Regular Leninism was what Lenin did in the 1800s. He
rallied all of the lower classes as his support base. In 1800s Russia,
the lower classes had no prospects for a happy future, until Lenin
promised them a happy future.
So
once Lenin gained power, these people became his staunchest supporters.
Why? Because they had the most to lose. Lenin elevated them. If Lenin
failed, or lost power, their only hopes for prosperity would be gone
forever.
Bioleninism is
the same idea, except with identity instead of class. Imagine a
stereotypical trans freak. (Not implying that all trans people are
freaks; I mean, imagine the most unpleasant, sociopathic, bad-faith
trans person). In any healthy society, these people would be suppressed
before they could bring our kids to drag queen story hour.
Bioleninism
is where a leader intentionally pursues these people as a support base,
and elevates them to positions of status, power, and prestige. Why?
Because this is such an affront to the natural order of a health
society, that it permanently links those peoples' prosperity with your
own. The only reason they have status, wealth, prestige, etc, is because
the leader gave it to them and made sure it stuck. As soon as that
leader loses power, society goes back to normal and the freaks lose
their positions. So the freaks will be absolutely and unquestionably
loyal; their lives depend on it (possibly literally)