, he was an exhibitor.
And I'd never seen anyone naked before, except
myself.
So I had no clue about what was
happening.
So it struck me so funny, I laughed
at him.
And I laughed uproariously.
I had tears, you know.
And he got infuriated.
And he said, out, out, out, go.
Did you tell your mother?
Well, I went down, it was very quiet.
I went down and met her in the
lobby of the administration building.
She came out very quietly from Louis B.
Mayer's office.
And we walked hand-in-hand silently to
the car, which was unusual.
We got in the car, driving home.
I said, Mom, you won't believe what happened
to me.
And I told her what happened, and she
got kind of quiet.
And she said, well, you don't know what
happened to me.
Louis B.
Mayer wasn't as bad as Freed was to
me.
He came on to my mother.
And so we both decided that we didn't
like MGM much.
It was better at Fox.
It's a horrible story.
It's horrible.
But it's like, if you're going to, you
know, that Hollywood, unbelievable.
Well, speaking of Epstein.
Eyo.
Yeah.
So I've heard this story in Fredericksburg, but
one of our producers actually wrote it down.
And I want to read it to you
because this is doing the rounds.
It's about the Trump card.
The Trump card.
And this is a gossip in Fredericksburg too.
Yes, it is.
Okay.
So we can assume there's military intelligence involved.
The Trump card for foreigners is to buy
their way into the U.S. So the
world's blackmailed elite who are on the Epstein
and similar lists are given an opportunity to
get out from under their blackmail and start
over.
So they flip on the blackmailers, cooperate with
U.S. authorities, and are given the opportunity
to buy their citizenship, a.k.a. safe
passage, and bring their wealth with them tax
-free.
That's the platinum card.
Not a bad price for the truth and
the evidence.
This is also why the release of the
Epstein list has been delayed as these agreements
are still taking shape.
So the Trump card is a little delayed,
but it took them a little longer to
get it all together.
Kash Patel is embedded with this process through
his Vegas ties as the liaison between both
worlds.
Because Kash has a storied past relating to
all these blackmail operations, making him the perfect
middleman.
That's why he's been stalling and acting shady.
Now you know the true story.
Oh, my God.
What a contrived story.
That is a good one, though.
I love it.
So in other words, what we're witnessing here
is instead of the Epstein list, it's a
blackmail scheme.
Of course, the FBI has always been blackmailers.
We know that.
Goes back to J.
Edgar Hoover.
And the CIA.
CIA does it, too.
And the CIA does the same thing, but
they're not as well known for it.
And so this is just part of the
long term, the long arc of blackmail.
And so they have the list of the
bad dudes that were involved with Epstein and
they're making them pay up, basically.
Is that right?
Yeah, that's the idea.
Pay up or else.
Ah, the world is fantastic.
It's so fun.
It's just a good one.
It's totally fun.
Speaking of Epstein.
Take a look at this.
A big statue popped up on the National
Mall.
It's President Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein holding
hands and skipping the plaque in front of
it, says, quote, in honor of Friendship Month.
At this point, nobody has taken credit for
this pop up display.
And this is just one of many temporary
statues that have appeared on the mall recently.
A few others were a big bunch of
bananas and one of President Trump holding up
a Bitcoin.
And whoever's behind this most recent statue got
a permit from the Park Service.
The permit says the statue can stay up
until Sunday.
That's the best part.
They got a permit for it.
Yeah, well, at least they went through channels.
I think that's a plus.
We can get a permit for a Curry
Dvorak statue on the mall skipping.
You know what bothers me to this day
is that if you recall during 2016, during
the show era, there were all these naked
fiberglass statues of Trump that were put all
over the place.
There was one in San Francisco.
And exactly why I didn't orchestrate, you know,
all you have to do is get the
right gear, a hard hat, clipboard, orange vest
and a pickup truck.
There it is.
Orange vest, hard hat, clipboard, pickup truck optional.
And you're good to go.
And you go drive it with a couple
of dudes and you go grab one of
those things.
That has got to do, as someone who
is an archivist, that has got to be
one of the great collectibles ever made.
Yes, get some dudes from Home Depot.
It's like Banksy material.
Yes, it is.
It's perfect.
Yeah.
Why I didn't grab the one in San
Francisco, I'm not absolutely sure what I was
thinking.
It's beyond me.
It's beyond me.
I feel very disappointed in myself.
You could have put it next to your
AI chip.
It would have been a perfect addition to
it.
Yeah, in the closet.
By the way, I'm going to call Glenn
Beck and suggest that we have a Dvorak
wing to his library because the stuff you've
got, I'm sure Beck would be like, wow,
this is like that chip.
He'll love that.
You've got all kinds.
Yeah, that chip might be something.
I think you've got a treasure trove.
Well, he would really like the Trump statue.
Oh, he would love to have that.
I mean, where'd they all go?
I mean, they made about 20 of them.
I mean, we should have Jay, we'll pay
Jay to catalog.
But by the way, to do that, she
needs a hard hat and a clipboard because
she might die under a deluge.
And the yellow vest.
You need that just in case.
You need to cordon it off because man,
it's a danger zone.
It's actually, I'm sorry, it's an orange vest
and a yellow hard hat.
That's it.
I'm telling you, Glenn will be happy, happy
with your stuff.
Happy.
It's happy actually.
Oh man.
Well, I can talk about the Kimmel stuff
or we can go to break.
No, let's do Kimmel stuff for a second
because that is worth discussing.
So yeah, Kimmel was taken off the air
for four days or something.
They made a big fuss about it.
And of course, nobody wants to talk about
Kimmel's commentary during when Roseanne was taken off
in 19...
We actually, we looked it up and she
was taken off the air because she tweeted
that Valerie Jarrett, then President Obama's handler, looked
like an ape.
Well, she looked like one of the actresses
in Planet of the Apes.
I think she just said she looked like
an ape.
I don't think she said.
Well, she was an ape.
I mean, the Planet of the Apes is
about apes, so yeah.
But, and then she went all soft and
was like, well, I was on Ambien and
like, come on, Roseanne.
Yeah, she wimped out.
Yeah, she wimped out big time.
And so that was the reason she was
fired.
But Kimmel went on and I put one
of the memes in the newsletter, has what
he had to say.
And it was largely, ABC has every right
to take her off the air.
ABC is a business and ABC this and
ABC that.
Yeah.
And so he defended her getting kicked off
the air.
And now, of course, when it happened to
him, he's whining and he's expecting everybody to
keep him on the air.
And he's back for a moment, got 6
.2 million viewers on the show.
It was his first show back, which of
course- Yeah, stop right there.
0.8% in the demo.
Yeah, the demos, the demo.
Yeah, he's got nothing in the demo.
Not even 1% of the advertising demographic.
What's the demo?
It's 18 to what, you know the number?
1849 and- 1849.
Now, 0.87% is much higher than
he usually does.
And that equates to about, roughly about a
million people in the demo.
So if he had that every single night,
I think that, you know, looking at the
numbers, so that's a thousand CPMs. So a
CPM has got to be pretty high.
They could do much better if he had
a 0.87 in the demo.
But it's still, as the demo goes, it's
pathetic.
You can put your money elsewhere as an
advertiser.
Yeah, and that's the problem.
So they're losing, they save 20 million a
year on this show and they're probably not
gonna, nothing's gonna change.
And by the way, all those viral pictures
and video, look, they're dismantling his set.
Guess that was bullcrap.
No, I'm sorry, what?
Oh, there was everyone like, it's over, look,
their shipping is set out the back door.
No, they weren't.
I never saw any of that.
This writing, you know, it's like a Candace
Owens level thing.
Well, we've done some sleuthing.
I have the receipts.
Snooping.
Candace Owens.
I have the receipts.
Yeah, all right.
This is definitely a menu for herself.
So we have, these are, this is, I
think I've got four clips of Kimmel acting.
I call it because this first clip is
acting for sure.
Then he does some material.
Basically, the whole show is a monologue he
brought in.
He did skits and bits.
He had De Niro come on.
You watched it, you're in the demo.
You're one of the 6.2 million.
Yeah, I watch it.
I have a show to do here.
Okay, let's listen to Kimmel acting one.
Cannot be allowed to control what we do
and do not say on television and that
we have to stand up to it.
I've been hearing a lot about what I
need to say and do tonight.
And the truth is, I don't think what
I have to say is going to make
much of a difference.
If you like me, like me.
If you don't, you don't.
I have no illusions about changing anyone's mind.
But I do want to make something clear
because it's important to me as a human.
And that is, you understand that it was
never my intention to make light of the
murder of a young man.
No, this is not acting.
That's real.
He's a crybaby.
He cries all the time.
He cries all the time.
He's a crybaby.
But he starts it off by saying the
government has no right to tell broadcasters what
they can and cannot do.
That's bull crap.
These are licensed.
These licenses, you know, they're standards.
They're standards and practices.
Have they ever heard of standards and practices?
ABC had nothing to do with it.
I mean, they had nothing to do with
the broadcast license.
They have a small amount of owned affiliates.
They have a lot of O and O's.
Yeah, but the big boys are out there.
But OK, fine.
It's a mute point.
The point is, is that he can't just
do and say whatever he wants.
And he never does apologize for saying that
it was the MAGA guys who killed Kirk.
No, he said it was all about the
joke, that the president is about the joke
and Trump can't take a joke.
In fact, I think maybe that's in clip
two.
Should the government be allowed to regulate which
podcasts the cell phone companies and Wi-Fi
providers are allowed to let you download to
make sure they serve the public interest?
Wow.
I hadn't heard this part of it.
That's really interesting.
Why?
No.
But that has been argued many, many, many
times all the way up to the Supreme
Court level as to whether the telephone network
is a equivalent to broadcast spectrum or if
it is an open resource that you should
be able to do everything you want on
it.
We have separate laws for that known as
wire fraud and RICO.
But this no, no, Jimmy Kimmel, this has
been argued a long time before we were
born.
You think that sounds crazy?
No.
Ten years ago, this sounded crazy.
Brendan Carr, the chairman of the FCC, telling
an American company we can do this the
easy way or the hard way and that
these companies can find ways to change conduct
and take action on Kimmel or there's going
to be additional work for the FCC ahead.
In addition to being a direct violation of
the First Amendment is not a particularly intelligent
threat to make in public.
Ted Cruz said he sounded like a mafioso.
Ted Cruz did himself no favors with that
because Cruz as a lawyer should know much
better than that.
What a dope.
He's a dope.
The other thing that's interesting here is that
I've said this before because I worked in
the government long enough to know one thing.
Don't start prodding bureaucrats.
Bad idea.
It's just not and it's not going to
work out for you.
They've got nothing better to do than because
they're usually bored.
They're in their office.
There's nothing to do.
But if they get in the word, the
term for the novices out there is hard
on.
They get a hard on for you and
they go at they find some ways to
make your life miserable.
By the way, they do it because there's
nothing.
It's more fun.
It's fun.
It was a veiled reference to Joe Rogan,
I think is a good point from the
troll room to say that about podcasts.
And should they be allowed over this cell
phone network?
I'm sure he's got a hard on that.
Rogan has a much bigger audience than he
has.
Well, it's not even comparable and probably a
bigger paycheck.
And he gets well, I don't know.
I mean, yeah, Rogan gets a big paycheck.
He gives it out.
You know, it's gross.
I mean, Kim will get 16 million dollars
for a show that loses 20 million.
I mean, it's ridiculous.
All right.
So here we go to the third clip.
The FCC has a tradition of meddling where
they shouldn't under many administrations.
But it wasn't always like this.
There was an FCC commissioner back in 2022
who worked under Joe Biden who was spot
on.
He wrote President Biden is right.
Political satire is one of the oldest and
most important forms of free speech.
It challenges those in power while using humor
to draw more people into the discussion.
That's why people in influential positions have always
targeted it for censorship.
You know who wrote that?
FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr.
Yeah, but it wasn't about the satire, but
that's OK.
Whatever it was.
I thought that was a good bit.
Yeah.
And he again is prodding a bureaucrat.
Yeah, you know, which is well, but but
but this is what you do.
Howard Stern made a career out of doing
this and it was disingenuous because he would
say the FCC won't let me say these
words.
The FCC won't let me talk about this.
That is factually not true.
It was the station owners and the broadcast
licensees who wouldn't let him do that because
they knew that because that with broadcast license
spectrum, there's certain words you can't say before
the watershed moment, 10 p.m. And Stern
made a whole big thing about I'm the
man.
It's against the man.
And once he didn't have the man, when
he moved to Sirius and he could say
whatever he wanted, it fell apart because he
didn't have that anymore.
So Kimmel is doing a smart thing here.
Despite you thinking it's don't prod the the
bureaucrat, it's the only thing he can do.
And I probably would have done the same
from a what?
If I were in that position, that's what
you do.
You go against the man.
This was good luck.
This was this will garner popularity for Kimmel.
It will work.
No, it won't.
Yeah, you know, his numbers will go down
every night ever since.
Of course, there was a good bit.
I mean, I think it's funny.
I think overall he did a decent job.
He never apologized and he blamed Trump for
the whole thing.
Yeah, that that's what you do.
That is the only thing you can do.
It is generally speaking lame.
And here's the final truth to power, man.
I'm speaking truth to power.
We're under attack here.
And I think unjustly this puts them at
risk.
The president of the United States made it
very clear he wants to see me and
the hundreds of people who work here fired
from our job.
I thought it's going to say me and
the hundreds of people who watch.
But no, it was the president of the
United States made it very clear he wants
to see me and the hundreds of people
who work here fired from our jobs.
Our leader celebrates Americans losing their livelihoods because
he can't take a joke.
Say that he screws it up.
No one cares about you losing your job.
No one cares about that.
Oh, and the hundreds of people who work
here do an entertainment show, bro.
No.
By the way, the biggest loser of the
night was Gavin Newsom, who went on Colbert
show the same night that Kimmel comes back.
Yeah, well, again, that's the news, of course,
made a fool of himself.
Here it comes.
So look, I just I think it's important
to have those civil engagements.
I think it's important to dialogue.
It's important to learn from your opponents.
And it's important to reconcile your weaknesses as
a Democratic Party.
We have a lot of work to do
to make up for our failures in the
past.
We got crushed in this last election.
And now we're in a position where we
are struggling to communicate.
We're struggling to win back now the majority
in the House of Representatives.
And that's a big part of what I'm
doing, not just today in terms of the
work out here, raising money, but also raising
awareness around how Donald Trump is trying to
rig the midterm elections and how I fear
that we will not have an election in
2028.
I really mean that at the core of
my soul, unless we wake up to the
code red what's happening in this country, and
we wake up soberly to how serious this
moment is.
Yes, yes, yes.
Applause.
Very serious moment.
We're not going to have elections in 2028.
Wow.
He could move to Fredericksburg.
That is great.
Of course, not really mentioned in any reports
of actual government censorship is this little ditty.
YouTube will soon reinstate users who are banned
from spreading misinformation about the COVID-19 pandemic
and the 2020 election.
YouTube's parent company Alphabet disclosed the move in
a letter submitted to the House Judiciary Committee.
Republicans are investigating whether the Biden administration forced
tech companies to restrict speech on their platforms.
In the letter, Alphabet's lawyer wrote the administration
pressured the company to remove content that it
said did not violate YouTube's policies.
Gee.
Yeah, that got no coverage.
No, why would it?
Why would it?
I mean, there's no coverage.
No, Kim got all the coverage.
Yeah, because he's awesome.
He's a hero.
He's awesome.
He's the Robin Hood of late night is
what he is.
And with that, I want to thank you
for your courage and say in the morning
to you, the man who put the C's
in the accelerated computing, say hello to my
friend on the other end, the one, the
only Mr. John C.
DuBois.
Yeah, well, in the morning, you, Mr. Adam
Currie.
We're pretty close back to our normal 1800s.
1768, the peakage, peak trollage.
So that's good.
Trolls are here.
Trolls are willing to hear what's happening.
They want to know they they they are
not interested in ballistics or exit wounds.
They just want to hear what's really going
on in their world.
We're going to the moon.
We're not going to land, but we're going
to the moon.
All of it here on the No Agenda
show.
The moon, Alice.
We're going to the moon, Alice.
And of course, you can listen to can
join the trolls in the in the troll
rooms.
noagendastream.com, trollroom.io and always be listening
on a modern podcast app, which you will
get an alert when we go live on
the show because we do this live before
a live studio troll audience, which is actually
quite beneficial to the show because we get
real time feedback, lots of trolling, 60 percent
trolling and good one liners.
People look stuff up sometimes.
Sometimes they don't.
But yeah, it's good.
And your modern podcast app, which you can
find at podcastapps.com is better than your
legacy app for a couple of reasons.
One, when we go live, you get the
bat signal and it'll give an alert on
your phone, on your supercomputer in your pocket.
You tap it, you're listening live in your
podcast app.
It's amazing.
And then, of course, if you can't and
you're just a subscriber to the podcast, which
means you want to get notified when we
post it, you'll get it within 90 seconds
of the show being posted.
We run value for value.
No hoops, no.
Oh, man, I've been hearing some some horrible
things about some of these advertising deals.
You know, if you're like, well, so like
people should go unmentioned.
But if you're if you're on Rumble and
Rumble will offer you a an advertising deal
and they'll give you 500 bucks a month
and every show, every show, you have to
read this whole thing about some vitamins and
you have to pretend that you're taking them
and you feel great.
I'd rather be poor.
I feel great.
I've been taking these vitamins and I've never
felt better.
I'd rather be poor.
It's amazing.
No, we don't want 500 bucks.
It's not worth it.
I'll tell you what, I'd do that in
a minute if it was a million dollars.
Oh, of course.
A show.
Yeah.
Hey, I'll dance naked for a million dollars
a show.
You heard him.
Send us your Bitcoin.
Only 10 Bitcoin, everybody.
And then you're good to go.
I'll come to your house.
Yeah.
So, no, we don't.
We don't.
Sweetening the deal is what we call that.
We're not interested in that.
And really, we start off, we had no
interest in having meetings with advertisers.
That's the worst.
That's worse than than pretending that you like
the vitamins.
None of that takes place on the No
Agenda show.
So you're telling me, hold on, that when
I'm listening to these podcasts, where they're talking
about one thing, then they quickly jump into
something else, that they're not taking these vitamins
that make them feel so much better?
They're probably also not buying gold for their
retirement.
I'm just saying it's probably not true.
That's my favorite.
You know, whenever I buy gold, John, where
do you buy your gold?
Where do you buy your gold?
I buy my gold from the gold guys
over here because they give me a fair
price.
And they give me these doubloons, which are
very exclusive.
They're hard to come by.
And they have pneumastic quality.
Yeah, I could do it.
Pneumastic?
That's a new word.
Pneumasticist?
What is it?
What is the word?
Now that you say that word, mispronounce it
so badly, I can't think of how to
pronounce it.
Pneumismatist.
Pneumismatist?
Yeah.
Pneumismatism or something like that.
Pneumismatics, I think, might be it.
Well, what is the term we're actually trying
to describe?
Coin collecting?
No, I mean...
Okay.
Error.
What is the term for a coin that
collectors think is of great value?
A sleeper.
That's the term.
A sleeper.
Okay, that's not what I meant.
How do I pronounce pneumasticism?
Pneumasticism.
That'll trip anyone up.
It's actually P-pneumatitis with a T in
there.
Close though.
English loves sneaky letters.
What?
P-pneumatitis.
That's some other word.
It's P-pneumatitis.
I never even heard of that one.
Well, P-pneumatitis is something you don't want,
okay?
Unless you buy these vitamins because then you're
going to feel great.
Makes you burn when you urinate.
No P-pneumatitis for you.
Error clearly hallucinating.
So the way it works is we just
give you all the value.
It's open.
It is the definition of free speech, all
right?
It's free.
It's free to you.
It's free.
Free speech.
No, it's just free speech because there's freedom
of speech is something I have been given
by God, and the government's supposed to protect
that, which they don't.
And free speech is what we give to
you.
It's a podcast.
I think the government protects it pretty well.
They put Kimmel back on the air many
months.
They're good.
They are so good.
So we give you the free speech in
MP3 form, and then you can decide if
you got any value out of that.
We find it very valuable because we put
a lot of our life and our energy
and our time into doing this program.
We do it as a public service.
We're happy to do it.
And we're happier when you return some value,
time, talent, or treasure.
And we want to thank some people who
gave us, well, obviously, our producers.
Even the guy from NASA is appreciated.
It's still value he's returning to us.
I think we give more value to him,
but it's valuable.
I appreciate it.
Even negative value is still value.
It's just it detracts from all the other
value somehow.
And one way that people can give us
value is by typing in words on a
keyboard to create art.
It's not a lot of value anymore, but
we do appreciate people doing it.
And the artwork for episode 1781, which we
titled Hate of Speech, perfect, got a lot
of traction.
People liked it.
This is by Darren O'Neill, so you
know it's AI.
And it was John and Adam in a
little rocket ship cruising through the cosmos.
And people loved it.
People really liked it.
This is where you say, yes, people liked
it.
We're going to the moon.
We were going to the moon, and it
was amazing how much people liked it.
Now, we did look at a whole bunch
of other AI-generated pieces of slop, and
let's see what we came up with and
what we ignored.
Well, we have to admit that when it
comes down to it, Darren O'Neill is
the, I hate to say this.
He's like the parachute.
He's the fallback guy.
He's the injection seat.
He always has a piece or two that
he rarely does a piece that's not usable.
Yeah, it's always usable.
Sometimes it's really good, and sometimes it's the
one that wins.
And he's won two or three times in
a row every so often.
He's got a lot of numbers.
Now, was this his hat trick?
It may have been.
I think it is.
I think he had a hat trick.
I think he might have.
Let's look at the list of winners.
Yeah, I think he has a hat trick.
Now, other pieces that were submitted, Jimmy Kimmel
dead instead of Jimmy Kimmel alive.
Yeah, it's a hat trick because he did
the robot.
The Future is Now, he did the street
signs, and he did the rocket.
And we made a point of discussing this
that we were not going to allow him
to get a hat trick.
No, we didn't.
We're like, whatever we do, we're not choosing
Darren.
And he gets it anyway.
It's uncanny how that happens.
So let's see.
What else was there?
There was some really bad orange from Darren
Grimerica.
Orange.
Lots of orange stuff.
More orange.
Jeffrey Rhea.
You got to find a different model, Jeffrey.
It's too orange.
Oh, just filter it.
That is too much work.
A lot of Trump cards, which I just
didn't see.
It wasn't really funny.
Was there anything else that we even discussed
kind of liking?
The 1984 Awakening was a cute idea, but
really too small, honestly.
Like the Apple commercial girl running up the
aisle.
You actually said, oh, the ice with the
mask is funny.
I'm like, no, it's not.
Which one was that?
The ice guy with the medical mask.
It's called ice.
It's a police officer with a medical mask.
You thought it was funny.
I was like, no, it's not funny.
I can't even find it.
Oh, there it is down at the bottom.
Yeah.
I didn't say anything about it.
I said it was, yeah, I liked it.
You did.
You did say it.
It was cute.
Yeah.
And it was subtle.
It was funny.
We're going to space.
Jeffrey Rice.
Jeffrey whatever.
Jeffrey Rhea.
Rhea Rhea.
Anyway, we're going to space was the winner
and well deserved.
And I see lots more.
Work slop has been submitted.
So we'll have another depressing time looking for
artwork.
Although I, you know, there are some real
artists who are trying.
What's always sad is.
So I'll get a new artist.
Hey man, I submitted a handmade art.
No AI.
And you look at it.
It's like, oh, that's too bad.
Because the AI art is just funnier.
I can't help it.
A lot of it's funnier.
I'm starting to use.
I'm going to make some AI songs now.
Do what?
AI songs.
I'm going to get some get me become
an artist on.
Oh yeah, you can do it.
Yeah.
You've always wanted to be in the music
business.
Because it's so lucrative now.
Yeah.
Now's the time to get in.
Yeah.
You can make three dollars.
Buy low sell high.
You can make three dollars.
Three dollars is not a problem at all.
Part of the value of a value system
is, of course, the.
Monetary the treasure that people support us with.
Anything is appreciated.
Any amount.
Anytime you feel that you got the value.
Just go to no agenda donations.com and
send it off to us.
Put a little note in there.
We love reading the notes.
We always thank everybody.
Fifty dollars and above.
We're pretty transparent in that way.
And you can see everything.
You can see how we're doing.
Make your own decision.
Never seems to thwart anybody from wanting to
support us, especially our executive and associate executive
producers.
That's it.
If you're fortunate enough to be able to
support us with two hundred dollars or more,
you get an official Hollywood credit of executive
associate producer.
And we will read your short note.
If it's three hundred or more, you become
an executive producer.
And these credits are real.
They are accepted and recognized by Hollywood.
Go take a look at IMDB dot com
where you can start an account if you
don't have one already as an executive producer.
Put on your LinkedIn, your ex profile, your
blue cry, whatever makes you feel good.
So let us start with now.
We got a lot of notes today, which
is kind of nice.
A lot of written, typewritten, handwritten.
And there he is.
And we start with Sir Tommy Hawk.
He is from Iowa City, Iowa, and sent
us five hundred dollars and a handwritten note
with interest on the card, too.
Oh, is it a card?
Yes.
Nice.
Well, I only see the the handwritten part.
So it's not going to take the picture.
Well, but then I don't know.
It was a nice card.
Now, do I do now?
I told you.
I.T.M. Gents, today is my 19th
birthday.
Hey, we got it.
We got a zoomer here, John.
We got a zoomer.
Yeah, we do have a zoomer.
Of course we do.
Zoomers are good business.
We like our zoomers.
Let me get my everything ready here.
Today is my 19th birthday, and I decided
to give myself the gift of a new
title.
Secretary General of the Heartland.
Sounds good to me.
Please play a little R2D2 karma and wish
Nolan, best son in the universe, a happy
birthday.
Sir Tom, does he have a kid already?
You think it's him?
Well, the guy's advanced.
That's pretty amazing.
Hold on a second.
Where's my R2D2?
Thank you very much.
Here it comes.
You've got karma.
Thank you, sir.
All the top donations are sent in as
checks, which is good.
Yeah, it's cool.
Uh, Garrett.
What is it?
Garrett?
No, it's Gansett.
Gansett Boomer in Saunderstown, Rhode Island, which is
a never heard of that one.
You might have.
No, no.
333.33. And he has a note on
typed out.
Printed note.
Yes, very nice.
Printed note.
Nicely printed.
Dear John and Adam, 333.33. ITM, this
donation is overdue.
Way overdue.
I am a first time appearance.
I am a first time appearance of.
What does it make?
Well, read the whole sentence.
I am a first time appearance of Adam
on Joe Rogan.
Listener.
There you go.
Yeah, that makes sense.
You both saved me from thinking.
Oh, I'm sorry.
You both saved me from thinking I was
going crazy during the pandemic when nothing was
making sense.
Yes, this is what we do.
I have learned so much about media deconstruction
and narratives from you guys.
I humbly request a deducing.
You've been deduced.
You notice.
Have you noticed how no one attacks us
anymore for the Ukraine nonsense?
Because we were right.
We told everybody it was nonsense.
And how it was set up.
And it wasn't just evil Russia.
You notice how that's happened?
Kind of gone away.
That happens all the time.
But they did the same thing with Vax.
Oh, yeah.
Oh, yeah.
Remember the hate we got?
Stooges.
That guy is that same guy.
That guy.
Dame Patricia is in Merced, California.
333.33. She has a note as well.
Dear John Adam, thank you so much for
the entertainment on my daily walks.
Double birthday celebration for me and my son,
Brian Lewis, on September 20th.
Plus an outrageous plug for Brian's business.
Brian Lewis's surface painting featuring Italian plasters and
specialty finishes in a Tascadero, San Luis Obispo
County, California.
Text Brian.
All right.
Write this down.
Text Brian at 850-470-9917.
So he knows you're a real person and
not Yelp or Google trying to sell some
advertising space.
Claim your no agenda discount.
Is there an area code involved here?
850-470-9917.
That is the area code.
She's doxing her son.
It's interesting.
Yeah, well, he's going to get some messages.
Now he gets some phone calls, too.
Hey, hey, ITM, baby.
God bless you both and keep well, says
Dame Patricia with the practically perfect penmanship in
Merced, California.
Oh, thank you very much, Dame Patricia.
Good to hear from you.
Nicer.
Saab, Saab, S-A-B-B of the
Silver Valley.
Yes.
333.33. He has a note, another note,
printed paper.
Here's some long overdue treasure for the invaluable
and ongoing amygdala mitigation that you two provide.
I've also been out hitting people in the
mouth on the regular.
I would hit him closer to the middle.
I often listen to the best podcast in
the universe while on my runs and the
combination of M5M deconstruction and a good physical
workout is something I highly recommend.
Not uncommon for me to burst out in
laughter as I'm running down the path.
Yeah, that's a great idea.
It looks like he's somebody falling with a
butterfly net.
So if anyone seems or sees that they
probably think I'm nuts, as part of the
treasure, I'd like to specifically recognize Adam's amazing
production.
Oh, there we go.
There we go.
Thank you.
It's about time.
Yeah.
The technical part is amazing, but the wisdom,
wit, and humor are next level.
One that stands out in the quite recent
episode 1796, when JCD says, this guy, I
think it's the A-L Hunt.
No, Al Hunt.
I think it's the A-O-L of
AI.
Every time I see A-L, I now
say A-I.
It's the Al Hunt in his name.
I'm not absolutely sure.
I can't remember.
Sure, I can't remember.
And Adam instantly mutters, yeah, Mike's brother, without
hesitation.
Absolutely fantastic.
You didn't catch that one.
A lot of people caught that.
There's one of those little Easter eggs I
slipped in.
Yeah, yeah, I do them all the time,
too.
Yeah, but I hear them.
Yeah, sure.
On a more serious note, I could feel
the weight of the Charlie Kirk assassination in
the first segment of episode 1798.
I'm still deeply saddened and also sick of
it all.
So as you aptly put it, Adam, it
makes me even more grateful for your faith,
your voice, and also for the two of
you having been able to deconstruct and try
to make sense of it all.
By the way, these lines are too long.
It's not enough leading and typeface could be
up at two points.
No jingles, no karma, but prayers for all
Sir Sabba the Silver Valley.
Okay.
Yes, complaints, complaints galore.
And Franny Knutson, Knutson, Knutson, 333.31. Also
a note, the final note that we have,
dear John and Adam, with 333.31. Oh,
no, hold on.
That's the wrong one.
Here it is, 333.31. Hi, guys.
With this added donation, I would like to
take the title Dame Free Free of South
Florida.
Donate, people.
And while you're at it, support Turning Point
USA for the future of this amazing country.
I beg of you.
Thank you for your courage.
I hope this note finds you well, says
Dame Free Free.
Oh, very nice.
Thank you, Dame Free Free.
And we're with Brandon Johnson in East Haddam,
Connecticut, 333.00. Dear John, Adam is not
a crackpot on British puppeteering.
You're also correct about us having...
Hating.
Oh, us hating.
Jeez.
Hating...
If I can clear my...
The frog in my throat.
Hating the British.
They infiltrated our education system and revised our
books and curriculum.
So that would not be...
So we would not be on guard against
them.
Yes, I pointed that out because of the
old books.
Pearson.
That's Pearson.
The publishing company, Pearson.
This is a British company that does a
lot of our educational material.
Pearson.
Yeah, that's been going on though since World
War II.
I know.
Well, hello.
And then we have Agent 99 in LaGrange,
Texas.
I've been to LaGrange.
I interviewed ZZ Top in LaGrange, Texas.
It's not LaGrange?
It's not LaGrange.
It's LaGrange.
I interviewed ZZ Top there in 1985, I
think.
Beards then?
Except for Frank Beard.
They certainly did.
And they were all alive.
And now we've lost one.
210 and 60 cents.
You said 1985?
I think so, yeah.
It was the Sharp Dress Men.
It was the Eliminator album.
Sharp Dress Men.
Yeah, I heard of him.
I'll forgo all the other things I said.
Thanks for providing media deconstruction and demonstrating the
mission of independent podcasting.
Well, podcasting was never...
I take issue with the podcast industrial complex
saying, oh yeah, we need more respect for
the indie podcasters.
Screw you, podcast industrial complex.
What does that mean?
Well, because if you're not trying desperately to
be at the top of the iTunes chart
and trying to make Joe Rogan money, then
you're an indie.
You're an indie pod...
No, we're podcasters.
We were here from the beginning.
You are the infiltrators.
Podcasting was always meant to be independent of
anything.
And you're now all captured.
Captured by running after downloads, which are phony.
And you're phoning your download numbers for money.
You're phony and I hope you sleep poorly
from it.
Well, they're going to get sick from the
vitamins.
That too.
All right, Eli the Coffee Guy's up.
And he came in with 209.25, which
is the date.
Uh, fall is finally here.
Enjoy the last gasp of warm weather.
Actually, here where we are, now the warm
weather begins.
In fact, it was like 99 yesterday, the
first day of fall.
Oh no, it's 80s here.
It's 80s now for us.
It's beautiful.
No, this is the time.
It gets warm.
It stays warm through November.
I still have green grass.
It's never happened since I've been in Texas
that you have green grass throughout the entire
summer.
It has been beautiful.
Go climate change.
Global warming.
Go climate change.
I love it.
And take the opportunity to visit your local
farmer's market.
The harvest is in, so there's a wide
selection of things available.
Support farmers and other small businessmen in your
community today.
He sells there too, by the way, at
least in Illinois, I think.
If you don't have a market or are
short a local coffee roaster, we got you
covered.
Gigawatt has some of the best coffees you've
ever had.
At a great price.
So visit gigawattcoffeeroasters.com and use code ITM20
for 20% off your order.
And by the way, we don't fake the
fact that we drink this stuff.
We drink the stuff we like.
We actually drink it.
And it's improved my health.
Stay caffeinated.
My libido is up.
I'm telling you, Gigawatt Coffee Roasters.
It'll get you laid, people.
William Lankford is in Negany, Negany?
Negany, Michigan?
I think it's Negany, it looks like to
me.
Maybe Negany.
$200.
Associate Executive Producer credit for, not for you,
William, but for Marge Lankford.
That's Marge with a J.
Happy birthday, my love, my lust, my passion
flower, my little chickadee, et cetera, et cetera.
And I wonder what he did.
I wonder.
Wow, you're in big trouble, bro.
Okay.
We hope that helped.
We hope that helps.
Oh, Linda Lou Patkins up.
She's in Lakewood, Colorado.
Yes.
She's in Lakewood, Colorado.
$200.
Jobs Karma for a competitive edge, she writes.
With a resume that gets results, go to
ImageMakersInc.com for all of your executive resume
and job search needs.
That's ImageMakersInc with a K.
And work with Linda Lou, Duchess of Jobs
and writer of winning resumes.
Now, unlike Gigawatt Coffee, we have not abused
Linda Lou Patkins' product.
No, but I have a test out there.
She's working with Brennan.
Oh, oh, oh.
And we'll see what happens.
Oh, guaranteed success.
When did she start?
How long ago?
About a month ago or so.
Okay.
Oh, I'm very excited to see how that
goes.
Awesome.
Well, thank you, Linda and your fellow Associate
Executive Producers and the Executive Producers for episode
1801, 18 years of podcasting, of indie podcasting.
We'll be celebrating that in October.
And of course, these titles are real, except
that anywhere where podcasts, the titles are recognized
or any Hollywood titles for that matter.
And we'll be thanking the rest of our
supporters, $50 and above in our second segment.
I got to give Linda her jobs, Karma.
Jobs, jobs, jobs, and jobs.
Let's vote for jobs.
Karma.
Support the No Agenda show with your value
in return for the value.
Go to noagendadonations.com.
Our formula is this.
We go out.
We hit people in the mouth.
Net says JCD has it right.
Negany, Negany, Negany is how I should pronounce
it.
Thank you.
Very appreciative of the pronunciation correction.
And Negany, Negany.
Very good.
Let's see.
Well, we got that note about Charlie Kirk.
And I think we have a, you know,
we had TDS, Trump derangement syndrome.
Now we have CDS, which I think is
a new thing we can categorize.
CDS is Christian derangement syndrome.
This is Tina Nguyen on MSNBC.
And it's obvious I'm a Christian nationalist.
What you're seeing here is a movement called
Christian nationalism that merges Christianity as it's been
practiced in America for, you know, centuries with
a very specific interpretation of what the founding
fathers wanted, what Aristotle wanted, going all the
way back to the ancients.
You saw Larry Arnn, who is the president
of Hillsdale College and a proponent of this
strain of interpretation of the Bible, merge Christianity
and protecting the Western civilization values into one
and the same thing.
It's a very somewhat convoluted argument.
But if you distill it into the right
talking points, it really hits you in the
patriotic heart area, as it were.
Well, I learned something.
What's that?
I didn't know that Aristotle was a Christian.
I think Aristotle got burned at the stake,
didn't he?
Or poisoned by hemlock or something.
Hard to say.
I can't remember.
But the thing is— He wasn't a Christian.
What is she talking about?
Well, so the idea here, and this is
what was evident at the Charlie Kirk Memorial—
I know you didn't watch it, but I
did— is that the country was founded— the
founders, the signers of the Declaration of Independence,
many of them were Bible scholars.
And MSNBC can't open a history book to
see the truth of what the nation was
founded on.
Like Sam Adams said, suppose a nation in
some distant region would take the Bible for
their only law book, and every member should
regulate this conduct by precepts that are exhibited.
What a utopia, what a paradise this region
would be.
The Bible is the best book in the
world.
He signed the Declaration of Independence.
I mean, it goes on and on and
on.
All of these guys were all about the
Bible.
But now MSNBC is like, this is some
weird convoluted— Well, there are a bunch of
atheists over at NBC.
I don't know why you're obsessed with this.
This is like my TikTok videos to you.
Now, I will say this.
I had a history professor at Cal, a
very famous one who won the National Book
Award that year with the book that he
just came out with, which was A White
Over Black, a famous book.
White Over Black?
Yeah, White Over Black was about pre-Civil
War race relations.
And he said that if you're going to
study American history, you should read the Bible
because you won't get it otherwise.
And he wasn't like a Bible thumper like
you.
So let me just get this right.
My talking about my faith and the Bible
irritates you in the same manner that your
TikTok videos irritate me?
No.
That's what I thought I heard you say.
Do my TikTok videos irritate you?
Yeah, they kind of do.
But I put up with it because I
love you.
Well, there you go.
Same thing.
Okay.
Oh, they're good to go then.
And now that we have that straight, let's
go to, then we have Comey.
Comey?
Yeah.
They're going to arrest this guy.
I'm looking at it right now.
Is this a sealed indictment?
What?
It's sealed?
Joe DiGenova was right.
Finally, a sealed indictment.
No, let's do this.
This is the, I think now we've been
through this in the lifetime of this show,
I want to say 15 to 20 times.
We're going to shut down the government.
It actually did happen once.
Yeah, I've got clips on it.
Yes.
I think it happened more than once during
the 18 years.
Well, give me your clips.
What do you got?
I got one clip.
Well, this is the bull crap.
I mean, this bothers me more than anything.
More than me reading the Bible?
No, you can read the Bible.
It's better than this.
First of all, they passed a big, beautiful
bill.
I was convinced.
Oh, that's for 2026.
So we got the government shut down.
Here's the boring old story.
This goes on.
You're right.
We've talked about this to excess every year
or two.
This is government shutdown one.
This is the NPR report.
Congress has less than a week until federal
funding runs out.
If lawmakers cannot come to an agreement by
Tuesday, there could be no funding for federal
services.
Let's get an update now from NPR congressional
correspondent Deirdre Walsh.
Hi, Deirdre.
Hey, Scott.
Hey, Scott.
So the deadline is coming up next week
for the Republicans controlling the House and the
Senate.
What are they proposing to avoid a shutdown?
Well, they're pushing a bill that would continue
the current levels of funding for federal agencies
for seven weeks through November 21st.
The House narrowly passed that proposal last Friday,
but it didn't have enough votes to advance
in the Senate.
All right.
So what is happening on the Democratic side,
specifically Democrats in the Senate?
They have their own plan, yeah?
Right.
Democrats did roll out their own proposal last
week.
It advanced current levels of funding through October
31st, but it also attached several healthcare provisions
to it.
Democrats want to extend subsidies for the Affordable
Care Act that help middle class, working class
people buy healthcare, make it more affordable.
They want to extend those.
Those are due to expire at the end
of December.
They also want to roll back a lot
of the Medicaid provisions that were sort of
the core of the Republican tax bill that
the president signed back in July.
Republicans have said that proposal is a non
-starter.
Initially, the president agreed to meet with the
two top Democrats, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer,
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries tomorrow, but he
abruptly canceled that meeting yesterday and he called
these demands unserious and said a meeting with
Democrats at this point would be sort of
non-starters.
So we're really at a stalemate and there's
no negotiations going on.
Yeah, no negotiations.
So first of all, the Medicaid thing is
a scam.
It's only to provide more free medical care
for illegal aliens.
Yes, and in fact...
So we know that's a bullcrap.
But the other thing is when they say
they want to make the Affordable Healthcare Act
affordable.
I thought it was affordable.
It's called affordable.
It's anything but.
We went off of our insurance because we
literally could not afford it.
I mean, you're lucky because you're over 65.
Yeah, one advantage.
I'll say lucky in air quotes.
But I mean, we were looking at like
$5,000 a month with an $8,000
deductible.
Are you kidding me now?
And so we got, you know, crowd health.
Which is affordable in the name.
Yeah, oh yeah.
So affordable.
You get a bronze, no Cadillac plan for
us.
Bronze with three wheels and no hubcaps.
It's not affordable.
And it's lame.
It's useless.
And you got to fight everything.
Yeah, you do have to fight everything.
Yeah, yeah, there's part two.
So Deirdre, and we've asked you this before.
If there's no spending approved by October 1st,
the government shuts down in practical terms.
What does it mean for, say, federal services,
for federal workers?
Right.
In terms of federal services, some functions of
the federal government are deemed essential.
Things like border protection, the social security program,
it's mandatory spending.
So those social security checks would still go
out if there was a shutdown.
Defense programs, border security programs would continue.
Airport security would continue.
But federal workers, you know, a lot of
them will be furloughed and they won't be
getting paid.
There was a law that was passed back
in 2019 that ensures back pay for federal
workers, but it's unclear how long a shutdown
could last.
And in the past, we've seen TSA agents
who weren't getting paid not show up for
work, and there were delays at airports.
Yeah, there have reportedly been more than a
dozen partial shutdowns over the past four decades.
I guess this time, is it unusual that
the two sides are not really negotiating?
I mean, we're a week before.
Sometimes things happen very quickly, right ahead of
the deadline.
You know, Congress can work quickly when they're
up against a deadline.
But this time, the two sides are really
far apart and very dug in.
It seems very likely that we are headed
towards a shutdown.
It's sort of unclear what it will take
to get out of it.
And, you know, I think right now we're
sort of in the middle of a messaging
war that could go on for some time.
Well, I've got...
Well, hold on a second.
Who are...
You know, the only reason this is happening
is because there's a couple of Republicans in
the Senate that are voting no.
Who are they?
Why don't they tell us who they are?
Well, hold on a second.
That's not true.
I think you're wrong on that.
This needs a supermajority.
This needs 60 votes in the Senate.
I don't know that it does.
I don't think so.
I do because I have the CBS report.
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries is speaking out
this afternoon after President canceled an Oval Office
meeting with Democrats.
And this was to discuss the looming government
shutdown set to start one week from tomorrow
if no deal is reached.
It's clear that Donald Trump and House Republicans
and Senate Republicans are running scared, which is
why they refuse to even sit down and
have a conversation to discuss the Republican government
shutdown and the health care crisis that is
going to cause people in the United States
of America to die.
We're all going to die.
And for more on this, CBS News congressional
correspondent Caitlin Huey Burns joins us now from
our Washington bureau.
Caitlin, very good to see you here.
Can you talk about what stood out to
you in that press conference and how much
weight do his words have at this point?
Hey, Nancy, it's great to see you.
In just over a week, the government is
poised to shut down if there can't be
a deal reached to move forward with funding
the government.
And what is on the table right now
is something that passed the House of Representatives
with Republican support.
It's now over in the Senate side.
And it's just essentially an extension of current
government funding for the next seven weeks or
so, and also includes new security funding for
members of Congress in light of the Charlie
Kirk shooting.
Democrats, however, want to use this as a
point of leverage.
Now, you may think, don't Republicans control the
House and the Senate?
That's true.
They do.
But in the Senate, they have to get
60 votes.
Republicans don't have 60 votes to pass something.
And so they're going to need support from
Democrats to get any of this through.
And so Democrats are using this as a
point to say, this is what we want
out of this if we're going to give
you these votes.
And notice the subtle, not so subtle, this
is a Republican shutdown.
OK.
You know, at some point, I believe the
American people will get tired of this.
However, I will equally say, just looking at
TikTok and Instagram, you are so right that
people who have a different media diet, and
that includes podcasts, they really believe these things.
They really, truly, honestly believe these things.
They believe Charlie Kirk was a racist and
that is actually, you know, he said in
order to protect our Second Amendment, some people
got to die.
So that's there you go.
And every report, every single report has cut
out the trans question just before he got
shot.
That is the most dishonest thing I think
the media has done in a long time,
where it just sounds like he's talking about
gun violence and not trans gun violence.
And so people don't know.
And what they don't know, they don't know.
You know, the people who are yelling that
Trump's going to take away my disability, taking
away my Social Security, taking away my Medicare,
hasn't happened to anybody.
But they still just believe it.
And, you know, maybe they should be taking
more Tylenol.
I don't know.
I think these problems will solve themselves.
They won't be making more babies.
They're taking Tylenol, so they'll kill everything they
got.
It's going to be a bunch of blithering
idiots running around.
It'll take a generation.
We're going to have to sit through it
and watch it.
But maybe we'll emerge victorious and a better
country for it.
That sounded kind of dark.
Well, that's a depressing piece of analysis.
Well, I live in Fredericksburg.
Everybody's pretty happy here.
We're just worried about the Trump gold card.
That's all we're really concerned with here.
And the grid going down.
The grid's going down any minute.
And actually, today, the rapture is supposed to
start today.
No, it was yesterday.
I thought it was the 25th.
My understanding, it was like either yesterday or
the day before, according to the maniac in
South Africa.
This happens all the time.
There's some guy gets a vision.
Next thing you know, he's talking about this
happening.
It never happens.
I wonder why.
How about this clip?
A little bit offbeat, but something worth talking
about.
This is the, where is this thing?
I just had it.
I don't know.
You know, you talk about the, there it
is.
Fake Ali boo boo or Al boo boo.
The Al, you know, the boo boo dolls.
Have you heard about these?
Are you there?
Oops.
I wanted to see how you would respond
if I got raptured.
Oh, that would take a while.
And I'm not expecting that.
So I'm not worried about it.
Eventually.
Maybe the dog.
Yes.
The boo, the boo boo, the boo boo
dolls.
Yes.
I'm very, I'm very familiar with the, the,
with the, the love.
I think it's love boo boo, not Al
boo boo.
But well, I have these Al boo boo
Al boo boo.
Sounds like it may be the middle Eastern
version.
UK border officials have seized nearly $4 million
worth of fake toys this year.
Most of which were copies of the highly
popular la boo boo dolls.
More details from Charlotte Edwards.
Research for the intellectual property office found that
nearly half of the people who purchase counterfeit
toys reported problems ranging from toys breaking to
unsafe labeling, toxic smells, and even reports of
illness in children.
75% of fake toys seized this year
failed safety tests.
Experts testing the goods found banned chemicals linked
to cancer and choking hazards.
Despite the dangers of fake toys, shoppers suggest
cost remains the biggest driver when deciding what
to buy.
Only 27% considered the product's safety.
You know, can we short these dolls?
It would be great to short them.
I mean, we should be able to make
money on the way down.
I don't know.
I mean, these dolls are horrible, but it's
like garbage pail dolls and, you know, laughing
Elmo or tickle me or whatever the hell
it was.
Yeah, all of it.
Furby.
That was a big deal for these things
that become faddish and they catch on.
And then the Chinese or some or the
Koreans, it could be either one, make copies
of them and they flood the market with
them, which is probably good.
It's, it's just a sad state of affairs.
And then they go on.
Oh, they're unsafe.
Why?
What?
They're toxic.
What?
Were the kids eating the dolls now?
What's going on?
There was a a hilarious moment with the
vice former vice president, Kamala Harris, doing the
rounds for her book.
One hundred.
Oh, yes.
People haven't caught her on the on the
Rachel Maddow show on the circuit.
Yes, she's the Rachel Maddow show talking about
gays.
Which was funny.
Here we go.
If his reaction to that, since this part
of the book has come out, if you've
had any reflection on that or I guess
I guess I'd ask you to just elaborate
on that a little bit.
It's hard to hear with you running as
you're the first woman elected vice president.
You're a black woman and a South Asian
woman elected to that high office, very nearly
elected president to say that he couldn't be
on the ticket effectively because he was gay.
It's hard to hear.
No, no, no.
That's not what I said.
No, no, no.
That's not what I said.
That's that he couldn't be.
Exactly what she said.
Yeah.
Because he is gay.
My point, as I write in the book,
is that I was clear that in one
hundred and seven days, in one of the
most hotly contested elections for president of the
United States against someone like Donald Trump, who
knows no floor.
Now, this is this is interesting.
I don't know if people caught this, but
she she is basically saying that against Trump,
he would just make fun of him for
being gay, would say that gay people have
no place in American government and that she's
a black woman who isn't a black woman.
And he has no floor.
He's a horrible, horrible man.
To be a black woman running for president
of the United States and as a vice
presidential running mate, who's a gay man with
the stakes being so high, it made me
very sad.
But I also realized it would be a
real risk because the American people wouldn't want
to vote for that ticket.
Are you now saying the American people wouldn't
accept you, Ms. Harris?
Is that what you're saying?
No matter how you know, I've been an
advocate and an ally.
I'm an ally.
Oh, I'm an ally.
You know me.
I love the gays of the LGBT community
my entire life.
So it wasn't about it wasn't about it.
Right.
So it wasn't about any any prejudice on
my part.
We had such a short period of time
so people could understand that a gay man
can do it.
It's OK.
Gays are the same.
You know, I didn't have time to explain
that.
And the stakes were so high.
I think Pete is a phenomenal, phenomenal public
servant.
And I think America is and would be
ready for that.
But I need more days.
But when I had to make that decision
with two weeks to go.
Two weeks.
You know, and maybe I was being too
cautious.
You know, I'll let our friends.
We should all talk about that.
Maybe I was.
But that's the decision I made.
And I'm and I as with everything else
in the book, I'm being very candid about
that.
Yeah.
With a great deal of sadness about also
the fact that it might have been a
risk.
It might have been a risk.
I'm so sad.
What a horrible woman.
It is horrible.
These are great.
This is what this is what identity politics
gets you.
It's like, oh, well, you know, I can't
choose him because he's gay.
Even though I want all the gays to
vote for me.
And then, you know, well, you know, I
didn't have a choice because he's gay.
I mean, this is I know it's classic.
It's it's it's so sad.
And, of course, great choice.
How did you do with Waltz?
That really worked.
Who is more gay?
Probably like we didn't care.
We care that he's a nut job and
that you're insincere.
They can't speak and you drink a lot.
We think I'm sure.
Seem well, that's what everybody thinks.
Sure.
Seem so.
She put through everybody under the bus.
She said in the book, she says, well,
I got to get a PDF of this
book.
That's what I said.
Why don't you just go and buy it
if you can still get it?
Because it's a hot book.
It's hard to get now.
It's hard to get a copy.
Yeah, sure.
According to Rachel, it's going to sell a
gajillion copies, she said.
Rachel should be incensed.
Yes, of course.
She should be incensed.
But no, she can't quite be incensed.
She should have said as a gay man
myself, I'm very incensed.
Exactly what she should have said.
So she's gone off and she's thrown everyone.
She threw Shapiro under the bus for being
vain.
She threw her running mate under the bus
for being fat.
She said he's fat.
I have not.
Now I need to buy the book.
This sounds like a doozy.
According, you know, Jesse Waters likes to read
from the book because he thinks it's a
great book because it's all gossip.
Tell me you have a clip.
No, I didn't get a clip.
But he's reading, he just reads randomly from
the book and it's all nasty gossip about
this and that.
It sounds entertaining if you're, you know, and
it looks like a short read.
Is it big type?
Big type.
Yeah.
So no, I don't have any clips of
anything.
She's been floating around.
She's here and there.
She went down the view and they asked
her about her screw up on the view.
And she says, I don't think that hurt
my campaign.
And she says, I didn't think there was
any, you know, I thought I didn't have
to answer that question because everyone knew there
was a difference between me and Biden.
They could just look.
Oh, yes.
Wonderful.
All right.
You got one last clip.
Take us out here.
Johnny boy.
Well, let's see what we have.
We have the.
If you get one last good clip.
Well, I have one that you make some
comments on, which I think it'd be good,
which is the Newsday.
Now, this is a teaser.
From BBC, the BBC show Newsday, and I
want to comment on the teaser and then
we can leave.
News and welcome to Newsday on the BBC
World Service with James Cobner and Catherine Biara
Hunger.
In the program today, China sets its first
ever target to reduce carbon emissions, a major
step in the fight against global warming.
Ah, that was part of my other presentation
where I bitch and moan and complain about.
So let's don't play that as the last
clip.
Doesn't work.
Whoa.
Oh, I'm just going to play a clip
and let it I'm going to play a
clip and let it stand.
Oh, I got to do my.
OK, epic fail.
It was an epic fail.
I agree.
So I want to play.
This is a standalone.
This is from Carl Reiner was on with
Bill Maher on the on his podcast.
OK, and this came up in the conversation
and I'm just going to play it and
let it stand.
And then, you know, maybe after the show,
we can talk about it.
But I found this to be a very
peculiar exchange.
And what clip is this?
Oh, Danny Thomas.
Groom for Daddy.
Call me, Daddy.
Call me.
Oh, well, that's a big room for Daddy.
Was it was Danny Thomas?
And we don't want to go there.
And if we don't remember all in the
family, you really remember that show.
I can remember me.
I remember Daddy.
Was your father friends with Danny Thomas?
Oh, yeah.
Danny Thomas was yeah.
Yeah.
Danny Thomas and his production company and Sheldon
Wright produced the Dick Van Dyke show, which
was my dad's show.
Of course.
Did you know Danny Thomas?
Oh, yeah.
Yeah.
I mean, I was friends with, you know,
I mean, Marlo.
I'm friends with, you know, Tony Thomas when
we dated my sister in high school and
stuff like that.
Yeah.
Was that true?
The rumor that always went around about Danny,
that he was a plate man.
You know, I don't want to go there,
Bill, because I don't have I don't have
hard evidence or loose evidence or evidence or
evidence that makes you hard.
OK, but there was always the rumor.
Yeah.
Who knows?
You know, he he had.
Back then, Jerry Lewis, all this guy.
It was a different era.
People were weirdos.
Yeah.
A plate man.
Yeah, that took a little research.
I'm going to show my school by donating
to No Agenda.
Imagine all the people who could do that.
Oh, yeah, that'd be fun.
The answer to these questions and many more
will be not be answered today on the
No Agenda show.
You can do your own research.
Do your own research on the definition of
plate man.
And you can do that.
I would say your best bet, if you
wanted to do this research, which I don't
recommend.
Urban Dictionary?
No.
Curiously, no.
OK.
Grok.
Grok?
Really?
Yeah, I know.
It had me buffaloed until I finally went
to Grok.
Hey, Grok.
What is a plate?
No, don't.
No, no, no, no.
Here we go with it.
We I got it.
Ah, Plank Man.
She says Plank Man.
All right.
All right.
Never mind.
John is going to give us the names
and amounts that our supporters, Value for Value,
have supported us with for today's show.
$50 and above.
But first, I want to thank Cassandra Fair,
F-E-H-R.
She's in Texas.
I'm one of the Texas women.
OK.
For sending me two exact same packages with
different items inside, plus a $100 check, which
was mentioned in the last show, I believe.
And I didn't mention I was I put
it aside to mention the stuff she did.
She is she sent me some jokes that
were carefully packaged and a couple of bottles
of colgene, including the hickory smoke, but also
the rare mesquite smoke colgene.
And I think it was some sort of
a, you know, she's Texas, so the mesquite.
But she sent these she sent a couple
of things and it was it was signaling
to me that this is what this is
one of the I've only run into a
few women like this.
She sent a package of gags that were
in envelopes and they were exactly it was
just unbelievably the packaging and everything, including the
boxes she sent everything in, was you have
to just say it was precise.
OK, and I've only run and I can't
even explain what that means, but I can
tell you this.
If if you find a woman who's precise,
you want to keep her.
No, she wants to go into sales.
The most successful women I've ever run into
are in sales and they're all exhibit these
qualities.
I don't know if you want to keep
her because precise women are precise, you know.
And I think they're probably great wives.
It probably for a slob like me, it
might be a good idea.
But I'm just as a recommendation to the
women out there that are this way, going
sales, sales, plastics is for you.
You will make so much money.
And I can't explain all the details of
why I know this.
But as a fact, anyway, I want to
thank her for this, for the cute stuff
she sent.
And now we go on to thank people
like Dame Rita in Sparks, Nevada, who came
with one oh nine twenty five and she's
at the top of the list again.
Jessica Beeson in Houston, Texas, one oh five
thirty five and got a birthday shout out
to two.
Oh, Kim, a keeper of the nutty fluffers.
Once again, she's getting a lot of attention
and well-deserved.
Yeah, it's after sending us a show donation.
Mm hmm.
Sir Sean of KDH in Moyoc, North Carolina,
one oh five thirty five.
Thomas Key in Lansing, Kansas, one oh five
thirty five.
Ian Field, one hundred anonymous in Miami, Florida,
one hundred.
Kevin McLaughlin, there he is, eight oh eight.
He's our Stuka Luna, lover of America, lover
of melons.
But Carrie Rosen Barker in Fayetteville, North Carolina.
I was listening to a recent episode and
I agree with Adam.
It is freedom of speech, brother.
Yeah, the constitutional lawyer checked in on that
as well, because I I said, you know,
what do you think?
And here's what he said.
He said.
At the risk of alienating you, the term
alienating me, no, you mean the term free
speech has never bothered me personally.
Yeah, that bothered me either.
It botherss me to no end because I'm
telling you what's going to happen is free
speech will be something that the government can
control.
You watch.
It's going to happen.
Film at 11.
Very good.
That is I would say that's Fredericksburg talking.
You just know that's Adam Curry talking.
Fredericksburg.
Nicholas Leary in Columbus, Ohio.
Seventy two.
Seventy two.
Matthew.
Matthew Elwert in Weatherford, Texas.
Six oh six, along with Dame Liberty Mom
in Vista, California.
Six oh six.
And Aaron Newbury in Littleton, Colorado.
Fifty eight oh nine.
A Dame J of the Angry Clouds for
its unknown.
Fifty one ten.
Mart, Mart, Mart, Matt Bulkey in Minnetonka, Minnesota.
Fifty two.
Seventy two.
Matthew Dropko.
Hey, there he is.
And Ellery Elraya.
I don't know how to pronounce that.
He's in Ohio.
Fifty.
Fifty three.
And his 53rd birthday is coming up.
He's on the list today.
Yes.
Forrest Martin.
Five oh five.
And now we have the $50 donors.
And there's not a lot of them, but
we have them starting with Alex Delgado and
Aptos Melissa Alvarez in Ponte Vedra Beach, Florida.
Brett Denton in Boise, Idaho.
Jacqueline Connelly in Green Bay.
Go, go somebody.
Packers, Packers.
I don't think they're going to make it.
George Wuschett in La Vernia, Texas.
Sir Greg in Newport, North Carolina.
Michael Myers in, or Mayers, I guess.
Mayers or Myers.
One of the two.
In Mandeville, Louisiana.
And then parts unknown.
Ox Otherix, which doesn't sound like a real
name to me.
These are all $50 donors, and they're all
contributors to the show 1802.
Yes.
Thank you all very much.
And thank you again to our executive and
associate executive producers.
If you're looking, by the way, go to
Grok, and you might want to try plate
man or plater, and you will find the
true meaning.
I don't know why you're so concerned about
telling people what that is.
Well, I don't like to sit here and
besmirch people.
Well, it's just a rumor.
But they started it.
They're the ones that talked about it.
Why would they know this very obscure term?
Unless they might be plate men themselves, is
my question.
That's this.
Yeah, exactly.
No agenda donations dot com.
Go there.
Support the show value for value.
You can now walk around the office and
say, hey, what are you, a plate man
or something?
People go like, what is that?
Well, you know, if you only listen to
the best podcast in the universe, you know
exactly what that is.
Know what I'm saying, son?
No agenda donations dot com.
Dame Patricia wishes her son Brian Lewis a
happy belated birthday.
He celebrated on the 20th.
Sarah and Cora and Jessica Beeson.
And they said happy birthday to Kim, the
keeper of the Nutty Fluffers.
We know her birthday was on the 22nd.
Matthew Dropko turns 53 today.
Sir Tommy Hawk, happy birthday with son Nolan,
who turns 19.
And William Langford, happy birthday to Mars.
And he gave her a switcheroo for her
birthday.
And we say happy birthday from everybody here
at the best podcast in the universe.
And we do have one secretary general to
congratulate.
And we're going to get him out here
now and prepare for his coming.
All hail to the secretary generals, because they
are the ones who need hailing.
All hail to the secretary generals on the
no agenda show.
Yes, we do actually need a new jingle
because, of course, the plural of secretary general
is secretaries general.
But that makes it that much more fun.
You have something to complain about.
We congratulate Sir Tommy Hawk, who today supported
the show with $500.
That makes him an automatic secretary general.
And he becomes secretary general of the heartland.
Congratulations to you.
All hail to the secretary generals, because they
are the ones who need hailing.
All hail to the secretary generals on the
no agenda show.
That's right.
Go to noagenderings.com.
People really want to see what those certificates
look like, John.
How's Jay doing?
We finally got everything in order to start
shipping.
I am excited.
I'm excited.
So somebody complained about the secretaries general.
Am I hearing that right?
Yeah, I'm sorry.
I was letting the dog out of the
studio.
Oh, I thought you were on the rapture.
I was raptured again.
Yes, it's correct.
We've moaned about it when we hear someone
do something incorrect.
And here we are doing it ourselves.
The plural of secretary general is secretaries general,
not secretary generals.
Now, is that true if it's a hyphenated
word?
Instead of secretary-general, would that be true
in that circumstance?
Is there any grammarian out there to answer
that question for us?
Well, it is, of course, because the general
describes the secretary.
So the plural would be secretaries general.
I'm quite sure that's correct.
No, I'm sure that's correct if it's not
hyphenated.
People are still looking up plate man.
They don't care about secretary general.
At all, at all, at all, at all.
Hey, we got a dame to welcome up
onto the podium.
If you could bring out your sword, please.
Here you go.
Very good.
Franny!
Hey, Franny.
Franny Knutson.
Thank you very much for supporting the No
Agenda Show, the best podcast in the university,
amount of $1,000.
And hereby, I'm very proud to pronounce the
K-D as...
Dame Free Free of South Florida.
That's right.
And we have some goodies at the table
here for you.
We got hookers and blow, rent boys and
chardonnay.
We got harlots and howl doll, pepperoni rolls
and pale ales, redheads and fries, beers and
blunts, cowgirls and coffee varnish.
It's coffin varnish, not coffee.
Rubin, Esmaline, Rose, Gases and Sake, vodka, vanilla,
bong hits and bourbon, sparkling cider, escorts, ginger
ale and gerbils, fresh milk and pavlum.
It's very male-oriented, this list.
And of course, some mutton and meat.
We need something for the dames.
I need to add a few things to
the round table for the dames.
You have rent boys in there?
Yes, yeah, but that's about it.
Chardonnay, that's...
Yes, yes, but you know, we got bong
hits and bourbon.
Oh, that's pretty good.
Yeah, I guess it's pretty even, but if
the women need to ask for what they
want.
And so now we have a brand new
dame at the round table, Dame Free Free
of South Florida.
Welcome to the round table.
Go to noagenderings.com.
There you'll see your very svelte looking dame
ring.
All we need is your ring size.
There's a handy ring size guide on the
website and tell us where to send it.
And thank you very much for supporting the
best podcast in the universe.
A couple of meetups happening this week.
Saturday, the Fort Wayne Third Annual Club 33
meetup.
That'll be at noon eastern in Cibola's Mexican
Grill in Fort Wayne, Indiana.
And next show day on Sunday, two meetups.
We have the IndyNA Tribal Welcome Back meetup.
That's right.
We've got Dame Maria and Sir Mark returning
from the European trip.
And of course he was injured.
So we need some pictures to see that
he's really there and okay.
And we love the meetups we get from
this.
Like 150 or 200 people show up to
those.
Blind Owl Brewery, Indianapolis, Indiana, three o'clock
on Sunday.
And also on Sunday, meetup number 67 of
the Flight of the No Agendas.
That's Leo Bravo at El Cholo Restaurant, this
time in Los Angeles, California.
Many more meetups coming, including the October 11th
extravaganza in Fredericksburg, Texas.
Many luminaries will be there from the Fredericksburg,
Texas, San Antonio area.
Come join us there.
I'll be there along with The Keeper.
That's the No Agenda Fredericksburg, Texas meetup, October
11th.
Go see all of them.
Find everything that is a meetup near you,
around the world actually, at noagendameetups.com.
If you can't find one near you, there's
a solution to that problem.
Start one yourself.
noagendameetups.com.
Always a party.
And before we get to John's tip of
the day and some brilliant end of show
mixes that are not AI, those are coming
up.
I'm very excited about those.
Whenever they're not AI, we need more of
your mixes, please, people.
End of show mixes.
Play them at the beginning for the pre
-show as well.
Yes, before Adam starts making them with AI.
Oh, that's going to happen.
That's going to happen.
See, that's a threat.
It is a threat.
Clip collector Steve, he said, he gave me
a couple of ISOs and they were Alex
Jones ISOs.
And he said, you know, sometimes I find
stuff and I clip them from our Big
Dirty Mouth podcast, OBDM.
And he says they were complaining that he
wasn't getting, they weren't getting any credit.
And so I figured those complainers are not
going to use them.
They're complaining.
What did we ever use from them?
Well, we played, you know, an ISO and
he got them from the OBDM podcast.
And there's some guys saying, you know, these
are only five, 10 words.
No, but they want credit that they found
these ISOs and I was not giving anybody
credit, but they want credit.
They want credit, man.
They want more credit.
For a two-second ISO at the end
of the show?
There's no agenda shows, man.
They're ripping us off, man.
All right.
Well, we don't have to use them.
We use AI.
I should say, enjoy our live stream for
free, boys.
That's what I would say.
And people are so ungrateful.
We give away everything to this show.
Everything.
All our clips.
People use all kinds of stuff.
People steal from us constantly.
And we never complain.
They steal our clips.
They steal our ideas and they never credit
us.
They've stolen all kinds of stuff.
They steal everything.
Our fabulous humor, our banter.
You watch Plate Man become a title somewhere
on some show.
You watch.
So I don't have any Alex Jones ISOs.
I do have these, however.
Something's coming next.
Yeah, I thought that was kind of good.
And I really like this one.
Big government sucks.
That is good.
I like that one a lot.
What do you have?
Let me guess.
Well, I have more that are AI stuff.
I have more along the lines of the
idea.
Let's start with.
Okay.
Okay.
So 11 labs.
I use that.
I admit it.
But they've changed the interface and they've changed.
And they took half my voices away.
And they put a bunch of new voices.
I've never seen these before.
Because you don't pay for it.
You're on the free plan.
Yeah.
Well, that's your problem.
They're onto you, bro.
It's annoying.
Well, then pay for it.
Pay for your AI.
I'll pay for when I have to pay
for.
Here's the ISO hoist.
Hoist a pint, mates.
Great show again.
Well, that was probably no wonder.
That sucks.
That was no good.
I don't like that one.
Hoist a pint.
Hoist a pint, mates.
Great podcast, as usual.
It's so vanilla, man.
It's vanilla.
This is big government sucks.
Okay, we can use that one.
That's what I call an ISO.
Now, nothing's vanilla about John's tip of the
day.
Okay, so this is a screwball tip that
came about because I think first of all,
Mimi started reading this book.
And then I had one of our producers
write me.
Are there any history books I should read?
I took because I would lecture about that.
Oh, that guy.
British.
That guy.
I know the British books or the history
changing for the Brits.
And it was you can have to dig
this one up.
But I'll give a little lecture about the
book.
It's one of the greatest books ever written.
Oh, that very few people probably have read.
Because it was written in 1918.
So that kind of limits the exposure.
But it's very readable.
It's written in a modern style.
So it's not written in some old fashioned
way.
And it's the decline of the West by
Oswald Spengler.
Volume one.
I think we've discussed this book.
Yes, we have.
Yeah, because Michael Savage used to promote this
book constantly.
And he always say, I remember.
And the reason that we said it, because
I always got a kick out of the
fact that Michael Savage, the, you know, erudite
intellectual, always said Otto Spengler.
And I think he does to this day.
He thinks the guy is Otto Spengler, Oswald
Spengler.
So Oswald Spengler's book, The Decline of the
West.
And I would say before you read the
book, read his Wiki entry.
It's quite interesting about Spengler.
He's like one of these kind of a
super genius.
And The Decline of the West is a
two volume book.
Do not bother with volume two.
Volume two came out about three or four
years later.
And you could, as a writer, immediately start
reading volume two.
And I can hear it in the tone
of the book.
It goes like this.
Oh, the publisher made me.
I promised I was going to do a
second volume.
And I'm going to have to do it.
And I'm going to write it.
This is it right now.
This is the second volume.
I'm writing it.
It's kind of a rehash of the first
volume.
But I hate the fact that I have
to write this book.
So that's what the second volume is all
about.
So forget it.
Just read volume one.
When was this published originally, this book?
1918.
So you think that the publishers back then
were already a-holes?
Back then?
They've been a-holes.
That's the publisher's job.
There you go.
No a-holes here, though.
That is John's tip of the day.
I don't know how we did it.
How did we do three and a half
hours all of a sudden?
That's too long.
Back off!
It was the plate man thing.
That's what got me all flustered.
Plate man.
Hey, coming up next on the Noah Jenner
stream, it's the millennial media offensive.
Those guys aren't complainers, but they sometimes slip
in little Easter eggs.
That was one of the funniest things I've
ever heard, by the way.
So thank you all for being here, for
joining us for another extravaganza of media deconstruction.
End of show mixes.
We got some good ones.
Nick Herron.
Bonald Crabtree.
We've got Agent Cooper.
I think he wants to be called Agent
Looper today.
And Jeffrey Crocker.
I incorrectly titled him.
I credited him as Corker, but it is
Crocker.
And that's it.
Those are the end of show mixes.
We'll be back on Sunday, and we'll bring
you more deconstruction of your world and what's
going on because most of it that you
see on TV is bullcrap.
And online, too.
It's all placed there by plate man.
Coming to you from the heart of the
Texas Hill Country, Fredericksburg, Texas.
In the morning, everybody.
I'm Adam Curry.
And from Northern Silicon Valley, where I remain.
I'm John C.
Dvorak.
Remember us at noagendadonations.com.
Until next time.
Adios, mofos, hui hui, and such.
So you want to know what really happened
to the No Agenda show in the morning?
Put your mouth on my south.
If the furries trying to hurt you, I
feel bad for your son.
I got 33 warrants and I'm low on
funds.
I am not a fed.
Turn a furry to a pet.
But I'm the spookiest rapper that you ever
met.
If you ain't a chicken, put some curry
on that bird.
Noah's Ark, Neogender, No Agenda fool.
You heard?
33, pager number 33.
Your freedom of speech is ready.
33, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3.
Put that on your agenda and smoke it,
you clanker hoe.
Man, stop the cap.
Stop the cap.
Ladies and gentlemen, it is time to rubble
ice.
Israeli airstrikes across Gaza City continue.
The situation is deteriorating rapidly for civilians unable
to get out of Gaza City.
75% of central water roads have been
destroyed or damaged by Israel.
The first phase of urban renewal in the
Strip was done.
The demolition, the time to build a real
estate bonanza is coming.
There's a plan on President Trump's desk.
Palestinians living in the enclave would be moved
out, at least temporarily, while billions would be
poured in to develop the territory as a
tourism resort and high-tech manufacturing hub.
The Riviera of the Middle East.
I don't want to be cute.
I don't want to be a wise guy.
But the Riviera of the Middle East.
Dance, peasants, dance.
I mean, come on.
Remember when you ran away and I got
on my knees and begged you not to
leave because I'd go berserk?
Be quiet!
You left me anyhow and then the days
got worse and worse and now you see
I've gone completely out of my mind.
It's like...
Time, they're coming to take me away, ha
-ha, they're coming to take me away, ho
-ho, hee-hee, ha-ha.
It's a funny farm where life is beautiful
all the time and I'll be happy to
see those nice young men in their clean,
whiny coats and they're coming to take me
away, ha-ha.
You thought it was a joke and so
you laughed.
You laughed when I had said that losing
you would make me flip my lid, right?
You know you laughed.
I heard you laugh.
You laughed, you laughed and laughed and then
you left but now you know I'm utterly
mad.
I'm gay myself.
Ha ha ha ha ha!
Ha ha ha ha ha!
The Best Podcast In The Universe!
Adios, mofo.
Dvorak.org slash na.
Big government sucks.