ITM boys,
I'm an engineer at one of the maintenance
air force bases where we deal with Boeing all the time so I've got some
standing here. Giving Boeing the contract for the F-47 is definitely NOT
good for America. Boeing is terrible to deal with. We're constantly in a
back and forth trying to get the parts we need to produce assets with
Boeing making sure that they send us all the lemons so we look bad. Then
with all the lemons and part shortages in hand they go complain that we
aren't producing enough.
I'm currently
involved with bringing in the workload for the Boeing KC-46 and it's a
disaster. This is the air refueler that was developed from the 767 and
you would think they would know their own aircraft but they don't. The
Boeing engineers can't answer any technical questions about the aircraft
and most of the time just ignore our requests for information. For
example, we recently asked them a specific question about a fuel control
part and they responded with the toll free number of their part
supplier. Boeing has technical authority over all this and the best they
can do is google a toll free number for the supplier. It's a joke. The
KC-46 program is coming up on being 3x over cost and they aren't even
done yet.
The F-47 won't be any different. They
are saying that it'll cost $20 billion but that number won't be under
$60 when they're done and I won't be surprised if it's over $100
billion. The big defense contractors plan on going way over cost knowing
that the government always ponies up and there are no repercussions.
Just look at all the contracts out there - Sentinel missile is $35
billion over and not done, KC-46 is 3x over, B-21 is over but they won't
say by how much, it's everywhere.
Boeing
commercial and Boeing military might as well be two different companies
so this won't do anything at all to help the quality problems the
commercial side is having. I've been on calls where we asked Boeing
military about something we've seen on the commercial side and they
actually told us they don't even know how to get ahold of the commercial
side.
John is right about one thing, the F-22
is a dynamite aircraft. So much so that we don't need a new fighter
between that and the F-35. Despite it's problems, give the F-35 a
software upgrade and it can do some of the stuff the F-47 is supposed to
do like being a drone leader.
I don't know
how Boeing landed this contract other than some sort of back room deal
where they were next up on the list of defense contractors needing a
handout. It doesn't help America at all, especially when the future of
war is less and less about fighters. At a time when Trump is supposed to
be cutting costs he's doing shady deals to hand out $60+ billion to
Boeing. It's rank hypocrisy and corruption.
Sorry for the long rant but it was too much to hear you get all giddy about Boeing pillaging us for more money.